Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

The Cult of Kindle

Posted by Zonk on Fri Dec 07, 2007 09:38 AM
from the they-sound-like-gamers dept.
DaMan writes "ZDNet's Hardware 2.0 blog is pondering the Kindle this week. There have been many attempts at an ebook reader in the past; why does Amazon think it can do any better? Given the high cost and DRM issues, will cachet be enough to win them financial success? Will the 'Cult of Kindle' help guarantee Amazon's success in the ebook reader market? 'A group of people willing to give it a five star rating just because someone else didn't, willing to back up every design, engineering and marketing decision that Amazon made, willing to defend the Kindle with their last dying breath. The Kindle doesn't cost money, it saves money. That 0.75 second flash as the pages turn isn't a downside because it gives you an opportunity to take in the previous page. It doesn't harm your eyes, in fact, it fixes them. Ergonomic issues that other reviewers have bought up are dismissed by the Cult of Kindle as flaws with the reviewer, not the device. The Kindle is perfect, and the Kindle 2.0 will be a little more perfect.'"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Amazon's Ebook The Future of Reading? 354 comments
theodp writes "With a seven-page cover story on The Future of Reading, Newsweek confirms all those rumors of Amazon's imminent introduction an affordable ebook. Kindle, which is named to evoke the crackling ignition of knowledge, has the dimensions of a paperback, weighs 10.3 oz., and uses E Ink technology on a 6-inch screen powered by a battery that gets up to 30 hours from a 2-hour charge. Kindle's real breakthrough is its EVDO-like wireless connectivity, which allows it to work anywhere, not just at Wi-Fi hotspots. More than 88,000 titles will be on sale at the Kindle store at launch, with NYT best sellers priced at $9.99."
[+] Apple: Kindle Versus The iPhone 376 comments
Bernie Campbell writes "Forbes takes a look at the recently announced Kindle ebook from Amazon, and considers the possibility that Apple may have beaten them to the punch. 'Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs has a not-so-secret weapon when it comes time to load up the iPhone with content: Google ... Google's Book Search project has already pumped much of the world's printed matter into Google's servers. Downloads of classic titles, such as Bleak House, can already be had for free. Mix Apple's iTunes content distribution smarts with Google's vast storehouse of content, and you'll have an instant competitor to Kindle -- one with a touch interface and the ability to play movies and music, too.'
[+] Hardware: Amazon's Kindle Sells Out In 5.5 Hours 417 comments
necro81 writes "As reported on Engadget, Amazon's Kindle e-book reader has sold out. Charlie Rose's interview with Jeff Bezos reveals that the Kindle sold out within just 5-1/2 hours of going on sale. Amazon hasn't revealed how many it had in stock at launch, so it may just be that they didn't anticipate early demand. A check of the Kindle's product page shows that more will be rolling out starting December 3rd." Wired also has a brief head-to-head of the more prominent ebook readers and PCWorld has a review of the new gadget from Amazon.
[+] Entertainment: Hands-On With The Kindle 365 comments
Amazon's Kindle e-book may have sold out in record time, but there's still a lot of discussion about the device's merits. Neil Gaiman likes it well enough, but it's sent Robert Scoble into a fit of apoplectic rage. For a real, meaty, hands-on look at the way the device operates in everyday life, Gamers With Jobs writer Julian Murdoch has a slice of life with the Kindle. He takes us through his Thanksgiving holiday weekend with the device, noting the quirks (good and bad) that cropped up with Amazon's new toy. "Short of reading in the tub, the Kindle is easier to read in more places, positions, and situations than a physical book ... But it's far from perfect. It is expensive. The cover, which I find completely necessary, is in desperate need of more secure attachment (Velcro works great). The book selection is less-than-perfect, although I imagine this will improve with every passing day. And Amazon needs marketing help. The Kindle's launch reeked of 'get it out fast.' The big-picture marketing efforts (like video demonstrations and blurbs from authors) were great, but simple things like communicating how freakin' easy it is to get non-Amazon content on to the device, for free, remain horribly misunderstood."
Submission: The Cult of Kindle by Anonymous Coward
[+] Ask Slashdot: Which eBook Reader is the Best? 469 comments
Mistress.Erin writes "I cannot decide between Amazon's Kindle and Sony's Reader. I've read some reviews, but their motives can be somewhat suspect. So, I come to the most tech savvy group around to ask: which eBook reader is the best? If not Kindle or Reader, then what?" We've discussed this question before, but things have changed a bit since 2005.
[+] Linux: Source Claims 240K Kindles Sold 176 comments
Naturalist writes "Exact data on (the Linux-powered) Kindle sales figures have been hard to come by. Amazon is notoriously tight-lipped about it, and although CEO Jeff Bezos did give some Kindle-related information back in July, the company has yet to break out how many readers it has sold to date. Now TechCrunch claims to have spoken to a source close to Amazon with direct knowledge of the company's sales figures. According to this unnamed source, Amazon has sold 240,000 Kindles to date, for an estimated hardware revenue between $86 million and $96 million; media sales would push the total above $100M." We've been following the Kindle since its launch nine months ago.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Petronius.Scribe (1020097) on Friday December 07 2007, @09:41AM (#21611963) Homepage
    I didn't realise the Kindle was made by Apple.
  • by confu2000 (245635) on Friday December 07 2007, @09:42AM (#21611971)
    Almost every product has them. I think even the Zune has two.

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      Fanboys is one thing .. but it sure didn't take long for someone to label them a "cult". I personally was very excited about the device until I learned about its DRM and behavior-watching aspects. That is enough to make me warn people away from the device.

      I think the best thing for the ebook industry would be for Apple to release a tablet-style device for this purpose. DRM would be tolerable (and fully circumventable), the device's design would be much more elegant and practical, and it would operate much

      • Sony isn't any better than the rest when it comes to DRM/keep the customer tight/buy, it's all we care.

        Of course I have no GSM in the reader, but I don't need it, do I ?

        and you have a plethora of tools working under linux to make your books and mangas compatible.

        300US $. and then you take the books wherever you want, even on Sony's book library (bastards offer you "free" books from their "classical collection", everything you can get for free on Gutemberg...).

        So, Kindle was a miss for me. I don't need a gad
        • by PopeRatzo (965947) * on Friday December 07 2007, @10:54AM (#21613001) Homepage Journal

          (btw, if you have way more money than me, have a look at Irex second iteration of their epaper. A4 format, tablet functions, wifi..700 or 800 US$)
          I bought an iLiad with some unexpected income. It's the most wonderful device, and if iRex can survive the almost certain efforts of Apple or Sony to "acquire" the company, I can see this being one of the most popular bits of personal technology. I'm hoping that future versions have some slightly more advanced editing ability, which would make marking up manuscripts a breeze.

          If you haven't seen this baby [wikipedia.org] you really should take a look, and be sure to click through to some of the photographs of it with the link at the bottom.

          I absolutely will not, under any circumstances, willingly purchase a device that uses DRM or locks me into using one vendor to buy books the way Amazon's Kindle does. Not when it's so easy to make a device that does what I want it to do instead of what the vendor wants to be done to me.
          • Sounds like Amazon (and proprietary/DRM-enforcing reader makers) are saying "Read it and WEEP"...
        • by hansonc (127888) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:52AM (#21612967) Homepage
          Guess what, books don't have backlights either. Unless you've actually seen the e-ink technology it's hard to understand but a backlight would suck on a device like this. Stop in a Borders bookstore sometime, I've seen the Sony e-reader on display at a few of them and it will show you that it doesn't make sense to add a backlight to the product.

          Battery life with a backlight is a whole different issue.

          That being said, as much as it pains me to say I'd rather by the Sony e-reader than the Kindle. Somehow it just seems less restrictive.... who would have thought Sony would get it more right than Amazon.com?
        • > To me, the inability to function as a printer and the utter incompetence on displaying PDFs renders both the Kindle
          > and Sony's offerings more or less useless.

          Two factors prevent this in the current generation. The e-ink screens are SLOW. Not lcd slow, but hundreds of milliseconds slow. Panning and scrolling around a PDF would be a nightmare and the current generation is orders of magnitude to low in both the resolution and size departments to present an 8.5x11" page in a readable form.

          Then there
    • by JohnBailey (1092697) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:20AM (#21612469)

      Almost every product has them. I think even the Zune has two.
      There was.... right up to the "incident" The poor guy got two zunes and squirted himself to death.
  • by explosivejared (1186049) <.hagan.jared. .at. .gmail.com.> on Friday December 07 2007, @09:45AM (#21612001)
    Pass on this one. This is about the worst article trolling I've seen. All it does is attack a particular set of supporters of the project. It is designed purely to incite flamage. It's disgusting. Zonk please think before approving this crap. The article doesn't want to start a debate at all. It's already made all the conclusions in an extremely prejudiced manner. I'm sure there are supporters of the kindle for legit reasons, and if I was one of them I would be horribly offended!

    Disclaimer: I've never used the product in question or even amazon.com for that matter. This was just a particular revolting piece of garbage.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I'm sure there are supporters of the kindle for legit reasons
      Well, the author points out the reasons given by those supporters, and then points out that they ignore the reasons why e-book readers have invariably failed before. He's not saying "Kindle suxxor," he's saying "This will never sell, especially for $400 bucks." How, exactly, is that flamage?
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      No, I don't think this is flamebait. It's more like an useless anti-fanboyism pointless and sour rant. It does not bring anything new, it just states what tests said and that strangely, ZOMG people can be satisfied by an imperfect product and not wait for the next vaporware E-Reader.
    • by Lord Ender (156273) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:38AM (#21612733) Homepage
      I've always has the impression that slashdot posts stupid articles on hot topics because it is a little more subtle than saying "Kindle: Discuss."

      Slashdot is a discussion site, not a news site, if you haven't realized yet.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Disclaimer - I bought a Kindle. Actually, it's sitting right next to me while I download or convert some books from http://manybooks.net./ [manybooks.net.]

      I do a lot of traveling and invariably end up taking a paperback and hardback with me and have been looking at readers for some time. I was getting close to buying the Sony 505, and then read up on the Kindle. *For me*, it fits my needs.

      Is there great stuff about the Kindle? Yeah! is there mediocre to bad stuff ($400 price)? Sure thing. But in the creature comfort/benefit
  • Alright, Amazon, I'm only going to tell you this one more time. People who don't like books aren't going to come around if you put them on a screen. People who like books like, well, BOOKS. And as the reviewer points out, $400 is a load of money for what is essentially a blank, fragile, battery-powered book.
    • by poot_rootbeer (188613) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:00AM (#21612223)
      And as the reviewer points out, $400 is a load of money for what is essentially a blank, fragile, battery-powered book.

      To be fair, it's also a cell phone that you can't make or receive calls with.

      I wonder how much more affordable the Kindle could have been if they had cut the EV-DO radio and network stack from the hardware design, and didn't have to incorporate the cost of a lifetime service agreement with Sprint into the price of the unit?

      People don't seem to have any problem plugging their MP3 players into a USB port every once in a while to synchronize new content; so who decided that it customers would not tolerate doing the same thing with an e-Book reader?

      • by mabhatter654 (561290) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:37AM (#21612721)
        it fixes the end-to-end DRM problem. The device is completely locked.. but you don't have to put soul-stealing DRM on your PC desktop and beg permission every time you update either. You can buy a new book from anywhere, so they turned lock-down into a feature. I could see this being a method for delivering content like magazines and newspapers because of the push ability, that could save some publishers.

        What people REALLY want is something e-paper about 13x19 tabloid size at 300dpi & reflective that can roll up. Better yet, have 2-3 that network to share a books on different pages. The current e-books are too small to be useful for anything other than reading sitting down.. like a book, and don't have things like tabs to mark sections of multiple open books. For most "geeks" to use this instead of books (like say O'Reilly material) you'd need to have 6-10 books open and 5 places bookmarked in each with both pages visible and stacked so you can quickly switch between them... just like a stack of real book when working on a project. It also needs to be the 13x19 because without that it eliminates using it for any kind of blueprint/charting work (another thing people would pay big $$ for)
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        The Device Software will provide Amazon with data about your Device and its interaction with the Service (such as available memory, up-time, log files and signal strength) and information related to the content on your Device and your use of it (such as automatic bookmarking of the last page read and content deletions from the Device). Annotations, bookmarks, notes, highlights, or similar markings you make in your Device are backed up through the Service.

        That's what really disturbs me about the always-on
    • by Bill, Shooter of Bul (629286) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:23AM (#21612499) Journal
      Darn right, its like I've been telling the upstart RCA: People who don't like radio aren't going to come around if you put it on a screen. People who like radio like RADIOS.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        Darn right, its like I've been telling the upstart RCA: People who don't like radio aren't going to come around if you put it on a screen.

        That attempt at sarcasm would be funny, except that people never did come around to radio on the TV. TV developed its own content while radio maintained its dominance of music until the CD era. You lose more funny points by failing to note that radio is still a major form of portable music for most people, and for the same reasons that books are still the dominant for

        • Extra points for you for recognizing it was partially joking, but I'm going to have to dock you points for not understanding that the early tv stars started off on radio. There were Radio serials that people used to sit around and listen to. Once Tv's were invented all most all of that content moved to tv leaving only music and a few news talk shows on radio.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Although, if an affordable reader came out that could read normal PDFs, text files (ie, Project Gutenberg stuff), and web pages, with a reasonably-sized screen, then I would be interested. I don't know if the Kindle does this, but it does not fit my definition of "affordable". Maybe in a few years when google comes out with a similar g-something.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Honestly, I don't buy that.

      Many people I know (including myself) who love books and want to love an ebook reader. Some day an ebook reader will succeed. We just haven't had one with all of the right features yet.

      I don't think $400 is too outrageous, but $200 would be better. The wireless features are a huge step in the right direction... But they still need to work on contrast, page turning speed, size, style, battery life (for an ebook reader this better be measured in "years". As an integer >= 1), capa
  • The Kindle is perfect, and the Kindle 2.0 will be a little more perfect.

    Amazon has been watching the iPod and iPhone phenomena, and it wants the same thing. What company wouldn't? Whatever you say about Apple, they know how to make stuff sell.

    The quote above is exactly the fanboi-ism that Amazon is looking for: "This gadget has absolutely no flaws, except for whatever Amazon deems are flaws, and then we will curse those flaws after the fact."

    • by Sunburnt (890890) on Friday December 07 2007, @09:53AM (#21612109)

      Amazon has been watching the iPod and iPhone phenomena, and it wants the same thing.
      Then they're missing the point. Lots of folks like Apple because they're like a fashion brand - they have a well-cultivated media image based on unique design, appeals to hipness, and high prices. (No, I'm not saying that's all they have going for them. Hold your fire.) Amazon has a reputation for discount books and Super Saver Shipping. I don't see how they hope to translate that into getting suckers to part with $400 for a fragile and empty book.
  • What about PDAs? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by stompertje (927012) on Friday December 07 2007, @09:49AM (#21612049)
    I don't really get the whole ereader thing; sure the Iliad looks nice, but my Palm TX works perfectly. I have 4 ebook applications on it and combined with FontSmoother it looks great. I always have it with me (because it contains my calendar) and it plays MP3's at the same time. Why would I want to spend twice that money on a dedicated reader?
    • My thoughts exactly, why have a mobile phone, eReader, MP3 player, ... Just so you can carry all of it around with you? Personally I prefer just 1 device that can ahndle all these functions!
    • Why would Amazon want me to spend twice that money on a dedicated reader?
      There, I fixed your question so that the answer becomes more obvious - they just assume you're a fool with too much disposable income.
    • the screen on these things are literally twice as big as the the average PDA. I have tried reading PDF's on PDA's. It is a pain, I just can't get comfortable in a chair trying to read more than the simplest of documents.

      I don't need the high res, the black and white eink displays are easy on the eyes. Try reading an entire novel on your PDA. The battery won't last through the entire book yet it will with one of these.

      The kindle though is fugly. It looks like MSFt designed it. Illiad isn't bad but way t
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Try reading an entire novel on your PDA. The battery won't last through the entire book yet it will with one of these.

        Ever since I got my Palm Zire (Im on my second now), my "books read per year" has improved greatly.

        Grant you, the small screen and 320x320 resolution takes time to get used to, but I can read almost any format (some need converting, but that's quite easy), but its cheaper than the Kindle and I can read any book I want, not only those that Amazon wants to sell me at a paperback price.

    • Re:What about PDAs? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by bahwi (43111) <incoming@josephguhlin. c o m> on Friday December 07 2007, @10:25AM (#21612525) Homepage
      Heavy backlights like PDAs and cell phones hurt a lot of people's eyes. The e-readers don't have that problem, (if it's the e-paper stuff) and has to be illuminated by a traditional light, like a book. I had a sony e-reader once and it was great, except the USB did not work. Sony suggested I unplug all my USB peripherals and only plug in the e-reader to make it work, which doesn't work when the mouse and keyboard are both USB. But it had problems, and hopefully everything will be fixed at some point and support will be improved.
    • Re:What about PDAs? (Score:4, Interesting)

      by ColdWetDog (752185) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:56AM (#21613031) Homepage

      Why would I want to spend twice that money on a dedicated reader?

      Because the TX has a weeny little screen and some of us are old enough not to want to stare at weeny little screens for hours on end. Sure, I've read books on my Palm (a TX in fact), but it's not my Reader of Choice (which is, in fact, a paper book).

      I'm not particularly interested in doing anything with a Kindle other than disassembling it, but a decent E-reader just has to appear Real Soon Now (TM).

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I don't really get the whole ereader thing; sure the Iliad looks nice, but my Palm TX works perfectly.

      Gah! Why does this have to come up every single time?!?!? It's very simple: Different people like different stuff! OK?

      I've toyed with reading ebooks for over a decade--with my old Palm, with an Axim (with a gorgeous 640x480--200 DPI!!!--screen), and with my iPhone. None of them are any good for me. (Key words there--for me.) They don't show enough text at once and I just can't read it comfortably: I'm eit
  • No PDF support, less features than an iLiad. Lame.
      • by xtracto (837672) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:30AM (#21612597) Journal
        The price I've seen is 700USD and for that price I can buy a cheap laptop that is way more expandable.

        If you think this, then it is clear that this technology is not for you. I read a lot of this in slashdot but what people fail to see is that there is a specific market for this kind of devices. Specially for the ones that allow making some kind of notes.

        As an example, both of my parents are biologists (they go to field trips to that strange place called "the nature" quite often). They sometimes stay camping when doing field trips which are usually done to catalogue species and the like. One of the main problems in those trips is that students may have to take their field guides (which are supposed to be special editions for field work but, are akin to our "SQL pocket edition " manuals, with lots and lots of pages). The problem is that sometimes they have to take two or three guides with them making it really painful to pack 5 Kgs of books...

        Now, they usually can not take a laptop because trips last for a lot of time, and they need access to the books quite often. Hence, a laptop which battery lasts for 4 hours at *most* wont be useful. However a device which lasts 15 hours or more will be very very useful.

        That is why, when I showed my parents and my flatmate (who is a zoologist) the OLPC, they got fascinated as it really solves quite a lot of problems for them. Specially, my flatmate goes into the Selva Lacandona and stays there camping and examining animals for weeks. A computer which can be powered by turning a crank and which power lasts longer (they do not need fancy graphics, even black and white is great) will be the perfect sollution.

        The problem is that from our closed computer cube world, this kind of devices only make sense as gizmos. But there *are* several uses for this technology.
  • by Radon360 (951529) on Friday December 07 2007, @09:54AM (#21612133)

    Ergonomic issues that other reviewers have bought up are dismissed by the Cult of Kindle as flaws with the reviewer, not the device.

    Attention reviewers buying ergonomic issues, I have a wonderful wholesale offer you can't refuse...

  • Paper Rules (Score:5, Insightful)

    by tjstork (137384) <tbandrowsky@might y w a re.com> on Friday December 07 2007, @09:56AM (#21612157) Homepage Journal
    Amazon has a problem in that, books are a "traditional" thing. Most of the books that Amazon sells are for personal enrichment and entertainment. I mean, there's more to a book than its content. Sure, if we're working and doing techy stuff, Google is good for finding things, but, if you want to just relax and unplug, a book is a beautiful thing. You hold in your hand a tradition of printing that goes back hundreds of years, of writing that goes back thousands. There's a whole literary culture floating out there, waiting for you to join it. For a brief time, when you do read a book, you do.

    Yes, you could argue, that an e-book could hold 10 million books. But, what of it? A book by itself is something that holds more than enough for you to read for a few hours, and you get the smell and feel of the paper, the binding, the immediacy, history and intimacy. An e-book is just another plastic appliance, lacking in craft.
    • by Sunburnt (890890) on Friday December 07 2007, @09:58AM (#21612195)
      Plus, if the fascists take over, a mass e-book deletion is somewhat lacking as a visual symbol.
      • by tjstork (137384) <tbandrowsky@might y w a re.com> on Friday December 07 2007, @10:47AM (#21612875) Homepage Journal
        One of these days mankind is going to have to forgo the luxury of killing trees because they smell nice. Why not today

        Trees are evil. They are always taller than we are, which means, they always look down on us. They hard and practically unbending, meaning they are inflexible.

        They stand before humanity, and mock them, continually. And yet, you support these things?

        I enjoy chopping down trees. The mighty axe puts any in its place, and I enjoy wood furniture and flooring as a symbol of my domination over nature.

  • I don't know about you, but I think the writer sounds a little bitter. Someone should buy him a Kindle to cheer him up.
  • Now the ePaper thing is cool admittedly. The DRM is as cool as chilli peppers in Hades...

    But does anyone else think that the Kindle looks like an all white speak-and-spell? It really looks like a cheap 90's designed kids toy to me. And not in a retro way -- in a Made-in-Taiwan kind of way.
  • Prediction (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Mr_Silver (213637) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:04AM (#21612253)

    All eBook readers will come with heavy and draconian DRM (as mandated by the book agency) until one vendor (also with heavy and draconian DRM) significantly corners the market through a beautifully easy to use device, tied in store and large volume of works.

    This one company won't licence their DRM to anyone else and uses their huge market presence to force book publishers to accept the price points and the restrictions they want.

    Given that the only way to get books out to everyone with that reader and avoid partnering with the one big company, publishers will find themselves having to accept that they're going to have to start looking at DRM free books.

    Sound familiar?

    (All I can say is thank god for Apple not licensing their DRM. If they'd done a Microsoft and licensed it to everyone who asked, music publishers would never ever have been contemplating DRM free media)

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2007, @10:18AM (#21612449)
    I do not own it, but I was able to borrow it for 48 hours.

    In reading other reviews, I think most of the reviews I have read are talking about the "eBook" concept in general. That, to me, is separate from a review of the Kindle. I have no idea of "eBooks" will catch on, or if people will generally like them. If you like the idea of an eBook, I thought the Kindle implemented the eBook concept quite nicely.

    I thought the platform was very nice. This is not a laptop, it is a book. And, for reading books, I thought it did a great job. I liked the the form factor for reading. It was comfortable to hold and comfortable for reading. I really liked the ability to "impulse buy" books. I only downloaded samples (as it wasn't my Kindle or Amazon account), but it was fast and enjoyable. I also liked the ability to change the font size. It allowed me to place the Kindle in a position that was comfortable on my arms and comfortable for my eyes. I really can't say I cared if it did PDF natively or not. I read PDF's on my laptop. I'm not sure why this has become some huge deal. I didn't feel Kindle was trying to replace all things paper.
  • by RichardKaufmann (204326) on Friday December 07 2007, @10:56AM (#21613025)
    I was given a Sony E-reader recently as part of an airline promotion. I was as skeptical as most in this thread about their utility, etc., but have become a bit of a convert:

    1. On vacation they're absolutely brilliant. I was out of the country for two weeks. The reader plus charger took almost no space, especially compared to the space ten or eleven books would have taken. I had my notebook with me as well, and was able to buy additional books -- which let me keep going on a series I particularly liked.

    2. The slow page refresh isn't terrible, and I gather the Kindle is faster than the Sony.

    3. I like the feel of the Sony reader. I suspect the Kindle is clunkier, but I defer to Pogue in the NYTimes who said it was fine. The screen works well in open daylight, and I quickly enough was able to ignore the medium and get into the content.

    4. It looks like Amazon is given customers a price break on e-books. Sony charges as much as a paper book.

    Bottom line: they're more useful than would appear to a non-user -- especially during travel.

    And to the cult thing: I suspect like most people, I am not particularly loyal to any online store. I am willing to pay *slightly* higher prices to Amazon for both the convenience and their excellent handling of (very rare) problems.
  • Why I got a Kindle (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 07 2007, @11:03AM (#21613139)
    I just got a Kindle, but I feel like both sides of the debate are being unreasonable. First, probably the reason that most people who buy the Kindle give it very good reviews is that they researched the issues with the Kindle beforehand and decided that those flaws didn't matter to them (I know I did, before I paid my $400). Those who give it horrible reviews decided the flaws made it not worth it to them. (I also suspect people are inflating their good reviews to compensate for all the 1-star reviews by the Kindle-haters).

    Now, why did I get the Kindle?

    First of all, the argument that book-readers like physical books isn't always true. I read a lot of law books (big, heavy, unwieldy things that are miserable to handle). I need to read the content. I hate the physical book. I have to lug several around with me when I travel (my backpack is fantastically heavy) and I can't read them in bed without wearing out my arms after a few minutes. The Kindle solves all of these problems. This applies not just to law books, though. Even moderately heavy hard-backed books are difficult to read in bed for long durations.

    As to the Kindle vs. other devices, I keep seeing people claiming that their iPhone is sufficient. Maybe they don't get eyestrain reading backlit lcds, but I do. The e-Paper is much easier on the eyes. It's not QUITE at the level of printed books (and you have to be a little forgiving of the typography--the Kindle doesn't seem to have a hyphenation dictionary), but I can read it for long durations without going blind.

    Finally, the biggest attraction for the Kindle is that it has the books I want or need to read. Amazon has law books (at least some, and hopefully more will be coming soon). They also have novels, etc. that I want to read. I looked into other e-books in the past and the major reason I didn't get them (even if their specs are better on paper) is because they don't have the content I want or need. The Kindle (mostly) does.

    As for the other issues, I would like PDF ability, but from what I understand there is no ebook reader that handles PDFs really well, and you CAN convert PDFs to Kindle's format if you need, though it is a hassle. The Kindle's web browser is decent, and makes a nice backup when I'm not around a WiFi spot, but there is Sprint service (and it's free). I also don't care about the looks of the Kindle (it actually looks better in person, I think, but even if it didn't, I want it for its function, not its form).

    Sure, the Kindle isn't for everyone. If you read mostly paperback novels, one at a time, the Kindle isn't for you. If you read enormous, unwieldy books that you have to lug across the country when you go home for Christmas vacation so that you don't fail your exams, the Kindle is wonderful. Same if you don't travel, but just like to read big, bulky books without having to sit up. Anyway, yes, there are legitimate reasons for the Kindle.
  • by FellowConspirator (882908) on Friday December 07 2007, @11:18AM (#21613403)
    The Sony Reader, is a better device for display, form-factor, battery life, format support (like PDF) and ergonomics, but lacks the cellular component. The Kindle is chunky, lots of buttons, smaller screen, etc. I wouldn't by either though since they are still fairly costly and both have crappy software (some of which is necessary to operate it, but still buggy).

    The next version of the Sony Reader has the possibility to be great, but Sony will complicate it rather than refine it and won't come up with a reasonable DRM scheme (which, iTunes, despite it's wrinkles, is perhaps the most palatable today).
    • by MBCook (132727) <foobarsoft@foobarsoft.com> on Friday December 07 2007, @10:03AM (#21612241) Homepage
      1. Not perfect, but they can be converted
      2. Do you try to do this much? I don't, so it wouldn't be a problem for me
      3. Browsing is complex and not designed for a device like this. They are giving you a reference, not a crippled browser
      4. OK, but it has CDMA access, which works fine when you aren't near a WiFi access point, or even if you are near one.
      5. But it looks better than an equivelent LCD

      Wrong. [everymac.com]. That newton was 480x320. The screen was physically smaller. It didn't have nearly as much contrast. The battery life isn't the same (the Kindle is measured in page turns, it will hold a page image practically forever). Newtons were great (I had one), but don't kid yourself. They aren't equivalent.

      The Kindle is interesting. The keyboard is ugly. The screen refresh time still seems like a problem for me (although I know it is a problem with all E-Ink stuff now). I think the Sony device looks much better. Still, these are quire an advance. My brother has one of those RocketReaders (or whatever) from ~2000 that is thicker than my MacBook Pro, heavy, ugly, and has a LCD screen about as nice as the Newton.

    • by w3woody (44457) on Friday December 07 2007, @12:49PM (#21614693) Homepage
      I have both the Sony Reader and the Amazon Kindle.

      1. The Sony Reader displays PDFs natively. The small screen makes this nearly useless except for especially formatted PDFs. PDFs can be converted for the Amazon Kindle and the results are generally not all that bad, except for complex formatted PDFs. (But most PDFs are formatted as 8 1/2x11 inch paper; to read that properly you'd need a 14" diagonal screen--and instead of a handheld device the size of a small book, you'd need something the size of a laptop.

      And guess what? A cheap laptop fits that bill perfectly.

      2. The Amazon Kindle in fact does allow you to annotate a page. Select the line using the menu scroll wheel, then select "Add Note". You can then enter a note that then stays associated with the line. On the main page a small 'note' icon shows up on the page. You can also browse your notes by selecting "Menu" at the bottom of the page, then select "My Notes & Marks"; this shows a list of all the notes that you've taken. Selecting the note allows you to go directly to the page where the note was set; you can then read your note. (The Sony Reader doesn't allow you to do this because it has no keyboard.) Both devices allow you to bookmark a page.

      3. You can browse web pages; use the menu wheel to select the line where the link is on, then select the line. A pop-up menu will then show a list of the links on that line, as well as give you the option to look up the meaning of any of the words on that line. Not exactly as elegant as using a pen or mouse input device to click on the line, but it does work.

      4. Sprint EVDO is more than fast enough and has wider coverage than a hodge-podge of WiFi hotspots. The price to surf using the Sprint cell network is built into the device--meaning that it is effectively "free."

      5. The resolution is 600x800x2bits/pixel, for 4 levels of gray, which is the current limitation of e-Paper. What makes e-Paper cool is that in direct sunlight or in a bright room, the e-Paper is extremely easy to ready. The downside is that it is unusable without a nightlight in the dark, and it is much lower resolution (and has no color resolution) compared to LCD.

      The Newton (which I also had) had a smaller screen, shorter battery life, did not have the ability to surf the 'net and had no content.

      (As a footnote, this is the thing that fascinates me about Slashdot: if a post sounds informative, it gets marked informative--even if the content was clearly pulled out of the poster's ass...)