Slashdot Log In
Backup Tapes With 2 Million Medical Records Stolen
Posted by
Soulskill
on Sat Apr 26, 2008 01:58 AM
from the doctor-patient-thief-confidentiality dept.
from the doctor-patient-thief-confidentiality dept.
Lucas123 writes "A vehicle used by an off-site archive company to transport patient data was broken into on March 17. The University of Miami just made the theft public last week, saying the thieves removed a transport case carrying the school's six computer backup tapes. On those tapes were more than 2 million medical records. In fact, the archive company waited 48 hours before notifying the university itself. A University spokeswoman said the school has stopped shipping backup tapes off-site for now."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Easy case (Score:3, Funny)
Re:yes but what's the value (Score:4, Informative)
What would YOU pay for 2 million social security numbers?
Parent
Re:yes but what's the value (Score:5, Informative)
On the black market these days, a full identity (name, SSN, address, bank information, etc) can go for $14 each [washingtonpost.com]. If the tapes had full identities, that's 2 million x $14 = $28 million payday for a bunch of crooks. Even assume a "volume discount" for these guys and they're still in the many million dollar range. Even if it's just name, address, and SSN there's some value on the black market for these tapes.
When you're breaking into a vehicle filled with stuff that looks like computer equipment, it's hard to know whether the data is going to be social security numbers (valuable), credit card numbers (valuable), medical records (valuable if there's addresses and SSNs), or routine corporate records (not all that valuable). Enough data brokers [reputation...erblog.com] are sloppy enough with their security that there's a good chance to get some identity information that has value.
These guys were either extremely lucky or knew exactly what they were doing. Or they're complete idiots who are wondering why these tapes won't play on their 8-track player.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
For Example: Alot of people don't want to publically share that they have STDs etc. Especially not if the files are cross linked with a list of their sexual partners.
While sale for identity fraud would most likely be the most profitable, there are alternative uses for this data. Given the enterprising nature of most criminals, this is
Doesn't modern tape backup software encrypt data? (Score:3, Insightful)
Good answer. Next question: Doesn't all modern tape backup software encrypt all data?
Even my personal DVD backups are encrypted automatically.
TFA does NOT say they were encrypted (Score:3, Interesting)
There's nothing in the article that says they were encrypted. They were compressed and some kind of encoding was involved. But encoding could be any number of things, and quite possibly the coding used by medical records systems to compact common terms to numbers. It could be hard to make use of the data. But if it was an "inside job", or the perps can get the software used on this, it can be cracked easily. This is not strong encryption.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Another example: If you have a database, it is sufficient to only protect/encrypt one of the (i think it's five) identifiers to be
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
In the case of physically moving backup high-value drives/tapes to off-site storage, that would mean an armored courier. That data is money to somebody, so protect it like money. Sure it's more expensive that the local Speedy Messenger cargo van, but so is losing control of the data.
Yeah, but ... (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Crooks hoping for physical, got useless tapes (Score:3, Interesting)
Hmm. (Score:5, Interesting)
After learning about the data breach, the university contacted local computer forensics companies to see if data on a similar set of backup tapes could be accessed. Menendez said security experts at Terremark Worldwide Inc. "tried for days" to decode the data but could not because of proprietary compression and encoding tools used to write data to the storage tapes.
Proprietary compression and encoding tools? the article reeks of FUD but proprietary technologies still aren't without their faults...but eh, it's not like they used this "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" [wikipedia.org], right?
Re:Hmm. (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
*Still* no encryption?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Transporting confidential data off-site via any medium, including the Internet, without industry-recognized encryption (not something that is proprietary and untested) ought to be a criminal offense with severe penalties.
TFA talks about proprietary compression and encoding and not about encryption. I simply do not believe that it is difficult to recover that data - whatever proprietary software wrote those files can be obtained from somewhere for a price. You can probably Google the file extension or some information in the header to determine the format and/or software.
It's incredible, really. Since TrueCrypt 5.0 arrived,I don't even carry my work laptop or flash drives around without either full disk encryption or encrypted container files on them, and they do not contain anything as sensitive as 2 million medical records.
Re:*Still* no encryption?? (Score:5, Interesting)
This isn't a question where they've got a file sitting on their desktop called "Data.abx" and all they need to do is figure out what program creates an ".abx" file. In all likelihood, there's an old custom or semi-custom mainframe system that wrote this to the tape that didn't format in FAT32. (Nor would it make sense to even both with a filesystem on this type of backup system -- you're not backing up files, you're backing up a database.) From looking at a stream of data dump, there's no way to immediately make sense of it. If there's no file headers, there's not as much of a clue as to where to start. It just looks like an endless string of hex (2 million records is a lot of data).
Somehow I doubt that this is just an Access file, sorry. Or even a SQL dump. They're not complete idiots.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Which means the file format could be anything...
I'm just glad they're not our customer. 8-)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Always assume the person is a complete idiot, unless proven otherwise.
Re:*Still* no encryption?? (Score:5, Informative)
1. It works.
2. IBM (assuming they are using IBM kit) mainframes are still being built today, and while they're totally different internally to the systems of 30 years ago, they're still compatible.
3. This is what companies like SunGard and IBM (yes, they have a DR consultancy team) specialise in. You tell them what equipment you'll need in a disaster recovery scenario, they agree to loan it to you. In which case, who cares how old the system is?
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I knew that I would see a post saying something like this.
Yes encryption is a great thing and should be used all the time, especially on laptops. Well actually, there is one time when it *shouldn't* be used (or at least, not automatically). Want to know when that is?
For backups.
THANK YOU. I'm glad I'm not the only person who thinks this.
The backup software I use (http://www.bacula.org - a fantastic piece of work) does have the facility to encrypt everything.
But I've considered the risk to the business in the event of tape loss versus the risk to the business in the event that we can't decrypt the data because for whatever reason the office has burnt to the ground and the offsite copies of the keys aren't recoverable.
I concluded that if it's a choice between explaining a lost tap
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
First, if your recovering from an off site backup tape, something went down and it's going to take a while to get it running again. Decrypting can't add much more than 20 - 30% (number pulled from appropriate nether region) to the time. If it does you need to upgrade those C-64's you're using in the server room.
Second, if the data is bulk stuff going off site, it's obviously not a primary rapid-respons
Do not panic (Score:3, Insightful)
Even better (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
2 million records, or people? (Score:5, Insightful)
Old school (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
In 2025 those will still be valid SS numbers (Score:5, Insightful)
put it in the Word
Stock it deep in the
by the ludicrous length and the strength of a reputedly
dictionary-attack-proof string of characters
(this, imperative to thwart all the disparagers
of privacy: the NSA and Homeland S).
You better PGP the
You better take the
scan that into a TIFF. Then, if you seek redoubt
for your data, scramble up the order of the pixels
with a one-time pad that describes the fun time had by the thick-soled-
boot-wearing stomper who danced to produce random
claptrap, all the intervals in between which, set in tandem
with the stomps themselves, begat a seed of math unguessable.
Ain't no complaint about this cipher that's redressable!
Best of all, your secret: nothing extant could extract it.
By 2025 a children's Speak & Spell could crack it.
You can't hide secrets from the future with math.
You can try, but I bet that in the future they laugh
at the half-assed schemes and algorithms amassed
to enforce cryptographs in the past.
Parent