Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Multitasking Harmful To Productivity 333

Greyfox writes: "According to a CNN article, a person who is multitasking several things takes a hit on his productivity. Oddly enough, it reads almost exactly like a description of the problem with multitasking on computers; context switches cost, especially if you have to swap a lot of crap out in order to fit the new process into memory. So basically, an employee who can stay focussed on one thing for long periods of time is going to have higher productivity than one who has to handle constant interrupts. Now if I could get my manager to buy into that ..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Multitasking Harmful To Productivity

Comments Filter:
  • by wiredog ( 43288 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @07:28AM (#2109777) Journal
    You pee twice as much while brushing your teeth? Better see a doctor about that.
  • by Leknor ( 224175 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @07:00AM (#2113080)
    Didn't Henry Ford relize this first.
  • by HerrGlock ( 141750 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @05:02AM (#2114443) Homepage
    Four radios, talking to six people, a co-pilot, maps, weapons systems, mast mounted sight, scanning for other aircraft, while on a screenline looking for bad guys, setting up relief on station and tracking the movements of everybody.

    Multi-tasking? What's that?

    DanH
  • by Zico ( 14255 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @04:30AM (#2114533)

    You got that right. I've got 18 freakin' browser windows open right now, forget about all the other stuff that's open, too. I'm impatient, and some of us can actually handle multitasking, thank you. Sure, there are some times when it slows me down, like I won't read a book while listening to something like the Phil Hendrie Show because that my brain doesn't handle very well. Then again, knowing the simps that work at CNN, it wouldn't suprise me in the least if they have one browser window open at a time, spending 50% of their time just watching that little blue ball spin 'round and 'round...

  • by csbruce ( 39509 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @04:02AM (#2115615)
    Trying to think of something profound, while going for First Post.

    That'd be real-time multitasking.
  • by Observer ( 91365 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @06:55AM (#2125043)
    A high level of interrupts is bad for throughput, too.

    But the tendency to use words and analogies drawn from current technology has a long history. Popular-science accounts of the working of the brain used to compare it with a telephone exchange. At the time they were written, this was the highest vaguely relevant technology. Fifty years later, comparisons were being made with computers. Most such analogies and comparisons become misleading if you try to extrapolate from the analogy back to real life - the brain isn't a telephone exchange or a computer, after all.

    Vaguely related: long ago, when the organisation I was in had far too much work for its headcount (something to do with a recession and layoffs - little changes in business) our group manager once picked on 'concurrency' as his word of the week. "Up your concurrency!" he exhorted his staff at an open meeting. A prim female voice from the back of the hall responded "Up yours."
  • by Robotech_Master ( 14247 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @04:05AM (#2128204) Homepage Journal
    I find myself trying to multitask a lot of the time during my free time...and usually what I'm trying to do suffers for it. Roleplay online, read net news, read Slashdot, read email, read net comics, watch a DVD movie...I guess I'm easily distracted by things.

    Oooh! Bright shiny object, sorry gotta go!

  • by Zico ( 14255 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @04:21AM (#2130632)

    Yeah, you tell yourself that women are good at multitasking the next time you let your girlfriend drive and when she's looking for a particular street sign, she starts screaming at you to turn the radio down. Come on! :)

  • by Kierthos ( 225954 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @04:19AM (#2131902) Homepage
    • Sky indeed blue, research study concludes.
  • by pieterh ( 196118 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @06:43AM (#2136741) Homepage
    Being distracted by irrelevancies is one thing, but switching between different projects and tasks can be very productive, if done right. First off, it is tiring to concentrate on one thing for too long. Secondly, when I work on different projects, the cross-fertilisation of ideas is often very useful. Lastly, in my experience, the cost of context switching between projects can be kept very low by using standard tools, similar environments, etc.

    There is some evidence that people who learn to speak several languages at once learn faster than those who learn a single one.

    Computers multitask stupidly. Many people multitask naturally and creatively. The trick is to make it easy, painless, and pleasant.

  • by jcarley ( 53604 ) on Monday August 06, 2001 @05:52AM (#2148164)
    I think I have the same problem although it sounds less acute. When my wife talks to me I can't hear her. The disorder seems to be hereditary because my kids can't seem to watch tv and hear their parents either...
  • Goldfish.. (Score:1, Funny)

    by marcushnk ( 90744 ) <senectus@nOSPam.gmail.com> on Monday August 06, 2001 @04:09AM (#2148971) Journal
    Is it just me or is this story kinda like say we're just like Goldfish??
    Ohh look a rock
    ohh look a rock
    ohh look a rock
    ad-infinitum (or something to the effect) Marcus
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 06, 2001 @04:00AM (#2152034)
    Trying to think of something profound, while going for First Post.

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...