Slashdot Log In
eBay'er Arrested For Attempting To Sell His Vote
Journal written by MacDork (560499) and posted by
ScuttleMonkey
on Friday July 04, @03:21PM
from the probably-should-have-thought-this-one-through dept.
from the probably-should-have-thought-this-one-through dept.
The Associated Press reports that Max P. Sanders, 19, is charged with a felony for attempting to auction off his vote on eBay for the upcoming presidential election. From the article: '"Fundamentally, we believe it is wrong to sell your vote," said John Aiken, a spokesman for the office. "There are people that have died for this country for our right to vote, and to take something that lightly, to say, 'I can be bought... It's a real shame"' Yes, that is a terrible shame, isn't it. Perhaps we should arrest, prosecute, and imprison everyone who sells their vote. The boy says it was all a joke, but prosecutors aren't laughing. Max faces up to 5 years in prison and $10,000 in fines if he is convicted.
Related Stories
[+]
Telecom Immunity Flip-Floppers Got More Telecom Money 277 comments
ya really notes a nice analysis by Maplight.org indicating that those Democratic representatives who changed their vote on telecom immunity between March and June received on average 40% more in contributions from telecom interests than those Democrats who held firm. Maplight asks, "Why did these ninety-four House members have a change of heart? Their constituents deserve answers." Across both parties, representatives who voted for immunity in June had received almost twice as much telecom money as those who voted against. Wired's coverage includes a quote from Larry Lessig, who is on the Maplight board: "Money corrupts the process of reasoning. [Lawmakers] get a sixth sense of how what they do might affect how they raise money."
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

You can't transfer a 'vote' (Score:5, Insightful)
The elections are anonymous.
I could sell my vote for a million dollars, and still vote however I liked, and you would be none the wiser.
Reply to This
Re:You can't transfer a 'vote' (Score:5, Interesting)
Worse than just selling your vote, this can be used for voter coercion.
Some people think paper is just the perfect solution for voting, but really it has many problems that can be solved by electronic voting when done carefully. (And of course, when done haphazardly electronic voting has many problems that paper voting does not).
Reply to This
Parent
Re:You can't transfer a 'vote' (Score:5, Insightful)
I would sell my vote, but Diebold already sold it for me.
Reply to This
Parent
I wouldn't have backed down. (Score:5, Insightful)
I'd have taken advantage of it, called in the media, and explained to them just how common "selling your vote" is in congress, and how there is nobody who truly represents "we the people", especially that portion of us below 30.
Reply to This
Re:I wouldn't have backed down. (Score:5, Insightful)
Selling a vote for a certain law or policy in congress is entirely different then selling a vote for an election.
You're right. One is 1/350 odd millionth of the popular vote, the other has direct, harmful impact on the public.
And you have no proof that congress men actually sold their votes. People donate to candidates who support issues they care about. It is entirely possible that the vote was completely separate from the campaign donations.
In the words of every valley girl "oh please". Please do sit and spin some more on this.
I could go on about problems with your concept of "we the people" with your notion of that in relation to the population under thirty and the decline of the education system but I will save that for another time.
Ah yes, let's turn around and bash the citizenry when they engage in civil disobedience and stay home because they know nobody gives a damn.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:I wouldn't have backed down. (Score:5, Informative)
Well, except most people don't vote, only about 120 million votes were cast in the 04 US election.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:I wouldn't have backed down. (Score:5, Funny)
I think your vote is like your pussy:
It's perfectly legal to give it away for free, but the moment you try to earn some cash...
Reply to This
Parent
That is really funny (Score:5, Insightful)
So does that mean that all the professional lobbiest are going to be arrested for trying to buy votes?
Reply to This
Excessive? (Score:5, Insightful)
I can see how this sort of thing would be illegal, but at the same time it's not as if he's really hurting anyone or causing a huge halt to progress. It just seems like it would be a waste throw him in prison for five years over something like this.
Reply to This
Re:Excessive? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Excessive? (Score:5, Insightful)
One should note that there is an automatic disqualification for most employment (and voting, ironically enough).
and when exactly will this be properly challenged and struck down?
if they're so keen on protecting our voting rights, then they shouldn't be able to silence people by putting a microscope to them and digging up some common everyday activity which happens to be a felony.
What better way to silence critics of your anti-drug policy than slapping everyone who smokes marijuana with a felony charge?
When last I checked, the constitution said nothing about smoking weed or snorting coke when they outlined the right to vote.
Reply to This
Parent
hmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
then ..... lobbying should be outlawed
Reply to This
Cue congressman/senator examples in 3, 2, 1 (Score:5, Insightful)
so, its ok if sale of a vote is made under other names, like 'donations', or 'lobbying', or 'support', but its not ok if it is named directly for what it is.
you gotta love the hypocrisy that is reigning on this world.
Reply to This
Cut out the middlemen (Score:5, Funny)
This guy just wants to cut out the middlemen.
Reply to This
If only he had made PayPal a payment option... (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
feedback... (Score:5, Funny)
A+++++++++++++ would vote again!
Reply to This
Free speech? Thought police? (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
Re:Free speech? Thought police? (Score:5, Insightful)
I think that the individual has the right to decide whether it's more important for him to gain a few dollars versus influencing which party wins.
Sometimes individual rights collide with the collective interest. When you choose to live in a country with a government, you give up some individual rights -- in exchange you get safety for your person. The old Icelandic Republic allowed the selling and buying of votes; within a few hundred years four families had cornered the market and civil war was the inevitable result. New democracies like the US don't allow the buying and selling of votes for a good reason. As a civilization, we learn from the mistakes of the past and try to avoid repeating them.
Reply to This
Parent
Arrested? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
How ironic (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Oh cry me a river (Score:5, Insightful)
And people have died for your country for your right to freedom. Freedom is also your right to handle your vote you want to. Who are you [John Aiken] to decide how people make up on who they vote.
PS, I'm not an USA citizen, hence the "your".
Reply to This
Open For Lobbying (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Sounds more like political theatre than a crime. (Score:5, Insightful)
This sounds like a play by the Secretary of State to win some political points than anything else. Consider the following:
1. No money changed hands.
2. No bids were actually placed.
3. The Secretary of State is an elected official.
4. The SoS office is playing this up big with statements about VFWs and trivializing votes like they caught some big criminal here.
5. The ebayer is some dumb college kid who's either making a statement, or a dumb joke, or both.
As far as the "people died to preserve your right to vote", I'd say those people also died to protect peoples rights of expression. This dumb stunt sounds a lot more like expression than an honest attempt at vote selling and profiteering.
Reply to This
The Real Travesty. (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm sorry, but my grandfather fought in both Korea and Vietnam, received the Purple Heart, and rose to the rank of Command Sargent Majour. He was also a life long Republican and a staunch Conservative. Old School Conservative, not this 'neo-con' crap.
And my grandfather, one of those men who fought and came close to dying for this right to vote, would find this person's arrest a travesty of what he fought for, because he also fought the that man's right to do whatever he wanted with his vote, include selling it.
Reply to This
Re:Children voting? (Score:5, Insightful)
"Since when is a 19 year old, of age to vote, considered a "boy"?"
You must be under 25.
Reply to This
Parent