Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Is the Yellowstone Supervolcano About To Blow?

Posted by timothy on Wed Dec 31, 2008 06:40 PM
from the four-horsemen-dressage dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Apparently, Yellowstone National Park has been having a very unusual number of earthquakes. Many of the most recent tremors have been deeper underground, an ominous sign. Combine that with a rapid rise in elevation over the past three years, and the possibility that earthquake activity from surrounding areas could trigger such an eruption on its own, and you've got the possible warning signs of a supervolcano eruption that would wipe out half to 2/3 of the continental US, plunge global temperatures, and wipe out a very significant chunk of world food sources. Here's a little more info to make your New Year brighter!"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] A Supervolcano Beneath Mt. St. Helens? 180 comments
We've discussed the supervolcano beneath Yellowstone a few times here (not going to blow, 2004; going to blow, 2008). Now scientists are pondering whether a large area of conductive material beneath Mt. St. Helens might contain enough magma that the area could be classed a supervolcano. The jury is still out on this one. Reader nhytefall sends us a New Scientist progress report. "Magma can be detected with a technique called magnetotellurics, which builds up a picture of what lies underground by measuring fluctuations in electric and magnetic fields at the surface. The fields fluctuate in response to electric currents traveling below the surface, induced by lightning storms and other phenomena. The currents are stronger when magma is present, since it is a better conductor than solid rock. ... [M]easurements revealed a column of conductive material that extends downward from the volcano. About 15 km below the surface, the relatively narrow column appears to connect to a much bigger zone of conductive material. This larger zone was first identified in the 1980s by another magnetotelluric survey, and was found to extend all the way to beneath Mount Rainier 70 km to the north-east, and Mount Adams 50 km to the east. It was thought to be a zone of wet sediment, water being a good electrical conductor. ... [Some researchers] now think the conductive material is more likely to be a semi-molten mixture. Its conductivity is not high enough for it to be pure magma.. so it is more likely to be a mixture of solid and molten rock."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Wrath0fb0b (302444) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @06:42PM (#26286495)

    After all, if we are going to have the sun blocked out by a huge cloud of dust, it would be fantastic to have as much heat trapped on earth as possible!

      • Re:Global Warning (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Stile 65 (722451) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:03PM (#26286695) Homepage Journal

        It's more likely to cause global cooling, as TFS and TFA state.

      • Re:Global Warning (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Mtn453 (1442435) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:06PM (#26286729)
        It would more likely knock out all human life in the USA and burn/melt most of the populated areas of Canada and Mexico. Don't forget it will cause a huge drop in temperature which will cause a mini ice age Doesn't really matter where you are in the world as everyone will most likely starve to death in a couple years anyways. I think it was Mt Toba that went off last time... which dropped the human population down to 10,000 and kicked off a mini ice age 75,000 years ago.
        • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:43PM (#26287111)
          So I take it my recent venture into the ice-cream business could have been a mistake?
        • Re:Global Warning (Score:5, Informative)

          by lysergic.acid (845423) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @08:51PM (#26287645) Homepage

          nah, it won't quite be that bad. most predictions expect the immediate danger zone to have a radius of 1000-1600km, with pumice & ash deposit probably covering all of California and most of the Midwest [tulane.edu]. but rather than being burned, most deaths/injuries will likely be caused by ash inhalation.

          luckily, modern humans have the benefit of science and technology.given enough warning, most people within range of the volcanic explosion and subsequent lava/pyroclastic flow (70,000 to 100,000+ individuals by some estimates) can be evacuated beforehand. everyone else will simply have to stay in doors for a couple of days before they too can be evacuated outside of the ash cover area.

          the USGS seems pretty confident that the YVO monitoring program will detect any premonitory indicators (such as emissions of magmatic gases) of any such impending disaster. and studies indicate that, if there is a volcanic eruption, it is not likely to be a caldera-forming supervolcanic eruption due to insufficient rhyolitic magma-storage to sustain such an event.

          in the event that a caldera-forming eruption takes place, then yes the ash will probably circle the entire globe and lower the temperature in the lower atmosphere for a few years, and that can have a severe impact on the ecology of the planet. but it's certainly survivable. and the chances of such an event actually occurring is still statistically insignificant--contrary to what is often reported, are are not "overdue" for a supervolcanic eruption. (the mean interval between such eruptions is 710,000 years, not 600,000 years.)

          if others are interested, you can read the USGS's report on the Preliminary Assessment of Volcanic and Hydrothermal Hazards in Yellowstone National Park and Vicinity [usgs.gov] (the actual report is in PDF format).

          • by Rei (128717) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @08:58PM (#26287693) Homepage

            Yep. Major rhyolitic, non-huge-caldera-forming eruptions have a far more statistically significant record than anything you could call "supervolcanic", and are only once every ten thousand years or so on average. Far more common. And most earthquake swarms at Yellowstone have nothing to with upcoming volcanic eruptions.

            Sorry to ruin everyone's doomsday fun. ;)

      • by Bastard of Subhumani (827601) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:11PM (#26286801) Journal

        If a volcano erupts, is it considered part of global warming?

        Yes, but only if someone hears it.

      • by Linux_ho (205887) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:14PM (#26286829) Homepage
        Oh come on -- that's no good. What am I going to do with all these Obama's the Antichrist pamphlets if you keep spreading all that rational thought around and telling everyone things are going to be OK? No good at all.
      • by Chris Mattern (191822) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:22PM (#26286895)

        You have NO friggin' idea what you're talking about. The mega-eruption, if it happens, could be *hundreds of thousands* times bigger than Mount St. Helens. The last super volcano was 75,000 years ago. Light was blocked out all over the world. 35 centimeters of ash fell *2500 miles* away. The global temperature plunged 21 degrees. Mankind was almost extinguished, cut back to only a few thousand. This one...could be *ten times bigger*.

      • by UconnGuy (562899) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:30PM (#26286953)
        You are forgetting about the volcanic dust in the lungs that will cause a painful death for many. For the most part, the dust is too fine to be filtered out.
      • by timeOday (582209) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:37PM (#26287059)
        No, it could very easily be much, much worse [wyomingnews.com] than Mt St Helens.

        The 1980 explosion at Mount St. Helens in Washington state blew out about 540 million tons of debris. Morrell said an explosion at Yellowstone likely would be 1,000 times greater, releasing about half a billion tons of ash.

        (emphasis mine).

        Second cite [bbc.co.uk]:

        Experts say such an event would have a colossal impact on a global scale... It would have a similar effect to a 1.5km-diameter space rock striking Earth, they claim.... A super-eruption is also five to 10 times more likely to happen than an asteroid impact, the report claims.... The volcanic winter resulting from a super-eruption could last several years or decades, depending on the scale of an eruption, and according to recent computer models, could cause cooling on a global scale of 5-10C.... The crater from the last super-eruption, 640,000 years ago, is large enough to fit Tokyo - the world's biggest city - inside it.

        Not just a dusting of ash, by any means. To extrapolate from a single event (Mt St Helens) which may or may not even be in the same geologic region (I don't know) is pointless when the Snake River Plain has erupted several times over - the entire landscape their bears the scars of it.

      • Um no (Score:5, Informative)

        by snaildarter (1143695) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:40PM (#26287089)

        Um no, dude, you don't really get it. If Yellowstone blows, there is no volcano eruption in human history that even remotely comes close. Mt. St. Helens would look like a fart standing next to Chernobyl. Areas 400 miles away would get covered in a foot of ash. There is just nothing like it.

        Here is a nice, graphical link for you to look at:

        link [discovery.com]

        The number of deaths could be staggering. That foot of ash, even 400 miles away in Denver, would collapse most roofs, and any with people in them would get severely injured or die. It would be the end of the U.S. as a global superpower, and there would be wars. You are naive.

          • Re:Um no (Score:5, Interesting)

            by Waffle Iron (339739) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @09:03PM (#26287725)

            At its worst, there will be an immense disruption of the electrical and telecommunications grid, immense expense from ash damage and removal, alot of immediate deaths and some ash deaths.

            You forgot one little detail: Widespread subzero temperatures and no new food anywhere on the planet for at least a year.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 31 2008, @06:44PM (#26286515)

    Dec 21, 2012

  • Suddenly... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Black Parrot (19622) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @06:44PM (#26286519)

    Suddenly the economy doesn't sound like such a big problem after all.

  • Why not? All the mathematical models claimed that the US Financial credit market and the Housing Bubble wouldn't burst at the same time- they calculated that was a once in 75 million years event. Given the luck of the United States lately, a 1/600,000 year event going off right now would just be the icing on the cake.

    • History books will refer to late 2008 as The Year God Decided He Really Hated America.

      (This is only true if the volcano blows within the next 5 hours, and I have to say - if it's going to blow, it should do it then, just for the humor value.)

    • by Unix Ronin (1442443) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:27PM (#26286927)

      Well, this is true, but what you have to remember is that those "mathematical models" were created by imbeciles who believed that all events in the financial market were independent (i.e no event in the market affects any other event), that the market can grow forever without limit, and -- worse -- still believe that when an event that the models say is a once-in-a-hundred-years event happens three times in six months, it's not an indication of a basic flaw in the model, but rather a rare fluke that means it's now statistically certain it'll NEVER happen again. The global financial sector's "mathematical models" are worthless, and always have been. They built a house of cards using imaginary money as cards, and the question was only one of when the house of cards would collapse.

      The financial market and the Yellowstone basin are hardly related. Our models of vulcanism are incompletely understood, and based on what is -- on a geological scale -- a very short period of observation, a mere century and a half or so in the case of Yellowstone. But they are at least based on observation and study, not wishful thinking. Yes, many of the models indicate that there could be another supervolcanic event at Yellowstone "any time now". But on a geological timescale, that "any time now" could be a thousand years away.

      This is interesting news, and absolutely bears close monitoring, but I think it's a little premature to run around shouting that the sky is falling. But regardless of the actual risk from Yellowstone, I don't think that the failure of the consensual delusion passed off as mathematical models of the global economy constitutes anything that can be used as evidence for anything except for how stupid a whole lot of ostensibly really smart people can actually be, when they're blinded by greed.

  • by DanWS6 (1248650) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @06:54PM (#26286623)
    I wasn't going to party tonight but this gives me a valid excuse to stop by the liquor store on the way home.
  • by KORfan (524397) <korfan@t[ ]net ['bc.' in gap]> on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:01PM (#26286683) Homepage
    Map showing recent earthquakes is over here http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/Maps/US2/43.45.-112.-110.php [usgs.gov]
  • by DanWS6 (1248650) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:02PM (#26286687)
    How many Library of Congresses is that?
  • by Werkhaus (549466) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:05PM (#26286721)

    Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow.

  • by hobo sapiens (893427) <cminor9@gmai l . com> on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:07PM (#26286745) Homepage

    The linked articles do not really raise any cause for concern. The title sure has a ZOMG!!! factor to it, but in reality it's just a bunch of what-ifs. Move along, nothing to see here.

  • by chaossplintered (1164745) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:16PM (#26286851)

    At times like these, I feel it's appropriate to start rocking back and forth singing:

    Life's a piece of shit
    When you look at it
    Life's a laugh and death's a joke, it's true.
    You'll see it's all a show
    Keep 'em laughing as you go
    Just remember that the last laugh is on you.

    And always look on the bright side of life...
    Always look on the right side of life...

  • by PCM2 (4486) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @07:55PM (#26287205) Homepage
    ...courtesy the U.S. Geological Survey: [usgs.gov]

    Fortunately, the Yellowstone volcanic system shows no signs that it is headed toward such an eruption in the near future. In fact, the probability of any such event occurring at Yellowstone within the next few thousand years is exceedingly low.

    ...

    Lava flows and small volcanic eruptions occur only rarely--none in the past 70,000 years. Massive caldera-forming eruptions, though the most potentially devastating of Yellowstone's hazards, are extremely rare--only three have occurred in the past several million years. U.S. Geological Survey, University of Utah, and National Park Service scientists with the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory (YVO) see no evidence that another such cataclysmic eruption will occur at Yellowstone in the foreseeable future.

    (emphasis mine)

    As for that "several million years" figure for a devastating explosion of the kind TFA is describing, consider that the United States as a nation is still less than 250 years old. I'm not saying it can't happen, but the idea that "it hasn't happened in a long time so it must be ready to happen now" is just a popular Las Vegas delusion.

    • Re:Warning (Score:5, Funny)

      by slugtastic (1437569) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @06:50PM (#26286575)
      50% end-time-discount hookers, call now!
    • Re:Warning (Score:5, Funny)

      by syousef (465911) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @06:52PM (#26286595) Journal

      Well, if it's going to be the apocalypse (and I'm not going to be responsible, much to my chagrin), can you just make sure I get a few weeks' notice? There are... things... I want to do.

      Those 'things' are girls and they've already told you they wouldn't have sex with you even if the world were ending.

      Oh wait on second thoughts this is slashdot. You do realize that at the end of the world, no one's going to care if you put out a new beta of your new Robocode [sourceforge.net] robot, even if it is unbeatable.