Slashdot Log In
Kaleidescape CEO Speaks Out About CSS Lawsuit
Posted by
timothy
on Mon Feb 14, 2005 05:34 PM
from the fighting-the-forces-of-nonsense dept.
from the fighting-the-forces-of-nonsense dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Engadget has an interview with Michael Malcolm, the CEO of Kaleidescape, which you might remember as the high-end DVD jukebox manufacturer that was sued by the DVD Copy Control Association for violating its CSS license.
Despite the fact that anyone who can afford a $27,000+ DVD jukebox also usually ends up buying
hundreds of movies to load onto it, the DVD-CCA wants
them to redesign the Kaleidescape to require the presence of
the physical DVD disc in the drive during authentication and playback.
Besides defeating the whole purpose of having a jukebox in the first
place (none of their jukeboxes allow for copying, streaming, or sharing
DVDs), Malcolm says he can't find any clause in their CSS license which
would require them to implement this "feature" anyway and they're about
to file a counter-action against the DVD-CCA."
Related Stories
[+]
Your Rights Online: Criminalizing The Consumer - Where DRM Went Wrong 75 comments
][nTrUdEr writes "The Economist has posted an editorial on how DRM has gone wrong. What ostensibly began as a tool to ensure artists received due compensation for their work has been turned, and now criminalizes the consumer for wanting to use what they have purchased. 'Despite the number of iTunes downloaded for a fee, Apple would be in trouble if people were prevented from transferring legitimately owned CDs to their iPods. The software Apple gives away to iPod customers is designed to let them do just that. Most people think it ludicrous that they can't do the same with the DVDs they own. Now it seems, despite squeals from the movie industry, the law is finally moving in the video fan's favour. The issue in the recent case was whether Kaleidescape, a maker of digital "jukeboxes" that store a person's video and music collections and distribute the entertainment around the home, had breached the terms of the DVD Content Control Association's CSS (content scrambling system) license.'"
[+]
Entertainment: Kaleidescape Triumphant in Court Case, DVD Ripping Ruled Legal 213 comments
Jim Buzbee writes "Ever wanted to rip all your DVDs to a big network server so that you could select and play them back to your TV? Up until now, manufacturers have been wary of building a device to allow this type of usage because they've been afraid a lawsuit. The DVD Copy Control Association had claimed this was contractually forbidden, but now
a judge says otherwise stating, 'nothing in the agreement prevents you from making copies of DVDs. Nothing requires that a DVD be present during playback.' Kaleidescape has finally won their long-standing lawsuit, a case we first talked about early in 2005."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
They're afraid of what - DVD swapping? (Score:5, Funny)
With the proposed protection feature, they'll have to bring out their DVDs for the exchange too.
Re:They're afraid of what - DVD swapping? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:They're afraid of what - DVD swapping? (Score:5, Funny)
~phil
Parent
Re:They're afraid of what - DVD swapping? (Score:3, Funny)
What they are afraid of (Score:5, Insightful)
That's what they're afraid of, and they're probably right.
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't think they're right to be afraid of the all of two people who actually by this thing.
Parent
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:What they are REALLY afraid of (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:3, Insightful)
Hmm...
3.3TB storage, assume 4GB/movie, assume $20/movie purchase. Assume $10 profit from eBay sale. (Numbers pulled from the ether.)
It'll hold 825 movies. That's $16500 to buy the movies, and $8250 from selling them... which won't cover the cost of the jukebox. So yeah, someone who buys one of these probably wouldn't bother.
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:3, Interesting)
Hell, I'll take it one step further. If I could flat out HAVE any movie I wanted I don't think I'd have 825 movies on the list.
99% of what's out there is poorly thought out, poorly implemented, poorly written tripe.
The 1% that's left over, that's what I'd buy and load up on my hypothetical jukebox. Even then, I doubt I could sell Casablanca on Ebay for much of anything.
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:4, Interesting)
Hell, I can't afford a 27k system to watch movies on and I wouldn't bother selling stuff I copied on E-Bay. I buy movies for between $10-20. I might get half of that back. My time is worth more than that.
The only time I have any real urge to pirate movies, is when I have to deal with fisking region encoding BS, CSS, and Macrovision. These things irritate me to the point that I want to make sure that whatever company has troubled me by using these 'features', doesn't make a DIME off of me.
I'll gladly pay for a physical copy of a movie I enjoy. Just don't tell me I can't watch a copy of a movie from china that Miramax hasn't yet ruined through editing, use my PC to watch it, or force me to sit through some sutpid 'coming to dvd soon' ad, and you will get no trouble out of me...
Parent
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:5, Insightful)
I've donated over 100 movies in the last year. I'll bet the DVD consortium will just love that.
How much are you going to get on a used DVD on E-Bay? Considering damn near every new DVD is $15 at WalMart (Lord of the Rings and multi-disc sets being the exception), what difference does it make?
Hell, I've filled in a lot of my "must have" collection from Walmart spending $10 a disc, including tax. They're now an impulse buy.
The Kaleidescope product isn't exactly a threat to that.
-Charles
Parent
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:5, Insightful)
I just loaded my DVD into my Jukebox... I don't need the DVD anymore, so I guess I'll go sell it on ebay or give it away..." That's what they're afraid of, and they're probably right.?
If you RTFA you would note that they covered this. In the current storage medium, this system costs $40-$60 in hard disk space, per movie. It is cheaper to buy two DVDs. This could be a concern in the future, but don't fool yourself, that is not what this lawsuit is about. This is about a loophole that was not dreamed up by the big media companies when they went with DVD as their DRM format. The idea is to sell multiple copies of every movie for multiple locations, and multiple new players. If you can just store an exact image of a DVD on a new player, why buy another copy in DVD-purple-ray-extreme-DVD3 format in a few years? And if you can back them up, there goes all the new copies to replace worn, scratched, broken, or misplaced movies.
Parent
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:3, Insightful)
But the Kaleidescape isn't much of a backup solution. If you lose your original disc, the file on the Kaleidescape server is only good for watching on a Kaleidescape player. There's no way to get back a new copy for the server.
Also, a disk imported now will always have the limitations of the current format, so the motivation is still there to buy "another copy in DVD-purple-ray-extreme-DVD
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:3, Informative)
The guy in the article quotes a price to store a DVD.
It is the cost of the *total* system divided by the number of DVDs it can hold.
Re:What they are afraid of (Score:3, Insightful)
This describes the situation that many digital audio fans currently find themselves in: "I just ripped my CD onto my computer, why do I need the CD?" The thing is, those shiny discs make excellent backups, especially since, if they're just sitting in their cases, they're pretty well-protected against dust and scratches.
I rarely pull actual CDs out of my cabinet anymore. But there'
The types of people who would buy a Kaleidescape (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course, the lawsuit is more about the long term possibilities... that
27k? 400 dvd carousel $300 (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't get the benfit of a system costing $27-100k, when you can put something together for 5x less.
Re:27k? 400 dvd carousel $300 (Score:5, Insightful)
dont get me wrong i'm not going to buy one, but the is alot more to it.
Parent
Re:27k? 400 dvd carousel $300 (Score:3, Insightful)
with reference to the DVD-CCA, (Score:2, Insightful)
the term "Money-grubbing SCUM" comes immediately to mind.
BOO FUCKING HOO (Score:5, Insightful)
YOU created this monster. Just like South Park's "Walmart" episode--who is number 1? YOU are.
The "threat" of DVD has been known for years. The DVDCCA came up with consumer-hostile garbage from day one: CSS, Region Encoding (aka RESTRAINT OF TRADE), and Macrovision in every pot (sorry, under every TV). YOU BOUGHT INTO IT. You just HAD to have your fucking "Matrix" DVD, didn't you? Nevermind all the problems with DVD--look at DIVX! HAH what fools! Right.
And now we have "big brother" DVD-CCA clubbing people over the head for violating their bullshit license for their bullshit "encryption" which has already been compromised 100 ways from Sunday. We STILL have region encoding despite the fact that it IS restraint of trade. And YOU allowed it. Every one of you that ran out to get a DVD player and filling your shelves with boxed-sets of whatever--you allowed this to happen.
So do NOT bitch about the DVDCCA. You fucking gave them the power. And you know what? Now that you let them stick their foot in the door JUST A LITTLE, they're going to try and see what ELSE they can get away with...the "broadcast" flag, the bending-over of TiVo...it's going to get worse because YOU, the drooling hordes, couldn't stop for ONE moment to say "hey, this is just a candy-coated fish hook!" Nope, GOTTA have that latest anime collection! Just GOTTA get that Matrix DVD Boxed Set!
Now go ahead--do your Slashdot duty...whine about the DVDCCA and how they "don't get it." Contradict me by saying "so? You can just get a hacked player!" (Yeah, and Apex is SUCH great quality too *snort*). Somehow tie Bittorrent into the conversation (it's just not slashdot if you're not blathering about how great bittorrent is). Mod me down to nothing. Continue preaching to the choir.
Parent
Thank god (Score:4, Insightful)
One day everyone will realize that the bully just had a self-esteem problem. Let's hope that day comes soon.
DVD CCA is almost right (Score:3, Informative)
Of course, this can be done at the client, by sticking a DVD in the playback client. The client, of course caches the keys extracted from that DVD, so this only has to be done once. For large numbers of DVDs on the jukebox that one wants to make accessable to a given client, just burn a CD (or DVD) with the whole set of keys that the client can cache, or explicitly push the keys to the known authenticated clients (or some desired subset thereof).
Sheesh, this isn't rocket science.
Re:DVD CCA is almost right (Score:3, Interesting)
Waste of time (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Waste of time (Score:3, Insightful)
1) Settle the outstanding issue that needs be resolved.
2) Establish a precendent.
(2) is much more valuable than (1) in the long run. Though the actual DVD format may become passe, the issues addressed here will not, at least not as quickly.
Honestly, I am always pleased when something like this goes to court, since it is a demonstration that people are willing to put their money towards causes that benefit the consumer.
Sure, you c
When you are trying to put a lock on air ... (Score:4, Interesting)
ALMAFUERTE
Re:When you are trying to put a lock on air ... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:When you are trying to put a lock on air ... (Score:3, Interesting)
Honky-tonk (Score:3, Funny)
Betcha cain't rest your beer on it and cry about yer lost love...
Gotta have Dolly parton onit...
Forgotten passwords (Score:4, Insightful)
"I forgot my password. Can you reset it?"
"Sure, what's your password?"
The argument should be simple (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't see a violation especially as no method for extracting the decoded data exists to my understanding of this device. I think the DVD-CCA is being [surprisingly?] overzealous with their issues here. But who knows... something good could come of this if the DVDCCA loses as I suspect they will.
Mac OS X has "jukebox" feature, too (Score:4, Interesting)
Yet another blow to Web Standards! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yet another blow to Web Standards! (Score:4, Funny)
What are you talking about? Internet Explorer supports CSS perfectly. In fact, I'm pretty sure that there is no better implementation of the Content Scrambling System anywhere. Stop spreading FUD!
Parent
Kaleidescape + Netflix or blockbuster subscription (Score:4, Insightful)
Flamebait (Score:3, Funny)
Latest Playback Requirement: Live Actors (Score:3, Funny)
Though the requirement will be an adjustment for some, once viewers get used to handling shovels and arranging for flights and hotel stays, they should get back to just enjoying their films...
What are they scared of??? (Score:5, Insightful)
Why sure, I'm going to buy a $27,000 machine to copy DVD's that I actually bought, because I can't afford them. That would be much smarter then using a $400 PC to get them off of Bittorrent.
Once the **AA's decide to embrace digital distribution instead of attempting to squash it, they'll make the same killing they have off every other technology they fought at first. Remember, radio and, later, the cassette tape were going to be the end of the music business. We're tired of hearing that the sky is falling. Start adapting your business model to technology, and quit telling us to adapt technology to your business model.
George Lucas Guilty of Pirating his own films (Score:5, Insightful)
I guess Lucas is guilty of pirating his own films . . . The concept of extreme protection of digital content is really getting out of hand when someone like Lucas can't legally "backup" his films onto another media. I don't really understand this when no one prosecutes the average Joe from copying a CD to tape or CD to MP3 player for convenience . . . Isn't this all that the Kaleidescope box does? Copies from one media to another for ease and convenience?
If you can do it with music, then why can't you do it with movies?
In related news... (Score:5, Funny)
Yet Another Linux/DVD Post (Score:4, Funny)
This quote is the one that made me laugh out loud, and shows that we (meaning the Linux/Slashdot/techie crowd) just aren't getting through to the proper people so that changes can be made. [Note: TT is "The Tech" and JV is "Jack Valenti"]
During all his time presiding over the MPAA, he didn't even realize the enormity of the problem. That sends the message that word justisn't getting out. This case, should Michael Malcolm be successful and gain some ground, may finally allow Linux users to legally play DVD's they bought with their own money.
Wealthy people don't steal? (Score:3, Insightful)
People at all income levels can be thieves. I doubt you could find any correlation between income level and thievery. As one poster commented, why not just add every NetFlix rental to their jukebox?
Wanted: Lawsuits (Score:3, Insightful)
The DVD-CCA are more than just nonsensical. (Score:5, Informative)
I was one of the good number of people named in the DeCSS case. I was offering a mirror of DeCSS on my site, in the hopes that people would be inspired to build a Linux DVD player package around it (or, at a minimum, that they could have used the Windows binaries to rip DVDs and then play them under Linux).
They sent me an email saying that because I hadn't responded to their earlier email, they were taking me to court.
Only problem is... I grepped my entire mail spool forwards, backwards and sideways (I never delete mails to my home email box, except spam, and even then rarely; I like being able to search for anything I've received) and could not find any previous email.
I called them, emailed them, etc., trying to ask them why they are claiming that I received a previous email when I didn't. Naturally I got nowhere.
I ended up having to sign an agreement basically stating that I'll never license or sell CSS technology. Over a lie of theirs.
(Not like I would license or sell their shit, but a sufficiently slimy lawyer-- and they have plenty-- would be able to argue that selling a used DVD-ROM drive (or a used DVD!) on eBay violates the agreement I made with them...)
Re:Forget about the lawsuit, this product is crap! (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Forget about the lawsuit, this product is crap! (Score:4, Informative)
I'm sure OSS could whip up something similar, but if you are buying this you just want it to work and you want someone to yell at then you can't get the cover art for "Hope Floats"
I'd never thought about the legal aspects of it, because it seems to me like fair-use backup. The DVDs are stored encrypted, so there isn't anything amiss there.
Parent
Price is irrelevant. (Score:5, Insightful)
Rich people don't know better.
Know better? They don't give a shit. When your house costs $10 million, and you've got $500,000 worth of custom-installed home theater gear, plasma screen TVs, multiroom audio and video, etc., an additional $27k or even $100k isn't that much to spend to ensure that you can watch any of your movies from any of your screens any time you want. It's a helluvalot more elegant and intuitive than some hack-it-together-yourself DVR or DVD caching box. Besides, you're going to be taking your family on a holiday to Barcelona or Shanghai or Aspen during the couple of weeks it takes to get that whole thing installed, configured, tested and debugged. And you probably will pay Kaleidescape the money to duplicate your entire DVD collection onto the hard drives so you don't have reload them yourself, or have your personal electrical engineer spend a week loading your DVDs onto the system.
Besides, if I'm some rich guy who's spent that much on his house and electronics, I'm showing off my latest "I'm cooler-than-you" gadgets to my other ultra-rich friends before we head off to cruise the Mediterranean in my private yacht. The people who buy this are the same people who buy the Ford GT (~$140k), the Mercedes SL65 AMG (~$140k), the Bentley Arnage T (~$250k), the Maybach 57 ($~$330k) or the Porsche Carrera GT (~$440k). The cost is irrelevant--it's all about the cool.
BTW: The CEO of the company I work for has recently bought both a Ford GT (~$140k) and a Mercedes SL65AMG (~$140k). That's to go along with the BMW 760Li (~$90k) he already owns, his $14 million Learjet, his $12 million house, etc.
Parent