Slashdot Log In
Knights Templar Sue the Pope
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:27 AM
from the trade-ya-for-the-grail dept.
from the trade-ya-for-the-grail dept.
pdragon04 writes "According to The Register, "the Knights Templar are demanding that the Vatican give them back their good name and, possibly, billions in assets into the bargain, 700 years after the order was brutally suppressed by a joint venture between the Pope and the King of France..."." I wonder what a holy grail goes for with 700 years of compound interest.
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
No legal standing to sue (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:No legal standing to sue (Score:5, Interesting)
If that succeeds, maybe the Freemasons have a case to fight too.
Parent
Re:No legal standing to sue (Score:5, Funny)
If that succeeds, I'm going to rename myself "satan" and then sue the Vatican to get them to give me back my good name.
Parent
Re:No legal standing to sue (Score:5, Funny)
Satan [wikipedia.org] plays for the Penguins.
Parent
What about the native americans? (Score:5, Funny)
Or, maybe they could just sue the USA for making them look silly - I mean, those native headdresses don't look silly to people who are native - just everyone else.
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Funny)
The English deported their religious fanatics to America and their criminals to Australia. I think we, the Americans, got the short end of the stick on that one. I want to sue the English government for dumping their religious nut jobs here. I'm going to admit videos of the 700 club as evidence of this maleficence.
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Insightful)
Their leadership came from a religious congregation who had fled a volatile political environment in the East Midlands of England for the relative calm of the Netherlands to preserve their religion. Concerned with losing their cultural identity, the group later arranged with English investors to establish a new colony in North America.
From Wikipedia, Or perhaps even more insightful...
In 1617, discouraged by economic difficulties, the pervasive Dutch influence on their children, and their inability to secure civil autonomy, the congregation voted to emigrate to America. Through the Brewster family's friendship with Sir Edwin Sandys, treasurer of the London Company, the congregation secured two patents authorizing them to settle in the northern part of the company's jurisdiction. Unable to finance the costs of the emigration with their own meager resources, they negotiated a financial agreement with Thomas Weston, a prominent London iron merchant. Fewer than half of the group's members elected to leave Leiden. A small ship, the Speedwell, carried them to Southampton, England, where they were to join another group of Separatists and pick up a second ship. After some delays and disputes, the voyagers regrouped at Plymouth aboard the 180-ton Mayflower. It began its historic voyage on Sept. 16, 1620, with about 102 passengers--fewer than half of them from Leiden.
From mayflowerfamilies.com
I still stand by my statement, go take a history class.
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Funny)
This is slashdot. No one was upset with the historical inaccuracy, nor the insulting of americans. The troll moderation was for the insinuation that community colleges were for idiots who don't know history.
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Interesting)
In fact, they only started using Australia when they lost Georgia. Australian settlement did not begin in earnest until @1800 if I recall correctly.
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Funny)
I think we, the Americans, got the short end of the stick on that one.
I'm not so sure about that. I suspect religion was merely a cover for those secretly desiring improved dental hygiene.
I want to sue the English government for dumping their religious nut jobs here. I'm going to admit videos of the 700 club as evidence of this maleficence.
Quakers != Baptists. Different breed of nut job.
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Insightful)
Ouch! It almost sounds like there are no consequences for perpetrating a successful genocide.
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Informative)
As a Protesant, I can't recall ever having read anything about Rome doing *any* of that. From the papal bull Sublimus Dei of 1537:
Parent
Re:What about the native americans? (Score:5, Informative)
If this lawsuit succeeds the native americans could only sue the catholic church for slander and defamation eg: saying they had no souls and could be slaughtered like animals or however manifest destiny is justified.
Except the Catholic Church never did either of those things. They're urban legends.
About your first allegation, it suffices to say that there's no point in converting something that has no soul. Besides, the Catholic Catechism teaches that everything that self-moves possesses a soul, and among those, everything that moves by virtue of reason to be human, body shape or color not being requirements. (Yes, Catholicism is "aliens ready" since the Middle Ages.) Case in point: the most important Catholic theologian for the first 1200 years of Western Church history, Saint Augustine, was black.
As for your second point, back in the beginning of the discoveries, you already had important Catholic theologians, such as Francisco de Vitoria [wikimedia.org], one of the creators of modern international law, writing extensively against the European subjugation of the New World. European crowned princes, of course, did it anyway. Politicians are the same, no matter whether they're in a monarchy or in a democracy.
Good reasons to criticize the Church do exists, but these two surely aren't listed among them.
Parent
Re:No legal standing to sue (Score:5, Funny)
Hello! My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father, prepare to settle.
Parent
Re:No legal standing to sue (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:No legal standing to sue (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
statute of limitations? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm thinking that 700 years might be a bit past the statute of limitations...
Re:statute of limitations? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm thinking that 700 years might be a bit past the statute of limitations...
NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Parent
Re:statute of limitations? (Score:5, Insightful)
Except that the Templars ran into trouble with the French, not the Spanish. Their real problem was that King Philip IV owed them a huge pile of cash that he didn't have.
Of course, that would have made Jacques de Molay even more surprised and fearful if the Spanish Inquisition showed up on his doorstep.
Parent
Re:statute of limitations? (Score:5, Informative)
As informative as your post is, I think it qualifies for a "Whoosh".
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gldlyTjXk9A [youtube.com]
Parent
Re:statute of limitations? (Score:5, Informative)
True, but the murder charges would be against individuals in France (not Spain) who are dead. Anyhow, that is criminal, and I was thinking this was a civil suit.
Parent
Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Insightful)
I wonder what a holy grail goes for with 700 years of compound interest.
I'm much more interested in how you make up for the lives & civilizations your organization destroyed [wikipedia.org].
I'm not saying this is true but Newsweek/MSNBC ran a story on pagan relics stored beneath the Vatican [tripod.com]. I've also read and heard that many Native American (both North & South) relics and documents were shipped back to the Vatican to be stored under it so they could study heathenism and combat it. This was after their owners were either converted or burned/shot.
I would think that the Catholic church could at least (as a sign of good faith) return these to their descendants or at the very least release them to a museum with all the information they have on it so that the rest of us can gain insight to their culture & religion. Of course, if this were true, I don't think the museum donations would be worth the black eye.
"the Knights Templar are demanding that the Vatican give them back their good name and, possibly, billions in assets into the bargain, 700 years after the order was brutally suppressed by a joint venture between the Pope and the King of France..."
The funny thing is that the Vatican probably has billions in capital at its disposal. I always got a kick out of the pope ruling a small nation-state in Europe (with its own currency, mind you) telling me to be more like Jesus. The same Jesus who said in Matthew 19:21
Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."
Or what Luke said (12:23)
Sell your possessions and give to the poor. Provide purses for yourselves that will not wear out, a treasure in heaven that will not be exhausted, where no thief comes near and no moth destroys.
Or John 3:17
If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him?
The funny thing is I could go on all day finding quotes from most major religions ... Like Buddha or Gandhi, I'm a huge fan of this Jesus guy. It's 99% of the people who purport to follow him that manage to genuinely fuck up the world.
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Funny)
(see sig)
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Funny)
[...]still standing by for Christianity-bashing and something about open source.
YEAH, how come Jesus didn't post the sermon on the mount for all of us to modify and improve upon instead of dictating it like Microsoft would do?
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Funny)
YEAH, how come Jesus didn't post the sermon on the mount for all of us to modify and improve upon instead of dictating it like Microsoft would do?
It's pretty obvious that the original source code has been lost, and the current source is a combination of ignorant reverse engineering, clumsy hacks, and viruses.
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Interesting)
As long as we're quoting from the Bible, why not disband the whole church system using Matthew 6?
"Be careful not to do your 'acts of righteousness' before men, to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.
2"So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. 3But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Prayer
5"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. 6But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Informative)
You seem to have missed the part in the Bible where Jesus prayed, in front of everybody, as an example of how to pray. He also prayed in the garden of Gethsemane in front of his apostles.
Prayer in front of others is only wrong if you're doing it so other people see you praying - similarly, Christ said that those who fast and act like they're fasting so others know they're fasting already have their reward. Praying in front of others is fine if your only intention is to pray, that is, if you do not do it for the praise of man.
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Insightful)
Because we're trapping people inside their own logic.
You say "bronze age mythology", they say "word of God". You then ask them why they feel qualified to pick and choose which bits of their God's word they obey and which bits they contradict.
You're unlikely to get strong followers of a religion to buy into a mindset that runs contrary to the basic concept of faith in their book, however good an argument you present. The thing is, a reasonable amount of what their book tells them is actually rather pleasant (yes, there's plenty that isn't, too) so asking them why they aren't obeying those bits is much more likely to change their behaviour than asking them to abandon it all, good and bad.
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm much more interested in how you make up for the lives & civilizations your organization destroyed.
I'm more interestded in how the list you pointed to is in any way relevant.
etc. What do any of these have to do with destroying people's lives?
I would think that the Catholic church could at least (as a sign of good faith) return these to their descendants or at the very least release them to a museum with all the information they have on it so that the rest of us can gain insight to their culture & religion.
I don't see how anyone could disagree with that. "Thou shalt not steal," not even if you are the Catholic Chruch.
The funny thing is that the Vatican probably has billions in capital at its disposal.
More pathetic than funny IMO, especially considering Matthew 19:23 - "Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. 24 And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God"
Never trust a preacher who wears a five thousand dollar suit preaching in a million dollar church.
It's 99% of the people who purport to follow him that manage to genuinely fuck up the world.
Amen to that. Pat Robertson has converted more Christians to athiesm than all the athiests at slashdot combined. Most of the people you find in any church worship money, not God.
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Insightful)
The funny thing is I could go on all day finding quotes from most major religions ... Like Buddha or Gandhi, I'm a huge fan of this Jesus guy. It's 99% of the people who purport to follow him that manage to genuinely fuck up the world.
I'd love to see where you got your statistics.
I don't disagree with you. Christians have done quite a good job of messing up the world. Heck...Christians are people too - we mess up. But, then again, we are all part of this earth, so we all hold responsibility for its state...it's not just Christians (and people of other faiths) who are at fault. The problem as I see it is, and as you very nicely pointed out, religions tend to be caught in their hypocrisy which makes them look that much worse. (What's worse - someone who does something bad, or someone who says to do good and still does the bad thing?)
I am also not disagreeing with you that all of that capital could not be used to help millions (billions?) of people in this world, and it's not. I am with you 100% on that.
With all that said, what I find interesting is that you quote passage after passage in the Bible, condemning Christians (and religions) about not being perfect, yet you forget one passage...
Matthew 7:5 - You hypocrite! First remove the beam from your own eye, and then you will see clearly enough to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
I challenge you that, instead of complaining about how others are not doing the right thing, go out and do the right thing yourself. How much better would that make the world?
Parent
Not so fast. (Score:5, Informative)
http://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/oct_2006/pagan_graves_in_vatican_basement.html [tripod.com]
To be fair, you completely misrepresent this article that you linked. The aforementioned "pagan relics stored beneath the Vatican" is nothing more than a new archeological site. It's not some cache of pagan artifacts gathered from past crusades/missions or some such.
If you read the article you'll see that it is a ancient Roman necropolis that was discovered recently, quite by accident*, during the construction of a new parking garage for the Vatican. It even has the rather tongue-in-cheek name "Necropolis of the Parking Garage" ("Necropoli dell'Autoparco").
The fact the burial customs used were clearly non-christian/Catholic, is the only reason why the site is labeled as a Pagan site. Also, it is dated to around 23 B.C.-14 A.D, which dates it just before Christianity as a whole.
The Vatican even plans to open the site to the public. This quote best sums up how the Vatican feels on the matter:
(* This kind of stuff happens all the time in Rome. It just so happens that the Vatican isn't in the habit of digging so deep.)
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Informative)
Well, if Jesus is God, then he owns the whole Universe and beyond. Can't be richer than that, can he?
Anyway, if you go beyond the Gospels into Acts, you'll see the apostles made such a money-less community. The problem is, it didn't last. At the end, they had to ask Paul to go around get donations from the churches abroad, what he did. Morals: being poor is good and all, provided you have someone from whom to ask money once poorness' ugly side shows up.
Oh, and by the way: the land the Church owned in Europe up to the 18th century were usually reserved for usage by the landless or anyone under persecution of angry Feudal lords. When those Church lands were appropriated by the many greed governments around, they got distributed among nobles, bourgeois and other close friends of said governments. That's when being a poor European landless peasant really became a problem (for the peasant).
In short: actual History is more complicated than our cherished oversimplifications would prefer it to be.
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Insightful)
No one would remember the Good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions; he had money as well.
Margaret Thatcher
Parent
Congratulations! (Score:5, Funny)
Congratulations! You have discovered the secret of Instant +5 Insightful here in our happy community:
"Blah blah [vapid knee-jerk complaining about vapid knee-jerk complaining and slashdot groupthink] blah blah," followed by a suggestion of patenting it.
Parent
Re:The Vatican has no cash! (Score:5, Informative)
Y'know... I've never really liked it when people use the word "ye" to mean "you"... it means "the". And it's actually supposed to be pronounced that way, too... The letter 'y' in that place replaces a thorn [wikipedia.org], and started doing so with the introduction of moving type. It does so because the French-made printing presses didn't have that letter in their character set, because it's of Anglo-Saxon origin, not Latin, and so the letter Y was used in its place. Over time, the letter simply fell out of use in the English alphabet, and was replaced with the combonation "th", which had started appearing about 100 years earlier.
Off topic, I know. But *shrugs*
Parent
Re:Silly (Score:5, Funny)
Let's go further than that! Join the Gondwanaland Reunification Movement!
Parent
Re:Yes the Vatican Is So Pure & Holy (Score:5, Funny)
The middle one is Luke 12:33.
Would that be AM or PM ?
Parent
Good luck with that... (Score:5, Insightful)
They'll have enough trouble trying to prove that they are the rightful heirs of the Knights Templar...Trying to get money from the church on top of that? And why not sue France? They got a huge chunk of change as well.
Not even close to being the first time someone has tried this, and it never goes anywhere. The dream of the Templars wealth keeps it going, but in reality there is no wealth to claim, no one with the right to claim it, and no one to claim it from.
Its all a coverup! (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Rightful heir of the Knights Templar (Score:5, Funny)
How about Sir Roger Moore? He's a Knight, and is famous for playing Simon Templar.
Parent
DNS hack! (Score:5, Funny)
I think the traffic to the register is being redirected to the onion!
I propose a deal. (Score:5, Funny)
They go back and *actually* liberate the Holy Land, and *then* the Pope has to pay them all the golden doubloons in Christendom.
10% bonus doubloons for finding the True Cross. On second thoughts, 10% bonus for each True Cross found.
Heck, I'll even chip in a squadron of Turcopoles and some Genoese arbalesters.
I had to look it up (Score:5, Informative)
So now you don't have to [wikipedia.org].
I fail to see how this is nerdy, but I do appreciate the humor of someone suing the pope.
We demand the Pantheon back! (Score:5, Insightful)
The Pantheon, in Rome [wikipedia.org], was built as a temple to the Roman gods, but was taken over by the Catholic church in 609 AD. It's time to return it to its original purpose, and restore the statutes of Mars, Venus, Apollo, Jupiter, and Diana.
"WTF" is "their good name?" (Score:5, Insightful)
As standing with The Register's excellent reputation these days, the article is short on details and what exactly "restoring their good name" means. Here's something that might make more sense:
http://www.cathnews.com/article.aspx?aeid=8360 [cathnews.com]
What the Templars want is the lifting of the ban on the order itself by the catholic church. Follow the money on this one. The templars appear to be a charitable organization now, but even 700 years later, c'mon, if you said you were a templar, the first two stupid questions you'd expect from an ignorant person are "weren't they all burned at the stake for crimes a long time ago", and "so where's the grail?"
Obviously the Templars want some legitimacy, and this is the first step. If the church basically lifts the ban, they can also probably get financial and political support from the Vatican, which is huge. By getting legitimacy, they stop having to answer the same stupid questions and can go back to doing good works "in the name of God and with the pope's blessing," if that's the type of thing that floats your boat, and people will start taking them more seriously. Right now I bet no one in the world takes them seriously, but if they win this, since this will be a pretty visible thing if the Pope does what he asks, it will catapult the group into the world spotlight.
I'm a living Neanderthal (Score:5, Funny)
...and I want to sue the whole of Europe for damages.
Re:Umm... hello, respect to the Holy Clergy? (Score:5, Informative)
They did, and the Pope & the king of France conspired to kill them all & seize their lands on the charges of heresy, satanism, and a few other rather unpleasant things. Betrayals don't foster respect. If the record is to be believed, it was a raw money/power grab.
Parent