Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Original Cast On Board For Ghostbusters 3

Posted by timothy on Thu May 21, 2009 08:32 PM
from the hi-there-sigourney dept.
bowman9991 writes "Dan Aykroyd reveals that all the original cast have now signed on for Ghostbusters 3, including Sigourney Weaver, Bill Murray, Harold Ramis and Ernie Hudson. Apparently Bill Murray, who holds a one-fifth controlling interest, was very reluctant at first, not even willing to read a third draft of Aykroyd's script. Aykroyd would like to see Ivan Reitman or Harold Ramis direct, wants to introduce a 'new generation' of Ghostbusters, and believes they could be filming the new Ghostbuster movie by winter."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Gee (Score:5, Funny)

    by QuantumG (50515) * <qg@biodome.org> on Thursday May 21, @08:35PM (#28048467) Homepage Journal

    I hope its as good as Blues Brothers 2000.

  • Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

    by lawpoop (604919) on Thursday May 21, @08:39PM (#28048495) Homepage Journal
    I'm all for Ghostbusters 3, but I don't understand this idea to put the original cast in it. They left Schwarzenegger out of Terminator 4 for a reason. Harrison Ford looked like a bad casting job in the latest Indiana Jones.

    Seeing a bunch of guys in their 60s doing action/adventure stuff won't cut it for me, I don't think. It's just a mis-match of the phases of human life and the plot of the story. Running around doing crazy shit is a young person's thing; a story where the cast is middle-aged should have the plot that involves the drama that a middle aged person gets involved in -- kids, grandkids, getting old, missed opportunities, rectifying relationships, taking on responsiblities, coming to terms with your life, etc.

    I think the baby boomers represented the great consumerist generation, and the marketers are trying to squeeze the last dollars out of this demographic.
    • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

      by binarylarry (1338699) on Thursday May 21, @08:41PM (#28048509)

      You really considered the original ghostbusters movies action adventure flicks?

      • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

        by lawpoop (604919) on Thursday May 21, @09:29PM (#28048857) Homepage Journal
        I don't know, it ended with some kind of lightning battle with an interdimensional god and a giant Stay Puft marshmallow man on the New York skyline... what category does that normally go in?
        • by _KiTA_ (241027) on Thursday May 21, @09:34PM (#28048891) Homepage

          I don't know, it ended with some kind of lightning battle with an interdimensional god and a giant Stay Puft marshmallow man on the New York skyline... what category does that normally go in?

          Acid Trip.

        • by gnick (1211984) on Thursday May 21, @10:12PM (#28049091) Homepage

          I don't know, it ended with some kind of lightning battle with an interdimensional god and a giant Stay Puft marshmallow man on the New York skyline...

          Damn it man, can't you preface that with a [Spoiler Alert]?!? It's still in my Netflix queue...

          • Re:Can we (Score:5, Informative)

            by HeronBlademaster (1079477) <heron@xnapid.com> on Thursday May 21, @10:30PM (#28049171) Homepage

            There is (or at least, there should be) a five year limit to how long after a movie comes out it's required to preface spoilers with a warning. That's enough time for the movie to go from theaters to crappy network stations.

            Books, on the other hand, shouldn't have that limit. It's hard to go through books as quickly as movies.

            • by PachmanP (881352) on Thursday May 21, @11:52PM (#28049673)

              There is (or at least, there should be) a five year limit to how long after a movie comes out it's required to preface spoilers with a warning. That's enough time for the movie to go from theaters to crappy network stations.

              Books, on the other hand, shouldn't have that limit. It's hard to go through books as quickly as movies.

              Harry killed Gandalf! My God, it's full of stars. The white whale gets away, but gets caught again for Free Moby 2 through 17. The yerks take over the world and have love children with the g'ould. The Pope is actually an alien, and Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones are the Illuminati.

              That said it was a good book, and you should read it anyway.

    • Re:Can we (Score:5, Interesting)

      by MichaelSmith (789609) on Thursday May 21, @08:43PM (#28048527) Homepage Journal

      Seeing a bunch of guys in their 60s doing action/adventure stuff won't cut it for me, I don't think. It's just a mis-match of the phases of human life and the plot of the story. Running around doing crazy shit is a young person's thing; a story where the cast is middle-aged should have the plot that involves the drama that a middle aged person gets involved in -- kids, grandkids, getting old, missed opportunities, rectifying relationships, taking on responsiblities, coming to terms with your life, etc.

      I am 43 and I spend more time running around doing crazy shit than I did when I was 20 years younger, mainly because I have the money and time now, and my seven year old son has similar tastes in crazy shit (or is learning too, anyway).

      But yeah, Bill Murray wants to move on, maybe the others should as well. Maybe they won't be there in the fourth if it gets made.

    • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

      by rishistar (662278) on Thursday May 21, @08:47PM (#28048559) Homepage

      Seeing a bunch of guys in their 60s doing action/adventure stuff won't cut it for me, I don't think.

      Ghostbusters doesn't really have action sequences though in the same way that Indiana Jones did. The biggest action sequence was probably them running ut of the library.

    • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Kamokazi (1080091) on Thursday May 21, @08:51PM (#28048585)
      While I agree with you for Indiana and Terminator, Ghostbusters is different. It's a comedy/action movie. Who the hell can replace Bill Murray and Dan Akroyd?
      • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

        by MichaelSmith (789609) on Thursday May 21, @08:53PM (#28048601) Homepage Journal
        If the new Pink Panther movies are any guide, nobody.
      • by GaryOlson (737642) <slashdot.garyolson@org> on Thursday May 21, @09:20PM (#28048805) Journal

        Who the hell can replace Bill Murray and Dan Akroyd?

        Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker? Chris tucker distracts Cuthulu with a continuous rant on Cuthulu's personal hygene and Jackie stunt fights thru the reanimated denizens of the Netherworld in a proton accelerated tuxedo.

      • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

        by penguin_dance (536599) on Thursday May 21, @09:47PM (#28048983)

        If anyone cares to notice, we're all recalling the original Ghostbusters which was great. That's because the Ghostbusters II (which also had the original cast) SUCKED big time!

        Unfortunately, I think this may be a case of, "Hey none of us are getting gigs, let's do a remake!"

        Sometimes you can't go back. {sigh} But I hope I'm wrong.

        • Re:Can we (Score:5, Interesting)

          by LurkerXXX (667952) on Thursday May 21, @10:40PM (#28049235)

          "Hey none of us are getting gigs, let's do a remake!"

          Yeah, they are all just desperate for work...

          Just take Bill Murray for example. In the past 5 years he's only got 12 projects listed on the Internet Movie Database

          Including :

          The Darjeeling Limited 67% fresh on Rotton Tomatoes [rottentomatoes.com]

          The City of Ember

          Get Smart

          Broken Flowers 87% fresh [rottentomatoes.com]

          The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou

          That's a struggling actor not getting gigs?

          Sigourney Weaver? Bah, she only has 18 film projects listed since 2004. And lots of TV gigs. LOTS. That's hardly working in the world of LA actors though, right? Oh.

          Harold Ramis? Well, he's sure slowed down in his writing, but he's been acting a little (Knocked Up,Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story, etc), a little producing, a little directing (a few episodes of The Office, etc). It looks like he's picking and choosing and having fun, not really struggling for projects.

          • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

            by SethJohnson (112166) on Friday May 22, @12:29AM (#28049849) Homepage Journal
            Everything Lurker says about those people is spot on. He's missing any commentary on Akroyd who is DESPERATE for money. So much so that he played the Dad in Britney Spears' movie, Crossroads. Murray resisted because he didn't want to let Akroyd rape the legacy of Ghostbusters like he did with Blues Brothers (2000).

            Harold Ramis is the most successful of all, and I can only imagine the reason he would particpate is out of charity to Dan Akroyd.

            Seth
    • by Junior J. Junior III (192702) on Thursday May 21, @09:17PM (#28048789) Homepage

      Maybe the original cast could be the ghosts.

      Besides, Ghostbusters isn't really an action film. It's a comedy with some effects.

    • by CuteSteveJobs (1343851) on Thursday May 21, @09:41PM (#28048931)

      Iron Man was great because it gave 40-somethings an action hero *THEY* can relate to.

      Not your typical, whiny, prissy-haired Generation-Y superhero who between fighting bad guys (like "Eco Man" and "The Recycler") shops and uses his iPhone to update his Twitter feed: "kckd butt yo lol lawl in4a!"

      If GhostBusters 3 gives 60-somethings an action hero they can relate to (Because Indy 4 sure as hell didn't), good for them!

    • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Have Brain Will Rent (1031664) on Thursday May 21, @11:05PM (#28049395)

      Running around doing crazy shit is a young person's thing; a story where the cast is middle-aged should have the plot that involves the drama that a middle aged person gets involved in -- kids, grandkids, getting old, missed opportunities, rectifying relationships, taking on responsibilities, coming to terms with your life, etc.

      Wow you need to know some different old people. In his 60's my Dad was travelling the world. Malaysia, Australia, The Alps, India... at his funeral (in his 70's) my sister and I found out he had three girlfriends at the time he died (no, that wasn't the cause :). At one point one of them took me aside and told me how while taking a break during sex she had ridden him naked around the living room and patio...

    • Re:Can we (Score:5, Insightful)

      by cashman73 (855518) on Thursday May 21, @11:07PM (#28049411) Journal
      They left Schwarzenegger out of Terminator 4 for a reason.

      The reason being that Arnold is a tad occupied with being the Governor of California at the moment,...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 21, @08:40PM (#28048505)

    Ghostbusters 3: Haunted Retirement Community

  • by FlyingSquidStudios (1031284) on Thursday May 21, @09:13PM (#28048753) Homepage
    In troubled times, I often like to say to myself the immortal words of Mr. Ray Parker, Jr. who said, and I quote, "bustin' makes me feel good."
  • by Conspiracy_Of_Doves (236787) on Thursday May 21, @09:17PM (#28048779)

    Please, don't let the 'new generation of Ghostbusters' consist of a goth girl, a hispanic guy, a guy in a wheelchair, and black mechanic.

  • by p51d007 (656414) on Thursday May 21, @10:25PM (#28049143)
    Terminator "4", Ghostbuster 3, Radiers 4, Batman 1,244 etc etc.... All hollywood knows how to do these days is take the same old worn out theme, slap on a fresh coat of paint and throw it up there. At least the "new" Star Trek "reboot" had a different cast!
    • by mosherkl (1251628) on Thursday May 21, @10:46PM (#28049291)

      C'mon. At least of the 6 major Batman movies, 4 of them were decent or good (I'm sorry, but Batman & Robin and Batman Forever SUCKED!). Did you even SEE The Dark Knight? Hardly slapping on a fresh coat of paint and slapping it up there. And nevermind that Batman Begins WAS basically a "reboot" for the franchise.

      And it's not necessarily originality that's lacking in Hollywood. It's the fact that original, high profile, big budget pictures tend to elicit quite a following if they're at least decent, and this causes sequels to be "big" as well simply because people who liked the first (or second, or tenth) will come see the next simply out of curiousity. Repeat ad nauseum.

  • reboot (Score:5, Funny)

    by cstacy (534252) on Thursday May 21, @11:31PM (#28049579)
    The phone rings and a desperate call, but the team is already engaged and Rick Moranis is left to answer the call. Attempting to prove himself worthy of being a Ghostbuster, he goes alone to encounter a demon who sends him back in time several years before the original Gozer encounter. Rick does get some action with Sigourney Weaver this time, but some other things go horribly wrong. But there is plenty of action and special effects, and by the end of the movie the team is formed albeit with some slight changes. Ghostbusters Headquarters looks like the Apple Store. Complete with Macbook Pros. And lens flare. Lots of lens flare.
    • Re:Last (Score:5, Interesting)

      by telchine (719345) * on Thursday May 21, @09:51PM (#28048999)

      Hurray!

      Yes, I'm quite tempted to join in with your such vocal enthusiasm!

      Usually I'd be cynical. After all, I saw Ghostbusters II at the cinema and I still have the scars to prove it... yeah, it was THAT bad!

      However Bill Murray who has gone on to reasonable success wants in. He's certainly earned enough money so he doesn't HAVE to do it. So maybe, just maybe it'll be decent.

      So hell yeah, let's be vocally enthusiastic and optimistic...

      Hurray!

      • Re:Last (Score:5, Insightful)

        by innocence18 (897646) on Friday May 22, @12:01AM (#28049715) Homepage

        Excellent reasoning...

        Just like George Lucas had "reasonable" success. He'd certainly earned enough money that he didn't need to do the Star Wars prequels. So the fact that he did them is part of the reason they were so...hang on...something is wrong with this train of thought