Slashdot Log In
30 Minutes of Frank Miller's The Spirit Reviewed
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Thu Dec 04, 2008 08:41 AM
from the wish-i-got-to-see-it dept.
from the wish-i-got-to-see-it dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Thirty minutes of footage from Frank Miller's forthcoming The Spirit were shown to journalists in London yesterday. The description paints a picture of a highly stylized movie, somewhere between Sin City and Crimewave ..."
Related Stories
Submission: 30 minutes of Frank Miler's The Spirit reviewed by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
I've seen the trailers (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Or it might be somewhere in between.
I have a bad feeling about this (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I have a bad feeling about this (Score:4, Insightful)
I remember reading a Spirit graphic novel called Life on Another Planet many years ago, but I certainly dont remember lots of sexy ladies and hammy dialogue. Is anything in this movie actually a Spirit story or done in the style of Will Eisner? The Spirit stuff I remember is introspective and smart, not the flashy-trashy stuff Miller now specializes in. For a minute I thought this trailer was for a sequel to his Sin City movie.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
I remember reading a Spirit graphic novel called Life on Another Planet many years ago
That was by Spirit creator Will Eisner, but it did not feature the Spirit characters.
but I certainly dont remember lots of sexy ladies and hammy dialogue.
The Spirit comics have some measure of both, but it's handled with infinitely more style and subtlety than could be ever be distilled from the morbidly stunted gray matter of Frank Miller. For a guy who claims to be one of Eisner's best buddies, he seems determined to shit all over everything the man stood for.
For a good comparison of the approaches of the two men, look for the book Eisner/Miller, published by Dark Horse
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Miller has only been credited as a Director on the Sin City projects, and now The Spirit.
Sin City was great, and a good enough adaptation of his work that he co-produced, DID take a director's credit and is now going on to make a sequel with Rodriguez.
So whose opinion is more valuable here: Miller's, who has created a huge body or amazing work, or the boxer-short clad
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.....
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't have any problem with Frank Miller's writing...he did some of my favorite comic book writing of all time when he worked on the Daredevil...I just have issues with the crappy movies. It reminds me of how MTV ruined The Maxx when they decided to animate it.
Re: (Score:2)
Gotta love the classics (Score:4, Interesting)
Sin City was incredible (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I think I liked it because it was stylized and was really like a comic book brought to life. Not sure if I will like this movie as well, but I will definitely watch it to find out.
And the nudity. Wait, did I just say that out loud?
Sin City was nippless. (Score:2)
"What's wrong with us for accepting such horrific violence but if a nipple shows up in film it's offensive?"
Because a nipple isn't a dangerous weapon? Best you can do with one is put an eye out.
question (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Am I the only one who finds Miller really overrated?
No. But then I've read DK2 [wikipedia.org].
Re:question (Score:4, Interesting)
No. I find his work visually attractive but stultifyingly misogynistic. I hate the way it glorifies violence. I'm familiar with it mostly from films rather than the books, but the films seem to hew very closely to the books.
Sin City is the only film I've walked out of in disgust. 300 was beautiful but best viewed with the sound off because the dialogue was incredibly stupid.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Me, I enjoy his linework and composition*.... I just really, REALLY wish he'd come out of the damned closet with his blatant bondage fetish.
I'm down with excessive violence... what I'm tired of is the boring-ass no-purpose "pornography of violence" that's fills out the runtime of a film more than it fleshes out the story.**
* There are comics I read for Story (Appleseed, The Invisibles, Transmetropolitan, Watchmen, etc) and then there are comics I buy strictly for the visuals (some of Miller's stuff, Battle
Review of 30 minutes of the movie (Score:3, Funny)
Only 30 minutes? (Score:2)
I mean, I know the economy is hard on everyone right now, but you'd think he'd have waited until he could see the entire movie.
Quick, let's raise a collection so he can review the entire thing!
Miller (Score:2)
Is a great writer and artist.
He totally sucks when it comes to making movies, IMHO.
I think he's too in-love with CGI to be effective in his movies- what he does well on the page of a comic book doesn't translate to the big silver screen.
Re: (Score:2)
How are people judging him on his skill as a director, when he's only ever directed one other film which was co-directed by Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino?
Oh dear, hype machine (Score:2, Interesting)
Hmm, film is released in less than a month and journos are shown a sneak peak of 30 minutes worth of clips?
That sounds like the studio has seen it, it's not good, and they are shitting themselves. Best thing to do is get the hype machine rolling with some choice clips to the press.
Hell I could pick 30 minutes of clips from 300 to make it look like a promising film but when you watch the whole film it's pretty boring. My guess is this is going to be the same deal.
Shame, because I loved Sin City :(
Re: (Score:2)
Hell I could pick 30 minutes of clips from 300 to make it look like a promising film but when you watch the whole film it's pretty boring. My guess is this is going to be the same deal.
Did you watch the same 300 that I did?
Granted, it wasn't factually accurate (I *really* wish that had told the true story of the traitor...way cooler than what they showed) and it definitely had a bit of fantasy to it, but I'm not sure I'd call 300 "boring."
Re:Oh dear, hype machine (Score:5, Interesting)
In fact, I'd call it one of the truest representations of the ancient Greek epic storytelling style to ever see the big screen. Since I'm guessing that was the whole point, I'm gonna go ahead and call the movie really damn good, not just as an action movie, but as an expression of art.
Disagree? Go look at the fight scenes in the Iliad and watch the movie again with that in mind. The somewhat fantastic animals, the way the heroes were larger-than-life, the fights over a fallen comrade, the caricatured enemy--it is exactly the way you'd expect a somewhat-talented ancient Greek storyteller to handle the tale.
Is it Homer? No. The story itself isn't as good. Is it a story about ancient Greece, told with impressive fidelity to the style of dramatic art popular in that time period? Hell yes. If that was the film makers' goal, then I'd say they nailed it.
I'd love to see The Iliad done in a similar style, gods and all. It'd be glorious. The Odyssey's another matter, but then it always read more like a modern novel to me, anyway.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not confusing anything. Re-read my post. I'm pretty sure the point of 300 wasn't historical accuracy, but to show a story of a real event being told with the embellishments and other characteristics of ancient Greek storytelling. If that was indeed the goal of the film makers, then they did a damn good job IMO.
The fantastic elements and caricatures of the enemy are a fit for this sort of folk-history storytelling, and my reason for bringing up the Iliad is that the battle scenes in 300 are composed o
Re: (Score:2)
In fact, I'd call it one of the truest representations of the ancient Greek epic storytelling style to ever see the big screen. Since I'm guessing that was the whole point, I'm gonna go ahead and call the movie really damn good, not just as an action movie, but as an expression of art.
Disagree? Go look at the fight scenes in the Iliad and watch the movie again with that in mind. The somewhat fantastic animals, the way the heroes were larger-than-life, the fights over a fallen comrade, the caricatured enemy-
Re: (Score:2)
I think the only people who actully like Frank Miller's writing are people who read comic books more than any other kind of book.
I am not trying to start a flame war. I have been an avid reader/collector of comics for decades. I used to have a complete set of Spider-man, Daredevil, the Journey Into Mystery issues
Re: (Score:2)
As a fan of the book, that really kind of pissed me off. They started off by teasing us with a few moments of the single very best depiction of phalanx combat ever put to film and then abandonded it for the rest of the movie.
In the book they NEVER broke formation. That was practically the whole point of the story. Hell, that was practically the whole point of the entire fucking Spartan civilization!*
You're kidding me... So that was the director/screenwriter, not Frank Miller. Well that's good to know. Ma
Re: (Score:2)
The somewhat fantastic animals, the way the heroes were larger-than-life, the fights over a fallen comrade, the caricatured enemy--it is exactly the way you'd expect a somewhat-talented ancient Greek storyteller to handle the tale.
Actually, the last three cliches are exactly the way I'd expect any mediocre storyteller to handle the tale.
"Somewhat fantastic animals" are not especially characteristic of ancient Greece either.
Re: (Score:2)
I too found 300 to be boring.
Much of that is probably due to my love for history. I found it terrible that they left out the influence of the Thespians and Thebans and possibly others who were present and all of whom outnumbered the Spartans.
In much the same way I am not as excited as I should be about the upcoming Valkyrie. Count von Stauffenberg was missing an arm as well as an eye. I can see Tom Cruise running and leaping about Deutschland like some modern day
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I watched the movie then rea the comics. I found the movie refreshing - yes, it glorifies violence, and more, it displays violence as a form of art. If you don't like that - you're not going to enjoy the movie.
Of course, don't go for any historical accuracy. There is none. But it makes sense in the context of the movie. It is being told from the eyes - well, one eye really ;) - of a spartan soldier. It is obvious he would raise the Spartan feats and those of his king to a demigod standard, and portr
Re: (Score:2)
I've been eating that stuff up ever since 1972 when Five Fingers of Death was shown at the California theatre in Berkeley, California. The next year Enter The Dragon was released and the entire country was eating that stuff up.
Yes, I like "violence as a form of art"; however, I insist that it be done well. Gratuitous violence is just...gratuitious violence. The art of creating art implies that the reader/viewer is connected emotionally with at least one of the characters. With
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have been told that you need to be gay to fully appreciate 300 [ducks!]
Not a review (Score:5, Insightful)
Not really "The Spirit". (Score:2, Insightful)
I mean, there's a reason the award they give for excellence in comics is called the "Eisner Awards."
I'm still waiting for an official statement... (Score:2)
...from Miller, explaining why he spent years refusing deals for filming Sin City, claming he was afraid that the director wouldn't be faithful to the comic book's spirit (pun not intended), and now is perfectly confortable in imposing his own view of The Spirit over Eisner's.
I'm not questioning here if the movie will be good or not. I'm just wondering if he ever tried to explain why he's not being completely hypocritical.
Re: (Score:2)
Dude. Reality check. Frank Miller is alive. The living need money, and movies pay a lot better than comics.
And Will Eisner is dead. As I'm sure Bryan Herbert would tell you, it doesn't matter what the dead may have wanted done with their work. The only thing that matters is the money to be made from their creative corpse.
Francis Ford Coppola's Bram Stoker's Dracula redux (Score:2)
Frank Miller adapting Will Eisner makes about as much sense as Sam Peckinpah adapting Jeeves and Wooster.
When Quentin Tarantino made Jackie Brown from Elmore Leonard's Rum Punch, people were all "dazzled" by how brilliant it was, this fusing of two great dialogue masters. Personally, I found that Tarantino's choices, starting with moving the story out of Miami and working right on through the list, did nothing more than systematically eliminate everything that made the book charming and great. In the end,
Obligatory (Score:2)
Story tagged "whores"
http://www.shortpacked.com/d/20060207.html [shortpacked.com]
How so? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Oh be quiet you. Pretty much every pirated film is available as a DVD quality (or better) rip before or while it is in theaters. The issue is either with A) some of the people involved in rating the films or B) people involved in making the DVDs or C) anywhere else between production and distribution.
The people who sneak camera's in are just sad, and wasting their time.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't forget The Phantom. These are all based on old comic book heroes, which seem to follow a certain pattern. I wouldn't be surprised if there were also The Shade, The Ghost, The Poltergeist, etc....
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
As a comic geek, I've read my fair share of Miller Stories and Eisner stories (Will Eisner's the creator of The Spirit, for anyone who might not know). I like both types, but form what I can see of the movie, it's not going to be Eisner's Spirit that we see.
I have no idea whether or not the movie is going to be any good, but it certainly will not have the wit and light-heartedness of it's source material. Eisner's Spirit was a goofily flawed hero who spent as much time trying to figure things out and gett
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno'. He didn't seem all that happy when P'Gell was working him over with a brick.
But then Denny did keep coming back for more, so who knows, maybe he was happy. :)
Re: (Score:2)
And don't expect to see Ebony White [photobucket.com] - at least without some kind of make-over.
Re: (Score:2)
I read the first 9 issues of ASBAR in one sitting. While initially it was very much a "huh?" phenomenon, if you roll with it, it is pretty damn fun. Not DKR quality, of course, but I did find it fun.
Re: (Score:2)
The Oedipus one I got from MST3K, the Dune one is an original.