Slashdot Log In
The Grammy In Mathematics
Posted by
kdawson
on Mon Feb 11, 2008 08:01 AM
from the woodie-rides-again dept.
from the woodie-rides-again dept.
An anonymous reader writes "A mathematician will receive a Grammy award for restoring the only known recording of a live Woody Guthrie performance — a bootleg someone made in 1949 using a wire recorder. Guthrie's daughter, who had never heard her father perform in front of a live audience, oversaw the restoration. The article links very cool before and after clips."
Related Stories
Submission: The Grammy in Mathematics by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:In even more other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Also: RIAA patents bad recording quality as a copy protection measure.
(couldn't be closer to the truth for your average CD...)
someone else take the torch from here
Parent
Re:In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Oh - BINGO!
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re:In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:In other news... (Score:5, Insightful)
Always record your originals in analog and immediately transfer to digital, and one day you may find that more of the original sonic environment can be recovered from that master than you ever thought possible through the progression of physics, chemistry and math.
Parent
Re:In other news... (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:In other news... (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
The lesson is also to keep the digital version in the simplest possible form. Lossy formats and high compression formats will end losing the data if we don't also make sure to keep around the file format too. Analogue how ever bad it is, is much easier to decode, since very little technology is really needed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:In other news... (Score:5, Insightful)
2) There are technologies that would benefit from having more information available. Imagine being able to extract enough information from a recording to simulate that vocalist singing something else. Heck, for an example of a technology that benefits from much fancier recordings than some people ever thought they would need, consider the game "Rock Band". You can't (today) use a master recording in Rock Band unless each drum in the drum kit has a separate recording track. This is why the old Rush songs in the game are covers and not masters. Almost nobody imagined they'd actually have a need for those more detailed recordings, but now we do. (I say "you can't today" because the software to de-mix the drums isn't advanced enough yet. Once it is advanced enough... we may determine that common digital recordings aren't as good for this purpose as straight-up analog recordings!)
3) This is the far-out one -- go ahead and warm up your mockery engines... what about superhuman hearing? Are you sure that, by technology (biotech, cybernetics, whatever), human hearing won't ever be improved? What about
Parent
Re:In other news... (Score:4, Interesting)
Because later down the line we might find that we do care about that missing information that we discarded because it had no obvious value at the time. The Romans didn't measure the temperature on a daily basis, but they did measure crop yields and other factors. From those figures we were able to deduce the average daily temperatures. To the Romans, the daily temperatures weren't useful. To us, it helps us track global climate conditions.
It is well known that string instruments Wouldn't it be interesting to know how a Stradivari sounded when it was only a few months old? We could have compared that information to surviving examples and had a better understanding of how the instruments age.
Granted that is just an off the cuff example, but I'm certain that it is better to preserve as much information as possible when dealing with musical performances.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re:In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Just delete the part about 'It is well known that string instruments'. I was going to describe how string instruments have a breaking in period, but it was too far off the mark for the original point I was trying to make.
about time (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/10/8/134958/152 [kuro5hin.org]
In the late 1970s when digital recording was born, 44 k samples per second was the best the equipment of the time could do. It was deemed "good enough," since the labels "golden ears" (humans with hearing well above average) didn't hear any noise and the sound of aliasing was something they had never encountered. They knew wha
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Title of story wrong? (Score:5, Informative)
The title of the article says the mathematician was norminated for a grammy, yet the article itself says the recording was put forward, which sounds more plausible.
Re:Title of story wrong? (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Only known what? (Score:2, Informative)
He was on a weekly radio show in the 40's and I've heard tapes of that, too. Hell, you can go to Wikipedia and listen to a streaming recording of Guthrie.
It's not the only "live" recording in front of an audience, either.
You think I'm gonna spend the time to read TFA to see what their actual claim is? No friggin' way.
Re:Only known what? (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
I believe that TFS means 'the only known recording of a particular live Woody Guthrie performance'.
Re:Only known what? (Score:4, Informative)
TFS actually says:
In 1949, recordings of live concerts were extremely rare. Live performances were rarely recorded. They were transmitted on the radio or TV and that was it. Call it short sighted but people really thought back then that TV and Radio were never going to catch on.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Why call it shortsighted? In 1949, recording technology was neither mature nor inexpensive. TV and radio had nothing like the budget they enjoy today, so there often simply was no money to archive broadcasts. Hell, the BBC (not what you'd consider an insignificant or poorly-funded organization) was plagued by this well into the '60s.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Only known what? (Score:4, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_recorder [wikipedia.org]
Didn't you ever watch Hogan's Heroes? Newkirk had one in his sewing kit. The thread in the kit was actually wire. And the Germans never figured it out!
Parent
hearing about Woody Guthrie (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I assume you mean either READ Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, or WATCH Grapes of Wrath by John Ford.
mirror please? (Score:4, Insightful)
CoralCDN mirror (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.sciencenews.org.nyud.net/articles/20080209/Guthrie1.aif [nyud.net]
http://www.sciencenews.org.nyud.net/articles/20080209/Guthrie2.aif [nyud.net]
For those of us who don't know Mr. Guthrie (Score:2, Informative)
Come back Woody Guthrie (Score:4, Interesting)
""I am out to sing songs that will prove to you that this is your world and that if it has hit you pretty hard and knocked you for a dozen loops, no matter what color, what size you are, how you are built, I am out to sing the songs that make you take pride in yourself and in your work. And the songs that I sing are made up for the most part by all sorts of folks just about like you."
"I hate a song that makes you think that you are not any good. I hate a song that makes you think that you are just born to lose. Bound to lose. No good to nobody. No good for nothing. Because you are too old or too young or too fat or too slim or too ugly or too this or too that."
"Yes, as through this world I've wandered I've seen lots of funny men; Some will rob you with a six-gun, And some with a fountain pen"
"This song is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal of Copyright # 154085, for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught singin' it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do."
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
As I was walkin' - I saw a sign there
And that sign said - no tress passin'
But on the other side
Now that side was made for you and me!
Arlo is great in concert, but I would love to have seen Woody too.
Z.
A Mathematician (Score:5, Insightful)
How awesome is that, to do some really interesting work, and finally get some world-wide recognition and even get your name on the front page of Slashdot!
Oh, wait...
Common people, let's give credit where credit is due. Thanks. The guy's name isn't even mentioned until the 11th paragraph of the story! Somehow when it's something cool like this it's enough to say, "mathematics did it!", as if this restoration technique of identifying the hum of a 1949 power supply to help guide a dynamic warping and interpolation technique just dropped out of thin air.
(It's Kevin Short by the way, although if I understand the article, this sound engineer Jamie Howarth played a large part as well.)
Re: (Score:2)
Would love to hear on Beatles's earliest tape (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Er, but... (Score:4, Informative)
Woodie Guthrie and Pete Seeger were both on this album.
After my folks were divorced in 1976 (the year I got married) it wound up being mine. Sadly the copy was stolen along with my killer stereo and most of my other albums.
Unlike what they call "stealing music" these days I no longer have my copy of the Weavers. Furthermore, it's out of print and I can't get a new copy. It should be in the public domain and I should be able to at least get a good SHN of it.
In USSA, copyright steals from ME.
-mcgrew
Re: (Score:2)
Sooner or later, this is pretty much the situation everywhere, I'm afraid...
As a side note... (Score:4, Interesting)
Grandma-ies (Score:3, Funny)
Sigh. I can't hear the difference... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:aif file not working in Helix player on Ubuntu (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:aif file not working in Helix player on Ubuntu (Score:2)
How is parent offtopic? he is asking about how to play the "very cool and after clips" presented in the summary. I could not play them in Kubuntu 7.10. What format is this
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The difference is negligible .. (Score:4, Informative)
Yes there is less hiss in the background, but to say that the vocals are unchanged is wrong. I don't know what you were expecting here, but the point was to get it to sound as close as possible to hearing him playing live. The tone and pitch is correct, the high nasal voice is common in folk music, and that is how other Guthrie recordings sound.
If you read TFA you would know that they used different mathematical approaches to compensate for kinks, and breaks in the original wire recording media, and various slow downs, and speed ups during recording which change the pitch when played back.
And I have to say... Banjo? WTF! If you can't tell the difference between a banjo and an acoustic guitar you have no business commenting on this article.
Parent