Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Global Warming Stopped By Adding Lime To Sea

Posted by CmdrTaco on Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:00 PM
from the but-then-nobody-can-have-a-good-gin-and-tonic dept.
Antiglobalism writes "Scientists say they have found a workable way of reducing CO2 levels in the atmosphere by adding lime to seawater. And they think it has the potential to dramatically reverse CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere, reports Cath O'Driscoll in SCI's Chemistry & Industry magazine published today."
globalwarming earth thatsalotoflime whatcouldpossiblygowrong limeinthecoconut
news earth
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Loading... please wait.
  • by xpuppykickerx (1290760) on Monday July 21, @12:02PM (#24275449)
    "Look at all the limes in this god damn thing! This fuckin' thing is tropical! Look at the limes, how they float. That's good news. Next time I'm on a boat and it capsizes, I will reach for a lime. Like I'll be water-skiing without a life preserver, people will say "What the hell?" and I'll pull out a lime. I'm saved by the buoyancy of citrus."
  • Sure... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Deathdonut (604275) on Monday July 21, @12:03PM (#24275457)

    This couldn't possibly have any additional side-effects, right?

    Next they'll want to add tequila and filter the salt to the coasts.

    • Re:Sure... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Trails (629752) on Monday July 21, @12:16PM (#24275773)
      In deed this strikes me as the climatological equivalent to the following song: I know an old lady who swallowed a cow, I wonder how she swallowed a cow?! She swallowed the cow to catch the goat, She swallowed the goat to catch the dog, She swallowed the dog to catch the cat, She swallowed the cat to catch the bird, She swallowed the bird to catch the spider, That wriggled and jiggled and tickled inside her, She swallowed the spider to catch the fly, I don't know why she swallowed the fly, I guess she'll die.
  • by minasoko (710100) on Monday July 21, @12:04PM (#24275483)
    ...thus solving the problem forever. FOREVER!
  • by jnaujok (804613) on Monday July 21, @12:05PM (#24275491) Journal
    Adding ten million square kilometers of lime from Australia's outback to sea water...

    ...yeah, no chance for any unintended consequences here.
  • Well... (Score:5, Funny)

    by snl2587 (1177409) on Monday July 21, @12:05PM (#24275515)
    As long as they don't start putting the lime in coconuts and mixing it together, we haven't entirely lost our sanity.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 21, @12:06PM (#24275523)

    You know...

    Based on the success of introducing the cane toad, tamarisk, the bark beetle, the banana slug, the mongoose, or the brown tree snake!

    Any time humans screw something up, the best bet is for humans to go double-or-nothing.

    Sure beats efficiency, responsible building practices, responsible reproduction rates, or simply riding a bike to work! Surely, changing the pH, salinity, disolved o2, and turbidity of the oceans will have no unwanted effect.

  • You'd think it'd be obvious, but at slashdot, you actually do need to point that out to people.

  • by bobdotorg (598873) on Monday July 21, @12:10PM (#24275617)

    On a chemical level, how does this differ from growing coral?

    A coral bred / genetically modified to grow in a wider variety of climates could also scrub CO2 from the air. Though the 'whatcouldpossiblygowrong' crowd might be concerned with over scrubbing by the GM coral.

    • On a chemical level, how does this differ from growing coral?

      Well, coral (and shellfish) can sequester carbon, but this only works as long as the water is sufficiently non-acidic. The problem is that as atmospheric CO2 is absorbed into the oceans, some of it becomes carbonic acid -- and the acidification of the water means that corals, and shellfish shells, dissolve.

      One nice effect of adding lime is that it lowers the acidity of the water, thereby allowing coral and shellfish to continue sequestering carbon.

  • Whoa there... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Kenrod (188428) on Monday July 21, @12:10PM (#24275631)

    It's more sensible and cost effective for mankind to use technology to adapt to climate change rather than to try to change the climate. After all, some climate change isn't caused by man and can't be stopped. Witness the last little ice age, and the last ice age before that that glaciated much of the northern hemisphere.

    Eventually some idiotic scheme like dumping X in the oceans is going to cause a truly great disaster. We need to stop screwing around with the Earth. Climate science is still in its infancy.

  • by radiashun (220050) on Monday July 21, @12:10PM (#24275637)

    But what happens when one nation decides this is a great idea while another fervently disagrees? Water doesn't obey boundaries.

  • I Am A Chemist (Score:5, Informative)

    by PatrickThomson (712694) on Monday July 21, @12:13PM (#24275701)

    And this appears to work. I'm sure some not-rtfa'ing people above me will have got in with a quick "making lime generates carbon dioxide hur hur" but the process already takes this into account. By increasing the pH of the seawater, they claim that it will absorb two moles of CO2 for every mole released in the manufacture of lime. I'm not an environmental chemist so I can't comment on the adsorption gradient of seawater, but if they think it'll work then it'll work.

    Carbon dioxide dissolves in water:

    CO2 + H2O H(+) + HCO3(-)

    As does Calcium Oxide (lime)

    CaO + H2O Ca(2+) + 2 * OH(-)

    Hydroxide and protons naturally combine to form water - it's another equilibrium but the constant is something like 10**-7 (that 7 is the pH of water)

    H(+) + OH(-) H2O

    i.e. at pH 7, there will be ten million times as much water as either of the other two.

    I'd imagine that various equilibrium constants shift around to prove that there's a net increase in the absorption of carbon dioxide from air. It's pretty elementary science - so elementary, I've forgotten how to do it. by simply ascribing a token amount of competence to the scientific background of the people in TFA, it can be shown that they probably know what the hell they're talking about.

    Also, there's no doomsday scenario where a drop of lime juice makes the ocean boil pure CO2 and kill us all. As far as I can see.

  • Chemical Description (Score:5, Interesting)

    by LeafOnTheWind (1066228) on Monday July 21, @12:21PM (#24275875)

    In case anyone was wondering:

    Lime = CaO

    CaO + H_2O Ca(OH)_2 + 63.7kJ/mol of CaO

    Ca(OH)_2 (aq) + CO_2 (g) -> CaCO_3 (s) + H_2O (l)

    CaCO3(s) + CO2(g) + H2O(l) -> Ca(HCO3)2(aq)

    Some of these compounds are strong bases that may be dangerous for both human consumption and wildlife contact. If this were done in segregated water areas, however, it may be possible to utilize the properties of the first reaction to produce energy via a heat engine.

    • Re:Ocean of Acid (Score:5, Informative)

      by paazin (719486) on Monday July 21, @12:10PM (#24275627)

      And then all these fish die because of too much acid in the water! Epic Fale.

      Uh, not really - Calcium Oxide reduces the acidity of water: Calcium Oxide [wikipedia.org]

        • Re:Ocean of Acid (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Svartalf (2997) on Monday July 21, @12:22PM (#24275881) Homepage

          Heh... Because of the CO2 we already have in the atmosphere, it's too acid right now. All they're doing is a process mother nature already does (Much like Thermal Depolymerization does with biomass and plastics to break it down into natural gas and sweet crude...). Strange as it seems, it might actually do some good- but it's a bold thing they're proposing.

    • Re:Ocean of Acid (Score:5, Informative)

      by wile_e_wonka (934864) on Monday July 21, @12:13PM (#24275697)

      This is why we RTFA:

      There are potentially huge environmental benefits from addressing climate change and adding calcium hydroxide to seawater will also mitigate the effects of ocean acidification, so it should have a positive impact on the marine environment.

      Lime is an alkalide.
      Read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium_oxide [wikipedia.org]
      Also here: http://www.cquestrate.com/ [cquestrate.com]

    • Re:Riiight. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by gfxguy (98788) on Monday July 21, @12:18PM (#24275801)

      Now, I'm not saying this is a great idea, but I'm getting pretty sick and tired of people bashing scientific findings simply because of who sponsored them. Why is Al Gore's sponsored research any more compelling than Shell's?

      Instead of a knee-jerk attack on the messenger, why don't you discuss what's wrong with the research, like every one else ("lime" jokes aside) is doing?