Slashdot Log In
IT Job Market Is Tanking, But Not For Everyone
Posted by
kdawson
on Tue Feb 03, 2009 09:01 PM
from the jobs-available-but-not-for-you dept.
from the jobs-available-but-not-for-you dept.
CWmike writes "Shortly after the COO of Automated HealthCare Solutions learned that Microsoft planned to cut 5,000 workers over the next 18 months, he and another employee of the medical services provider flew out to Redmond. AHCS now has more than 100 resumes, some of them from Microsoft employees, for about a dozen open positions. That's how the tech job market is these days: there's no doubt the market is tanking, but not for everyone. While numerous IT vendors are laying off workers, and corporate IT jobs are being lost as well, plenty of companies are still hiring. Microsoft's careers site lists more than 700 open jobs in the US, both technical and administrative positions. And IBM has about 3,200 jobs and internships listed worldwide, more than 550 of them in the US — even as it cuts thousands of workers in a move that it is describing not as a layoff, but an effort to 'match skills and resources with our client needs."
Related Stories
[+]
IBM Hides the Bodies, Eyes US Government Billions 410 comments
theodp writes "As his company was striving to hide the bodies of its laid-off North American workers, IBM CEO Sam Palmisano stood beside President Barack Obama and waxed patriotic: 'We need to reignite growth in our country,' Palmisano said. 'We need to undertake projects that actually will create jobs.' While Sam positions IBM to get a slice of the $825 billion stimulus pie, Big Blue is quietly cutting thousands of jobs and refusing to release the numbers or locations, arguing that SEC disclosure rules don't apply since the US job cuts are immaterial in its big global picture. The layoffs included hundreds in East Fishkill, coming early in the year after NY taxpayers paid IBM $45 million not to cut additional jobs in East Fishkill in 2008. Some are questioning whether IBM incentives are worth the cost."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
first post... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:first post... (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Yeah, I know... (Score:4, Funny)
I just fired half my staff, but I'm still employed! Booyah.
Re:Yeah, I know... (Score:5, Interesting)
Years ago, when MS-DOS was just entering version 5, I worked for Micro(-)soft, and I was on the shell team. One little optimization could be made to the PAUSE function, I thought, so I added it in, and even when I told my manager of the patch, he said surely a promotion would soon ensue, and Dave Cutler might even consider me for this project called "Windows NT"!
So everyone approved, and the patch was added. It was written in assembly language, by the way. So the patch was added, and soon the final build of MS-DOS 6 shipped. However, soon we started getting calls from users saying their batch files crashed DOS, and a thorough code inspection went under way. While inspecting the last couple of patches, many bugs were found, some even I fixed, and we were sure MS-DOS 6.21 was the final solution.
How wrong were we! The test batch files still crashed the OS, and upon further inspection, it was found that the PAUSE() function would crash just after printing the characters to the screen. They inspected my patch, found an erroneous jz mnemonic (despite our getch setting the eax [return] register to a non-zero ASCII character).
The log showed it was my patch, and I was soon speedily fired before the compilation of MS-DOS 6.22, which corrected the PAUSE function I messed up so bad. I have since regretted that function every day of my life, and I put it in my
Never forget, slashdot, never forget.
Parent
Re:Yeah, I know... (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Yeah, I know... (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Yeah, I know... (Score:5, Interesting)
Ah, I had more fond memory of doing optimization. I'll chip in my story.
I just graduated in the early 90s, and started working the next day after my last exam, at a small telecom equipments company. The system was running on QNX 2, with every software components developed in house, except the OS and some of the drivers.
The company was built by hardware engineers, and I was the first guy from a CS background. There were 6 people in the engineering group. The "database system" was actually a small engine of simple linked list, and must load all data into memory to do anything. Insertion, modification, deletion, etc, were slow, database-related work is so slow, but everyone was used to it. Especially on a 386SX with 1MB of memory, and QNX had no virtual memory, the physical memory was precious.
After I started working, I saw this and said: "What the fuck?" Being good at data structure and algorithms, I decided to do something. Not to interfere with my day job, I spent a couple of evenings and one weekend, writing a memory-mapped B-tree engine, with some quite primitive transaction and rollback features, while trying to keep the same API as the original linked list engine. The memory-map part was so that I wouldn't have to load all data into memory to do the work.
After testing for 5 or 6 hours on the Sunday afternoon and evening, I plugged it in, replacing the old engine. I "checked in" the code. We didn't even have CVS, we just mount to the manager's machine, and put the codes there (basically, replacing what was there). I made the mistake of not informing the manager.
I went home the evening, it was raining hard, got wet, and had a fever. The next day, I called in sick.
At noon, the manager did a new build for testing. People where shocked that database-related operations just returned back right away. This normally would be an error situation. A few panicked, as there was no CVS to track who checked in what, and the db engine was there for almost 2 years already, and considered the most stable component. So no one looked there. But everything seemed to work just fine.
While I was sick, I also wrote a design document about the new engine, how to call the API, etc. On the 3rd day, I came in. After my first cup of coffee, I heard the news from my neighboring coworker. So I went to see the manager, told him about what I did, and handed him the design document. This was the first "real" design document, BTW.
The manager was relieved and excited, and finally, called in the CEO of the company too, and said: "Dude, you scared the shit out of me, but this is great work. Next time, tell me first before putting in the code, ok? I'm too old for that. BTW, do you see other areas that we can improve?" The CEO said: "I'd like to hear that too." With that kind of encouragement, I gave a list of areas that should be reworked, but with very low risk, and some areas that might need extra works.
The CEO said: "I want you to work on those items".
So, for the next 6 months, I was working more or less on every component of the system, including the UI framework that we developed (no, QNX Photon was still many years away), to do optimization and in quite a few cases, re-code them.
And I also downloaded CVS at home with my oh-so-slow modem (the company has no internet connection yet, only the CEO and VP had dialup), brought the floppy to the company, compiled the CVS source on QNX, asked and got a new machine to build a CVS server, so that we can track the codes better.
At the end of the year, I got a big bonus, with 2 extra days off for the Christmas holiday. It was fun.
Parent
Re:Yeah, I know... (Score:4, Insightful)
Yup...
Worked 15 years optimizing software-- took it from a 63,000 line "contractor late on a deadline" mess to a 18,000ish line clean machine. Then a competitor bought our company, boxed the software, closed the company, and tried to take on our customer list (lost 90% of them because they hated our competitor). On a related note, we were told everything was okay and we would remain in business- I left immediately and it was 5 months later that they shut us down. Our business was profitable too.. made about half a million profit a year and employed about 200 people.
While at that company... we converted computers. I worked my ass off. I worked about 72 hours a week for two months. At the end of that period, they gave me a $50 bonus and half a Friday off. I have never let a company do that to me since and it's been almost 20 years and I am now a low level manager. The time to get bonuses negotiated is up front. If they won't promise hard cash up front, I'll do a good solid non-heroic job.
Young pups willingly give up the time of their life that they are the healthiest, in the best shape, and even smell and taste better than they will by the time they get to my age. You can't give up your life for a company.
Parent
Re:Ohhh!!! The Irony!..The Irony!!!. (Score:4, Funny)
God, what is with you people today?
They looked at their 401k...
Parent
No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
If you're good, you can always find a new job. Smart companies always have exception programs to let in talented individuals. Layoffs tend to be a way to get rid of a lot of the sub-average to average performers. If anything, finding good quality people is even more important after layoffs are announced- the good ones have the ability to get hired easily, so they'll hedge their bets by looking as soon as layoffs are announced. Its not uncommon to see an exodus of them before the layoffs actually occur. Plus you can typically hire one of them to do the work of 3 or 4 of the people you just fired.
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Interesting)
I used to believe that. I've got a damn good resume, and I'm damn good at what I do. I'm working the network of friends and ex-coworkers, all of who say, "damn we'd love to hire you, but we don't have any openings."
I'm 38 years old, and I've NEVER experienced anything this shitty.
damn.
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
Your answer, it's called "welding school".
I can't be the only person hanging from a crane welding in new support beams on a bridge...also reminding myself to submit my kernel patches when I get home.
The pay by the way, is about the same. (30-50 for nubs, 50-100 for traveling pros)
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:4, Funny)
I can't be the only person hanging from a crane welding in new support beams on a bridge
I bet you are; I for one am at home in front of my computer. I hope your laptop is one of those Toughbook types.
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:4, Funny)
I don't like heights.
Or, come to that, hard work. Why do you think I'm a programmer?
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:4, Interesting)
I know the feeling, except that of being 38 ;)
I'm an IT janitor. I fix things. No formal training in most fields (but a few certs I feel have some meaning, and some Mirosoft certs I feel are meaningless), but I still do everything (except maybe DBA-type stuff and art). People with all sorts of levels of competence say I should be able to get jobs with Big Name Companies. This I've tried, skillfully avoiding open source-unfriendly companies (not so many anymore, thank fuck). I rarely hear anything back, so I guess the market is either quite full of people like me, or somebody somewhere is spreading crap about me.
So I said "Fuck it!" and have sort of started on my own, doing the usual things. Helping friends and family here and there (different rates for the stupidly rich!), making webpages (being no designer, I'm happy to work with people who do the design with me before I make the magic happen) and thinking up THE iPhone app everybody will want. I'll get back to you when I figure that out :P
A note about those "available positions": I know for a fact that many of them are fake. Sorry, guys. The big companies are being assholes. They are required by law to post all open positions and take in people for interviews in some countries, but they have really writen some of the positions with specific employees already in mind. It's a frickin' scam. I know IBM did it, I know the ISPs sometimes do it (and enjoy temps they can easily shed, rather than actual employees).
To hell with all that! No boss hanging over me now, and I can sleep till noon before I code away/spit out some hawt CSS/fix somebody's printer. Not getting rich yet, but I have some backup money until luck turns.
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:4, Insightful)
There is more to it than being "good". Certain types of jobs are affected more during recessions than others. Departments seen as cost centers will be the last to regain reqs.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
3 or 4? We hope for ratios more in the 10-50 range. One really good hire can completely replace a 20 person dev team that is not delivering.
Of course, many of the new hires turn out less good that hoped, but that is solvable. Also, you have to keep the bad team around until it's clear its product is inferior. But hey, that's business.
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
You don't get great work out of great people by issuing demands. You explain the situation (priorities, politics, history) as best you can, and let them find a way to contribute. Make yourself accessible for immediate feedback, support, and discussion, and you're off and running.
Oh, and pay oodles of money to the people who excel.
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Informative)
A skilled commander seeks victory from the situation and does not demand it of his subordinates. - Sun Tzu
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
If you're good, you can always find a new job.
It feels like you are invoking the fallacy that most of us think we are above average. Most people aren't significantly above average.
Layoffs tend to be a way to get rid of a lot of the sub-average to average performers.
You are telling this to the people who just got laid off!! So if they were laid off and looking for work, you are essentially telling them that they are probably on the lower side of average. And yet "if they are well above average they will have no trouble finding work". This doesn't bode well.
Plus you can typically hire one of them to do the work of 3 or 4 of the people you just fired.
So these people are both head and shoulders above average, and are willing to do the work of a small team to boot? Oh and they'll accept the same wages of the semi-morons he replaced too?
Yes these mythological creatures will always have jobs.
Technically, yes, you are right, Microsoft lays of 5000 people, and the top few percent will land new jobs right away.
Do you have any advice for the other 80-90%? Those are the ones that need it. The top 5-10% probably won't be unemployed long enough to have to start dipping into their savings anyway.
Parent
Booms make jobs for sub-average (Score:5, Insightful)
Advice for the sub average? Well if you are sub average then you're always going to be at high risk. The same applies to any industry - it is not just a computer thing. Find something you're better at.
If you're sub average and insist on being in the industry then face it that you're only going to be employed 50% of the time.
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
This is not always the way layoffs work. Sure, it'd be good for the company to get rid of some of the people who were, as you said, sub-average. But in the situation I was in, the company had two major products. The board/CEO/Investors decided that one of them was not making them money. The people who worked on that one project had been there for years, some of them are the best of the best. Great people and great coders. Since they were not part of the surviving product, they were cut, 60% of the company (small company, about 40-50 before the cuts).
Typically you fire people who suck, you lay off people when you need to save money, yet there's no good other reason to cut the person.
However, I agree, if you're good you can probably find a new gig pretty quick. The part of the layoffs that suck is really about change and forced career shifts. I for one found other work quickly, and even came out with 1/3rd more money than I previously made before being laid off. But I liked that job, and I'm glad for the opportunity.
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
Not the OP, but my advice is that you should get into a profession where you can be in that top 10%, or re-educate yourself in your current profession until you are top 10%.
You realize of course that it is mathematically impossible for more than 10% of the people in a given profession to be in the top 10% of their profession. And further, that if everyone tried to follow this advice it is a mathematical certainty that 90% of them would fail.
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, we can just build a society where only 10% or so have any real hope of success or stability, what could possibly go wrong?
Terrorists would fly planes into our buildings?
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:No surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
Rule No. 1: You may be good. But there is always someone better.
Rule No. 2: The geek too young too have seen rock bottom: a time when there are no openings anywhere, for anyone. But it happens.
Parent
Office Politics (Score:5, Insightful)
Being good includes the ability to handle office politics successfully. Jobs that don't require office politics are incredibly rare.
If you can't find anybody in your old company that likes you, you probably need to work on your social skills. It's one of the things employers need to make sure the job gets done.
Parent
In good times (Score:4, Interesting)
A couple of business owners have had to lay off some of their skilled labour, it was a last resort, because they know it's going to cost a fortune to replace them when things pick up again.
Lots of companies use downturns to advantage (Score:5, Interesting)
Something that everyone forgets is that many companies use downturns as a time to clean house, to get rid of people that they feel are more dead weight than not.
Now anyone with experience in a large company knows that also can include some good people that ended up on the wrong side of an internal political battle, and doesn't usually include much middle management that may well be overburdened. Even so, layoffs are not always about a company needing to get rid of jobs so much as a natural resetting mechanism (at least at first).
Talented, Skilled, and Experienced (Score:5, Insightful)
The behavior of "cutting the fat" is persistent in any business worth it's salt. It just so happens that this behavior is synchronized, and expanded, in weaker economies.
A person desiring to keep their employment intact, or finding new opportunities, needs to understand three elements of their "business related worth".
Every company on the planet needs people who have different mixes of the above qualities. The big problem is that these three aspects run in a Rock/Paper/Scissors manner. The bigger problem is that the relationships change from company to company. Sometimes experience trumps talent. Other times talent is better than experience.
If you approach these elements of your work history without ego, focus your job search on opportunities that match your mix, and clearly communicate them to prospective employers - you will actually find a better job that makes you happy.
It can be done, don't go into it with a negative attitude.
Re:Talented, Skilled, and Experienced (Score:4, Insightful)
That's about the most naif thing I've ever heard.
Having had for a long time a high level on the three axis you listed above (which by the way are not true axis since they're correlated), I've long ago discovered the following:
- The single most important set of skills for successfully keeping your job and/or finding a new job are social skills
Meeting and befriending people outside your inner circle will make it more likely that if the company downsizes your whole department you will get "fished" to another department if you're really good.
Being a friendly and pleasant person means you will be good at working in a group, something that is even more valuable than ultra-elite coding skills.
Self-confidence, a friendly manner and maybe some humor will make you come out a lot better in an interview. Awareness of other people's moods will help you detect what they're interested in and not interested in while discussing your CV and allow you to emphasize those things you're good at which are also important to the prospective employer you're interviewing with.
And this is just the tip of the iceberg ...
Parent
Let's not forget one segment: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Let's not forget one segment: (Score:5, Interesting)
Gotta agree. The price of parts alone puts PC repair just fine if you can do it yourself, but if you plan on charging for your services, then forget it. The screwdriver shop market half collapsed already several years ago. For those willing, it's an ok way to make a few dollars here and there, but very, very few can maintain sufficient business to make a living out of it.
The simple fact is that if the computer isn't in warranty, then it's probably not worth repairing. Outside of that period it's not only outdated technology-wise, but physically if one component has reached the point of failure then all the other moving parts are starting to get within that zone too. Replacing the hard drive now, and the DVD drive in another 8 months, then a few fans in 6 months, then the monitor in another year, etc, and you you're getting to the point where you're paying as much upkeep on keeping your crappy computer working as a new one would cost.
As to used computers - generally a waste. Most people get around to selling a computer because it has issues already, and the ones that aren't problematic are at a minimum going to be fairly outdated. PARTICULARLY laptops, which I'd NEVER recommend buying used. When new systems are as cheap as they are already, it normally just makes no sense to buy a used system.
Besides, the computer is generally a purchase that you make and then hopefully can use for a while. Where people (and companies) are going to makeup their differences is in recurring costs. For citizens, that will mean cutting back on recurring costs in places that you can afford to. Cooking more and eating out less for example. Buying the store brand of an item rather than the name brand. Refinancing loans to a lower rate. Possibly moving into a smaller/cheaper apartment or home. Taking in roommates instead of living alone. Going out to the movies or other recreational activities less.
Companies look at it the same way but salaries are their recurring costs. The simple fact of the matter that I've seen is that in many departments (of all types, IT included), people have adapted to a comfortable work level, but if everyone pushed harder the same work could be done with significantly less people. In a good economy people won't take kindly to that and you can't push them that hard, but when people are afraid of losing their jobs, they'll gladly work a bit harder to pick up the slack.
Cutting those recurring costs will make orders of magnitude more difference than simple purchases like a computer.
Parent
Re:Let's not forget one segment: (Score:5, Informative)
Most people don't know and don't care about warranty-less repairs vs new computer if the cost is low enough. Hmm, $150 for a fix that will get it running (quite possibly better than before, ie, bigger hard drive, more RAM, better video card, etc) or $400+ for a brand new one that isn't a total piece of crap, ie, dumpster-diver eMachines bottom end. Vista has kept a lot of people from buying new as well. And that moving parts bit is just plain silly. I've seen relatively few machines bounce back that often.
Utter claptrap on used computers. I've made a bundle in the business. I'm not talking about buying and selling via Craigslist or crap like that. I'm on the mailing list for every higher-ed surplus sale within 100 miles and then some. Some schools will surplus computers as soon as the warranty expires. I'm going to be picking up some 3ghz P4 systems tomorrow for $35 apiece, XP license keys on them, and thus far they've had a very good success rate. One dud in perhaps 25, maybe a few bad but easily-replaced components in others. I can turn around and resell those for as much as $200 depending on what's in them and what I can put in them. I don't deal in laptops. More hassle than they're worth. It makes plenty of sense to buy a used system if the person is on a tight budget (more and more people these days) and doesn't need anything fancy, just something for internet, email, music, etc. Or maybe they need something simple for the kids and a new system would be wasted money. I made a shitload of cash at a local flea market moving used systems, so don't tell me they're generally a waste. If you know where to get them cheaply and reliably and can move them at a low enough price while maintaining a healthy margin, they're a very lucrative market.
Parent
Good People Hard to Find ... (Score:5, Interesting)
It has already been mentioned, but in speaking with a few recruiters, the general opinion was that the company's that are laying off are cleaning house of dead wood for the most part. Those who are good at their jobs are staying put right now until the market seems to show some sense of light at the end of the tunnel. Of course their are casualties at all levels in various orgs, but I'm not yet left with the overwhelming sense that quality IT people are flooding the market looking for work.
Re:Good People Hard to Find ... (Score:4, Interesting)
Yup. I just recently got a new job for a very senior position for a very cool company, one of the best to work for in the region anyway. There was multiple openings for the team. Not a single one, ZERO, nadah, none, of the candidates they interviewed had what they needed (and what they needed wasn't obscure by a long shot, and the required skillset wasn't 16 page long...they just wanted someone good). They couldn't find any.
In the end, I got the job even though I didn't have one of the major requirements, because they thought I was good enough to be worth training. Even with that concession, I was the only person they could find on the continent (no one in the region at all, big metropolitan area, and no one on the -continent- who was willing to move). Finally, they found ONE other person for the job, who had worked for them in the past across the globe in asia (no, not in a third world country...I'm being vague since, well, can't post all the details on the net), and they're relocating him.
Qualified people are almost inexistent if your requirement goes beyond raw computer science or script kiddies, the two extremes. And for the AC that posted, no, they weren't looking for someone with 20 years of experience, I have something like 7.
Parent
As I always say (Score:5, Interesting)
Are the jobs being laid off REALLY Information Technology? I hardly consider sales, data people, or most management positions IT. They might be IT related in that they work with IT people, but they do nothing actually technical and I would not be calling any of them to repair a network or fix a computer. In the same way I dont consider engineers to be IT either, they are engineers, not technicians, related but still different fields.
When it comes to actual IT work, I have no want for job opportunities atm, getting at least one valid offer a month, though I am specifically staying with my not as well paying public position BECAUSE of a questionable private sector market. Be seriously most of these jobs being shed are just not true IT job, and people need to learn what the actual definition of IT is and isnt.
Some key words missing in summary (Score:5, Insightful)
In this sentence:
"While numerous IT vendors are laying off workers, and corporate IT jobs are being lost as well, plenty of companies are still hiring."
should read:
"While numerous *LARGE* IT vendors are laying off workers, and corporate IT jobs are being lost as well, plenty of *SMALLER* companies are still hiring."
If anything I've seen the job market for small IT suddenly go UP. I'm willing to bet these smaller companies are willing to hire these former big-wig employees and those big-wigs are willing to take the lower pay in exchange for financial security in this horrendous economy.
The big guys are tanking and having to cut because they squandered and litigated themselves into this mess, while the smaller companies don't have this bullshit to worry about and can thus keep turning a profit because they're not wasting money on laws and lawsuits and patent trolling - they just provide actual services, pay their employees, pay their taxes, and go home.
Don't Discount The Flood (Score:4, Interesting)
There has been a steady but rising flood of semi-skilled people getting into IT increasing the size of IT shops ... and generally their cost. I don't like to see people lose jobs, but in some cases shrinking IT is really, really good. I don't want to work with 50 so-so or worse developers or sysadmins ... but I'd be more than happy to work with 10 stellar engineers/admins. Same goes with management. Speaking with some friends this past year it almost seems there has been a popular trend in adding layers of management for the sake of reporting structures (group A reports to manager who reports to manager who reports to director who reports to ....). In a lot of cases that is just cruft that is not needed that increases cost for little to no gain.
Then again, I've seen the definition of IT being stretched to include positions that have nothing to do with Information Technology.
Employed but looking? (Score:5, Interesting)
Please don't think me greedy for what I'm about to say but I'm currently still employed after over 3 rounds of layoffs and I've recently kicked my job search into high gear. While I have to agree that what's currently left at the small company I work for is nothing but the best (at least in the IT department) the workload that was done by 30 is now done by 10 -- with as few as 3 people in one section of IT.
That being said, these *quality* people who probably have nothing to worry about are jumping ship (even management!), some without even having jobs to switch to yet. But I guess that's what happens when reason goes out the window and marketing calls the shots in an attempt to turn a profit for a change. That coupled with pay cuts leaves a bad taste in people's mouths.
I disagree with the thought that the good workers will sit idly by and take what the companies are doing and accomplishing what 3-5 of their peers used to. Sometimes what seems like a good job for a while can turn ugly and treat you poorly when things get tough and that's not necessarily a place you want to work. At least that's my reasoning.
Cue the macho posturing (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh, here we go, cue the chorus of "Dude, if yer the best you can alwayz get werk..."
Listen up. You have to look at this systemically. If there are a thousand people willing to do your job for less, it doesn't matter how leet and brilliant you are. You are an expensive widget, and the business side will always sacrifice quality for cost. Do you really think the suits upstairs can tell the difference between Linus and Zaboomafoo the Typing Lemur?
My phone rings daily with scared-crapless kids whose networks are falling apart because they don't have the experience the position requires. Every one of those kids replaced some grey-haired 40-year-old who would have avoided the disaster months ago, but was let go because Billy the Paperboy braindumped his certs and offered the do the job for less.
No one, No. One. Ever connects the million-dollar disaster with the now-incredibly-cheap-looking salary that would have saved the company untold amounts of money.
So, for the Beavis-and-Butthead crowd sitting around crowing about how they're the best, look at it this way: The surplus resumes flooding the market may not cost you your job, but they will cost your your raise, as well as any leverage you might have had to push back against bad ideas. They'll cost you in the midnight calls you get and the tribute of overtime demanded because your boss knows you don't have any other options. And if you really are that good, it still might not save you.
Perhaps this should be the next poll? (Score:5, Insightful)
A lot of us here on /. are IT workers, why not just ask us?
How has the current economic landscape affected your employer?
It might actually provide some useful insight. #6 applies to me.
IBM layoffs (Score:5, Informative)
"Match skills and resources with our client needs" doesn't mean layoffs...its a feature!
Actually, IBM claims that it's not an extraordinary event - in the course of normal business, every quarter they lay off some people with useless skills and hire others with useful ones.
They didn't file an extraordinary activity report with the SEC because a certain level of layoffs is ordinary in an organization that size.
Parent
Re:Education (Score:5, Insightful)
Schools will always turn out code monkeys. You can't learn innovation and leadership in the classroom - you have to learn them by applying them.
Yes, but especially today there is very little innovation being used/taught in the classroom. Whereas in the 1980s or 1990s you would get high marks for finding a different, better way of coding a program, today the "know-it-all" IT professor is more apt to fail you because you didn't do it his way that might have actually been a disaster. There also seems to be less innovation in the workplace. It used to be that faster ways were praised and lead to promotion, today they are frowned upon because innovation makes it a pain to teach the secretary how to use it.
Parent
Pretend job openings (Score:5, Interesting)
We're on hiring freeze despite a sizable number of openings posted.
Good point. Since people use job openings to judge the health of a company, it's possible to use it to send a misleading signal to the stock market.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually, the theory is to fire the lowest 10% in relation to performance every quarter.
Ugly, yet effective.
Re:Machiavellian strategy (Score:5, Insightful)
Not that smart. If I see too many people around me fired, I'll look for a new job before you get around to firing me.
If I'm good, and you want to keep me - I'll find another job.
Parent
Re:Machiavellian strategy (Score:5, Insightful)
The theory is to fire the lowest 10% in relation to performance every quarter. Ugly, yet effective.
Ugly yes, but only effective in the very short term. 10% per quarter equals 40% turnover per year. No highly-qualified candidate you interview is going to want to hear this number and the best ones are certain to find it out either from you or other sources.
Further, you'll be spending huge amounts of time trying to find new personnel to replace the ones you let go or cross/retrain the existing ones to do the work that the laid off ones did. Productivity will grind to a halt and your company will be in really deep shit compared to your competitors who didn't dig themselves in the hole you dug yourself.
Parent
Re:Machiavellian strategy (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent