Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

2008 Beijing Olympics as a Media Test-Bed

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon Jul 07, 2008 03:45 PM
from the just-a-test-of-inconvenience dept.
CNN is reporting that NBC is using the 2008 Olympics in Beijing as a test-bed to understand how people are using different media platforms. "NBC has scheduled 3,600 hours of Olympics programming on its main network, along with Telemundo, USA, Oxygen, MSNBC, CNBC and Bravo. That's the equivalent of eight days of programming packed into each day. In addition, the company is planning to make 2,200 hours of streaming video available on NBCOlympics.com. Consumers may also get video on demand via their computer and Olympics content through their mobile phones."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • The problem with this test is: who's actually going to watch the Olympics?

    If they're using the Olymipcs as a test bed to see how people view media, then somebody in that department needs to be fired. You can't test a wide range of media on content that nobody's going to view in the first place (at least not enough to make it a real "test" of various media strengths).

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      A surprising number of people do watch them. I don't know why- most of the sports on the list would draw record lows on ESPN8. But throw in the every 4 years thing and some flags, and all of a sudden a large number of people care.

      • Who doesn't love ribbon dancing and curling?
      • by mixmatch (957776) on Monday July 07 2008, @04:00PM (#24089405) Homepage
        Maybe it has to do with the fact that it's an international competition for athletic dominance.
        • In a bunch of sports that nobody cares about. Like I said- throw in some flags, and for some reason people watch.

          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            I guess it just depends on who you talk to. I'm pretty sure NASCAR is pretty low on the rank of international sports, but its #1 spectator sport in the USA... Lets not equate NASCAR to racing. That would be like saying that gymnastics is defined by baton twirling.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Even more than that, it is a pure humanist celebration. Even though two countries hate each other, they compete together fairly under the same rules, and acknowledge when they lose. The entire world is also looking at one city for a while and if you follow the coverage you'll inevitably understand that place a little better.

          And that's just the sports, there is all sorts of cultural stuff that goes on. Saying the Olympics are all curling and ribbon dancing is like saying the world cup is just a bunch of p

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        I can't stand watching them on TV, because they will show one heat of a swimming event, then cut over to the 5000meter run for a few laps, then go to curling, etc. I want to watch the freaking event. Maybe if they stream all of it, I'll actually watch the events I want to. (I don't necessarly just want to watch the media's favoritte American's compete.. Thats not the point of the olympics)
    • Re:The Olymp-whats? (Score:4, Informative)

      by Morris Thorpe (762715) on Monday July 07 2008, @03:59PM (#24089389)
      Nobody's watching? You better tell the 4 billion people who were planning to do just that...

      Beijing expects four billion TV viewers for '08 Games [reuters.com]
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Nobody's watching? You better tell the 4 billion people who were planning to do just that...

        Historically, the Olympics have gotten low viewership in the West even when we host the Olympics. I think the Beijing estimates are a bit rosy even though they would now of course be higher due to domestic viewership in China.

    • So it's more of a narrow test even than you might think. To participate you have to have more money than sense. The advertisers should love it.

      Until the servers go down, anyway. Microsoft might have some smart folks, but they're no YouTube.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        The message I got trying to watch one of the videos:

        "Video is currently supported on the following browsers:

        - Internet Explorer 6, 7 for Windows (2003, XP SP2 or greater, and Vista)
        - Firefox 2 for Windows (2003, XP SP2 or greater, and Vista) and Mac OS 10.4.8+ (Intel only)
        - Safari 2, 3 for Mac OS 10.4.8+ (Intel only)

        - (coming soon) Firefox 3.x for Windows (2003, XP SP2 or greater, and Vista) and Mac OS 10.4.8+ (Intel only)"

        *Disclaimer* I knew it would not work, just curious on what would happen. I run Kubun

          • First of all, it's 2 betas in over a year.

            Since September 2007, we've had Silverlight 1.0, Silverlight 1.1, Silverlight 2 Beta 1, and two weeks back, Silverlight 2 Beta 2. None of the versions are backwards-compatible, in fact, between 1.0 and 1.1, the computing model had completely changed. code developed for one version isn't operable in others.

            Second of all, this is the standard MS release cycle. They do an alpha or CTP. Then they do one or two betas. Then they do one or two RC's, and finally RTM.

            The Olympics start on 8-8-08. Today's date is 8-7-08. We're at Ver 2 Beta 2 now. By your words, they need to do an alpha, at least one RC and then release NBCOlympics.com in production. All this in a month.

            Gosh, Firefox 3 went through what, 6 RC's in one month. YEAH! DESPERATION!!!!! I SPITE AT THEE MICROSOFT, FROM MY MOTHERS BASEMENT!

            I work with Silverlight on a daily basis; you can see some of the work my team did on the Silverlight showcase site (won't point to the exact entry). None of the work, though, was developed on Firefox, nor did we do any of it in my mom's basement.

            Trust me when I say this, MS has been _extremely_ aggressive in rolling out new features and versions in Silverlight. We think the only reason they're so aggressive is because of the Olympics; this is a hard production deadline they can't afford to miss. That is why we have versions every month. Hence my supposition of there being panic in Redmond.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Yes, you are right. Who would like to watch the best athletes in the world, make their best effort, competing against each other as they strive to be the fastest, strongest human beings in history, as they strive to achieve perfection in their disciplines. Who would be that crazy? PS: I know this guy is being a troll, but nevertheless ...
      • And how exactly does curling fit into that? I mean I could probably place in a competition involving eating nachos whilst programming, that doesn't make it a legitimate athletic event. Same goes for the luge in the Winter games.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      To put it in a geek context, one word: Silverlight [techcrunch.com].
  • by jollyreaper (513215) on Monday July 07 2008, @03:51PM (#24089235)

    The other networks have to turn it into a fucking soap opera giving you a 20 minute tear-jerker biography of the damn athlete before each event. That cuts into time that could be better spent, I don't know, covering the actual Olympics? There are so many sports that don't even make it on television.

    • There are so many sports that don't even make it on television.

      Tell me about it. [slashdot.org]

    • This is what I hate. Just show the events and forget the Costas crap "human interest" commentary.
      • This is what I hate. Just show the events and forget the Costas crap "human interest" commentary.

        There are essentially three ways to cover the Olympics:
        1. Nationalistic Penis Waving
        -My Country is better than yours; what a victory for [Country]

        2. Human interest pieces
        -[Athlete] worked so hard for this victory

        3. Technical analysis of the event
        -Look at his/her form in [event], the hip rotation generates power, etc etc etc

        Of those three, which do you think is the hardest and most expensive to get right?
        Hint: hiring knowledgeable & telegenic commentators for hundreds of events is not simple or cheap.

    • Unlikely, NBC is famous for the 20 minute biographicals and has exclusive rights to broadcast the Olympics in the US through the 2012 games. (So far...)

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      I've basically given up watching the broadcasts for exactly that reason. You only get 3 or 4 minutes of actual competition followed by a 15 minute sob story about some athlete having to deal with the deaths of her mother/father/sibling/uncle/pet goat after which they cut back to the studio where the talking head says where they'll be going to some time later but first these 10 minutes of commercials. And good luck getting any time for sports where the Americans are out of competition. Its simply not worth t

    • Agreed. I just want to see people compete at the highest level so I can see what something look likes when it's done "the best" it can be done.

      If I want to know someones life story I'll check wikipedia.

  • I recall a lot of folks were annoyed during the last olympics because the BBC blocked access to their online video streams to American IP address blocks because of NBC legal threats/licensing junk.
    • by sunderland56 (621843) on Monday July 07 2008, @04:27PM (#24089857)

      And the reason people were going to the BBC for online content was.... NBC's coverage sucks.

      NBC insists on covering the Olympics "live", in prime time. Problem is - the Olympics are being held in a different time zone. So NBC tapes the events, blocks any "live" coverage that it can, and then presents the taped event in EST prime time as if was live. (That's why so many of the events on TV have *surprise* American winners - they just discard the tapes from events where the Americans lose badly).

      Hopefully, if NBC is streaming content, they'll stream really live content from all sports. If not... then broadcasters that do a decent job in other countries will see a large uptick in their traffic.

  • by AmIyourJuliet (858232) on Monday July 07 2008, @04:04PM (#24089485)
    I would love to see them actually stream decent quality video on their website. All networks want to boast their revolutionizing web access, when all they do is stream some ultra low res grainy crap. It's totally unwatchable when you are used to watching the exact same events in HD, for free. Why are content providers so scared to broadcast HD feeds via the web? They could leave the commercials in, and it would be the same as watching it on TV. It can't honestly be that they are worried about people distributing the content. I mean.... people can very easily capture the HD feed to their computer with a tv tuner. And when it comes to the "too much bandwidth" argument, couldn't they just use bittorrent? I know the reason probably has to do with money... but I'm not seeing it. Someone please enlighten me.
    • 1. Can you even use BitTorrent for video streaming?
      2. We're talking about live video, too.
      3. ?
      4. Profits

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      An HD broadcast requires a big transmitter to be setup once, and then broadcast over the area. Big initial cost, then basically free (there are still some upgrades, power bill, etc) To show HD on the internet, your talking about Multiple Megabit connections for EACH viewer. The costs of that are astronomical. I guess, it would be similar to the differences between Multicast (transmit that 2GB file once to 100 machines), and unicast (transmit that 2GB file 100 times!).
    • by rayzap (700032) on Monday July 07 2008, @04:18PM (#24089717)
      Plus it is in WMT wrapped in SilverLight poo! No Linux, they promised Mac but did not deliver. WMT is a great streaming format for live but not when wrapped in SL poo. WMT is fine for corporate work but consumer streaming is best with Flash so all can view. NBC is just a big lumbering media company who no longer "gets it".
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      HD feeds wouldn't work out so well, as most people don't have the bandwidth. Bittorrent wouldn't be good for NBC, because think about what happens when the masses start learning how to use bittorrent. You know someone will edit out the commercials and create new torrents that will quickly become more popular than NBC's torrents.

      However, it's not hopeless. I think they should create a proprietary, cross-platform P2P based Olympics viewer. A user could simply rank the events they were most interested in, and

  • My fiancee is a big fan of the olympics. We'll be out of the country for the first few weeks of August with no intentions of watching any TV. So she's looking into DVR options. I think every minute of coverage will be available somewhere on the internet after we get back. It'll certainly be easier than trying to pick everything to record beforehand. But she's afraid to take the chance that she'll miss something.

    So will NBC or others make all of the video available online immediately after the events?

    • So will NBC or others make all of the video available online immediately after the events? Will someone else?

      Seeing the Olympic is an international event you might be able to foreign websites to view streaming video as long as you don't mind it being in your native language.

      • Seeing the Olympic is an international event you might be able to foreign websites to view streaming video as long as you don't mind it being in your native language.

        Ummm.. But assuming that all the people on Slashdot have English as their native language there are lots of other countries that speak English that may have it streaming, though some may have IP blocks for US IPs...

  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna (970587) on Monday July 07 2008, @04:13PM (#24089623) Journal
    They keep bragging about something called the Beijing Olympics in NBC. What the hell is Olympics?
  • A Joke (Score:2, Informative)

    I am a track coach and the latest Olympic Trials streaming for track was a joke. They only webcast the same hours they broadcast. No in depth streaming, just re purposed broadcasting. Plus, if I have to watch stories instead of performances I am pissed. NBC is lost when it comes to Track and Field (as opposed to the NCAA where I happily sat at my desk and watched hours of great events. It's Ok to watch streaming as we are a streaming provider and I am the owner, haha.
    • The coverage may be bad, but, hey, be thankful your favourite sport is in the Olympics. Some of us love sports that are ideal [wikipedia.org] candidates, but don't make it in because of stupid IOC politics. :-(

  • "The whole idea is to get the same person and to touch them across all different sorts of platforms,"

    Spielberg's "Minority Report" might not be a classic, but it was very savvy in it's predictions about technology. In particular, the above quote brings to mind the excessively invasive advertising keyed to individuals via eye-scans. You can tell these NBC bastards have a hard-on for that kind of future.

    We're basically in a one-sided war. Advertisers are pulling together intelligence and getting orga
  • Well gee, with 2 events potentially being held at the same time or at 3:00 in the morning in a US time zone, obviously on demand is going to beat everything else because then people can watch it whenever they want. Plus, people without DVRs can't just pause and re-watch anything so they'll double up with on demand also. Here's another prediciton too: all the traffic is going to melt the freakin internet!
  • if you get CBC... (Score:4, Informative)

    by wardk (3037) on Monday July 07 2008, @04:35PM (#24089983) Journal

    they do an outstanding job covering the Olympics, if you can get it.

    while they of course emphasize Canadian athletes, they don't cater to them exclusively.

    and you get to actually watch complete events. not flip from event to event in a format apparently designed only for those with attention deficit.

    I bet CBC even gets some of the smog on screen. what a wonderful place to run long distances...

  • There was a cartoon in the paper that read something like:

    "We have just had a report that other countries are competing in the olympics. Now back to our coverage"

    That has pretty well summed up every telecast I have seen in recent times, and what I fear will happen for Beijing no matter how many hours of coverage they stream/broadcast

  • Bravo? (Score:3, Funny)

    by ya really (1257084) on Monday July 07 2008, @04:46PM (#24090175)
    What exactly are they going to carry? Synchronized swimming?
  • by SengirV (203400) on Monday July 07 2008, @05:03PM (#24090401)

    I can't even watch the Olympics anymore thanks to NBC bastardizing it. It's like they swap out the NBC sports division with the staff from Lifetime.

    Guess what NBC, I WANT to see the fucking prelim races for ALL of the track and Field events. Not just 1/10th of the final race/event with 10 hours of stories about the F'n athletes that don't even win.

    DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! You've killed the Olympics NBC, and your network is in last place for a good reason. Isn't it time for Law and Order Peoria to make it's debut?!?!?!?

    • I noticed this recently when they switched away from flash and it suddenly stopped working.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      I just tried looking at a few videos on that site, and it requires Silverlight. Why can't they use flash like everything else?

      Microsoft Silverlight Gets a High Profile Win: 2008 Beijing Olympics [techcrunch.com].

      NBC got incentivized. After Microsoft failed to gain control of Yahoo to use it as a channel to force Silverlight dominance, the NBC agreement was the fallback.

    • by symbolset (646467) on Monday July 07 2008, @04:53PM (#24090287) Journal

      The actual events will require both Silverlight and Vista.

      Thereby making absolutely certain that the videos won't be cached, transcoded and redistributed within seconds of their first webcast. You won't be able to archive them or time shift them or view them on the evil Lunix or your otherwise capable crackberry or eee pc. Right? Right? Because Vista's secure media transport and display has been perfected and will never be cracked.

      This streamed olympic footage will not be available for fair use, ever. Not even long after even those who participated have ceased to care. Me, I don't care already. If they stream it to an open platform I might watch some of it but Vista alone is too much of a price to pay, let alone Silverlight. I think instead I'll click over to CNN and see if they manage to smuggle out footage of protesters.

        • by symbolset (646467) * on Tuesday July 08 2008, @12:15AM (#24095543) Journal

          Oh, really? [nwsource.com]

          The Seattle PI reports: "However, there's a catch- this generous helping of everything from taekwondo to equestrian is exclusively available to Windows Vista users."

          Now read my post again. Is some part of it not in agreement with the facts?

          I think you're deliberately misunderstanding me in order to muddy the issue.

          The NBC "Olympics On The Go" service will only be broadcast to users of Windows Vista [arstechnica.com]. You can have the Olympics in "up to HD" but only if you take Vista too. I can only presume they are afraid their servers couldn't handle the load of allowing it to the broad audience of popular operating systems and handheld devices, even though users of that equipment are a much bigger market for their advertisers.

    • No, they definitely meant mean Olymics. The idea of media covering the Olympics is just obvious and completely un-newsworthy. Slashdot would never do that. I haven't RTFA yet, so I don't know what Olymics is, but considering neither of us have heard of it it probably needs news coverage, right?