Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Gen Y Hits the Library the Most -- But Not For Books

Posted by timothy on Tue Jan 01, 2008 04:27 AM
from the checking-out-cuties dept.
Lucas123 writes "More than half of all Americans visited a library this past year and, of those, most were from Generation Y, the tech-loving young adults aged 18-30 years, according to a recent survey. The reason most cited for visiting their local public archive? Not books. Most were seeking gaming software programs, characters in the Second Life virtual world and online help with homework."
Another way to think about the results: about 47 percent of Americans didn't visit a library even once last year.
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Strange Ranger (454494) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @04:32AM (#21873066)
    Finding an attractive girl with a brain in her head was always a top reason for visiting the library.
    • by pembo13 (770295) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @04:38AM (#21873090) Homepage
      How did that work out for you Mr. posting on Slashdot at odd times of day.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Fair enough. Interestingly, I met my wife when I was working at the library (computer hotline), and had to take the library time sheet over to Computing Services in another building. So, I didn't meet her in the library, but I did meet her because I was working in the library. We're still together 12 years later.

      As for going to the library to use the computers... I was doing that over 20 years ago! Who knew I'd be one of the trendsetters.

      (Their Apple ][e kicked my TI-99/4A's arse. I still have tho

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      How do you handle the approach though? Indeed, most of the time, she will be busy reading, doing homework or browsing the shelves.

      To stay on topic though, the University of Leeds was the last place where I spent a lot of time at the library (Peopleware, Code Complete, The Limits to Growth [2nd ed], The World at the End of Time...). That was in 2000. I've been ordering books from Amazon ever since, since the books I now read cannot usually be found in local libraries or bookstores (I live in France/Switzerla
  • That would be me (Score:5, Insightful)

    by enjo13 (444114) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @04:33AM (#21873070) Homepage
    I didn't visit the library one single time in 2007.. and the same goes for 2006. Hell I haven't stepped foot in a library since college.

    I guess I'm a knuckle dragging idiot. Or, I use a much easier resource (the Internet) for my research. I buy books instead of borrowing them. So ya, I'm not terribly surprised that there are a bunch of other Americans just like me.
    • I'm sure there will be plenty more people looking to other sources for info besides the library in the future. This survey even shows that those who did go to the library weren't doing so for traditional purposes. Uni. libraries are a far better source for reference material, and much of the casual material average joes used to go to the library for is becoming available online. Perhaps this survey shows that public libraries have to adjust how they operate in order to stay relevant. :\
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Even as a college student, I frequently find that the primary value in my college library is through its online databases. For one of my major term papers, I didn't visit the library at all, simply using my in-dorm access to journals provided through my library as sources. Although I did visit the library for the other term paper, I only used it to collect books that I had identified through Google and then did the rest of my research via Google Scholar and JSTOR. In both cases, I had full-text access to
    • And not just for research, but the internet has also made it much easier to get books physically to you. I used to go to the library a lot as a kid because it was just as easy as going to a bookstore. But now I can get books from Amazon, or cheaper from eBay, or cheaper still from places like Baen, and a library is not as useful to many people...

      I think they have done a good job adapting to the times. One of the things I still like libraries for is browsing through a rather large set of magazines, or of
    • Re:That would be me (Score:4, Interesting)

      by jovin6 (1134619) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @05:36AM (#21873228)

      I buy books instead of borrowing them.
      I never understood the rationale behind buying books. I read a good amount, mostly science fiction, but a good deal of classic literature as well. Even so, I rarely reread books, and buying them seems like a tremendous waste of money and paper. For those of you who buy books regularly, do you really read them 3+ times? Or is there some other reason you do it instead of going to the library?
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        When it comes to sci-fi/etc. I typically buy used books at about 1-2$ a pop, load up on 20-40 and I'm set for a year. Way more convenient than the library.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        It is nice to have the books in my room, to be able to see them, read a little bit sometimes, look for a quote you know are here, etc. Or reread them completely after some years (yes, I read some books 3+ times). Or take years to finish a book.

        Some people might also like to be able to mark them or write on them, but I would never do that.

        I also love to give or lend books I have liked, and I thinks it is better to do so with books that are mine ;)
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          Some people might also like to be able to mark them or write on them, but I would never do that.

          I do it all the time and it's very good: While I read a book my mind works all the time and I'm thinking a lot, and if I have an idea I write it on the margin, or elaborate some of the mathematics that the author didn't explain much. My marginalia go back 10+ years, so I can see all my life in them, as I often include the current date with most marginalia. It's also funny when you lend a book... you can actually communicate with fellow nerds only with marginalia. All my books are treated as workbooks,

      • Re:That would be me (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Mr Z (6791) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @05:58AM (#21873282) Homepage Journal

        Easy: I buy reference books, not fiction. :-) I don't even read the whole thing once, but I do read many portions repeatedly, and it tends to be demand-driven random access. That said, I did read "Effective C++" pretty much linearly cover-to-cover when I got it, as well as "The Algorithm Design Manual." I'll still go back and reference bits randomly.

        Aside from that, there's my, erm, "throne of learning" book set, which currently consists of "Areas of My Expertise" (which I did read cover to cover, and will probably re-read bits of for a muse), and "A New Kind of Science", which I'm about 1/3rd of the way through. ANKOS is big enough that I can't possibly read it as a borrowed book. And, it has pretty pictures... I'm sure I'll go back and borrow some of the automata to repurpose them. And as for having books in the john... I know I'm not alone.

        So, I guess there's two rationales: Reference books get reused, and many people read books while in the bathroom. As for the former, it's nice to keep the book. As for the latter... wouldn't you like one that hasn't been in the bathroom yet?

        --Joe
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        I agree that there is no point in buying fiction books, since you will inevitably run out of space, no matter how large a library you have.

        Tat being said, there is something nice about looking at an entire room filled with shelves of books and know that you've read everything there. And just picking something out when you have a few unexpected free minutes to browse through.

        And, yes, I have a (paper & digital) personal library, and wouldn't trade it away. :-)
      • Simple - It is much more accesible.
        If I were to go to library every time I want to read books, I would read much much less.
        It is too much of a hassle, especially since people dont plan too much for these items.

        What I do is, every 3 months or so, I buy a bunch of books and store it.
        Later, whenever I am in the mood of reading books, I take one and read it.

        My guess is that this is what most people would be doing.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        For those of you who buy books regularly, do you really read them 3+ times?
        Sometimes I re-read even more times then that, other times I only read it once or twice. I often buy books because the library doesn't have them.
      • For anyone over about age 25, buying books makes a ton of sense in certain categories. These are my particular reasons.

        1. Borrowing a book creates an obligation to keep track of it, and then return it in good condition without any accidents. Since everything I read is alongside a snack, I manage to smudge the page of at least a book a year, sometimes two. If it's yours, and you're not a perfectionist, you don't have to care. Plus, I was paying attention in the "active reading" class. I write notes all aroun
      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        I re-read most of them many, many more times than that. I've got books that I've had for almost 25 years that I still re-read on occasion. If I buy a book and I like it it, I'll re-read it a lot. If I buy I a book and it kind of sucks, I'll put it in with my mom's flea market stuff and recoup some of the cost.

        Like the GP, I haven't been to a library since college, but I read quite a bit.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        I'll agree with many of the points made by other responders. There's also the simple fact that buying books by authors I like helps support the authors and encourages them to write more. (And I'm saying this as someone who works in a library and who borrows quite a lot of books to read from work.)
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        For those of you who buy books regularly, do you really read them 3+ times? Or is there some other reason you do it instead of going to the library?

        Why? Well, it's partly trying to help out artists by supporting their work, and it's partly because for a few dollars I can own a work of art.

        I never bought books when I was a student, but always borrowed them from the library. Now that I'm finally earning a decent wage, I've gone back and bought my favourite books so that I own a copy. Not only can I re-read them at my pleasure (and yes -- I do re-read my favourite books), not only can I lend them out to my friends and share the love of good literature

    • on the internet, the only reliable sources of research data demand subscription payments for facts.

      They can eat me, especially because they demand financial and personal information big brother can use to track me.

        I'll access my university's resources under alum privileges.
    • I visited a library a few times in 2006, precisely because I have a good Internet connection at home. I was doing a distance learning course, and I wanted somewhere to study where I wouldn't be tempted to check Slashdot. Libraries are quiet places where you can read and write without much in the way of distractions.
    • Most of the books actually worth reading, university press offerings, typically cost over $100 apiece (many over $500). So, you either have a good job that allows you to buy them constantly, or the knuckle-dragging appelation is appropriate. Heavy use of a university library is part of the intellectual life.
  • Library? (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    What is this "library" you speak of?
  • by A beautiful mind (821714) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @04:49AM (#21873114)
    ...and I'm currently connected to it.
  • Do I offset this? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Smordnys s'regrepsA (1160895) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @04:55AM (#21873132) Journal
    I visited the Library at least once a week, ONLY for books. I browse every new book in the new section, hit up the SciFi section, see if there is a new romance book that suits my needs. I'll be there for about an hour, and sometimes I'll head over to Bookmans for a used book afterwards if I can't find what I want. If I'm willing to wait, I use the library's electronic catalog to order the book, and pick it up when I stop by next week.


    I can't get a single friend to visit the library, but when I see a book I *know* they will love, I check it out for them, and make them borrow it. I routinely have to borrow ~4 books at a time, just so I have one to read.

    So, how about average number of books checked out, because I can't be the only person who brings home entertainment for the masses.
    • Agreed. (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      My fiance and I, both in our thirties (I, only by mere days, dammit!!!! ;)), have library cards and visit often.

      And I'll go a bit more 'lug-head' here: libraries kick some serious ass.

      After finishing an engineering degree, then heading back into the library for leisure, I find the damn thing chock full of damn near everything I had previously wanted to sink time into, but simply didn't have ... Engr kids gotta drink too, partake of ye ol' mind-widening substances, and keep that GPA up.

      With a decent job and
  • but since the main reason seemed to be to use the internet it seems to me a large portion of them was just using it as a free high speed connection anyway. I already have cable in my house and, being 33, I can do whatever I want with my computer so I see no reason to go to a library to do anything. Nor do I do anything that needs to be that anonymous.

    As far as books go, I have a better technical reference than my local public library does and I have all the fiction I really want to read (also quite large).
    • Another way to think about the results: about 47 percent of Americans didn't visit a library even once last year.

      My 1st thought was, "Hey, but even more of you didn't bother to vote last time 'round."

      I worked in a public library for 9 years, 1992 until 2000. This saw many changes and developments (online databases, CD-ROMs, www, etc) and to this day I am amazed at how many students, parents, business leaders, teachers, etc STILL cannot grasp basic search/database interrogation strategies.

      While I am sure that you are across it, many people benefit from a little expertise at finding those hidden gems of information (

  • by Secrity (742221) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @05:02AM (#21873150)
    I am baby boomer and have haven't been to a library for over 10 years. I used to just about live in the library, but they have become irrelevant to me. The technical section is full of out of date arcane crap, yet they spend huge sums on Oprah books and Brittany Spears CDs. A few years ago I tried to donate a box full of recent technical books to the local library; THEY REFUSED TO TAKE THEM. It used to be that even if the library didn't want the books for the shelves they took them for their book sales. The up side to that is that the local used book store gave me a good price (store credit) for the books, because they were the type of books that they can sell.

    Anymore, I either get the information from the internet or I buy the books.
    • by thegrassyknowl (762218) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @06:29AM (#21873364)
      I agree. Our local library has a lot of "photochop for dummies", "service your car for dummies", "the idiots guide to google" (you need instructions to use Google?) type books now.

      It was once a treasure trove of useful technical manuals in fields like engineering, computer science, medicine and the like. The fiction section was even pretty good with a fairly wide range. Now it seems that it's mostly popular romance trite and not much more.

      I still go there for the kids books (yes, a Slashdork spawned a child process), which they keep fairly current.

      That said, I must concede I have a couple of electronics magazines that they have only recently resubscribed to.
    • I am baby boomer and have haven't been to a library for over 10 years. I used to just about live in the library, but they have become irrelevant to me. The technical section is full of out of date arcane crap
      Wow, it must be old if someone like you is calling it outdated. When were the books published? 1901?
  • That's why I haven't been to a library in years. That and the fact that most research I do is on the Internet anyway. Libraries certainly fill a need, but not going to them doesn't necessarily imply negative things about us I don't think.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 01 2008, @05:18AM (#21873182)
    The original purpose of a library was to allow a community to invest a small amount of money in books and then let everyone in the community benefit from all of the books.

    I think it would be appropriate for libraries to change their names to be called "Infotainment Centers", and for books to largely be replaced by computers, software, and DVD collections. Computer gaming should be perfectly acceptable -- because it is no different than people going to a traditional library and reading fantasy books or other forms of fiction. There are commercial "computer gaming rooms" and "Internet cafes" appearing in shopping plazas -- but, just as libraries have long coexisted with massive bookstore chains (Barnes & Noble, Borders, etc), the "Infotainment Center" can coexist with commercial "Internet cafes" and gaming rooms.

    There are certainly many valuable books from decades past, and it will take a long time for all of that information to be available online -- and so I hope the traditional book-archiving aspect of libraries continues for a while -- but I think a plain computer lab, for GAMING, WATCHING DVDs, for AMUSEMENT, in addition to research and learning, should be the goal of libraries. The library will serve the modern public better -- and I think recreation is a valid way to serve the public -- and the idealists who hope to hook people on "more productive" or "more educational" things like reading, reading classic literature, and learning, might benefit from having the target audience already in the facility. (I'm guessing that Borders and Barnes and Noble booksellers have discovered that letting potential customers read books at their leisure, while drinking coffee, or even studying for exams with fellow students, is all OK because having people in the store will ultimately lead to more sales of books and coffee. In the same way, getting people in to the library by having X-Box, the latest video games, open WiFi, porn DVDs, whatever, might provide opportunities to encourage "more productive" or "more educational" activities.)
  • Instead, my daughter and I go to Borders or B&N. The library is so far out of the way and I'm so lazy about returning books, it usually amounts to the same thing anyway.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Good point. When I first moved down to my new job, before my wife had graduated college, I'd spend a lot of time at B&N "renting" books for $3/cup at their coffee shop. (Typically these were $60 - $90 tomes from the engineering section.) Every so often, I'd actually buy one that seemed worthwhile. With B & N shops every couple miles, it's just too easy. I couldn't even tell you where the libraries are in that neighborhood. But I can tell you where the bookstores are.

      In the end, I think I en

  • I'm not surprised libraries aren't used as much, there are so many things competing for a persons attention today besides just books, movie, TV, radio, entertainment, internet, etc. The internet is pretty much the one stop-shop for all of these, although I think there will always be libraries, I think one of the failings of the digital age is that digital masses of digital information can be wiped out fairly easily, but on the plus side, it's easier to copy and make redundant. I still wonder about the dang
  • by MMC Monster (602931) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @06:15AM (#21873326)
    It's got an excellent DVD and CD library.

    Use your library. Donate digital media. Your entire community will thank you.
  • ... about 47 percent of Americans didn't visit a library even once last year.
    And they took the survey in front of libraries so the group of library users is over represented. ( :
  • "Another way to think about the results: about 47 percent of Americans didn't visit a library even once last year."

    For those of us old enough to remember when the local library was pretty much the only large source of information, this is a bit sad. But, not necessarily bad, just another example of things changing. With all the information available on the internet, there is less need for me to go to a library. Also, when I was that age stores like Borders -- with a huge selection of books and chairs whe
  • I do [irc] visit [thepiratebay.org] libraries [lib.ru] often. I've read a couple dozen books last year. Of those, only two were on dead trees.
  • One big problem... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by tgd (2822) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @07:08AM (#21873482)
    Libraries suck these days. Budgets are cut and unless you're looking for an old book, the odds are unless you're in a particularly forward thinking or wealthy town they're not going to have what you're looking for.

    I was at my towns Library maybe a dozen times in 2007 -- and while it may be close, I'm fairly certain I donated more new books than I checked out books there.

    Unless the books you read are VERY mainstream (ie, your reading is dictated by talkshow hosts), libraries just won't work anymore.
  • !Library (Score:4, Funny)

    by ShakaUVM (157947) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @07:20AM (#21873522) Homepage Journal
    Why do we need libraries any more?

    All the world's information is on wikipedia! One or two pages can encapsulate the information on every subject!

    Besides, how else would we learn about how the Black Panthers guard Vibranium?
  • by NorbrookC (674063) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @11:15AM (#21874632) Journal

    When I lived in an urban area, I never went near a library. I could get broadband, there were lot of bookstores, and there were movie rental places on almost every corner. A couple of years ago I moved to a very rural area and rediscovered the joy of going to a library. There was no broadband in the area. The nearest bookstore was 75 miles away. The local video rental had about 150 titles. So any option to use the Internet, buy books, or rent movies was limited, to put it mildly. Then I visited the library. Broadband connection. Books to choose from, and if they didn't have it, they could get it. A huge selection of movie titles. All for free!

    I still live in this area, and we now have broadband, but the book stores are still far away, and movie rental options still suck. So I still visit my local library regularly. I get to check out books, and if I do like them, I'll go ahead and order them from one of the on-line retailers for a personal copy. If I don't like it, I'm only out some time.

    In this area at least, the library is a valuable resource, and one that's there when you need it. If you don't have the money, or thing like broadband, bookstores, or movie rentals simply aren't there, the library is. Even if you aren't in need of it now, it doesn't mean it's irrelevant or useless.

    • by twms2h (473383) on Tuesday January 01 2008, @05:34AM (#21873218) Homepage

      When I was 17/18, we were Generation X - now I'm 28, we're Generation Y? How does that work?
      You changed your gender?
    • When I was 17/18, we were Generation X - now I'm 28, we're Generation Y?

      No you were just born late enough in generation X that you have a little bit of overlap (2 years) with the start of the next generation.

      If you aren't born in the first ~30 years of any particular generation, you are forced to deal with the realities of overlapping with the next generation, as those of your own generation become adults, and start producing the next.

      The younger you are, the more dramatic the range of ages in a single gene