Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Microsoft Launches the Zune

Posted by Zonk on Thu Sep 14, 2006 02:35 PM
from the zune-slayer-of-ipods-eater-of-souls dept.
Media Music Microsoft Toys Technology
Doug-W writes to mention an Engadget post about Microsoft's launch of the Zune. From the article: "Not a lot of surprises in the specs department, but they've confirmed the basics we've known for a while, like WiFi, 30GB of HDD, built-in FM, a 3-inch screen and the basic music, pictures and video playback. They also finally let slip the screen res -- an unsurprising QVGA -- and some better news on the codec front: the Zune supports h.264, MP3, AAC and WMA. As for ballyhoo, wireless Zune-to-Zune sharing is where the real action is at, and it works pretty much like we've been hearing: you can share a full-length track with a friend, and they've got three times to listen to it over a three day period, after which they can flag the song for purchase on the Zune Marketplace -- unless they're an unlimited 'Zune Pass' subscriber, of course."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Ask Slashdot: Zune - Microsoft Killer or Next Apple Victim? 159 comments
prophet asks: "Now that we have all seen the new Microsoft 'Zune', and the suits over at Microsoft have seen fit to inform us of a whole line of 'Zune' related hardware and software products, my real question is, will Microsoft be able to de-throne the ever growing iPod phenom? With the current confirmed 'Zune' prototype photos dispersed throughout the net, it is hard to see how Microsoft has thought that the current design of the 'Zune' is in fact enough in its current form for users to be pleased aesthetically, and at the same time impressed by ease of use. At the current moment, rumors are circulating of a redesign of the controls on Microsoft's part before a complete release. With the current aesthetical design of the Zune, will it appeal to the masses in the way the iPod did? More importantly, does it appeal to you?
[+] Your Rights Online: Zune's Viral DRM Will Violate Creative Commons 266 comments
lopy writes "Medialoper has noted that Zune's highly touted wireless file sharing will infect otherwise unprotected audio files with proprietary DRM. In cases where users are sharing songs covered by any of the Creative Commons licenses, this would be a clear violation of those license. From the CC FAQ: 'If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license.' It'll be interesting to see how and if the CC community responds." An anonymous reader wrote in mentioning a post to the Crave blog, relatedly exploring how the Zune stacks up to the iPod.
[+] Your Rights Online: Zune Won't Play Old DRM Infected Files 463 comments
Spritzer writes "According to the EFF, the new Zune portable media player from Microsoft won't play files infected with the old Microsoft DRM. It seems that all of the 'PlaysforSure' media that has been sold and is currently being sold will not play on the Zune. In addition, Microsoft has now advocated violating the DMCA in order to transfer files to the player. Microsoft Zune architect J Allard was quoted as saying there's 'Lots of DVD ripping software out there that encodes to those formats, so the most popular formats out there, whether it's MPEG-4 or H.264, we'll support those.'" ZDNet offers up additional commentary on this revelation.
[+] Apple: Wal-Mart Leaks Zune Price 313 comments
nieske writes, "Engadget reports that Wal-Mart accidentally published online the intended price of the Microsoft Zune; the iPod rival would apparently retail for $284. The price was quickly pulled from the Wal-Mart site. Reports say that Microsoft was flustered when Apple dropped the price for the iPod 30 GB, previously $299, to $249. BetaNews states that 'undercutting the iPod is a major goal of Microsoft's upcoming effort.' Will Microsoft respond to Apple with another price drop?"
[+] Why Microsoft's Zune Scares Apple to the Core 574 comments
BoredStiff writes "Computerworld has an article examining Microsoft's plans to launch a competitor to the Apple iPod, the wireless media player called Zune. The article lists five reasons why Apple may fear the Zune, and why it won't be as easily smacked down as the dozens of mp3 players before it have been. The Zune isn't just a music player, the article argues. Think of it as a portable, wireless, hardware version of MySpace. With the Zune, Microsoft is trying to launch a consumer media 'perfect storm.'" From the article: "Microsoft will make the movement of media between Windows, Soapbox and the Zune natural and seamless. The Zune interface is just like a miniature version of the Windows Media Center user interface and is very similar to some elements of Vista. Apple fans are overconfident in the iPod because Apple once commanded 92% of music player market share, a number that has since fallen to around 70%. About 30 million people own iPods. But Microsoft owns more than 90% of the worldwide operating systems market (compared with Apple's roughly 5%), representing some 300 million people. The company expects to have 200 million Vista users within two years."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Microsoft Launches the Zune 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • How will... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:38PM (#16107739)
    the brown Zune look with the blue screen of death?

  • Reality of "wireless sharing" (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Cybert4 (994278) * on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:38PM (#16107747)
    Here's a hint on all these ad-hoc wireless networks. We also have another ad-hoc wireless network. We call it air, and it can transmit vibrations from one person to another! Seriously, I've had my DS for awhile, and I've never suddenly found a person to play wireless with. Unless you have bells and whistles going off to indicate another person is around (and I'm not going to sit around at a "looking for" screen), it's a solitary thing.

    And slapping on the usual DRM shackles won't change this. Most likely, make it much worse and harder to stick to the general public.

  • The Name (Score:3, Insightful)

    by buddhaunderthetree (318870) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:40PM (#16107764)
    Is it just me or is Zune a terrible name?

  • Available in black, white and... *BROWN*? (Score:5, Funny)

    by payndz (589033) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:42PM (#16107788)
    Brown? Seriously? It's meant to be a cutting-edge, fetishistic techno-gadget, and they offer it in fucking brown?

    Steve Jobs: "Here's our new iPod Nano! It's available in black, white, silver and shiny green and pink!"
    Steve Ballmer: "Oh yeah? Well, here's Zune! It's available in black, white and this stylish turd-brown!"
    Steve Jobs: "Brown, huh? You got it in beige as well? Or tweed? How about a nice Argyle pattern?"
    Steve Ballmer: "Fuck YOOOOOUUUU!" [throws chair]

    Good ol' MS. Always as stylish and tasteful as ever.

  • Two things I care about with this (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Space cowboy (13680) * on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:42PM (#16107790) Journal
    ... and neither are mentioned, as far as I can see:

    Price & battery-life

    Bit of a pity that:

    "The Zune-to-Zune sharing feature may not be available for all songs on your device, and works only between Zune devices within wireless range of each other. This feature allows recipients to play full-length sample tracks up to three times in three days. Recipients cannot resend music that they have received via the sharing feature." ... as well...

    Simon.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by theantipop (803016)
      You can bet if either the price or the battery life was anything spectacular they would've mentioned it. Personally, along with battery life I was looking for some dimensioning. I'm sure in the coming weeks we'll find out the rest of the story and become even more unimpressed than we are now.
    • > ... and neither are mentioned, as far as I can see:
      > Price & battery-life

      Maybe because what you see are three photos of a *prototype* device that is not even in production and nobody knows when it will be? :) So these (what you look at) are more like *goals*, not the final effect. Effect which will constitute of the look (ok we see it), price (no mention), specs like battery life (no mention), ease of use (no mention - but I expect independent review for that, it has ipodish wheel for sure - but how does it work?), service around it (think ITMS for iPods). Etc.

      So these are really just few photos that say nothing.

      > Bit of a pity that:
      > "The Zune-to-Zune sharing feature may not be available for all
      > songs on your device, and works only between Zune devices within
      > wireless range of each other. This feature allows recipients to
      > play full-length sample tracks up to three times in three days.
      > Recipients cannot resend music that they have received via the
      > sharing feature." ... as well...

      Yeah. Great feature. :))) Share with crippled music...

      Also I am suspicious of this wifi stuff. I know wifi is right now quite complicated to use, and it uses lots of battery power (it was not designed especially for low power consumption). Also I wonder about how those devices will autoconfig to work ad-hoc flawlessly.

  • The imporant question at M$ (Score:3, Insightful)

    by treak007 (985345) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:44PM (#16107813) Homepage
    What about the Zune is so revolutionary that it makes a person not want to buy an ipod or throw away their current mp3 player for the Zune.

      • Re:The imporant question at M$ (Score:5, Informative)

        by flooey (695860) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:17PM (#16108169)
        That, and the iPod is grossly overpriced. MS doesn't have a history of overpricing their consumer products, although Apple does. As long as it's reasonably priced, I'm getting one.

        The rumored price is $300 for the 30 GB version. The 30 GB iPod is $250. So, pretty much, same pricing strategy.

  • Is it really a launch?? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Chanc_Gorkon (94133) <gorkon&gmail,com> on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:45PM (#16107823)
    Is this really a launch? Can they be purchased today?? No? Then this isn't really a launch then is it? I can order a new Nano and it will be here in a few days to a day. Zune's probably ain't going ot show up until November.....

  • Killing the MP3? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mpapet (761907) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:50PM (#16107881) Homepage
    Because it will decimate every other mp3 player brand besides apple, I wonder if this isn't a play to destroy the concept of owning your music entirely.

    Yes, I know they claim to play an mp3, but the devil is in the details. As in they will likely make it very inconvenient to use mp3's. Kind of like how easy it is to open may formats in MSWORD, but very difficult to use anything other than .doc.

    The thing I'm interested in seeing is the wireless sharing. I don't think the average mp3 player consumer -wants- sharing, but I'd be very interested in them proving me wrong.

    What's even more interesting will be the first virus transferred from zune-to-zune.

    It's microsoft. It had to be said.

  • If they only renamed it the "Wii" it could be... (Score:5, Funny)

    by xxxJonBoyxxx (565205) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:52PM (#16107907)
    If they only renamed it the "Wii" it could be on Slashdot three times a day.

  • Song-sharing? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by msuzio (3104) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:53PM (#16107918) Homepage
    That is the stupidest feature I have ever heard of. Did they do any market research that led them to believe this was something people actually *wanted*? And that it worked the way they would want it to work?

    So let me get this straight... if I have a Zune... and my friend has a Zune...

    I can send them a track. Presuming the units sync up, and wireless works, and the phase of the moon is correct, because wireless is still basically tin-can-and-string at times... ...and he can listen to it for three days before it self-destructs?

    Lame. Useless. Unless my friend and I both decided to take a risk and go out and get one of these doohickies each, how would this situation ever come up? Even if you find another Zune owner, what are the chances he also shares you musical interests?

    • Re:Song-sharing? (Score:5, Funny)

      by Grishnakh (216268) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:09PM (#16108095)
      Even if you find another Zune owner, what are the chances he also shares you musical interests?

      That's simple. There's only 100 songs at any given time that you should have any interest in, and they're kept in a convenient list called the Billboard Top 100. If your music hasn't been on the Top 100, then you have no business listening to it.

      After all, if people were interested in totally different types of music, the record companies would have to spend too much money marketing and producing all these different groups and artists. So it's better now that we all just listen to the same music.

    • Re:Song-sharing? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by daniel422 (905483) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:13PM (#16108134) Journal
      Obviously you are no longer in high-school, or junior high, or even elementary school here in the US. The proliferation of iPods and portable music players among those who can't actually afford them themselves (but their parents bought them one) is staggering. So is the propensity to share music in these user groups -- something the iPod makes a tad more inconvenient than flaky wireless.
      While I can't personally say I'd use this feature much (since I'm long since out of school), it seems to make perfect sense for these types of groups to desire such a feature. I also could see sharing a new song occasionally with a friend so they could purchase it themselves if they wished (since song use is limited). All in all -- this seems more like a "demo song" feature intended to increase music sales (much like listening to samples of songs on the iTunes store, but you get to take them with you).
      You don't design a product assuming no one will buy it ("if I find another zune owner") -- you assume it will be a smashing success because of all the great features you've implemented.
      And really -- wireless in an open-air area, ad-hoc, works great -- like cell phones!;) You're using it to share a song with someone right in front of you! Your comments (generously modded "insightful") show a distinct lack thereof.

  • But does it support (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Rik Sweeney (471717) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:55PM (#16107943) Homepage
    Gapless playback?

    As of yesterday, it's a must have

  • Box art? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Rik Sweeney (471717) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:00PM (#16107997) Homepage
    If anyone is wondering what the box art will look like, here it is [google.com]

    • Re:Box art? (Score:4, Informative)

      by davron05 (778470) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:21PM (#16108219)
      This video also came to my mind and I was very suprised when I have seen how Zune's box will look like [betanews.com]. I thought "man, Microsoft finally learned something". The box looks very stylish to me.

  • Check out the second picture... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by wandazulu (265281) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:01PM (#16108013)
    ...the white model. The happy couple are frollicking in ... the east river of New York City. That's the Manhattan bridge in the background, and they're esentially right below and slightly west of the Brooklyn Bridge.

    I have walked/jogged/biked/fled from that area thousands of times and it is *not* anywhere you want to put your feet in the water...the water itself is unbelievably polluted, and unless the pic is doctored, or somebody spent a month cleaning up the area, the dude is walking on broken glass, rusted everything, and stuff that can't be identified, and maybe that's for the best.

    I'm not sure what to message to take from the pic: "Take a life threatening chance: buy a Zune!" comes to mind.

  • 3rd party improvements to follow: (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Apocalypse111 (597674) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:05PM (#16108058) Journal
    1st will likely be a means of sharing over wireless without the self-destruct "feature".
    Probably shortly to follow, either a firmware update that adds more codecs, or a software app that transcodes to whatever Windows format is being used for video on that platform.
    Next, a web-browser that can take you to various pages you have saved as favorites.
    Finally, complete Linux port.
    Any other good ideas?

  • Obligatory... (Score:5, Funny)

    by payndz (589033) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:09PM (#16108085)
    Wireless. More space than a Nomad. Lame.

  • "bullshots" (Score:3, Funny)

    by faust2097 (137829) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:09PM (#16108094) Homepage
    I find it amazing that, according to their press photos [microsoft.com], The Zune's 320 x 240 screen is so amazing that it can display what appears to be five times the number of pixels it actually has.

    Someone give those ClearType guys a raise!

  • Classical MS action... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kosmosik (654958) <.konrad. .at. .kosmosik.net.> on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:21PM (#16108214) Homepage
    Well the *photos* do look nice. But nobody have seen the device in wild so they can be as well 3DStudio renders. :) Typical for MS they announce something like it is real - Zune is unreal as for now. Where can I get one? Where can I read independent review of one? Etc. Etc. Etc.

    It does not even has branding on it. Just the look of it is not sufficient for branding - look of iPod is a brand itself, this looks like an iPod clone.

    Actually I am used to MS strategies like announcing LongHorn with all WinFS and great stuff that just yet still is not here. So I take this announcement like usual. I will think that this is anything worth looking at when I actually can touch one.

    Also I have some concerns, especially with:

    1. The interface. Those *three* photos look nice but they do not tell anything about how the device works? Is it easy to use? I've used MS PDA (PocketPC) and it was horrible. I am with Palm now which is somewhat less horrible - so I don't se MS mobile products as quite easy to use or reliable.

    2. Those ad-hoc wifi networks - how it is going to work? I've used MS PDA with wifi and it was pain. Actually wifi is quite painfull as for now (especially in MS arrangement). So how they are going to wifify those devices? IMHO wifi is not quite good for establishing such semi-PAN networks - BlueTooth is. But wifi - it is a hog on battery for sure.

    So conluding - this is not something real. These are few photos even without branding (forget specs, pricing, performance and so on). So it is nothing actually - just to say "hey wait (like few months... or years) and we will have something like iPod is right now!", "don't buy iPod right now - wait (like months... years) for our mythic device" etc.

    Quite unfair but at least in this market we know who rocks with launches that are real launches for real existing products and services...

  • Clarifying the "Plays For Sure" incompatability (Score:5, Interesting)

    by amichalo (132545) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:25PM (#16108253)
    Engadget recently interviewed an MS Corporate VP regarding the Zune and how Microsoft explains the lack of supporting "Plays For Sure". The resulting statements from this Microsoft Exec are truly worrisome:

    Full Article Here" [engadget.com]

    E: "PlaysForSure was the thrust of Microsoft's strategy until the announcement of the Zune. How does PlaysForSure fit into Microsoft's strategy going forward?"
    MS: "...There's another class of consumers that just want to get digital media, and they just want to be able to go to one store and have it all..."
    E: "Wasn't that the point of PlaysForSure?"
    MS: "...Zune says there is no choice; you get a Zune device, you hook it up to the Zune service, and it just works."

    Yikes! I thought the iPod was evil because Apple didn't give me a choice...now it seems no choice is just what the doctor ordered! How stupid does Microsoft think we are?

  • What makes this a product "launch"? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by timbck2 (233967) <<moc.liamg> <ta> <2kcbmit>> on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:28PM (#16108301) Homepage
    I can't buy one (not that I would if I could). I can't find anything but a presskit on Microsoft's website. There's no Zune website. There's no mention of pricing, nor when the things will be available.

    All I see here is a half-assed response to Apple's new iPod product launch a couple days ago.

    • Re:Let me be the first to say... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by rwven (663186) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:44PM (#16107809) Homepage
      Me...for one. I think it's pretty sweet.

      One thing that we're all still wondering is how will people control the thing? I haven't seen one explanation for how the center "wheel" (if that's what it is) works. I think we'd all like to see a screenshot of the menu/control systems...

      • Re:Let me be the first to say... (Score:4, Informative)

        by badasscat (563442) <basscadet75&yahoo,com> on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:51PM (#16107896) Homepage
        One thing that we're all still wondering is how will people control the thing? I haven't seen one explanation for how the center "wheel" (if that's what it is) works.

        I think it was confirmed a while back (via an FCC filing or something) that it's not actually a wheel, just four buttons arranged to look like a wheel. The clickwheel without the wheel part.

        Makes sense, as Apple does have a patent on the clickwheel design, and I was wondering how MS was going to get around it when I saw this. Simple enough; the wheel is not a wheel.

        • Re:Let me be the first to say... (Score:4, Insightful)

          by vought (160908) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:36PM (#16108374)
          Makes sense, as Apple does have a patent on the clickwheel design, and I was wondering how MS was going to get around it when I saw this. Simple enough; the wheel is not a wheel.

          You know what else Apple has? Something I haven't seen mentioned in the first 120 comments on this post?

          The Dock connector.

          Apple's trump card, the 30-pin dock connector and it's communications scheme is par of their defense against other players stealing marketshare.

          Want to plug your iPod into your new car? Next model year (which starts, ah in a few weeks), you'll be be able to buy a car from any of roughly 3/4 of the world's automakers that has a built-in iPod dock. The offerings this year aren't bad, either.

          I see the requisite oval connector shape on the Zune (since they just couldn't stop at copying Apple's buttons and wheel look), but it's unclear what kind of dock connector they're using. If Apple has an exclusive deal with AMP, you can pretty much write the Zune off (as well as for other reasons, like the "what were they thinking?" color choices of white, black...and brown).

          So, to sum up:
          Apple has convinced everyone and their brother to put a dock connector in cars, boomboxes, camera connectors, etc. ad infinitum.

          Zune does not have a dock connector, and can't use any iPod accessories, including those that come with a "Steering" wheel.

            • Re:Let me be the first to say... (Score:5, Insightful)

              by soft_guy (534437) on Thursday September 14 2006, @05:21PM (#16109313)
              Funny, if MS had that you'd be screaming anti-competitive practice...

              Give me a break. There is a huge difference between coming out with a proprietary technology that SOLVES A PROBLEM and being able to successfully promote it vs. calling OEMs on the phone and saying "Ship Netscape and Die".

    • I imagine lots of people care (Score:5, Insightful)

      by th3axe (690230) <gorrillas@gmail.com> on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:52PM (#16107911)
      It may not be earthshaking news, but there's a lot of people who care - every person who owns MS stock. Microsoft has to keep pursuing new markets and Zune, like it or not, is one of their plays to get into a new market and keep the money flowing. (Of course, if they insist on losing money like they are with Xbox, that story may change.)

      Microsoft's markets are largely saturated and under increasing pressure from FOSS and other products. And that's not a good story to tell investors. Microsoft hasn't had a killer product for a while and it's a company that thrives on growth. They need new brands badly because the ones they have are aging, and old brands, while good in financial and insurance markets, are not so good in consumer and high tech markets.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by iroll (717924)
      How can something that is functionally equivalent to an iPod be, in any way, the "next big thing?"

      And no, I don't consider zune's wireless sharing to be even the "next little thing." It's like trying to take on Kimberly Clark (maker of Kleenax) by selling your own brand of facial tissue. Sure, you can make money, you might even take some of their market share, but you will never be Kleenax. You have to find a new niche if you want to be the next big thing.

    • Re:is it enough? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by jmorris42 (1458) * <jmorrisNO@SPAMbeau.org> on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:01PM (#16108012) Homepage
      > Although it sounds good, do people hate microsoft so much (thanks to windows) that it will not be
      > a success compared to the more-respected apple?

      I'm still waiting for a portable player that meets my, admittedly demandinging, feature checklist. Doesn't look like Zune is in the running.

      1. Must be able to run Rockbox. No vendor, especially Microsoft, is going to release a perfected firmware first try or even tenth try, and will move on to the next product long before the bugs are squashed and certainly before I am ready to buy a new unit. At least with something like Rockbox I could fix a really annoying bug myself if all else failed.

      2. Must be able to support a wide range of codecs I am interested in and am able to rip to. MP3 is of course a given, but FLAC is important to me, especially on a HDD based player. OGG would be nice, but wouldn't be a deal breaker. I understand why many don't do it, nobody is doing it in a DSP yet so software only playback eats CPU and battery. AAC and WMA can exist, although I won't be using either of them. Video on a 2-3 inch screen is of zero interest for me, but if it doesn't bloat the physical size or kill battery life I'm neutral on it.

      3. Must have a user replacable battery. Period, full stop.

    • Re:is it enough? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by King_TJ (85913) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:15PM (#16108152) Homepage Journal
      Personally, I'd wait to see how it pans out before buying. First off, what kind of battery life is this going to have? With wi-fi and everything, I can't see how it'll be very good at all.

      Second, what about the accessories? Right now, my iPod can be fully controlled from my Pioneer car stereo through their interface (and it charges the iPod for you too). Think they'll offer the same for Zune players? What about all the other iPod-related devices that have cropped up like clock radios with iPod docks, voice recorder add-ons, and digital camera storage adapters?

      • This ought to be good! (Score:5, Funny)

        by NDPTAL85 (260093) on Thursday September 14 2006, @02:49PM (#16107868)
        Alright you simply have to explain this one.

        You'd rather give money to Microsoft over Apple.

        All of Slashdot is pulling up a chair, make it a good one!

        • Re:This ought to be good! (Score:4, Insightful)

          by rizzo420 (136707) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:02PM (#16108023) Homepage Journal
          the zune supports more file types than the ipod. 'nuff said.

          • Not enough for me (Score:5, Insightful)

            by amichalo (132545) on Thursday September 14 2006, @04:05PM (#16108679)
            Supporting more file types is irrelevant to me. I want it to support THE FILE TYPES I USE.

            I don't have any WMA media. I do have iTunes Fairplay media. It doesn't support that.

            Further, all these "Features" are typical MS lies - the file sharing won't work with all media, It may have a screen that is 0.5" larger but will it play movie content? Are you sure?

            It doesn't even support MICROSOFT'S VERY OWN "PLAYS FOR SURE" DRM!!!!

            • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

              by tb3 (313150)
              You certainly won't! Especially if you buy a brown one!
              (Good manners prevents me from describing what you will look like.)
            • Bigger screen, with the same resolution, and available in shiny turd brown! WOO! I'll take two!

                  • perfect for the brown sound (Score:5, Funny)

                    by snuf23 (182335) on Thursday September 14 2006, @04:18PM (#16108787)
                    That's not the only color it's available but personally I applaud MS for releasing turd brown as an option. Now if they do a special "Ween Edition" turd brown - it'll be the perfect player to enjoy the brown sound on, especially if it has "Poop Ship Destroyer" engraved on it.

              • Re:This ought to be good! (Score:5, Insightful)

                by shinma (106792) on Thursday September 14 2006, @04:45PM (#16109033) Homepage
                I've never met anyone who thought that owning an iPod made them different, or bragged about their uniqueness because they had an iPod.

                I'd rather choose [insert object here] based on how well it performs the functions I require than whether or not "everyone else has one."

                It amazes me how image conscious geeks can be. A large subsection of geek culture will go to such extreme lengths just so that they can brag that they don't fit in. And then they complain because nobody understands them...

                It's ridiculous.

                • Re:This ought to be good! (Score:4, Insightful)

                  by rizzo420 (136707) on Thursday September 14 2006, @04:40PM (#16108989) Homepage Journal
                  just how old are you? i bet i'm not far behind.

                  i know a lot of people who bought the ipod solely because it's apple and apple is cool and if you say otherwise, you're (as you said), an idiot.

                  the zune has more features than the ipod already built into it. it's not the same thing everyone else has. it supports more formats than the ipod. it (according to a review i read last week) has a more intuitive interface than the ipod. sounds to me like the apple fanboys are just whining that microsoft did something right.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by sith (15384)
      It's not widescreen. It's the exact same resolution as the iPod with video - 4:3, QVGA (320x240). They've just turned the screen sideways and made it 3" diag instead of 2.5".

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by varmittang (849469)
      Not to bust your bubble, but all MS has done is just regurgitated an portable player. The bigger screen is nice but it will also eat up your battery life too. Apple might have only given a little bit better screen with brightness and higher resolution, but at least they gave a much better battery life, both devices have yet to be tested in that area yet but we don't even know what the Zune can do yet.

      Ad-hoc wireless sounds nice, but I'm sure its going to have a major bug that everyone is going to exploi

    • Re:what about sharing your own stuff? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by iroll (717924) on Thursday September 14 2006, @03:12PM (#16108119)
      I've got $20 that says only protected, purchased WMV's (or w/e they're called) will share. It's just a brazen way to drive people to purchase from the Zune store; they have no interest in sharing everything. Of course, they'll tell you that they only allow that kind of sharing to keep from "confusing" customers with shared files that can't be purchased. Thanks for the assistance, MS.

      They've already hinted at it, saying that only "certain" files can be shared.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.