Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Uwe Boll To Quit Making Movies With 1M Signatures

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon Apr 07, 2008 03:20 PM
from the just-means-he-is-switching-media dept.
An anonymous reader writes to mention that Uwe Boll, the infamous German director behind such video game adaptations as House of the Dead, BloodRayne, Dungeon Siege and Postal, has recently admitted that he would retire from making movies if enough people want him to stop. When FearNet mentioned to Boll a petition online signed by 18,000 people requesting that he cease making films, Boll responded that '18,000 is not enough to convince me.' So how much would be enough? 'One million,' Boll said."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by OMNIpotusCOM (1230884) * on Monday April 07 2008, @03:20PM (#22992916) Homepage Journal
    Where do I sign? Do you need blood? Money? A donation? How many times can I sign? Fucking I'LL SIGN!
    • by Androclese (627848) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:34PM (#22993116)
      Petition Link [petitiononline.com]
    • Where do I sign? Do you need blood? Money? A donation? How many times can I sign? Fucking I'LL SIGN!
      I reacted slightly differently. At first, yes I was eager to sign this ... but then I paused ... what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars?
      • by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 07 2008, @04:08PM (#22993512)

        what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars?
        Obviously you haven't been keeping up with Hollywood's latest technology. At this point you could do a whole season of MST3k just by hitting IMDB and doing a search for any movie featuring a dragon.
      • by glwtta (532858) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:18PM (#22993616) Homepage
        what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future?

        The problem is, there's nothing "so bad, it's good" about his movies, they are in what I like to call the "Shat Out With the Least Amount of Effort" category - not much MST3K can do with that.
      • by Bob9113 (14996) on Monday April 07 2008, @05:22PM (#22994228) Homepage
        I reacted slightly differently. At first, yes I was eager to sign this ... but then I paused ... what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars?

        Nothing wrong with him making crap films. The problem is with making crap derivative works. Crap derivative works that the original artists in most cases are opposed to.

        But, then, that's more a problem with copyrights being owned by corporations. The artists get boned and the lawyers and MBAs get paid. And oh how those (sociopathic, since we increasingly select for that in the corporate world) lawyers and MBAs love to sell their children to cannibals for a few bucks.

        Copyright to support the progress of the useful arts? If that is truly the goal (and I'm not saying it is, or should be, just if it is), then give the artist more non-transferrable authority.
    • by Hoi Polloi (522990) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:37PM (#22993834) Journal
      Come on spammers and botnet scammers, we need your l33t skills to get 1 million names entered in. Just use the ones you put in the "from" line.
      • by 1u3hr (530656) on Monday April 07 2008, @09:20PM (#22996030)
        Does anyone believe for a minute he would really give up no matter how many signatures?

        He would just say: All these people SAY they hate me, but it means a million people know who I am and have seen my movies. Doesn't matter whether they like them or not, I still get paid.

        As Oscar Wilde said, "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about".

  • Sign the petition! (Score:5, Informative)

    by JediLow (831100) * on Monday April 07 2008, @03:22PM (#22992928)
    Over 60k signatures already!

    http://www.petitiononline.com/RRH53888/petition.html [petitiononline.com]

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Its just a PR stunt. Stop pandering to the tax-loophole-exploiting jerk.
      • by sherpajohn (113531) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:06PM (#22993502) Homepage

        Its just a PR stunt. Stop pandering to the tax-loophole-exploiting jerk.
        A PR stunt it may well be, but I take exception to your characterization of his financing methods. At least according to his Wikipedia entry, he is one of the few people in Germany using the German tax laws in regards to German film fiancing on the way the German government intended it. the article states most "German" film financing using these "tax-loopholes" are mere exploits used to finance American films.

        His movies may suck, but at least he is using the money and tax laws as they were intended!
  • by oncehour (744756) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:23PM (#22992946)
    Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why?
    • by JediLow (831100) * on Monday April 07 2008, @03:25PM (#22992974)
      He makes your eyes bleed... seriously. (I've tried to watch some of his stuff, I couldn't take it)
      • by XxtraLarGe (551297) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:40PM (#22993220) Journal

        He makes your eyes bleed... seriously. (I've tried to watch some of his stuff, I couldn't take it)
        Maybe he should change his name to Ewe Bola!
        Ba-dum-dum!
        Thanks, I'll be here all week!
        • by glittalogik (837604) on Monday April 07 2008, @07:31PM (#22995322)
          The problem is not that he's making movies, it's the movies he's making. He's being put at the helm of some of our favourite game franchise crossovers, and then butchering them mercilessly.

          Imagine your favourite game in the world. You've beaten it on Legendary 15 times. You've read every spinoff novel. You've unlocked every single outfit and cooking utensil. Not only have you rescued the princess, you've persuaded her to get hot-coffee-mod-freaky with you. You own figurines of every single character AND the entire dev team. There's a personal dedication to you on the inside cover of the walkthrough. You've taken out whole battalions with 100% headshots using a catapult and a bag of frozen peas.

          This game is your everything. Others might not understand, but it makes you happy, and that's all that counts. Then you find out that there's going to be a movie. On a given release date in the near future, your life will be complete. You impose a media blackout on yourself - no previews, no trailers, no interviews. Nothing that will spoil the anticipation, the cloud of pure joy on which you're floating. This is going to be the best shit ever.

          The day arrives. You're at the first screening in the country, sitting front and centre. You've driven 1500 miles to be there. Your hands are shaking. You can't stop grinning. ...

          Two hours later, your eyeballs are bleeding. The only reason you're still alive is that you chewed your own foot off. All that you know and love lies in smoking ruins.

          The credits roll... "Directed by: Uwe Boll"

          You get where I'm going with this, yeah?
          • by Your Pal Dave (33229) on Monday April 07 2008, @07:47PM (#22995450)

            Imagine your favourite game in the world. You've beaten it on Legendary 15 times. You've read every spinoff novel. You've unlocked every single outfit and cooking utensil. Not only have you rescued the princess, you've persuaded her to get hot-coffee-mod-freaky with you. You own figurines of every single character AND the entire dev team. There's a personal dedication to you on the inside cover of the walkthrough. You've taken out whole battalions with 100% headshots using a catapult and a bag of frozen peas.

            [...]

            You get where I'm going with this, yeah?
            Umm, you really need a girlfriend?
    • by Svenne (117693) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:28PM (#22993016) Homepage
      His movies are bad. Really, really bad. Unfortunately, they're not bad in the kind of way that they become unintentionally funny, they're just mindnumbingly bad.

      Please, take my word for it. Don't watch any of them just to find out. I'd hate to have another human being waste 2 hours on that dreck if I can help it.
    • by jollyreaper (513215) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:31PM (#22993074)

      Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why?
      Imagine a modern hog factory farm, imagine the veritable rivers of semi-liquid feces squelching downhill from the oinking, shuffling pigflesh. Imagine a rope around your leg, the far end attached to a speedboat. Imagine being pulled backwards through that stinking mass, mouth clenched tight against your bile but still the runny shit makes it up your nostrils and down your throat, between your eyelids, burning your retinas, the impact of the brown waves against your body like sledgehammers.

      If you can tell me what's so bad about that, I can tell you what's so bad about Uwe Boll movies.
      • by phallstrom (69697) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:13PM (#22993590)
        You work for the US Government's Torture Oversight Committee don't you?
      • by OldManAndTheC++ (723450) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:23PM (#22993674)

        Imagine a modern hog factory farm, imagine the veritable rivers of semi-liquid feces squelching downhill from the oinking, shuffling pigflesh. Imagine a rope around your leg, the far end attached to a speedboat. Imagine being pulled backwards through that stinking mass, mouth clenched tight against your bile but still the runny shit makes it up your nostrils and down your throat, between your eyelids, burning your retinas, the impact of the brown waves against your body like sledgehammers.
        Or to put it another way, if you were to take the paragraph above and adapt it as a screenplay, the result would be better than any Uwe Boll movie.
        • by _Sprocket_ (42527) on Monday April 07 2008, @07:49PM (#22995472)

          Or to put it another way, if you were to take the paragraph above and adapt it as a screenplay, the result would be better than any Uwe Boll movie.
          Unless that screenplay was then given to Uwe Boll.

          OK. That's not fair.

          Unless that screenplay was used for the basis of a video game which in turn was the basis for a Uwe Boll movie.
      • by Wizard Drongo (712526) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:54PM (#22993978)
        Heh, brings to mind a description on a torrent site of the first (and co-incidentally last) I ever saw. I had to download it after I saw this. I thought it couldn't be that bad... I was wrong. Here's the quote: "Without doubt, this is the worst film ever made, and probably that will ever be made. It is not worth the cost of a cinema ticket, it is not worth the cost of the power it took to keep my computer running to download it, it is not worth the cost of the power to keep your tv on as you watch it. It is not even worth killing the electrons that power that tv's tube, infinitesimal though their brief, tortured lives were. Avoid."
    • Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him?
      • -His movies are bad. Really, universally accepted as terrible.
      • -He keeps getting handed video game franchises to make movies out of, which is problematic because video game fans hate to see their favorite franchises turned into crappy movies, but it has further reaching implications in that it states, essentially, that the movie industry has no respect for the video game industry since they keep letting this man make shitty movies (that lose money, no less)
      • -His initial career was only made possible due to a loophole in German tax law which allowed him to spend other people's money on his bad movies since they could write off the loss for tax purposes. Once that loophole was closed, he decided to stop making expensive ($1M+) movies
      • -He's quite arrogant and usually pretty angry (which you might be too if people kept shitting on your movies
      • -He lured critcs out to a charity fight [wired.com] and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital
      On a deeper level, whereas people like you and me have to work our asses off, he's rich off his no-talent works because of a (now closed) loophole. He wipes his asses with video game franchises (the Postal movie actually made 9/11 jokes) and he's a pretty despicable human being (see the Wired article above).
      • by kabocox (199019) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:12PM (#22993578)
        His initial career was only made possible due to a loophole in German tax law which allowed him to spend other people's money on his bad movies since they could write off the loss for tax purposes. Once that loophole was closed, he decided to stop making expensive ($1M+) movies
        He's quite arrogant and usually pretty angry (which you might be too if people kept shitting on your movies
        He lured critics out to a charity fight and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital


        This guy is my new hero. WTH does it matter that you or I don't like his movies or that they were funded by a tax loop hole? Nada. There are similar tax loops here in the US. One of my college professors made movies using the US version of this. He was pretty up front about all of it. Yep the people who fund him don't care about money or where their money is being spent because they just need to lose some for tax purposes.

        I'm impressed that this guy had the guts to beat the snot out of his critics. Most of us would B.S. about it or try to bluff our way out of something, but we just wouldn't have the balls to do that. I'm sorry, but that's great. It doesn't matter how bad his movies are. He's defending them and some one is obviously paying him to make them. This guy now ranks above Cmdr Taco in my people that deserve respect for doing something that I should have done/would like to do book.
        • by commodoresloat (172735) * on Monday April 07 2008, @04:39PM (#22993848) Homepage

          I'm impressed that this guy had the guts to beat the snot out of his critics. Most of us would B.S. about it or try to bluff our way out of something, but we just wouldn't have the balls to do that. I'm sorry, but that's great.
          It doesn't take a whole lot of guts to beat up a guy with no fighting experience who gets lured into the ring thinking the whole thing is a publicity stunt rather than an actual fight.
          • by MukiMuki (692124) on Monday April 07 2008, @07:52PM (#22995492)
            Never mind that once someone with actual fighting experience stepped up to the challenge (and barely weighed less than Uwe), the fight was denied. Boll only accepted entrants who weighed significantly less and had no idea what they were doing.
    • by goldcd (587052) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:37PM (#22993168) Homepage
      He makes averagely bad straight-to-video style films - yet rises above the mass of other jobbing directors with his ability to drum up publicity. FFS - how may other 'directors of his calibre' can you name? Reason he's working (putting aside tax breaks), is that he takes a relatively small amount of money from producers, rights for a computer game and makes them all money on the film he produces.
    • by Coryoth (254751) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:38PM (#22993184) Homepage Journal

      Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why?
      He engenders the degree of hate (particularly on the internet) that he does for a couple of reasons. The first is that his movies are bad -- and I mean really, painfully, teeth-grindingly bad. Of course that alone doesn't generate that much hate; there are, after all, an endless supply of incredibly bad movies and abysmal movie makers in the world. The second point is that Uwe Boll has a great love of "adapting" computer games for the screen, and he is highly prolific at doing so. This manages to piss of geeks by raping their fond memories of games (Boll has a habit of going after older games, as far back as the 80s) by butchering what made the game good and simultaneously making something that, while attractive from the title, is painful to sit through. For those who have wised up and don't attend his films, there's still the niggling fact that, by producing so many video game based films that are so very bad, Boll has gone a long way toward discrediting both video games, and the idea of making films based on video games (in this latter point he is hardly alone of course). Since internet geeks and video game geeks have a nice large overlap, this makes internet based Boll hate something that gets noticed.
    • by norton_I (64015) <hobbes@utrek.dhs.org> on Monday April 07 2008, @03:41PM (#22993228)
      His movies are really, really bad. But I would never sign the petition. Better to try making moving and totally suck that be a bunch of whiny jerks on the internet who can "hate" someone for simply making movies which they can choose not to watch.

      As for "loophole tax shelter"--it was never a loophole, it was an incentive to get people to make movies in germany, which he did. If I were a tax paying german, I could see being upset by this, but since I am not, I don't really see any reason to do this.

      Yes, I am being whiny jerk on the internet. That doesn't affect whether what I say is true or not.
    • by iluvcapra (782887) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:50PM (#22993316) Homepage

      As someone who actually works in the film industry, I'm not too quick to complain, since all of his films generally result in people working....

      But on the other hand, his films are some of the most cynically exploitive junk you've ever seen. He uses a provision in the German tax code to get tax credits and free money, and uses those to bootstrap foreign distribution pre-sales and video-game tie in deals. In effect, he's made money before he even starts rolling the camera, and so the quality of his film itself is irrelevant as long as it cuts a good trailer, will have a good poster, and has enough "bankable" stars in the project to stimulate box office. It's essentially the Roger Corman model, just without the class and punk authenticity.

    • by Mr. Bad Example (31092) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:02PM (#22993462) Homepage
      > Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him?

      Perhaps this review [agonybooth.com] of his version of Alone in the Dark will be instructive (as well as entertaining).
  • by elrous0 (869638) * on Monday April 07 2008, @03:27PM (#22992994)
    Boll is actually quitting because the German government recently closed the tax loophole [cinematical.com] that allowed Boll and other German filmmakers to set up their "films" as tax shelters for businessmen (with no intent of ever making any money). The gravy train has dried up and the scam is over.
  • A Challenge (Score:5, Funny)

    by whisper_jeff (680366) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:29PM (#22993032)
    Bad move. Never challenge geeks. We'll always find a way to overcome.
  • It's Like Wrestling (Score:3, Interesting)

    by dcollins (135727) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:33PM (#22993102) Homepage
    Yeah, yeah, I've seen this a bunch of times when pro wrestling is promoted. The heel "retires" and then comes back as a celebrity referee or manager, so he's still in your face all the time. C'mon, people!
  • just let him be (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nguy (1207026) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:33PM (#22993104)
    I don't get it. Why petition the guy to stop making movies? Maybe his movies will be quickly forgotten, maybe they'll be cult classics 50 years from now. As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go.
    • Re:just let him be (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 07 2008, @03:51PM (#22993324)

      I don't get it. Why petition the guy to stop making movies? Maybe his movies will be quickly forgotten, maybe they'll be cult classics 50 years from now. As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go.

      You're missing the point. As long as he's in the business, no one's favorite videogames are safe from being turned into horrible movie adaptations, preventing decent adaptations from ever being made. It's self defense. ; )
        • Re:just let him be (Score:5, Informative)

          by Idaho (12907) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:33PM (#22993786)

          What was the last German movie to gain any kind of international attention? Run Lola Run?


          How about these for example:

          - Good Bye Lenin! (2003) [imdb.com] - nominated for Golden Globe (ok, perhaps that doesn't amount to much, but it's a nice movie)
          - Der Untergang (2004) [imdb.com] - oscar nomination for "best foreign language film of the year" (where "foreign" means "not english")
          - Das Leben der Anderen (2006) [imdb.com] - won the oscar for "best foreign language film", as well as many other awards in several international film festivals (Great Britain and Canada among those)

          That's quite a few movies since Lola rennt (1998). Looks like there are quite a few German directors who are actually doing better after all... those movies are all very much worthwhile watching, by the way (though quite disturbing).

          P.S. I'm not German so I'm bound to have missed several more good movies.
  • by Herkum01 (592704) on Monday April 07 2008, @03:56PM (#22993388)

    I would think the fewer number of signatures would result in him having an increased chance of quiting. If they got 1 million signatures, that would mean that nearly 1 million people actually heard of him! He could claim that he has the presence to draw large numbers of people to his movies!

    If he was only able to get 20~ 25,000 signatures no studio is going to look at and say "His works are so beloved that they are not complaining about him!" His career would be over.

    The opposite of love is indifference. If you want his career over ignore him.

  • by kentrel (526003) on Monday April 07 2008, @04:19PM (#22993638) Journal
    This kind of hatred over a filmmaker who's creating something is really sad, pathetic and unhealthy. No, his movies might not be very good, and yes they are in fact terrible, but they're hardly the worst films ever made unless you've never seen 90% of the horror\musical genre, or anything made for youtube.

    Filmmaking was and never ever has been a democracy. This idea of writing petitions to DEMAND that he stop making movies that you don't ever have to watch or think about is pathetic. 99% of movies are released weekly around the world that you'll never ever know about, simply because you don't care enough. His movies aren't mass-marketed, they're not shoved in your face on TV or fast food restaurants. The only people who are shouting about Uwe Boll loud enough for ANYONE to hear are the people who hate him. Stop hating him, stop shouting about him, and he'll likely go away a lot faster. In fact, if he had been ignored like most other filmmakers he may have gone a long time ago.

    No member of the public has a say in who gets to make movies. It's not a democracy. If they want to vote, vote with their dollar. If enough people still pay to see the movies, such that the filmmaker is still in work, then nobody has a right to demand that he goes, except his business partners. That's life. Suck it up. There are bigger injustices in the world to worry about.

    Signing a petition is just hilarious and pathetic, and will probably have the opposite effect people intend. This kind of hatred is unhealthy. Have some perspective people. He's not answerable to any of you. Fanboys need to stop kidding themselves into thinking that they have any say in what filmmakers do. They don't. Filmmaking has been a business since its inception, and still is. Even if there were a million signatures he's under no obligation to do anything that a bunch of deluded movie geeks "demand" of him.

    He could make a movie where he prints those signatures out, laughs at them, tears them up, and posts the resulting video on youtube. Don't fanboys ever see that the more they are outraged at something inconsequential like this the more ridiculous and hilarious they appear to the rest of us? Pick your battles.
      • To be fair, if the list does hit one million, he'll just claim fraud. And based on your comment, he'd actually be right.

        Way to go! Uwe Boll will continue making video game movies, even if the petition reaches one million signatures -- and it'll be YOUR, peragrin's, fault.

        (Granted, I don't expect him to stop even if the petition does hit one million unique, verifiable signatures, but still, I'll blame you.)