Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Melting Coins Now Illegal In the U.S.

Posted by kdawson on Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:59 PM
from the facing-meltdown dept.
A number of readers have noted the action by the U.S. Mint to outlaw the melting down or bulk export of coins. This has come about because the value of the precious metals contained in coins now exceeds their face value. The Mint would rather not have to replace pennies (at a cost of 1.73 cents per) or nickels (at 8.74 cents). The expectation is that Congress will mandate new compositions for some U.S. coins in 2007.
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] US Pennies To Be Worth Five Cents? 729 comments
Z-MaxX writes to point out Reuters coverage following up on last month's news that the US Mint has made it illegal to melt or export US coins in bulk, since the value of their constituent metals — in the case of pennies and nickels — now exceeds their face value. The new story quotes Francois Velde, senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, who thinks the new rules will not be enough — he believes that determined speculators are already piling up pennies. Velde suggests "rebasing" the penny to be worth five cents. Quoting Velde: "These factors suggest that, sooner or later, the penny will join the farthing (one-quarter of a penny) and the hapenny (one-half of a penny) in coin museums."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by KingSkippus (799657) * on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:00PM (#17240092) Homepage Journal

    If this keeps up, .002 cents really will [slashdot.org] = $.002

    (Sorry, but it had to be said...)

    • If I had a nickel for every time I heard that one...
      • by dgatwood (11270) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:21PM (#17240590) Journal

        .05 cents? Let us know when you've reached 20 and maybe somebody will send you a penny for your thoughts. :-D

            • by turbidostato (878842) on Thursday December 14 2006, @04:23PM (#17244396)
              "a business making money off destroying currency (and costing the government money) might be [a crime]"

              Yes, it should be a punishable crime... and some public workers should pay for it.

              How is it possible to have things so upwards?

              It is *not* "costing the government money"; it is costing the *taxpayers'* money. It is the government the one that is using something to guarantee something of less value. It is the government's fault and it is the government the one that should pay for such a deep arrogance about thrashing away tax-payers' money.

              Well, the government declares owing me a cent by means of an item called "a cent". OK, that's the government side of the deal; it had all the powers to choose a piece of paper or a Ferrari to stablish its debt against me. But then, someone else offers me 1.73 cents for such a token. Why shouldn't I accept it? Despite what the government says, the *thruth* is that I'm liberating the government of a "contract" with me. In what crazy world is the debtor able to punish the one that wanted to condom the debt?
              • by RKBA (622932) on Thursday December 14 2006, @04:45PM (#17244810) Homepage
                the value of copper has gone up significantly since 1998
                You have it backwards just as almost all so called "news reporters" do (including even financial reporters). The value of copper, gold, nickle, etc., hasn't changed at all. The reason copper and all other items cost more than they used to is because the value of the US Dollar has declined. One ounce of pure gold still buys a good quality men's suit just as it always has.
              • by feepness (543479) on Thursday December 14 2006, @04:57PM (#17244978) Homepage
                It isn't just a decrease in the value of a dollar, it's also an increase in the value of the metals.

                I'm sorry and this isn't personal but I'm amazed at how little financial acumen we collectively have. This is the financial equivalent of being surprised that 40% of all sick days are taken on Monday and Friday.

                The dollar being worth less and things costing more are exactly the same phenomenon. The value of the metals did not inherently increase. Were this lmited to a specific metal or commodity I would believe it, but it is very broad based and therefore can be traced to a monetary phenomenon (record low interest rates, loose lending practices, and increased consumer/government debt).
                • by rrkap (634128) on Thursday December 14 2006, @06:09PM (#17246272) Homepage

                  The dollar being worth less and things costing more are exactly the same phenomenon. The value of the metals did not inherently increase.

                  The value of metals DID increase relative to other commodities. So the parent post is right to say that it is a combination of a general decline in the value of the Dollar and an increase in the price of Zinc and Copper.

          • by YrWrstNtmr (564987) on Thursday December 14 2006, @02:06PM (#17241662)
            Those are illegal. It's just that no one actually cares enough to enforce it.

            It's only illegal if you intend to use/distribute them as 'money'. Novelty items are OK.

            (Text as of 2/19/02) 18 U.S.C. 331:
            Whoever fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates, impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales or lightens any of the coins coined at the mints of the United States, or any foreign coins which are by law made current or are in actual use or circulation as money within the United States;
            • by penguinrenegade (651460) on Thursday December 14 2006, @02:20PM (#17241962)
              It's actually okay to mutilate coins as long as the intent isn't fraudulent.

              Pressed Penny FAQ [pressedpenny.com]

              It takes some doing, but it's possible to have fraudulent intent to mutilate. For instance, making a 4-legged buffalo nickel into a 3-legged (rare) variety is fraudulent. Dropping pennies in a machine at Disneyland for souvenirs is perfectly okay.
          • by basscomm (122302) <basscomm&crummysocks,com> on Thursday December 14 2006, @02:09PM (#17241716) Homepage
            From the US Mint FAQ [usmint.gov] (emphasis mine)

            60. Is it illegal to damage or deface coins?

            Section 331 of Title 18 of the United States code provides criminal penalties for anyone who "fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales, or lightens any of the coins coined at the Mints of the United States." This statute means that you may be violating the law if you change the appearance of the coin and fraudulently represent it to be other than the altered coin that it is. As a matter of policy, the Mint does not promote coloring, plating or altering U.S. coinage: however, there are no sanctions against such activity absent fraudulent intent.
        • by Sparr0 (451780) <sparr0NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Thursday December 14 2006, @02:52PM (#17242640) Homepage Journal
          Getting rid of pennies has nothing to do with getting rid of cents. The two are distinct. Most banks already handle transactions down to the 6th decimal place. My bank account at any given time could have a certain number of thousandths of a cent in it. The only time it has to be converted into coins is when I withdraw it. Getting rid of the penny just means that physical money transactions have to be rounded. The same thing happened when we got rid of the 1/2 cent piece. When you buy something and the total comes to a non-nickel-aligned amount, it gets rounded. Easy, simple, any idiot can handle the math.
          • by Bloke down the pub (861787) on Thursday December 14 2006, @03:41PM (#17243550)
            Most banks already handle transactions down to the 6th decimal place. My bank account at any given time could have a certain number of thousandths of a cent in it.
            I've worked in the USA, Europe and the UK. I've never had a bank account with more than 2 decimal places. What's more, I work on business & accounting software, and the only times I've seen that use a resolution finer than what's available in the local currency is for highly specialised functions - and even then, it's only for internal, intermediate calculations.

            To put it another way: I call bullshit.
            • by technothrasher (689062) on Thursday December 14 2006, @03:52PM (#17243780)
              've worked in the USA, Europe and the UK. I've never had a bank account with more than 2 decimal places. What's more, I work on business & accounting software, and the only times I've seen that use a resolution finer than what's available in the local currency is for highly specialised functions - and even then, it's only for internal, intermediate calculations.
               
              You really need to get out more. Gasoline, cheap electronics parts like resistors, mutual fund values... lots of stuff is accounted for at greater than 2 decimal point accuracy.
          • by crlove (857212) on Thursday December 14 2006, @04:04PM (#17244018) Journal
            My bank account takes those little remainders and puts them into another account. It's just like taking pennies from the tray.
        • by walt-sjc (145127) on Thursday December 14 2006, @02:54PM (#17242676)
          First, getting rid of the penny would not affect electronic / check transactions.
          The only change would be cash transactions, which would be rounded (probably up) to the nearest nickel.

          When the half-cent was abolished in 1857 it was worth more than eight cents in today's currency. It's time for the penny to go, along with the paper dollar. In another 20 years or so, they may as well get rid of the nickel too.
        • by sholden (12227) on Thursday December 14 2006, @03:08PM (#17242958) Homepage
          Australia manages just fine.

          You just round to the nearest 5 cents. If something costs $13.23 then you end up paying $13.25 if you pay cash, if it costs $13.27 then you also pay $13.25 if you pay cash. When paying by EFTPOS (think swiping your debit card in the US) or credit card or cheque (think check it the US :) you pay to the exact cent. Actual prices are still specified to individual cents, the rounding is done on the total purchase not on each individual item.

          It works perfectly well, sure you can get 2c worth of free petrol (gas...) by putting $40.02 in the tank, but no one does because it's 2c... Sure you could try buying 2c (or 7c) worth of petrol over and over again, but no one does that either because it's retarded.

          Just because you remove something from cash transactions doesn't mean you change the "base" of your currency - to claim that is just being moronic. Amazingly Australia didn't collapse, the banks didn't have a field day with "false" interest rates, in fact the only thing that changed is you don't end up carrying 10kg of coins at the end of the day...

          Inflation means that a penny now is a *much* *much* finer resolution on prices. People managed perfectly well 50 years ago with a much coarser price scheme... Seriously who gives a stuff if something costs $12.32 or $12.33 - can you even tell the difference at the end of week?

            • by sholden (12227) on Thursday December 14 2006, @05:04PM (#17245110) Homepage

              Say you're buying a $5.23 lunch, five days a week. You're actually paying $5.25 a day.


              You conveniantly ignore all the occassions you buy a $5.27 lunch and save 2c. Or you're too stupid to read a simple post. Or maybe to stupid to understand what rounding means.

              It averages out - sometimes you pay a cent or two above the total price. Sometimes you pay a cent or two below the total price. If you really care about 2c you can always arrange to be paying less, you just have to add/remove items with non-multiples of 5c prices until your total ends in 1c, 2c, 6c, or 7c.

              Of course no one does because, they know it evens out in the long term (heck even in the short term).


              I would bet the store you're giving those two or three or four cents to does not see it as insignificant, considering that they may be getting that extra one to four cents on hundreds of transactions in a day. Free extra revenue, from people who think that pennies don't matter!

              You can't seriously be that dumb, there are only 5 possible results for an individual transaction.

              1. the price paid is exactly the total price
              2. the store gets an extra 1c
              3. the store gets an extra 2c
              4. the customer gets an extra 1c
              5. the customer gets an extra 2c

              There is no 3 and 4 cent option, as is pretty obvious if you think for about a quarter of second instead of just making shit up.

              And if you are retarded enough to care, then just always arrange to but things which total $X.02. Congratulations, you save 2c on every transaction you make. Of course the time required to make sure the transaction ends in 2, and the extra items you have to buy to do so will probably make it not worth while - but feel free to stick it to the man!

              For everyone else it averages out.
               
  • Paper? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Shadow Wrought (586631) * <shadow,wrought&gmail,com> on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:02PM (#17240122) Homepage Journal
    Can I continue to light my cigars with hundreds?
      • Re:Paper? (Score:4, Informative)

        by merreborn (853723) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:51PM (#17241304) Homepage Journal
        This is a classic 'net argument. Long story short, the destruction of currency *with intent to defraud* is illegal.

        There's a great google answer here:
        http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=77 334 [google.com]

        "You are correct, that the only criminal statute regulating the destruction or defacement of U.S. currency requires fraudulent intent." ... well, until this law was passed.

        There are a few famous classroom science experiments that involve the destruction of pennies. Here's hoping that's still legal.
        • Re:Paper? (Score:4, Informative)

          by merreborn (853723) on Thursday December 14 2006, @02:15PM (#17241842) Homepage Journal
          Actually, I'm guilty of not reading my google answer link in full.

          "You are correct, that the only criminal statute regulating the destruction or defacement of U.S. currency requires fraudulent intent." only applies to *coins*

          Further down, there's a statute related to bills, which our researcher
          "Note that this is also an intent-based crime. An element of the offense is "...intent to render such [currency] unfit to be reissued.""

          So lighting your cigar with a bill might just be illegal after all. However, under these laws, dissolving a penny in acid isn't.

          There's a bit more here:
          http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=42 6715 [google.com]
  • by plasmacutter (901737) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:02PM (#17240146) Journal
    They stopped making em out of copper before the 50's (I forget exactly when its finals week XD)

    they make them out of an electroplated nickel alloy now..

    Dare i say it shouldn't just be oil we should be concerned about running out?

    JUNK METAL coins are now worth more than their face value... I think this is a sign that asteroid mining could be feasible (the average nickel iron monster is worth several trillian.. not counting any incidental precious metals)
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      They stopped making em out of copper before the 50's (I forget exactly when its finals week XD)

      they make them out of an electroplated nickel alloy now..

      No to both of those, as it says in the article. They stopped making pennies out of copper in 1981 and they're now made of copper coated zinc.

    • I think this is a sign that asteroid mining could be feasible (the average nickel iron monster is worth several trillian.. not counting any incidental precious metals)

      It could be worth significantly more than that if you threaten to smash it into somewhere important!

      One MILLION dollars! Muahahahaha! Muahahahahahaha!

      *ahem*
    • by Phreakiture (547094) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:09PM (#17240312) Homepage

      They stopped making em out of copper before the 50's (I forget exactly when its finals week XD)

      I'll give you some slack for finals week, but you are off by three decades. Pennies were made of 95% copper until the mid 80's. Dimes, quarters, half-dollars and full-sized full dollars (i.e. not sacagawea-sized) were made of silver until 1963.

      (Yes, I am a coin collector)

      they make them out of an electroplated nickel alloy now..

      Zinc, actually, not nickel.

      Dare i say it shouldn't just be oil we should be concerned about running out?

      Well, not exactly a misplaced point, but we can recycle metals, hence the very problem the article was about. We can't recycle oil once it's been burnt.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:03PM (#17240152)
    A worthless coin anyway.
  • by Bastard of Subhumani (827601) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:03PM (#17240154) Journal
    Dada21 will be along to spout something about precious metals, followed at 11 by a film.
  • by east coast (590680) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:03PM (#17240164)
    As much as I can understand why they do not want people melting down these coins, how much is the metal really worth in it's "raw" form unrefined?

    My second question is how much would it cost to refine these metals to make them worth the most? Copper prices are sky high right now but a lump of melted pennies probably wouldn't be able to be sold as a "copper" since there are a number of other metals involved. Is this something that can really be profitable?
  • by jimfinity (849860) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:04PM (#17240188)
    It might just be more feasible to get rid of pennies altogether.

    here is an article i have found to be particularly illuminating.

    http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a981009a.html [straightdope.com]
    • by hey! (33014) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:22PM (#17240626) Homepage Journal
      Why stop there?

      Why not get rid of nickles and dimes as well?

      And why we're at it, let's get rid of all paper currency, replacing it with coins in the following denominations: $1, $5, $20, $50. Then we can stop printing money to replace all those torn dollar bills.

      Think of the affect on crime. While you could carry a couple thousand dollars on your person if you really needed to, the drug kingpin who wants payment of a million in cash is going to need a forklift, not a suitcase. Similar issues of phyiscal inconvenience will deter counterfeiting.
  • Devalue (Score:5, Interesting)

    by HappySqurriel (1010623) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:04PM (#17240198)
    I wonder how much of this is because of "increasing value of precious metals" and how much is "The devaluing of the American dollar" (I recognize that from the perspective of Americans this would be the same thing); if it is based on the dollars value, why wouldn't you attempt to correct the problem with the dollar (by not running a 1/2 trillion dollar deficit) rather than finding cheaper materials?
    • Re:Devalue (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Skreems (598317) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:08PM (#17240280)
      Ah, but that assumes that the government actually cares about the deficit, and would rather pay down the national debt than blow untold billions of dollars on pork barrel spending for their own states.
  • My question (Score:5, Funny)

    by UbuntuDupe (970646) * on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:05PM (#17240204) Journal
    Since they only penalty is a fine, can you pay the fine out of the money you made selling the metal from the melted down coins?
  • by b0s0z0ku (752509) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:06PM (#17240234)
    And deprecate the coins equivalent to the penny and have the lowest monetary unit be 5 cents (it's obviously possible to make a coin for under 5 cents since a penny costs 1.75 cents to make). Also, encourage the use of $1 coins and create $2, $5 and possibly $10 coins as well (keep the $10 bills at least though). That way, it'll be easier for automated machines to give change. When I go to NJ from NYC, there's few things more annoying than the river of $1 coins that the ticket machine vomits as change when you put a $20 in to buy a $10.25 ticket!

    And for folks who'll ask, replacing cash with electronic transactions isn't the answer. I for one like the anonymity of cash and the fact that I'm carrying a physical object of known value that can handle some pretty heavy abuse before becoming worthless.

    -b.

  • by stry_cat (558859) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:07PM (#17240250) Journal
    How can the US Mint make something illegal, only Congress has the power to pass laws. Someone please explain.
  • by TheWoozle (984500) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:07PM (#17240258)
    I'm too busy straining the gold out of seawater and reclaiming the platinum out of old catalytic converters to mess with melting down pennies and nickels...
  • Pennies (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Kelson (129150) * on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:07PM (#17240264) Homepage Journal
    Perhaps it's time to start seriously thinking about withdrawing the penny from circulation. You can't buy anything with a penny anymore. You only really use them for two reasons:

    1. Stores like the $X.99 price point, because it subtly makes people think they're paying $X rather than $X+1. $X.95 is also popular, and could work with only nickels.
    2. Sales tax is based on percentage, so even if you have a round price like $1.00, you may end up with something like $1.07.

    OK, 3 reasons if you're paying for gas with cash. But note that gas stations already advertise prices to the thousandth of a dollar -- as far as I know, the US has never actually minted a mil -- and they already get rounded up to the nearest penny. I'm sure gas stations would be quite happy to round to the nearest nickel instead.

    Of course, given how many transactions are electronic these days, withdrawing the penny wouldn't necessarily alter credit or debit transactions.
  • by gelfling (6534) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:08PM (#17240270) Homepage Journal
    Take them out of circulation, and then the Mint can do whatever they like with the alloys. Or if they're smart, they'll use alloys for a $1 coin and stop making the $1 bill.
  • by Speare (84249) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:12PM (#17240364) Homepage

    Under what authority can the US Mint create new law? The US Mint, the Secret Service and the Treasury are all in the enforcement, not the legislative branch.

    Some AC said it was illegal to mutilate or deface paper money. Uh, no, it's not. It's also not illegal to cut up a US coin in some artistic fashion and sell it for a higher amount; this is done all the time. In terms of defacement, you can't stick a picture of Kennedy on a quarter and try to redeem it as a half-dollar, and the same goes for gluing a "20" on the corner of a one-dollar bill. That's simple fraud, in this case called counterfeiting.

  • by rlp (11898) on Thursday December 14 2006, @01:47PM (#17241244)
    I always thought that the mint should make all coins out of radioactive waste. It would solve the problem of nuclear waste disposal. It would encourage consumers to spend money - quickly. This would help the economy. And it would definitely discourage hoarding of currency.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      lemme just grab some tin foil out of the kitchen....... Seriously though, I wonder what they will use for the new coins....

      Plastic?

      I mean, it's not like we're running short on oil.