Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

New "MP3 100% Compatible" Logo For DRM-Free Music

Posted by kdawson on Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:29 PM
from the plays-for-sure-this-time-we-really-mean-it dept.
thumbnail
Sockatume writes "A coalition of seven UK digital music stores have created a logo for DRM-free, MP3 music. The 'MP3: 100% Compatible' logo allows the stores to emphasize the advantages of the format, namely that MP3 files will run on any device and won't keel over and die as DRM-laden files are wont to. The BPI — the UK equivalent of the RIAA — is backing the scheme, emphasizing that it will also allow users to identify legitimate stores."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Sweet (Score:5, Interesting)

    The tide has turned: A once geek-only outrage will now be slowly taken up by the AOL like masses.

    About frigging time.
    • Re:Sweet (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 04 2008, @11:24PM (#25636647)

      The tide has turned: A once geek-only outrage will now be slowly taken up by the AOL like masses.

      No kidding.

      A non-geek friend of mine bitched about this last week. He's nearing 40, doing well, and is a big metal fan. He was trolling memory lane on YouTube, and decided to go get some more albums of one of his old favorites. The store had a deal on the band's full boxed set -- sweet! -- then he noticed the DRM tag. He took it to the till and asked the clerks if he'd be able to play the tunes on his iPod. Clerk 1: "I dunno." Clerk 2: "Probably not."

      Downer: no sale. He's such a nice straight-up guy he wrote the Lable about it. Got no reply of course, which pissed him off more. I nodded through this and explained again why DRM sucks - it fucks over the legit customers like him, while not slowing down the pirates.

      This new "100% Compatible" logo is /exactly/ what he (and the store clerks) needs. It's due. Regular customers are fed up with this shit now, not just geeks.

      • Re:Sweet (Score:5, Funny)

        by Tubal-Cain (1289912) on Wednesday November 05 2008, @12:50AM (#25636977) Journal

        Downer: no sale. He's such a nice straight-up guy he wrote the Lable about it. Got no reply of course, which pissed him off more. I nodded through this and explained again why DRM sucks - it fucks over the legit customers like him, while not slowing down the pirates.

        Speaking of which: did you email him links to .torrents with instructions?

      • Re:Sweet (Score:5, Insightful)

        by lysergic.acid (845423) on Wednesday November 05 2008, @01:05AM (#25637061) Homepage

        having worked in the music industry i'd tend agree with you. i think this initiative, especially the fact that it's backed by a powerful trade group, will send a strong message to record labels and artists.

        while i'm hoping my boss learned his lesson after receiving a bunch of complaints and product returns on music CDs using standards-breaking DRM (i think a rep from Megaforce, our distributor, sold him the idea originally), i suspect the notion of DRMing future releases is still in the back of his mind. and, honestly, even without the product liability issues that come with CD DRM technology, it's still a huge waste of money that alienates customers/fans.

        resources wasted combating "piracy" and on anti-consumer policies/tactics like DRM, or any other means of restricting consumer freedom, would be better used on music promotion. record labels can't dictate to consumers how they can or can't use the music they've purchased. online file sharing, like swapping cassettes or CDs, is an timeless constant. the smart labels will use this to their advantage rather than try to fight human nature.

        record labels spend millions of dollars each year on promotion, whether it's buying spins on the radio, paying for TV/radio commercials, taking out ads in magazines & one-stops, printing fliers, putting your tracks on listening booths, co-op promotions, etc. it's all about getting the music out there, getting the band's name out there. you let people listen to your music for free on the radio, and you grow your fan base. in fact, the more plays you get on the radio, the more albums you sell. the industry understands the value of this kind of _paid_ promotion, but when it comes to free promotion, they just can't seem to wrap their heads around it. so they actually waste money to try to stop it.

        instead of worrying about the music "pirates" who don't pay for music, which is really a relatively small percentage of the population that you're never going to reach anyway, why not exploit the marketing value of the internet. viral marketing the most effective, and simultaneously cheapest, means of increasing your fan base, and subsequently your customer base. so it makes much more sense to distribute DRM-free MP3s that people can share with their friends and let file sharing work for you through viral marketing.

          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            "don't know how I'll get well-written, well-performed, well-produced music in large enough amounts to satisfy me without my money becoming they money."

            Then you're not a music "sharer".

            You pay for it, make your money their money. The point is you're not going to stop people sharing it, thats pretty much impossible, but you can stop punishing legitimate users and learn to live with a level of piracy that's not going to go away.

            Meanwhile, you and I are paying for our music because we like it and want more. Act

          • Re:Sweet (Score:4, Insightful)

            by Mateo_LeFou (859634) on Wednesday November 05 2008, @11:06AM (#25643231) Homepage

            "Cool. So everybody... "

            Right at the word 'everybody' is where you indicate that you missed the point entirely.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        I once bought a CD that refused to play on my computer. That was 4 years ago and that was the last CD I bought. Recently I discovered deezer and finally get to listen to other things than webradio
  • by dasuser (1173323) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:32PM (#25636335)
    Well, I suppose this is gonna get the suddenbreakoutofcommonsense tag.
  • yes but... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Sfing_ter (99478) <<ten.llun> <ta> <natek>> on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:33PM (#25636339) Homepage Journal

    Will it run on linux? :?

  • by aliquis (678370) <dospam@gmail.com> on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:34PM (#25636341) Homepage

    New logo on top of the Pirate Bays search logo in 5, 4, 3, ... ? :D

  • by syousef (465911) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:43PM (#25636399) Journal

    How does use of the logo show you're legit? I bet there are plenty of pirate and torrent sites that could stick that logo right on their front page today.

  • by sleeponthemic (1253494) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:44PM (#25636415) Homepage
    Swastika on all the DRM'ed files.
  • by sootman (158191) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @11:12PM (#25636595) Journal

    Wow, what a mouthful. 12 syllables. "MP3 100% Compatible" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue. They should have gone with something shorter, catchier, but with the same meaning... like "plays for sure!" or something.

      • "Plays Damn Well!"

        Great for heavy metal, but might seem a bit strange on the Mormon Tabernacle Choir's latest release.

  • by ScrewMaster (602015) * on Tuesday November 04 2008, @11:13PM (#25636605)

    The BPI â" the UK equivalent of the RIAA â" is backing the scheme, emphasizing that it will also allow users to identify legitimate stores.

    I'd say their willingness to allow a distinction to be drawn between an open format and their restricted garbage is a temporary phenomenon. Odd in a way, since they (and their ilk elsewhere) have spent a lot of money convincing buyers that DRM-infected files are just as good as unencumbered ones. Makes me think that as soon as they have people aware that MP3 is different than whatever it is they're offering, they'll start spending billions vilifying MP3 files. These guys are sneaky and not to be trusted under any circumstances.

    • by TubeSteak (669689) on Wednesday November 05 2008, @02:02AM (#25637351) Journal

      I'd say their willingness to allow a distinction to be drawn between an open format and their restricted garbage is a temporary phenomenon. Odd in a way, since they (and their ilk elsewhere) have spent a lot of money convincing buyers that DRM-infected files are just as good as unencumbered ones.

      I disagree. It is not odd at all.
      They are trying to break the back of iTunes and preventing anything like it from ever arising again.

      It drives them insane that a 3rd party has the kind of market power that lets it set pricing on their product.

    • by darkhitman (939662) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:41PM (#25636389)
      Yeah, but '73.38% compatible'* just doesn't have the same ring to it, you know?

      *Number pulled out of ass, just so y'know.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:42PM (#25636393)

      You are mistaking "compatible" with "open". .ogg is open, but is compatible with significantly fewer devices and computers at the moment. I don't think my computer will play it (though I could download a codec for it if I cared), and I know my phone, portable music player (aka MP3 player), and car stereo can't play it.

      • by SanityInAnarchy (655584) <ninja@slaphack.com> on Wednesday November 05 2008, @02:09AM (#25637389) Journal

        Flac, then. Turns into mp3 or ogg easily enough, and is open and unpatented.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          It's also fully lossless. I'm not sure people need or want that, considering the ballooning size of digital music libraries even with lossy compression.

          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            It's also fully lossless. I'm not sure people need or want that, considering the ballooning size of digital music libraries even with lossy compression.

            Hard disks are up to 1.5TB. That's maybe a hundred times what they were when Napster first became popular. FLAC is typically, what, ten times the size of an MP3? Seems to me the time for lossless compression is here.

          • by DrYak (748999) on Wednesday November 05 2008, @06:28AM (#25638469) Homepage

            Are there even any unhacked non-PC devices that play FLAC? Nothing against FLAC

            FLAC is currently the most popular Lossless compressed format for hardware players.

            High end living-room digital players usually support it. Some offer services where you send your CDs and when you receive your player it's pre-loaded with FLACs of your music (like Olive [olive.us] for example)

            Several Jukebox also exist with support for FLAC, like in car systems from PhatNoise [phatnoise.com]'s.

            Logitech's latest Squeezbox supports it too, for a more recent example.

            For more detailed and longer list see FLAC's own list [sourceforge.net].

            In addition to all these branded software, don't forget also about all the countless of no-name "multimedia-harddisk-case" (small box usually centered around some miniITX board running a small embed linux-based mediaplayer. Sold pre assembled in store and buy-your-own-harddisk in computer shops). Granted most of them DO use Linux and PC-like hardware. But they are sold as ready-to-use appliance, like your DSL/Cable modem and Wifi router (which is most likely to run Linux, too).

            In short the fact the iPod doesn't play it, and Microsoft's "Play-for-Sure" logo forbids it in the USA, doesn't mean that the rest of the world isn't already using it.

      • Indeed. The .ogg format would need a new label. "100% incompatible", perhaps?

      • by jonaskoelker (922170) <jonaskoelker&gnu,org> on Wednesday November 05 2008, @09:32AM (#25640551) Homepage

        I could download a codec for [.ogg] if I cared

        Hi. I'm mister pedantic.

        Ogg is a container format, meaning you can stick audio and video data inside ogg files much the same way you can files into a zip file. Except that zip has features to enable corruption detection and ogg has features to enable corruption handling (find next magic number, continue from there). Also, Ogg is streaming friendly, zip puts the data first and all the inode-like data last.

        The ogg container format is most typically used with Vorbis sound and Theora video. There's also a Speex audio codec optimized for human voices (as opposed to "all sound").

        Similarly, AVI is a container format [AVI = Audio Video Interlace], often storing mpeg data I'm told. Other container formats include Matroska (.mkv).

        See wikipedia if you lack something to nerd out over :)

    • by Jeff DeMaagd (2015) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:42PM (#25636395) Homepage Journal

      Proprietary or not, MP3 is THE audio format to play. Give an ogg file to most people, they are almost certainly not going to be able to play it without some hass.e Most audio devices don't play ogg files, while most audio file player devices can play MP3.

      • Anecdotal evidence, sure, but I travel most of the year and offer to share music with a lot of people I meet. Most of my collection is in FLAC, and I'm amazed at how many people I come across with limited computing skills are still open to getting files in such a format, "Lossless, CD audio-identical? Free codecs? Cool." While the lack of support is a problem in portable devices like iPods, I'm not sure there's that much resistence to Vorbis/FLAC/what have you among people who play their music off a desktop or laptop.
        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          I think that does make a good amount of sense, because computers can easily play just about any file format, given an easy installation of a driver or decoder program. Getting a typical phone, car audio head unit, iPod or ipod-like device to play them generally isn't going to be so easy. If you offer to install the player, I would bet the resistance would be low, but people without that kind of acquaintance would probably just forgo it.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          While I am sure that is true for the older generation,for the younger they pretty much think music=MP3. A few weeks ago I went to pick up the oldest from school and all you saw was MP3 players everywhere. Some of his buddies were talking up how they had all gotten these cool speaker docks to play their iPods at home. They started to laugh at how my nephew plays his tunes at home on his PC until he said "Well my uncle gave me his huge super powerful '80s Pioneer home stereo which he wired into my PC so all m

        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          I'm not sure there's that much resistence to Vorbis/FLAC/what have you among people who play their music off a desktop or laptop.

          I'm fairly resistant even though my Rockboxed Sansa can play both just fine. My situations is that I ripped a few hundred of my CDs to high-quality MP3 and it takes up about 30GB of storage. With an 8GB portable player, that means I can take along about a fourth of my collection. This works out pretty well because a lot of it is my wife's stuff that I'm not into, and I don't like every single song from even my favorite artists.

          Now, suppose I were starting from scratch and considering FLAC. I'm going to

      • by lysergic.acid (845423) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @11:20PM (#25636633) Homepage

        well, MP3 is an ISO standard (approved in 1991). however, i agree that the licensing/patent issues are a huge drawback. to quote Wikipedia:

        A large number of different organizations have claimed ownership of patents necessary to implement MP3 (decoding and/or encoding). These different claims have led to a number of legal threats and actions from a variety of sources, resulting in uncertainty about what is necessary to legally create products with MP3 support in countries where those patents are valid.

        The various patents claimed to cover MP3 by different patent-holders have many different expiration dates, ranging from 2007 to 2017 in the U.S. The initial near complete MPEG-1 standard (parts 1,2,3) was publicly available in December 6, 1991 as ISO CD 11172. Since US patents must be filed by no later than a year after publication, some of the later patents are questionable, and MP3 may be patent free in the US by December of 2012.

        sounds like typical patent-trolling to me. this is a prime example of how our IP laws hinder technological progress/innovation rather than encourage it. and a 20-year patent term for software algorithms is just plain insane. by the time the patent expires and finally goes into public domain the algorithm will likely be obsolete. technological progress is the result of open collaboration and collective efforts. these type of patent lawsuits are counter-productive and greatly hamper cultural symbiosis that every field of knowledge/research depends on to move forward.

        so it's too bad that petty patent claims plague the dominant digital music format. maybe Ogg should be made into an ISO standard. perhaps then more hardware manufacturers (and downloadable music retailers) will adopt it alongside of MP3. frankly, MP3 is already a little outdated as it's fallen behind other compression formats over the years.

        • Since they're going for patented technology anyway, I'm a bit disappointed that they didn't push the AAC format. While I know geeks tend to associate it with iTunes, it's pretty much a universal standard in newer players. As a bonus, it's smaller, better quality, and a heck of a lot easier to license than the craziness behind the MP3 and MPEG formats.

          Yeah, yeah. I know that MP3 has brand recognition. But nothing will ever change if no one pushes things forward. And besides, MP3 100% Compatible? That doesn't even sound cromulent!

          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            While I know geeks tend to associate it with iTunes, it's pretty much a universal standard in newer players.

            You mean Apple iPod or iPhone players? My two Creative mp3 players and my Krazor cell phone can not play .aac files. And the only thing on my computer that can play those files is the VLC player, and VLC can pretty much play anything -- anyway. .aac files are some of the most finicky media files I have. Almost all the other medias I have can be pretty much played on several of the players I have inst

    • I agree that mp3 is suboptimal, and I use flac or vorbis myself(rockbox ftw); but mp3 is pretty damn compatible. There exist several Free implementations of encoding and decoding, and Fluendo makes a binary version of their MIT licenced gstreamer plugin available, for free, with the mp3 licence fees paid. It isn't perfect; but it could be far, far worse. Also, mp3 is a fairly old format, all the relevant techniques and algorithms and whatnot are either unpatentable at this point, or already patented and on
    • Its saying the file is 100% compatible with the MP3 format. As in, there's no additional DRM that has been tacked onto the MP3 file.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Proprietary and compatible do not have to be linked.

      ogg is not closed source/proprietary, but despite this it only works on what, 60% of players? hardly "compatible". Being open source does not maketh compatible.

      But then WMV9 is closed/proprietary, and only works in maybe 1/3 of the players. Probably an intersection of where "proprietary" marries "profit".

      Then there's the third alternative, mp3. Proprietary, yet universally (100% for all practical purposes) supported.

      Can you find an audio player that do

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Ogg is Open and Free As In Speech, but it's compatible with almost nothing. Yes, devices could be MADE compatible with it with no licensing costs, but good luck convincing Apple, who alone controls over two thirds of the mp3 player market with the iPod. I doubt the Zune supports ogg right now either, though I'm sure many of the less-popular players that are trying to nail as many features as possible in the hopes of taking a couple of Apple's customers support the format.

      That's not knocking ogg - it's har

    • by Kamokazi (1080091) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @10:52PM (#25636469)
      Because it's hard, if not impossible to find a player that doesn't support MP3. You actually have to look for OGG or FLAC support while buying. This is about making it easy for consumers, not forwarding the agenda of open source/format nazis. Maybe, just maybe, something not completely open is actually...good?
    • by phatvw (996438) on Tuesday November 04 2008, @11:04PM (#25636563)
      MP3 is supported on more handheld players and integrated chipsets that's why. It may not be the best compression scheme as there have been some great developments in psychoacoustics in the last 15 years, but MP3 just works.

      Also, don't worry about Fraunhofer/Thomson. The patents are gonna expire in a couple years and none of the big companies have sued anyone for using LAME yet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3 [wikipedia.org]
    • by maglor_83 (856254) on Wednesday November 05 2008, @12:16AM (#25636857)

      I don't like encoding my music into a proprietary format.

      That's OK. The files will come pre-encoded.

          • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

            Ah, but who runs the Catholics?

            the old dude with the tall hat isn't it?