NSync Copy Protected CD 577
admiral2001 writes "This article from NewScientist.com details the most mass market venture into copy protected CDs. Namely, NSync's new CD will be released in a least 3 different versions (with different copy protection techniques). Also, one of the types has (small) labelling saying that the CD cannot be played on computers."
Whoa... I just noticed... (Score:5, Informative)
"Copying using home CD recorders is variable, with the US CD giving a "no disk" message on some recorders."
So this is lovely! The US version is still rippable. Except on the "consumer" home CD recorders that pay the royalties to the RIAA anyways because the only thing they were usable for was copying other CDs.
This is even more fscked than at first glance.
It's just the German version. German geeks: your mission is clear. Buy and return as many NSuck CD's as possible!
Re:Part of bigger problem, not just N'sync CDs (Score:3, Informative)
Re:trademark? (Score:2, Informative)
Here [uspto.gov] is the USPTO record.
'N Sync-Celebrity is Available. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What should be done... (Score:1, Informative)
~~~
Canadians...? (Score:5, Informative)
I can take YOUR NSync CD and make a copy for myself (%insert_your_own_joke_here%).
See more about this here: http://neil.eton.ca/copylevy.shtml#copy_for_frien
So, does this mean that this 'version' of the NSync CD wont be sold here in Canada? Or will I have to start buying and returning CDs and showing them that their product infringes my rights as a Canadian according to the Copyright Act...
This could be seriously fun...
Re:What should be done... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:trademark? (Score:3, Informative)
Panasonic licenses the technology needed to create cd-da, and will probably send lawyers after anyone who attempts to use their trademark without paying the required tribute.
But the claim that you must somehow meet the IEC 908 standard in order to legally use the trademark has not been backed up by any information I've seen presented thus far.
Analog doesn't suck. 128 kbps MP3 does. (Score:2, Informative)
But that is not a digital copy, I can't listen to that analog crap, digital only! Only digital copies are good! Digital! Digital! DIGITAL!!!!
How is a full bitwise digital copy intrinsically better than one with an analog step in-between? Nothing matters but that you enjoy the music. The quality loss from encoding to 128 kbps MPEG layer 3 interferes more with the subjective experience than does the DAC on a good CD player or the ADC on a good sound card, especially ADCs that sit outside the noisy computer case environment and connect through SPDIF. (The analog step may be necessary in case your sound card recognizes SCMS.)
Re:copy analog (Score:1, Informative)
How to rip the audio files of the new copy protect (Score:1, Informative)