Chinese Hacking of American Military Networks On the Rise 205
Anti-Globalism writes with this excerpt from the Guardian:
"China is stealing sensitive information from American computer networks and stepping up its online espionage, according to a US congressional panel. Beijing's investment in rocket technology is also accelerating the militarization of outer space and lifting it into the 'commanding heights' of modern warfare, the advisory group claims. ... A summary of the study, released in advance, alleges that networks and databases used by the US government and American defense contractors are regularly targeted by Chinese hackers. 'China is stealing vast amounts of sensitive information from US computer networks,' says Larry Wortzel, chairman of the commission set up by Congress in 2000 to investigate US-China issues."
The full study addresses these issues and others relating to the US-China relationship (PDF).
Obligitory... (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, you just saw the first propaganda salvos (Score:5, Informative)
They'll escalate it from there.
From TFA:
"says Larry Wortzel, chairman of the commission"
Larry Wortzel was:
http://www.heritage.org/about/staff/larrywortzel.cfm [heritage.org]
who are:
http://www.heritage.org/about/ [heritage.org]
"Our Mission
Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute - a think tank - whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense."
Yah got to have a bogeyman.
Re: (Score:2)
Convenient that he mentioned neither republicans nor democrats.
Conservative simply means to preserve the status quo, American Democrats are just about as conservative as the Republicans, so that's why there is a 50/50 split.
If the Democrats where as 'leftist' or 'liberal' as is usually spouted around on the intarwebs then no sane democrat would like to be seen near this group.
Re:Well, you just saw the first propaganda salvos (Score:5, Insightful)
In the democratic theater that is modern western politics, the two governments that the population choose between (Republican/Democrat in the USA, Liberal/Labour in Australia, Conservative/Labour in the UK) need to be effectively identical in order that the real decisions get made not by the people, but by the neo-nobility.
There's no difference between modern western politics and autocratic regimes such as monarchy or even dictatorships. It's just that the ruling class hides behind the veil democratic system, and like the Wizard of Oz, pulls the string without the vastly dumbed down population being any the wiser.
They are kept in this subjugated state with a combination of bread and circuses to keep them politically passive as well as carefully constructed media content that portrays a monoculture as though it's freedom.
This is actually an on-topic point, that meandered for a bit. The point I'm trying to make is that only a fool would believe that the US does not have a cyber-warfare (ugh, idiotic term) program, and all this reporting on online attacks by the Chinese is an example of the media reporting bias.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The point I'm trying to make is that only a fool would believe that the US does not have a cyber-warfare (ugh, idiotic term) program, and all this reporting on online attacks by the Chinese is an example of the media reporting bias.
The burden of proof is upon you to show that the US has a cyber-warfare apparatus which is attacking foreign governments in the same way that the Chinese are attacking the US government.
The are only 2 reasons you shouldn't be able to provide credible support for your claims:
1. The US government doesn't actually conduct Chinese style hacking raids.
2. Foreign governments hacked by the USA do not publicly talk about it.
I'll accept any news stories from credible foreign or domestic media.
Re: (Score:2)
It's called "Windows Vista", however the US gov made a mistake and all countries have to suffer. :D
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
hides behind the veil democratic system
Well, that's your problem right there... we are not a democracy, we are a republic. And a republic functions exactly as you describe. The older I get, the more appreciation I have for this too. Some of the dumbass ideas I've seen and heard over the years that most everyone would support (if they actually voted) would ruin this country. There's a reason the founding fathers set us up this way.
If you and your ideas are truly worthy, you can get your message out and past the gatekeepers who keep dumb s
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Bush still got reelected.
So either the voters didn't object to it that much, or the elections got significantly Diebolded...
You will have a problem as long as voters keep voting for candidates mainly because those candidates get a lot of money from greedy companies. Go figure.
Democracy is window dressing if the voters abdicate. Which is what many do.
Democracies: imperfect but not like dictatorships (Score:3, Insightful)
IMHO Western countries are *not* comparable to dictatorships at all - not in the slightest. I am from Zimbabwe - that's all I claim as qualification.
Whether or not they are heavily influenced by powerful individuals, there are a lot more powerful and rich people in democracies so there are many interests to be satisfied and compromises to be made to keep parties in power. i.e. nobody can have it all their own way.
In dictatorships, anyone who appears even as if they *could* provide some challenge is mown dow
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Parent speaks truth, where Asian countries have the strongest talents is in being able to provide great services at cheap prices. When I say that I don't mean because they're poor, I mean because the Chinese are extremely inventive and respectful to customers. They follow the money, when the iPhone came out it was a big race for the first company to clone it and provide it to the Asian markets.
You could say that the Chinese compare this to subbing pirated anime from Japan. It's illegal however no one cares
Re: (Score:2)
How about that all of it is geared towards plutocratic, militaristic, nationalistic, socially conservative repression?
I'm a fan of a strong national defense. Too bad whenever I see anyone use that phrase, they really seem to mean a strong national Offense. I guess "that's the best defense" in some minds.
Can you possibly figure out why someone might find that terrible?
Re: (Score:2)
Is this some excuse for another cold war?
If the USA government is poking at China, its more sophisticated and not readily detectable from the civilian nets. Appropriate technology and its proper use is the solution to this 'problem' that is very visible on our nets.
--
No, I can't read your signature, but my computer can. Using 'geek' is nicer than 'nerd' in these parts.
Re:Obligitory... (Score:4, Funny)
No no, we need to stop the creation of nuclear weapons by dismantling our nuclear facilities and reducing our workforce of experts. By spearheading this initiative, we can expect other nations to follow suite.
Or they will surpass our technology and stockpiles while we hold hearings on the effects of global climate change. But I am confident they will not do so.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe, but I stand confident in the fact that their are others, like me, who aren't that smart.
Re: (Score:2)
Then we can play fallout 4! Weee!!
WTF? (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps I'm just too simple minded, but WHY ON EARTH is ANY of that information even accessible from the interwebz?
Re:WTF? (Score:5, Insightful)
My first though to, why is it even accessible if they think it's such a problem? Guess at least the military should know such basic things. (Though I do understand it makes their sharing easier.)
Re: (Score:2)
Has this been confirmed by Netcraft?
Where's The F***? (Score:2, Insightful)
No you're not simple minded. Why indeed is it anywhere near the internet ESPECIALLY with a report telling us WE KNOW THERE"S A PROBLEM!.
Get real. (Score:5, Interesting)
This is propaganda. It's simply preparing the public for adding China to the Axis of Evil, erecting trade barriers etc.
Re:Get real. (Score:5, Insightful)
And even that is faked (Score:3, Informative)
Re:And even that is faked (Score:4, Interesting)
Don't be to hard on them. China holding dollars gave the west cheap finance, which triggered an asset bubble, and encouraged overcapacity building in China (overcapacity and debt are the two main causes of depressions, depending on which economists you ask). Then they didn't pass on the wealth to their grunt workers, so Chinese demand won't be able to cushion the fall. Oh wait, that was pretty hard on them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think its much more that were dependant on China buying our Treasury notes, or else we would literally be bankrupt.
Re: (Score:2)
They are already buying American and they are still hacking the military.
Whose operating system do you think is getting hacked if not Microsoft's or Apple's ?
Re:Get real. (Score:5, Insightful)
Bang on correct! When do people, especially government types admit that they have a problem and are hemorrhaging data to foreign states? Only when there is an advantage to doing so. In this case, I think you are right, it's part of a ramp up on public information to demonize the Chinese. Specifically who among the Chinese is yet to be determined, but the probably have a short list of targets.
Re: (Score:2)
The really funny part about conspiracy theories is that they are all bullshit until enough information comes to light to show they are not. There are many things in the world that happen which the general public as blissfully unaware of. This is a good thing in some cases, a bad thing in others. Since WWI, the US and western countries have had a habit of building up bad press against the people they don't like. Demonizing them as axis of evil etc. This is all about manipulating public opinion.
Personally, I
Re: (Score:2)
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Re: (Score:2)
A very good mantra, but one that was written before malicious stupidity became the default modus operandi of political figures. Yes, I realize there were both maliciousness and stupidity long ago. The trick is that in recent decades there are certain political figures who have managed to combine the two in a publicly accepted manner. They use is both to defend themselves and to push for ever more bizarre legal changes. When we believe them too stupid to pull the wool over our eyes they have the perfect oppo
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I think the US was just testing the waters at that point. We signed the commerce deals, opened borders... that sort of shunted the communist thing to ground. Now we have to deal with the 21st century cold war problems. What we are seeing is that effort. Dealing with enemies that cannot be outed without revealing your own discrepancies. Cat and mouse in the age of social networking and video phones is much different than the post WWII cold war.
Everyone has forgotten the mysterious underwater cable cuts. Not
Re: (Score:2)
If that is true, then why have I received tons of scans from Chinese IP addresses? When I last looked at my firewall logs, most portscanning crap came from China, so I blocked a bunch of Chinese subnets.
What about the people injured or murdered by fake epogen and tainted food? Are the Chinese private sector and military out of control, or is this a deliberate effort?
Either way, this is a good reason for me to have an unfriendly attitude toward China. Maybe this is propaganda, but there must be some trut
Re: (Score:2)
It could simply be botnet harvesters trying to 'encourage' your machines to join the botnet.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Actually, according to this list [spamhaus.org], the top spammers are from the US but perform their nefarious deeds using Chinese servers.
In other words, your claim that "The Chinese are EVIL!" because they portscan you is BS.
I also think that by saying this "this is a good reason for me to have an unfriendly attitude toward China" you qualify for the Dumbest Statement All Week award. Most civilized people have, by now, realized that the "us versus them" attitude between nations is stupid, as no nation's people can be jud
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You're living in fantasy land if you believe the Chinese aren't spying on us to the best of their ability. Yes, this includes network sweeps and all kinds of other shit that you can see, right in your own logfiles! You can read about it in the paper if you wish.
I don't think the poster was saying "All people of Chinese heritage including people who are genetically Chinese but were adopted by American parents are evil!" He was saying "The People's Republic of China is spying on us."
Get a grip, man. Save
Re: (Score:2)
This is really old news, the chinese standards where found to be taking bribes and the main guy got sentenced to death. What more do you want? He's dead.
Now if only people in the US got executed for fucking up like that. I bet if the same thing happened in the US no one would have even got a jail sentence, they'd have just been fined.
In fact t
Re: (Score:2)
If your the right person you will not even get fined.
http://www.fas.org/news/china/1998/h980618-prc8.htm [fas.org]
Selling Loral's guidance system for Nuclear Weapons to
China for some campaign contributions was A-OK.
No, it is not propaganda. (Score:4, Interesting)
But a year later, we were looking for funding. Found a Tawain born guy from Loveland who use to own the chinese restaurant there. He wanted to invest. But he insisted on getting control of the hardware (which was the important part) if we defaulted. When would company be considered defaulted? When he said so. Told him no way. So, then he wanted to buy hardware and said that he would sell it in mainland china and we could all be worth 30 million or more. The hardware was only 1M. But he explained that mainland was willing to pay 30 for it and might go higher. I was actually shocked since I considered him Tawainese and would not do that. My opinion changed when at a slashdot posting, a tawain native said that the chinese who came there STILL consider themselves chinese, not tawainese. The original guy may not have been a spy. But, he was all too happy to sell tech to them. More interestingly, he indicated that he had been in touch WITH mainland china.
No, this is absolutely not propaganda. This is VERY real. Chinese ppl are happy to see their country coming up. And I understand that. But chinese gov is STILL in a cold war with us. They are very much spying on the west and buying tech. whenever possible. And yes, it is the west, not just America. That includes countries like Japan, Australia, Canada, France, UK, Israel, etc and even Russia. In fact, I consider your statement far more propaganda, because you have NO IDEA of what you are talking about.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Are you kidding me? Your evidence is based on a slashdot post?! The biggest hive of Asperger syndrome whining twitter morons on the internet? That's your proof?!
Re: (Score:2)
just for clarity - was that your comment or your sig?
Can i use if for my sig? AHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHHA
That is possibly the best comment I have ever read.
Re: (Score:2)
Huh? (Score:3)
And that Taiwanese guy was also "all too happy" to sell something that costs 1 million to the Chinese Government for 30 million.
30 million dollars. Not 2 million, not 1.5 million.
Oh yeah, it was because of patriotism or "The Love of China" that he gave them 50% off the original price of 60 million. That must be it eh?
Given what I know of Chinese people, it's far more likely that the Taiwanese guy was just seeing it as a great business opportunity - a cha
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So what's your point? That he'd stop trying to make lots more money because he already had millions in the bank?
That's hilarious if you knew how a typical chinese businessman thinks.
Most Chinese care about Family and Money (for some - Money first then Family
Just
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
While I'm well educated in the Road to War, I don't think this is it. I think this is merely a military responding to a known threat. They are being attacked by known external entities via seeded USB devices, and that attack is being amplified by ignorance on the part of the rank and file thinking these devices are innocuous or can be made so.
Opsec has been pretty lax. If you read the USB spec, you will get that any device plugged into it can write to arbitrary memory locations. It's wide open. A devi
Re: (Score:2)
Verified:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/12/FBI-worried-as-DoD-sold-counterfeit-Cisco-gear_1.html [infoworld.com]
http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html [hereinreality.com]
http://www.fas.org/news/china/1998/h980618-prc8.htm [fas.org]
Re: (Score:2)
It's not available. The military has had regulations preventing the placement of confidential information on publicly accessible networks for over 20 years (which is back when I was in the Air Force). I'll leave it to the amazingly brilliant posters of /. to figure out why they might make such statements...
This TF (Score:2)
Really, really sensitive information isn't available that way. I'm told that organizations like the DoD that have separate networks with no physical connection to the Internet for the "burn before reading" stuff.
But you can't hide all your sensitive data behind that kind of security. Your organization would grind to a halt. Besides, not all data really merits that level of protection. You don't want the bad guys to have it, but it isn't the end of the world if they do.
Security is always a tradeoff of cost (
Re: (Score:2)
> I'm told that organizations like the DoD that have
> separate networks with no physical connection to the Internet
Yup, it's the SIPRNET [wikipedia.org] as opposed to the NIPRNET.
From that same Wikipedia article, it looks like the Coast Guard Academy has a SIPRNET node [uscga.edu]... kind of surprising... but the cadets might as well get used to working with classified materials. CMS officer on a ship, there's a job with court martial potential!
Re: (Score:2)
According to the article you link, the Coast Guard Academy is the only service academy with a Spirenet node. I'd be very curious to know why the CG thinks their cadets need access to classified information on this level. After all, the CG is primarily a law enforcement and safety entity these days.
Re: (Score:2)
> After all, the CG is primarily a law enforcement and safety entity these days.
Perhaps... but they still carry all the comms gear and COMSEC and whatnot so's they can do joint ops.
WTF?-Tasters Choice. (Score:2)
"Those people have needs while at work and it'd be inhumane to not address them!"
Well that explains the secret ingredient in MREs.
Re: (Score:2)
"+1 Wishful Thinking" would be nicer.
Re: (Score:2)
Well there is also these problems:
Counterfeit chips in Cisco gear on military networks:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/12/FBI-worried-as-DoD-sold-counterfeit-Cisco-gear_1.html [infoworld.com]
Chinese buying the main fiber network the US military uses:
http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html [hereinreality.com]
Stupid is, as stupid does...
Why would they bother? (Score:5, Insightful)
America is sending all of it's wealth to China anyway and is happily enslaving future generations to chinese investors.
"Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." Sun Tsu. 2500 years ago so.
Re: (Score:2)
America is sending all of it's wealth to China anyway and is happily enslaving future generations to chinese investors.
Hee hee jokes on them. Its not going to get paid back. And at the end of the day all the stuff they sent us is worth more than all the paper we printed to get it.
I'm only half joking. Seriously... Maybe I'm being too cynical, but I think if this debt spiral continues... when it collapses under its own wate, the US is going to undergo an internal 'revolution', declare that it has no intentio
Re: (Score:2)
One problem with your theory.
The WTO will embargo the US, and if you have not looked
lately we don't manufacture much here.
Also a near worldwide embargo will have an effect on us.
Alot of ppl like to yack on about how we won WW2, but in fact
the Russians bore the brunt of the casualties, and fighting.
The US is vulnerable to having the oil cut off at this point too
as we import 70% of the oil into this country.
Luckily Canada is our #1 oil importer.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, the Russians did a magnificent job fighting the Japanese for all those years.
Re:Why would they bother? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Dude, that is a totally unfair trade. You have to keep Dion.
Re: (Score:2)
Our countries are brothers. You guys can have all the oil, gas, water, electricity, and uranium you want.
You've got our back; we've got yours.
Re: (Score:2)
Well all you need is fair bit of desert and you can grow
your own oil from algae at the rate of about 100,000 gal/acre.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hioZ7C6HLs [youtube.com]
It's not one way (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's not one way (Score:4, Insightful)
That got out of hand fast. Anyway, just because "they're both annoying little bastards" doesn't mean you shouldn't keep an eye on them. Especially if you live in Tokyo.
Time to do what we did to the USSR (Score:5, Insightful)
One of the largest non-nuclear explosions ever came as a result of US technology that was stolen by the Russians. Except, the CIA knew it was happening and instead of stopping it they decided to plant faulty chip designs. Once the USSR knew the tech was unreliable, they were stuck with one helluva an auditing problem, beyond their capability.
How much do you want to bet that somewhere on a "vulnerable" network, there are some designs that are just... a little... bit... off.
Here's the Link (Score:3, Informative)
It was part of the Farewell Dossier [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Boo! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
We can have two (Score:2)
Old School Security (Score:3, Interesting)
Perhaps this seems a bit extreme, but exactly WHY are these military computers even connected to the Internet? If it's really secret information, shouldn't they have their own network or just not put these things online?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
That is old-school security - the admins probably still think it's called ARPAnet.
Beijing's investment accelerating militarisation? (Score:4, Insightful)
Beijing's investment in rocket technology is also accelerating the militarisation of outer space
Funny, I thought it was the US [commondreams.org] stance [eetimes.com] of space dominance [defensetech.org] that was accelerating militarisation of space.
For chrissakes! (Score:2)
Why don't we just take measures to sanction China? Oh wait, we let our economy fail to the point that China owns us. Somehow all this business-favoring government has managed to allow everything to get outsourced and allowed everyone to source everything from China.
China's internet link needs to be severed or otherwise blocked from passing through U.S. routers. US influence should also persuade similar actions in other nations as well. This sort of behavior should not be tolerated. CUT CHINA OFF. The
Re: (Score:2)
If most of your military traffic goes over the old
global crossing network, don't allow the public sale of
that network to a foreign nation with an opposing ideology.
http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html [hereinreality.com]
When you do stupid things, bad things happen.
Very off-topic pdf, except part of ch. 2 (Score:3, Insightful)
The pdf may be of interest to those studying relationships with China, but very little mention of any "cyber war" except part of chapter two that stresses its 'non-classified' information. The biggest hole in US computer security is Windows and how people use it. It is very common for 'users' of Windows not to set passwords, which just makes it even easier easier to penetrate the whole network. Hopefully, no Windows machine can even access classified information in the first place.
Unix isn't perfect either and again, its the human aspect that is the biggest risk. Anyone caught using an account with access to 'sensitive' or 'classified' without an adequate password should be warned, explained what a good password is and fired if they can't comply. It would seem that there is high compliance and regular audits anywhere 'classified' information can be accessed. Chapter 2 of the pdf only mentions 'unclassified' material, never mind all 'classified' material is created from 'unclassified' resources. Truly classified data should never be accessible from The Internet in any way, in the first place. Any information placed on, or close to The Internet should be considered 'public' on a worldwide basis.
Generally speaking, China uses the simplest, known techniques, to penetrate servers. Any admin can tell you how many dictionary attacks come from China. It is impossible to determine which ones are just 'script kiddies' or students and which are serious organized efforts. There is a very small rate of success from this method. Today it seems that these (Unix) machines are simply used to spread the simple scripts on a wider scale. Simply moving off port 22 (even to port 23) will stop 99% of the problem. Statistical programs that temporarily deny access to a certain IP address can be very effective as most scans never return, even if the access is denied for as little as five minutes. To combat the hardcore attempts where the attack returns, simply increase the 'access denied' time and ultimately blacklist the IP address and the whole net if necessary. (It is very rare it ever goes that far.)
In conclusion: Don't put classified information in the reach of The Internet. Never use any Microsoft product to view 'classified' or 'sensitive' information unless it can be assured there will never be any Internet connections of any sort. It is highly unlikely any government secrets leak out unless that was the intention, such as a "trial balloon". At this time, this is a non-problem that can be stopped. If absolutely nothing is done, it could escalate in much the way spam did. The official report appears to draw the same conclusion, however that is buried in a pile of irrelevant and off-topic material.
BillSF
zeros (Score:4, Informative)
Really? (Score:2)
I wonder if it is personal? (Score:5, Interesting)
The DoD takes everything personally, and for good reason, but I have a steady stream of chinese hackers attempting to break into the router in my tool shed that reports battery voltage and temperature at a cabin that is inaccessible for 6 months of the year.
I really should put a webcam in there so they can see what they have achieved if they ever do manage to get in.
(22.1F, batteries 25.3V, 600 watt hours of energy stored today.)
poisoned Honey pots (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
They mostly come at night. (Score:2)
Because most admins are home watching reruns of 'Lost'.
This thread is a lot more amusing... (Score:2)
Counterfeit IC's in Cisco Routers (Score:3, Interesting)
It is not too hard to hack a network if you got
counterfeit hardware inside the network giving
you a backdoor in.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/12/FBI-worried-as-DoD-sold-counterfeit-Cisco-gear_1.html [infoworld.com]
So once they got in, they learned what they needed
to know to stay in, and put other methods in place
to stay in.
They are going to have to rebuild their network one segment
at a time from the ground up.
They need several things with one of them being segment
monitoring IDS system that can detect the outbound traffic.
Something that can track all outbound traffic against
a white-list of acceptable IPs, think a reverse peer guardian
that tracks what IP's are reached and snds alarms if they
are not on the list.
In any event they will have a monumental task of clearing
all the backdoors in the system, and should consider going
totally to a secure hardware+software encrypted VPN that
does not even travel over the public internet.
There is enough dark fiber out there to do it for the classified
material they transmit.
Also if most of your military traffic goes over the old
global crossing network, don't allow the public sale of
that network to a foreign nation with an oppposing ideology.
Namely China !
http://www.hereinreality.com/likashing.html [hereinreality.com]
When you do stupid things, bad things happen.
Re: (Score:2)
When was the last time you went into a Wal-Mart and looked at the 'Made In..." tags? 70%-plus of the stuff in that store is from China, from trash cans to seasonal stuff to lego-like shelving units.
Re: (Score:2)
Major "woosh"
Re:Communist China! Your days are numbered! (Score:4, Insightful)
This sends the message to the rest of the world that the US may not pay its debt to them if they do something the US does not like.... That would be a bad precedent, as we would soon find ourselves very isolated when it comes to finance and commerce...
Re: (Score:2)
chines checkers != go
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Checkers [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Chinese Checkers (Go).
Chinese Checkers & Go are two entirely different games.
Re: (Score:2)
I propose we ban Chinese Whispers. That's how things really get out of hand.
Re: (Score:2)
Whispering was not required when you can trade campaign
donations for guidance systems for ICBM's.
http://www.fas.org/news/china/1998/h980618-prc8.htm [fas.org]
Re: (Score:2)
There are -zero- smelting plants for steel based alloys in the US.
Completely false.
I won't even read the rest of your comment.
Re: (Score:2)
Electronics manufacturing is not done in the US? Then what is Wolf Electronix [wolfelectronix.com]? Were the semiconductor facilities run by Intel and Philips just my imagination? Holy shit! I must be really fucked up to have hallucinated all that!
Re: (Score:2)
Ditto to Texas Instruments and a few others.
Re: (Score:2)
because most of the attacks do not come directly from them, they come via proxies from infected systems the world wide....
Re: (Score:2)
"Combine moving inept corrupt people into agencies, with corrupt people from Microsoft and the CEO of companies like GE, walmart, Target, GM, etc and you have the downfall of American civilization and probably the west."
-You forgot ".....and using corrupt programs written by a corrupt software company."
Re: (Score:2)
Not most, just the advanced guidance systems for Nukes.
Nothing important or anything.
http://www.fas.org/news/china/1998/h980618-prc8.htm [fas.org]
LOL
Re: (Score:2)
Ppl mod this troll but this is right in line with
what Rockefeller has said at CFR meetings, but
ppl don't pay attention to anything that isn't
entertainment these days.
Oh well...