Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Computer Science Major Is Cool Again

Posted by kdawson on Tue Mar 17, 2009 01:08 PM
from the on-average-we-all-have-jobs dept.
netbuzz sends along a piece from Network World reporting that the number of computer science majors enrolled at US universities increased for the first time in six years, according to new survey data out this morning. The Taulbee Study found that the number of undergraduates signed up as computer science majors rose 8% last year. The survey was conducted last fall, just as the economic downturn started to bite. The article notes the daunting competition for positions at top universities: Carnegie Mellon University received 2,600 applications for 130 undergrad spots, and 1,400 for 26 PhD slots. "...the popularity of computer science majors among college freshmen and sophomores is because IT has better job prospects than other specialties, especially in light of the global economic downturn. ... The latest unemployment numbers for 2008 for computer software engineers is 1.6%... That's beyond full employment. ... The demand for tech jobs may rise further thanks to the Obama Administration's stimulus package, which could create nearly 1 million new tech jobs."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Cool? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by oodaloop (1229816) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:12PM (#27228951) Homepage
    From TFS:

    the popularity of computer science majors among college freshmen and sophomores is because IT has better job prospects than other specialties

    How does that make it cool? It sounds more like desperation.

    • Re:Cool? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by stewbacca (1033764) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:42PM (#27229585)
      It's cool to have a job, I guess?
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Cool is where the money is.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      From TFS:

      the popularity of computer science majors among college freshmen and sophomores is because IT has better job prospects than other specialties

      How does that make it cool? It sounds more like desperation.

      Exactly.

      What's worse, is that computer science is not relevant for most IT positions. Unless you are programming, but those jobs are the smallest slice of the IT pie.
      Those kids would be better off at a trade school or VoTech learning networking, systems administration, etc.

      Next winter you can expect to see an article alerting us to a sudden surge in CS majors who are switching or dropping out & going to IT tech schools.

      It's a fairly predictable cycle.

      • Re:Cool? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by COMON$ (806135) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @02:41PM (#27230817) Journal
        Man I need to start copying and pasting my response to this question. If the kid wanted to take the easy route, yes, VoTech is the way to go. However, I have made a rather sucessful carreer as a network/system admin with a BS in CS. Sure I dont work on microcontrollers and I cant tell you how to write C++ anymore. But the vision and reasoning skills I received by getting a BSCS gives me a huge advantage. (relevant books in parenthesis) I can relate to any area of IT easily, I can read code smoothly (Essentials of programming languages), I can troubleshoot (File structures,algorithms and analysis), predict future needs (numerical analysis), adapt easily to different OS's (Applied Operating system Concepts), and can relate socially (many late nights at the bar).

        Yes CS CAN be IT, is there an easier way to do it? Oh hell ya. But you miss out on so much. Vo-tech is outdated in 5 years...BSCS well that hasnt changed in what...40-50 years?

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          '... but for most coders doing business apps, a few programming classes are all that is needed.'

          Yes, and we all know how reliable, secure, and performant business apps are.
          (Sorry, I'm always most cynical this early :)

        • Re:Cool? (Score:5, Informative)

          by xenocide2 (231786) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @03:33PM (#27231897) Homepage

          Do yourself a favor, go find the richest, most Republican suburb you can, and find its mall. Time how long it takes from stepping out of your car to finding Army recruiters. Move towards the urban center and repeat this experiment every five miles.

          Feel free to stop when you can't make it to the mall doors anymore. Then look around, and look at the economic conditions people there live in. Ask yourself whether you feel "desperation" or "patriotism".

          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            One of my close friends is a (Republican) trust fund baby who joined the Army to get some self-discipline and find some kind of sense of purpose. It has served him well for all the many years after he left. Just about everyone in the armed services talks like a Republican, and most vote that way.

            I think you're confusing "poor" with "desperate". Making a considered choice that joining the Army is the best way to better your life (and not incedentaly serve your country). That choice is more likely if your

            • Re:Cool? (Score:5, Insightful)

              by Lemmy Caution (8378) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @05:06PM (#27233605) Homepage

              A lot of the people who are in the US military - about 40,000 - aren't even US citizens. Clearly, they aren't motivated by patriotism (at least not patriotism of their home nations.) They are serving another country with the hopes of joining it, because they are desperate to become US residents.

              The people who are being targeted in inner city recruitment centers consider the Army because they lack a lot of other options.

              This is about the enlisted ranks: officer commissions are a different matter entirely, and US military officers are, indeed, usually very accomplished. But for the enlisted ranks, you are in denial if you think that much, even most, recruitment isn't essentially a business proposition, a quid-pro-quo, usually directed to people with few other viable choices.

          • Re:Cool? (Score:5, Insightful)

            by lgw (121541) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @04:29PM (#27233043) Journal

            I have looked at the average person that enlists in the Army. Have you? Sure, there's some amount of falling for a recruiter's sales pitch, but there's a lot of deliberate decisions to make one's life better through self improvement. Self improvement is rarely anyone's first choice, but neither is it a sign of desperation! I've also looked at the average person who thinks "work" is some sort of scam invented by "the man", and I far prefer the company of the average person that enlists in the Army!

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Or you could skip the art minor and, ohmygosh, date someone outside your area of specialization. (Note: I may be guilty of this, in my opinion, fairly closed-minded line of thought as well.)
        • Re:Cool? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Lemmy Caution (8378) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @04:58PM (#27233475) Homepage

          Studying art (and literature and film etc.) may actually help make you interesting to people who are outside your field of specialization. Heck, I even find people in my field of specialization boring if that's all they know.

  • RTFA (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Marxist Hacker 42 (638312) * <seebert@aracnet.com> on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:12PM (#27228971) Homepage Journal

    These ain't programmers, nor are they REAL "Software Engineers", the article writers are throwing Project Managers and Software Architects into the mix to get their numbers:
     
     

    "The latest unemployment numbers for 2008 for computer software engineers is 1.6%...That's beyond full employment," says Josh James, Director of Research and Industry Analysis with TechAmerica. "Computer programmers' unemployment rate has gone up from 2.5% in 2007 to 3.7% in 2008. That's a sign that programming skills are easier to do from anywhere in the world. But the high-growth jobs include skills that are hard to send abroad such as systems integration and IT managers."

     
    In other words, for the type of *real programmer* who isn't on a team and does everything from Requirements Gathering to QA (and everything in between) your job is STILL threatened by outsourcing. But the schools have finally figured that out, so instead of teaching basic concepts like data mining and programming, they're teaching people to be managers right out of the box. Dilbert Principle, here we come.

    • Re:RTFA (Score:5, Insightful)

      Data mining is not a basic principle, and programming is to computer science what algebra is to mathematics.

        • Re:RTFA (Score:5, Informative)

          by Metasquares (555685) <<slashdot> <at> <metasquared.com>> on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:47PM (#27229665) Homepage
          Data mining and databases aren't really the same thing (although mining is often performed on databases). Data mining is actually pretty similar to AI: it involves tasks such as classification, clustering, and feature extraction that require constructing statistical models and learning about the dataset in question. The techniques involve more linear algebra and statistics than many CS undergrads will take. Moreover, mining isn't explicitly demanded in industry (certainly not at the level that programming is, at least). I suspect most people are unaware of it.
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          And 99.99% of the applications anybody will PAY you to write, will be data mining applications at this point

          I think data mining will increase in the future, and I definitely agree that database design needs to be taught to new developers. But data mining is still FAR from 99% of new development.

          Traditional reporting and traditional OLTP apps are still going to be the majority of development. If you disagree on my OLTP statement, who do you think is going to be GENERATING all of the data that 99.99% of these new grads are going to be mining? It takes multiple OLTP apps to generate one data warehouse worth m

    • Re:RTFA (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Nursie (632944) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:21PM (#27229137) Homepage

      "In other words, for the type of *real programmer* who isn't on a team and does everything from Requirements Gathering to QA (and everything in between) your job is STILL threatened by outsourcing."

      What sort of a real programmer isn't on a team these days?

      Any serious sized project has a team. And believe me, good software engineers are still very sought after.

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      Reminds me of a comment by the CEO of one of the Indian outsourcing companies (Tata Consultancy?), "If India is going to continue to be successful in attracting outsourced work from the USA, the US must put more effort in attracting graduates into management roles".

  • engineering (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Lord Ender (156273) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:17PM (#27229047) Homepage

    Now that the financial industry is in shambles (what do they produce, again?) the only way to make bank without sacrificing the 8 to 12 years of your youth to med school or law school is engineering. And since most people are now familiar with computers, software engineering seems more accessible.

    This makes perfect sense. Engineers make more money than any other Bachelors degrees can get you. Many students don't realize that it is damn hard to get an engineering degree compared to other degrees, though. At least, that's true of good colleges.

    • Re:engineering (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Ethanol-fueled (1125189) * on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:54PM (#27229799) Homepage
      Software engineering != using software to solve engineering problems!

      All of the "Software Engineering" coursework around here is training in more of the abstract and organizational aspects of programming such as development methodologies and teamwork, buzzwords, fancy colored charts, and consulting.

      All of the classes I know of which use programming to solve math problems are under the umbrella of the math departments. YMMV.
      • Re:engineering (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Lord Ender (156273) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @02:00PM (#27229937) Homepage

        Who said anything about math? Scientific computing, including math-related stuff, is not what's driving software engineering employment. It's the ability to produce software which helps business that's driving the hiring. This means "pure" programming, yes, but also HCI, communication, design, testing methodology... there's a lot more to producing software than just programming.

          • Re:To nitpick (Score:5, Insightful)

            by Daravon (848487) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @02:44PM (#27230879)

            Agreed. In a Venn diagram of who would benefit the most from a simpler tax code and those who are in the position to make that a reality, there's a tiny bit of overlap with maybe two dudes in it.

  • Oy! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Samschnooks (1415697) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:21PM (#27229127)

    Harsha says computer science majors are critical for the U.S. economy because their training provides them with computational thinking and problem solving skills that they can deploy in any industry.

    So does: physics, chemistry, engineering, math, accounting....

    "The primary reason for the downturn in computer science majors was the erroneous fear that everything was being outsourced to India, which we know is not true," says Prof. Jerry Luftman, executive director of the School of Technology Management at Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, N.J.

    Really? Tell that to IBM. [businessinsider.com]

    The lobbying group TechAmerica says computer software engineering and computer systems design are the fastest-growing high tech jobs, even in the fourth quarter of 2008.

    Who is this "TechAmerica"? The lobbying group TechAmerica says computer software engineering and computer systems design are the fastest-growing high tech jobs, even in the fourth quarter of 2008. Oh, I see. So, corps want more H1-Bs, I take it and they're setting up the public opinion to be more open to it in these troubling times.

    The whole article keeps mentioning "IT","IT","IT" and only once did they say something mobile devices. I wish they would say exactly what area of IT is booming.

    This article is nothing but fluff.

  • by Paul Slocum (598127) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:21PM (#27229135) Homepage Journal
    I only skimmed the article, but I never saw any mention what's happening to CS enrollment relative to *other* departments. It was my understanding that there is a general increase in college/grad enrollment in most departments when the economy dips.
    • by tverbeek (457094) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:48PM (#27229701) Homepage
      You can't get through a single news item or political speech on the subject of the current job market without the reporter/politician saying something about how people need to be retrained for jobs in "health care" or "high tech", because that's where the jobs will be. Of course this doesn't mean that we'll have a surplus of job openings in IT... only that most other fields (especially manufacturing and farming) are contracting like an old red supergiant.

      (The only field that really looks good for the foreseeable future is nursing. With the Boomers already starting into their 60s and lifespans reaching into the medically-dependent 90s, there is going to be a persistent need for lots of nurses in the decades to come, and that's something that simply cannot be "off-shored". How we'll pay them all a living wage is a good question, but at least they'll have jobs.)
  • by plasmacutter (901737) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:24PM (#27229193) Journal

    What a spin piece.

    CS majors had plummeted to near extinction over the past decade.

    Given the market is still there, the stats had nowhere to go but up out of sheer law of averages.

    Additionally, major does not necessarily mean field. People might be going into the major to gain greater understanding of the tools used by even the burger flippers today.

    The fact that it's math and logic heavy makes it look better on a resume than east asian studies.

  • by PeanutButterBreath (1224570) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:24PM (#27229199)

    Picking a major, especially an intensive one like CS, based on current employment statistics, that is.

  • by geminidomino (614729) * on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:26PM (#27229241) Homepage Journal

    I feel for the hotshot larval geek that's been programming since he was in the single digits, knows 3-4 operating systems, and can put together a computer in 15 minutes while getting a blowjob and having a gun pointed at his head, who is going to enroll in a CS program and find out he knows fuckall about "computer science."

    Lest I get modded down for being an elitist prick, I'm not bashing those kids. I *am* one (although too old to be a kid). It's all downhill from Discrete Math...

  • by dmomo (256005) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:29PM (#27229305) Homepage

    We on Slashdot think so?

    Me: "I'm sorry Miss, but there will be no cutting."

    She: "But Dmomo, I don't just want to be with your CS Degree, I love you for you. Let me push your stack."

    Me: "Typical story. Get to the end of the Lady Queue... I'm a FIFO man"

    She: "Swoon"

  • Dead Cats (Score:4, Funny)

    by travdaddy (527149) <travo@nOsPam.linuxmail.org> on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:32PM (#27229377)
    the number of computer science majors enrolled at US universities increased for the first time in six years

    Well, I guess it HAD to increase sometime. There's a financial saying that applies here, "Even a dead cat will bounce if you drop it from a great height."
  • by jollyreaper (513215) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:40PM (#27229555)

    I love learning but am sick of institutionalized education. The problem is the right way to do education is incredibly expensive, incredibly time-consuming, but if we had proper priorities as a society, would be seen as completely worth it. At this point, only idiots or saints would go into a career in education. There's no money in it, and I'm not talking about enough money to become a rich bastard, I'm talking about enough money to avoid poverty.

    I'm not quite sure what the right solution is yet but I'm wondering if it might not be a good idea to start on the Young Lady's Primer. We've certainly made some advancements on the sort of technology that would be required.

  • by ErichTheRed (39327) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:41PM (#27229575)

    While interest in the field is good, there are still some major barriers to entry that need to be considered.

    1. Unlike previous downturns, we currently have tons of IT/CS people out of work. I'm very lucky to have work; according to all my colleagues, hiring is extremely limited, especially in large public companies. In addition, competition for these jobs is incredibly tough.

    2. Outsourcing has not gone away. IBM's a perfect example, as are many of the other professional services firms. India is rapidly moving up the food chain, and even advanced dev jobs are moving elsewhere very quickly. The best strategy is to get involved with a small company who doesn't have the resources to manage an outsourcing engagement.

    3. A corollary to #2 - Lots of companies are "discovering" they don't need an IT department anymore. Most of the programming jobs will be for vendors, if the whole "cloud computing" fad turns out to be more than a fad.

    4. Don't assume you can choose where you work, if that's important to you. Companies are shifting their support functions to cheaper locations within the US, so keep that in mind unless you don't care about living in Boston vs. Omaha.

    So, as always IT and programming are fun fields to be in, but just keep in mind that the employment prospects are still unstable. If you're the kind who doesn't mind bouncing from one 6-month contract to another, you'll do fine. Full time work might be harder to come by.

  • by cortesoft (1150075) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @02:31PM (#27230625)

    I have been programming since I was 8 years old (made a kick ass dog racing game in 2nd grade), but decided to be a philosophy major at UCLA instead of a CS major. The best decision I ever made. My philosophy training (I specialized in formal logic theory) has helped my programming more than any CS class would have. A good programmer needs to be able to teach themselves, or they will be obsolete almost immediately. Learning how to use logic and transform abstract human concepts into a formal logic representation is the true base skill for programmers.

    It worked out for me.... 4 years removed from graduation, I have a great programming job that I love, making excellent money, and happy as can be.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      "Learning how to use logic and transform abstract human concepts into a formal logic representation is the true base skill for programmers."

      Which is why we teach it to freshmen. Sadly, most of them find the subject so difficult they sell their book and try their hardest to forget they ever knew it. I've literally had Computer Engineering friends tell me that logic started at 0 and ended at 1. Nothing more complicated than that should exist, he asserted.

  • by walterbyrd (182728) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @07:57PM (#27235739)

    When you are doing reading corporate propaganda from a lobbyist group. You might want to take a look at comments from real IT pros:

    http://techtoil.org/wiki/doku.php?id=articles:news_and_commentary [techtoil.org]

    A BSCS is almost as difficult as a degree in engineering, but it's as worthless as a degree in Liberal Arts.

    Look at the job ads, employers don't give a damn about your silly BSCS, they want experience - many years of professional, verifiable, recent experience, and in many different technologies, and no jobs have the same requirements.

    Maybe there are few slashdot readers, who don't live in caves, who may have noticed that practically ever major tech employer has been laying workers by the thousands - especially US IT workers. And yet you are going to believe this corporate sponsored bullshit? You have my pity.
     

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      That's because economist-bureaucrats have defined a certain level of unemployment as "full employment". They figure you're always going to have some people who are out of work... so they don't count that many of them.
    • by i.of.the.storm (907783) on Tuesday March 17 2009, @01:39PM (#27229533) Homepage
      Full employment is defined as around 5% unemployment. This is made up of frictional unemployment, people between jobs or looking for their first one, structural unemployment, people whose skills are obsolete, and cyclical unemployment, unemployment due to the ebb and flow of the business cycle.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Um, if 1.6% or more of all CS people are unemployed, I think it's weird to say that's "beyond full employment." How is it that you can even be beyond full employment? Weird! LOL

      In economics full employment [wikipedia.org] is defined as an unemployment rate of between 2 and 7%.

      Falcon

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Right, someone just "made it up" after decades of scientific study.

        The idea here is that "full employment" is the condition where there's a job available for everyone who wants to work at the prevailing wage. There's still unemployment in that situation, because it takes time to fill positions. If you're given 2 week's notice that your position is being eliminated, and you get multiple leads and go on several interviews in that time (as happened in my last gig), and you know what your new job is by you la

    • WTF? Really? Where?

      McDonalds. To save money, they are no longer purchasing specialized cash registers with individual buttons per item. Going forward, a new generation of tech-savvy employees will have to "program" the register to display the order price.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      The problem with new CS/IT grads is that they mostly do not know how to design software or even how a computer works at a basic level. In the last ten or more years most of these computer science majors are familiar with Java but know no assembly and very little C and have more training in Web design than in systems analysis.

      We have a winner!

      I'm currently in my second year of CS undergrad, and the sheer number of people who bitch constantly about having to use pointers, manual memory allocation, C, and assembly in our school's "Architecture and Assembly" class absolutely astounds me. People seem to figure that if they know Java they're a programmer and that if they know discrete mathematics on top of Java it makes them a computer scientist. For someone who spent his early years messing about with pointers and in-line assembly

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        These grads will need C and Assembly approximately never.

        Those of us who work on embedded systems beg to differ.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      I'd far rather have someone from another country here doing the work here than just having the work go to another country.

      Don't think it can't happen.

    • You want to create tech jobs, Mr. Government? Send back the H1B Visas to their home countries, and stop letting more in here for big corporations to hire cheaper than Americans.

      The United States was built and paid for with the blood, sweat, tears, and even the lives of immigrants. Ninety-nine percent of every citizen's great grandparents, great-great grandparents etc. came to the U.S. from another country. Personally, I think we should welcome talented and hard working people in to the U.S., naturalize th