Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Slashdot Subscribers Now See The Future

Posted by CmdrTaco on Thu Mar 06, 2003 11:30 AM
from the well-isn't-that-special dept.
We're pleased to announce the newest reason for you to subscribe to Slashdot. Besides the ability to suppress banner ads, limit journal postings to friends, and a few plums, Subscribers now see stories posted on Slashdot from The Mysterious Future! These stories are recognizable by the red title bar, and the lack of a time stamp. Subscribers will be able to beat the rush and read the links before everyone else. You can hit the link below and I'll explain exactly what this means. If this appeals to you, you could read the subscriber FAQ or just go subscribe.
First off, this feature doesn't change anything for non-subscribers. All Slashdot stories are put into the story queue before you see them. The time stamps on these stories vary tremendously. Sometimes the story is posted days in advance (like, say, a Book Review or an Ask Slashdot where time isn't critical and we post a set number a week) Other stories are "Breaking News" and are posted just seconds before they go live. But most stories are posted 20-30 minutes before they go live. This time window gives other authors a chance to take a look at them. To fix spelling, to check for dupes (HAH!) or even to reject the story outright!

So while subscribers won't see news posted at the last minute before everyone else, most of our stories will be available to them 10-20 minutes before everyone else. This means they can click through and beat the Slashdot Effect.

Another possible feature addition that we're discussing is to allow subscribers to post during this window. We haven't decided if that's a good idea or not. Since subscribers are still subject to all the same restrictions as anyone else in the forums, they could still be moderated into oblivion if they were jerks about it so it's probably not subject to all that much abuse, but this is still something we're only considering. Feel free to discuss it in this forum, or to contact me with opinions.

A couple of notes here:

  • Subscribers have a variable on their subscriptions preference page that tells us how many banner ads they wish to "Spend" per day. This number must be at least 10 for you to be eligible to see the Mysterious Future plum. This means that your $5 subscription will last 100 days- or, $15-20 a year.
  • You also need to hit the checkbox to disable ads on the Index. Once you hit your Max Pages for the day, you will see ads again, but you will also be eligible for the plum.
  • These notes will be clarified on both the subscriptions page and in the FAQ very soon. Your feedback will help us decide how best to explain this since it's not exactly black & white here. Give us a couple weeks and it should all be blazingly obvious from the documentation how everything works.

In closing, this is a new feature and we appreciate all your feedback, both good and bad. We decided to implement this after tons of feedback from you, and we're really excited about it. This is a really great incentive for users to subscribe, but it also can give subscribers a chance to alert us in advance if stories have mistakes in them. We'll likely be expanding this sort of functionality in the future.

Now please go subscribe and help support Slashdot!

Update To clarify the timing. Right now the mysterious future is set to 20 minutes. That number is not a promise tho, since a story posted 11 minutes before "Air time" would be seen slighter later. A story posted 30 minutes in advance will be visible 20 minutes early.

+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Hah! First! (Score:5, Funny)

    by sulli (195030) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:31AM (#5449386) Journal
    Is that a Subscriber Benefit too?
    • Re:Hah! First! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by gmuslera (3436) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:34AM (#5449431) Homepage Journal
      If you see the article hours before most of slashdot readers, I think that yes, this will be a subscriber benefit. For the others a lot of discussions will start half full just when the article is widely available.
    • Re:Hah! First! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by idiotnot (302133) <sean@757.org> on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:39AM (#5449508) Journal
      Actually, it would be, and AC's (unless they're logged in, posting anonymously) would be 30 minutes and 100 comments behind.....

      I could start reading at zero again.

      FWIW, I did subscribe. It wasn't much. I just wanted to get the ads out of the story pages. Banner ads don't bother me. I went back and checked before I posted, and I've still got like 400 out of the 1000 pages left. It's been worth it, I think, and this will just convince me to renew when the time comes.
  • But... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Rudy Rodarte (597418) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:32AM (#5449400) Homepage Journal
    doesnt /. want to be free??
    ;)
  • /. effect? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Lothar+0 (444996) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:33AM (#5449407) Homepage
    Will this now result in a pre-/. effect? Maybe the subscribers will be nice enough to mirror /.-ed sites on their own sites before the rush, but I'm not holding my breath.
    • by kriegsman (55737) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:46AM (#5449601) Homepage
      Here's a great marketing opportunity for someone entrepeneurially-minded:

      1. Subscribe to the Mysterious Future via ./
      2. Contact Web site owners and warn them politely of impending future slashdotting
      3. Offer to sell them (short-term?) service on a Content Delivery Network
      4. ... Profit!

      Commercial sites would love this. Academic/government ones probably wouldn't care as much. You could sell them a contract with an existing CDN (Akamai, Mirror-Image, etc.) or build out your own special purpose service, just to handle slashdot-like effects.

      -Mark, founder of Clearway Technologies (now owned by Mirror-Image Internet)
    • Re:/. effect? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by cgenman (325138) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:54AM (#5449714) Homepage
      This might be a good thing (tm) for system administrators. Getting a sudden, solid surge of slashdot referrals might trigger a webserver to htmlify dynamic content and / or switch to a text-only site in anticipation of the real flood, which might shut down any such system.

      Of course, if you can't hang with the ping flood, you're screwed. But for those who aren't Dossed but merely hosed, this could be a great thing.
  • WOW! (Score:5, Funny)

    by gpinzone (531794) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:33AM (#5449408) Homepage Journal
    No only do you stop getting ads that even the most brain dead ad-blocker could have gotten rid of for free, you also get to be Taco's personal dupe checker! I can't wait to send my money in!
  • by Bingo Foo (179380) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:33AM (#5449411)
    I can see it now...
  • Great! Now I can see dupes before they are posted!

  • Well... (Score:5, Funny)

    by 1010011010 (53039) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:33AM (#5449415) Homepage
    It will at least get the trolls to subscribe, so they can keep trying to get First Post!
  • by agrounds (227704) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:34AM (#5449421)
    So, since I'm a subscriber, am I actually typing this in the future as well since the title bar is green? It's really red, but I am seeing it green, thus I must be operating in the future! Jeez, and I though Babylon 5 was confusing!
  • Old news... (Score:5, Funny)

    by ZenHarbinger (541888) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:34AM (#5449427)
    I knew about this yesterday.
  • Hmmmm (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ZaMoose (24734) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:35AM (#5449437) Homepage
    Didn't TotalFark already go this route? What's next, Slashdot Photoshop contests? *grin*
    • Re:Hmmmm (Score:5, Funny)

      by i.r.id10t (595143) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:41AM (#5449540)
      No, but we will be able to rate b00bies at +5, Interesting.
    • Re:Hmmmm (Score:5, Insightful)

      by sweetooth (21075) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:46AM (#5449604) Homepage
      Farks a touch differant in that a lot of the total fark news items never make it to the front page at all. So you are paying more to see the list of ALL of the submitted stories and not just what's being published before it goes live. Also with Total Fark you could get a head start on the photoshop contests.
    • Re:Hmmmm (Score:5, Funny)

      by weave (48069) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:48AM (#5449636) Journal
      Think of the possibilities for a boobies topic icon, given that slashdot's topic icons are like 70x70 instead of the 70x27 on fark.

      Think of it, http://boobies.slashdot.org/

  • Awesome (Score:5, Insightful)

    by RedWolves2 (84305) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:36AM (#5449451) Homepage Journal
    But..
    Another possible feature addition that we're discussing is to allow subscribers to post during this window. We haven't decided if that's a good idea or not. Since subscribers are still subject to all the same restrictions as anyone else in the forums, they could still be moderated into oblivion if they were jerks about it so it's probably not subject to all that much abuse, but this is still something we're only considering. Feel free to discuss it in this forum, or to contact me with opinions.

    I don't think that is a good idea. I think the fact that users can read ahead of time and then they can prepare their posts. This might make better prepared comments.
      • Re:Awesome (Score:5, Funny)

        by RackinFrackin (152232) on Thursday March 06 2003, @12:04PM (#5449846)
        I've personally got my prefs set at +3 just to weed out the silly stuff.

        That's a silly thing to say in a comment with a score less than 3. I guess it's working. :)
  • well golly (Score:5, Informative)

    by JeanBaptiste (537955) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:36AM (#5449463)
    Thats a pretty good idea. I would still think the /. effect would be better suppressed if slashdot would mirror stories, especially if its running off of somebody's mother's DSL connection.

    Still, this offering may finally make me a subscriber. And I do like the idea of a subscriber getting to post first. The types of people that would subscribe are probably not the same ones that post the goatse.cx links and such. I'd even go so far as to maybe allow a subscriber another +1 bonus to karma, or maybe allow a subscriber a higher karma cap, or even let a subscribers post get modded to +6... but what do I know...
  • paying for what ??? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mirko (198274) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:38AM (#5449489) Homepage Journal
    1. So subscribers will pay to let you batch your weekly job ?
    2. they will only be able to warn you about dupes before the slashdot crowd

    ergo: they pay you to help you doing your job ?

    (just a question : not a flamebait)
  • by ThinWhiteDuke (464916) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:38AM (#5449503)
    OSDN outsources slashdot editing to its subscribers base. These happy few will have the privilege of beta testing dupes, broken links and poor spelling and grammar. They will also be the sole beneficiaries of the prestigious first post award as well as the (somewhat less prestigious) AYBABTU, ISR and Beowulf Cluster awards.

    Must find my credit card, quick!
  • by malachid69 (306291) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:39AM (#5449506) Homepage
    After reading the article, I was prepared to just close the link since I have no interest in paying to visit ANY site. Hell, at least I registered with /., I still won't do that for the NYTimes articles that keep getting posted -- I just ignore every single one.

    And pay to PARTIALLY disable banners? Very lame. I never see them anyways, since I have gotten so accustomed to ignoring them... It's amazing at how trained you can get at ignoring pretty much all graphics on all sites.

    But, to top it off, I read ALL of the comments to this article so far. Not a single good one -- doesn't that hint at something?

    Malachi
  • by hackstraw (262471) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:39AM (#5449512) Homepage
    I've noticed that the shere volume of stories in the past few months has increased, yet the quality of them is kinda variable. ask slashdot hovers around unbearable, but is sometimes good.

    Why can't subscribers get a chance to mod stories during this "preview" time, and possibly even keep silly stories and dups from getting posted to the "real" slashdot.
  • by DavidpFitz (136265) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:39AM (#5449515) Homepage Journal
    Another possible feature addition that we're discussing is to allow subscribers to post during this window.
    But this would mean 2 things:

    (1) If a story gets pulled, lots of comments could already be posted. This would be pretty annoying if you had spent some time posting.
    (2) Moderation is biased torwards early posters, and as such it would provide a disincentive for non-subscribers to post, thereby reducing the amount of discussion. This could be a good thing, since subscribers (hopefully!) provide more worthwhile reading.

    • (1) This is a big issue and one that we would need to consider. I guess what it would probably mean is that you post to future-dated stories at your own risk. You're seeing Slashdot behind the scenes, you should expect some dust.

      (2)Moderation is already based towards early posters. But since subscribers will likely only represent a small percentage of all posting, I can't imagine more than a few dozen comments making it inside this window. And right now, the first couple dozen posts are almost always disposable anyway.

      We already know pretty reliable that subscribers are statistically better moderators. (we've done a bunch of internal reports, and basically according to M2 results, they are several percent more "Fair" then the population as a whole. I don't think we've ever done any reporting to see if subscribers are better posters. I'm guessing they would be less likely to crapflood, but beyond that, I really would only be speculating.

  • Ummm... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Tal Cohen (4834) <{gro.2murof} {ta} {lat}> on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:41AM (#5449539) Homepage
    Isn't red/green the most common form of color blindness?
    • Re:Ummm... (Score:5, Funny)

      by Xaoswolf (524554) <Xaoswolf@gm[ ].com ['ail' in gap]> on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:55AM (#5449737) Homepage Journal
      Tell me about it.

      My only tech problem used to be trying to crimp patch cables, now I have to worry about reading slashdot right.

    • Re:Ummm... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Whatsthiswhatsthis (466781) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:58AM (#5449761)
      I am red/green colorblind. This doesn't mean that I cannot distinguish red from green. I can tell that everything on Slashdot's main page is in a green motif. It's harder to distinguish when the colors are close together or very light/dark.

      This colorblindness test [umds.ac.uk] illustrates the problems I have recognizing the difference between these colors. In plate 2 I read the number "3" and in plate 3 I see "70." Try it for yourself.

      If people who are red/green colorblind could really not distinguish any difference between the two, traffic lights at night would be really confusing.
  • by binaryDigit (557647) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:41AM (#5449541)
    I'm a bit ambivilent about the early posting idea, since having an early post is directly related to the number of people likely to see your post, that "privilege" suddenly becomes a paid one. So people who might actually have something worthwhile to contribute suddenly have to become paying members.

    But anyway, that is not the point of this post. I just wanted to say that if they do allow early posters, that they should NOT allow these early posts to be anonymous. This should help keep the quality of the early posts up. Maybe even have another modifier that increases any negative moderation by 1, again to try make the privilage of early posting a true privilage and keep abuse down.
  • by FearUncertaintyDoubt (578295) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:43AM (#5449562)
    Gee, I'm sure all the web sites that are suddenly and violently knocked off the web will be happy to know that slashdot is doing this for their subscribers. This seems a little like saying, well, my movie theater is quite flammable, so if you pay me $5 more, I'll make sure to seat you by an exit so you can get out before everyone else dies. It doesn't change the core problem, i.e., that slashdot is posting stories where they know from the outset that the effect is going to be a massive web server smackdown, and providing neither a mirror or a warning to anyone that this is about to happen.

    Perhaps now there will be a little bit of warning. When you start seeing the first referrals from slashdot on your web server, those are the subscribers -- the advance guard before the real assault.

  • if you pay more, you get more

    unfortunate, but true

    for healthcare, for the legal system, for media/ information

    equality is an illusion

    true in life, true in not-real-life internet communities

    sad but true
  • This means they can click through and beat the Slashdot Effect.

    Something is wrong when a subscription incentive is to see a site before Slashdot launches a distributed denial of service attack against it: That's right, subscribers, click on the link now because we are about to DDoS the site!
  • by techmuse (160085) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:51AM (#5449673)
    "Another possible feature addition that we're discussing is to allow subscribers to post during this window."

    This is a bad idea, because earlier posts tend to be moderated higher than later posts, simply because more people see earlier posts. This will give subscribers a much louder voice in the forums, while potentially degrading the quality of the discussion.
  • by thatguywhoiam (524290) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:53AM (#5449696)
    I like Slashdot a lot. I come here every day. Despite the common flames (and downright freaky displays of human frailty around -1), I think the group consensus here is fantastic. It's often very funny, and I like knowing what all the really smart mf'ers think about certain issues and topics. I feel smarter for reading Slashdot.

    Having said that, my lack of subscription is for a very simple reason: it's not professional.

    I won't subscribe until I never see a dupe or typo. Really, for all of our vaunted technology, if Slashdot cannot surmount these two very simple obstacles, it doesn't deserve any real monetary support. It just doesn't. And again, I say this as a real fan.

    Fix that, Taco, and you've got my money. And maybe even a little more credibility.

  • by dfn5 (524972) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:54AM (#5449708) Journal
    If people can read articles from the future it will inevitably corrupt the time line and will spell certain doom for everyone. Resist the urge. Don't do it.
  • by leviramsey (248057) on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:55AM (#5449730) Journal

    The BSD section is already red. How would stories from the future be posted to the BSD section?

    I can see the replies already to this post: "*BSD is dying; it has no future!"

  • by cheesyfru (99893) on Thursday March 06 2003, @12:05PM (#5449850) Homepage
    Good marketing, Slashdot! It reminds me of the Coke machine fiasco a few years ago. They tested machines that had temperature controls -- when the temperature got hot, it would automatically raise the price of the bottles. The media caught wind of this and had a field day. If Coca Cola had only beaten them to the punch and billed it as a "machine that discounts soda in cold weather", they'd have been heros.

    "Slashdot subscribers - you get news quicker!" Sounds a lot better than "Cheapskates: you get delayed news!", doesn't it?
  • by NFW (560362) on Thursday March 06 2003, @12:14PM (#5449947) Homepage
    FREMONT, CA - March 6 2003 - Slashdot, the world's largest nerd news network, announced a new distributed denial of service attack warning service for web site operators around the world. "For years now we've noticed that web sites tend to go down in flames after we direct our hordes or readers to them," said founder CmdrTaco. "And since we're having a difficult time pulling in revenue, it only seemed natural to charge for advance notice of our DDoS attacks."

    Web site operators worldwide are encouraged to sign up for advance notice of port-80 DDoS attacks. "If you see it coming," said co-founder Hemos, "at least you have a chance to take down your web site before your ISP prepares a gigantic bill for that web site you put up to show your friends what you've been doing with your Lego kits."

    Slashdot is a subsidiary of OSDN is a subsidiary of VA Software Corporation.

  • ...to fix spelling, to check for dupes (HAH!) or even to reject the story outright!

    How about putting a simple little form underneath the stories for these previews? Something like:

    Story is:
    [] dupe (enter orig. url: ______)
    [] fake (rebuttal url: ______)
    [] mis-filed (better section: {popup})
    [] mirrored (enter mirror url: _____)
    Misc. Comments: [__________________]
    [submit comment to editor / author]

    Something like this would make it trivial for people to immediately help with the editorial process -- as opposed to having to write up a full email, etc. Plus, by allowing previewers to voluntarily announce a mirror this way, a list of mirrors could be presented once the mirror goes live, right at the top of the article. (come to think of it, it might be good to keep a mirror link list / submission form for all users, even once it's posted...)
  • by ChaoticCoyote (195677) on Thursday March 06 2003, @12:18PM (#5449989) Homepage

    I'll be more likely to subscribe when I see:

    • Professional Journalism
    • Proper use of English
    • Less flippant editorializing by the staff
    • More in-depth, investigative reporting

    Being able to see articles "early" just doesn't motivate me to send money.

    • by CmdrTaco (1) <malda@ s l a s h dot.org> on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:57AM (#5449753) Homepage Journal
      Users can always make suggestions to stories by emailing the author. We do hope that subscribers will be likely to alert us to typos and stuff. No story on Slashdot is really ever set in stone. But I would consider a story from the mysterious future to be totally plastic- I will be editing and updating stories during that window without spelling out changes or putting in little "Update" comments. We've always used the last few minutes before a story goes live to make updates and corrections. This won't change, but users will be able to alert us to issues before it goes public.
    • Suppressing ads from servers is a fairly common practice. Probably 2-3% of our users do it. And that number will likely grow as browsers make it very easy to do so. Thats why we're adding plums unrelated to advertising on Slashdot. We knew that the Ad Suppression filter was really more of an Honor System kind of thing since using Junkbuster or even Mozilla's built in blocking is trivial for even the most competant of users.

      However we hope that enough of our users will think beyond that and try to support us. Programmers, Editors, OC3s and Racks of web servers cost money.