Full-Screen Video Over 28.8k: The Claims Continue 459
gwernol writes "Over at Screen Daily they are claiming that an Australian company has demonstrated a high quality, full-screen video-on-demand service that is delivered over a 28.8k modem. They claim this will 'eliminate the need for broadband.' If this is true, then they'll change the world. Of course, the basic technology has been around for a while, see this article from 1998 or this one from earlier this year. I remain extremely sceptical. If this is real, why won't they allow proper independent testing? But it is interesting that they're getting funding. Could this be the last great Internet scam?"
Several readers also pointed out this brief report at imdb.com as well. We've mentioned this before, but the news here is the reportedly successful demo. It would be a lot easier to swallow if he'd let people test it independently, but video-over-28.8 sure is tantalizing.
Last great Internet scam?!?! (Score:1, Funny)
If you believe that... (Score:3, Funny)
Yes, and I am able to compress all of Slashdot down to 10 bytes.
It's all in the buffering (Score:3, Funny)
easily done (Score:4, Funny)
http://lzip.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]
I hope this isn't another Pixelon...
What's that? (Score:4, Funny)
Yes sir, full screen video over a 28k connection.
So what am I seeing? It looks rather blank.
Well sir, that's a white cow in a snow field. It just scared out some snow hares.
Over 28k you say? Where do I sign?
Sound good (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Smoke and Mirrors (Score:4, Funny)
Perhaps a GPS beacon as well.
Re:It's all in the buffering (Score:2, Funny)
Fractal compression (Score:2, Funny)
Re:End of Broadband? (Score:4, Funny)
Broadband is great b/c I don't have to wait 5 mins while my porn comes up, I don't have to wait 15 hours for my whatever.tar.gz to download, and I certainly don't have to worry about my roommate stealing all the bandwith downloading MP3s.
Even if 28.8kbps can support full motion video you can't do much else while it is downloading.
Re:If you believe that... (Score:2, Funny)
compression is more effecient when thare is lots of predictable duplicate data right ?
Well just think about how many "Linux is great" posts on slashdot there is...
Re:If you believe that... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:It's all in the buffering (Score:3, Funny)
Re:This could work... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:If you believe that... (Score:2, Funny)
However, the decrypt key is 4.5 GB long
Re:easily done (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I can watch me (Score:2, Funny)
Re:MP3... (Score:2, Funny)
Recall that a "quantum leap" is by definition the smallest possible leap. The next quantum leap in compression will be just compressing one more bit. Why hope for that?
Re:Too bad... (Score:2, Funny)
I'm already leaning towards banning it because it enables faster dissemination of copyright materials. We may have missed the chance to outlaw the internet as a whole, but we will definately get each and every individual new peice as it comes up.
Do you people not understand that we own you.
All your ass are belong to us.
yes, it is running over 28.8 (Score:1, Funny)