Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Kazaa to be shut down? 419

darkpriest writes "According to this article on The Register, the file sharing software KazaA has been ordered to cease copyright infringment. They have two weeks to comply with the Judges ruling or face a penalty of $40,000 a day." CD: We've gotten a number of submissions about this, I had no idea Kazaa was this popular (must be all those a's in their name). I bet anyday that the RIAA will sue cisco for making routers that could be used to infringe.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Kazaa to be shut down?

Comments Filter:
  • more info... (Score:4, Informative)

    by thanq ( 321486 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @01:45AM (#2635002)

    There is a little bit more information about it on cnet:

    http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-8022666.html? tag=mn_hd [cnet.com]

    although it does not contain too many facts beyond the actual case and the judgement.

  • by Bitsy Boffin ( 110334 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @01:49AM (#2635022) Homepage
    For those who didn't read the artikle, it's a Dutch court who ordered the Dutch company to cease & desist.

    More to the point, Kazaa (the file sharing system) and FastTrack (the network (and libraries for accessing it)) are one and the same, so this should also affect Morpehus and Grokster (not to mention the buggy linux Kazaa client) !

    This is bad bad news. Quick to the Kazaa before it goes away !
  • Yawn. (Score:4, Informative)

    by drix ( 4602 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @01:52AM (#2635035) Homepage
    Now seems like an opportune time to remind everybody that the FastTrack protocol was reverse-engineered some months ago by these guys [sourceforge.net] (definitely a highly impressive RE feat, IMHO). gIFT is a fully functional, open source FastTrack implementation which happily coexisted with Kazaa and Morpheus until FastTrack decided to break it by further obfuscating their protocol. Which is a shame, because in doing so they make the FastTrack protocol reliant on centrally run servers to obtain a cryptographic key... this is all covered in detail on the gIFT website. Long story short, Kazaa can go down in flames for all I care, even though I use it almost every day. gIFT is in the public domain and here to stay. It's not ever going to be taken away from us. It works like a charm. It's decentralized. And it's just waiting to load up on content so it can gain that critical mass of users needed for widespread acceptance. Kind of a chicken or the egg problem, I suppose. So my advice to everyone is to start running gIFT and develop OpenFT network. This sounds like bluster but it's true for the time being: gIFT is the be-all-end-all of P2P filesharing.
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @01:54AM (#2635046)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • WinMX (Score:5, Informative)

    by DarkZero ( 516460 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @01:54AM (#2635048)
    For anyone that's unfortunately bound to Windows and is looking for a new file sharing service to jump to, I'd recommend WinMX [winmx.com]. It's a great P2P program that has always had whatever I'm looking for (and what I look for is pretty damn obscure, i.e. Asian pop and such), yet has still remained firmly under the radars of the RIAA and MPAA. Of course, at the rate the RIAA is going, every currently existing P2P program will be gone eventually (though they will be replaced with new ones in the mean time), but I estimate that you'll get at least six or ten months of use, and possibly much more, out of this one.

    And by the way, for those that are modding this... I do not work for WinMX in any capacity, nor do I have any financial or personal stake in it. I'm just trying to help the people that looked at this article and thought, "Well, damn. What's left for me to go to now that doesn't suck?".

  • Re:Popularity (Score:5, Informative)

    by nsample ( 261457 ) <nsample@sta n f o r d.edu> on Friday November 30, 2001 @02:28AM (#2635078) Homepage
    We did a study in the P2P group at Stanford two months ago... with pretty interesting results. Kazaa (as monitored through a Morpheus client gateway) consistently topped out at over 50 terabytes of data and peeked at just over 1.1 million active clients. It's becoming truly ubiquitous, and it's growth rates (in terms of both users and size) indicate that they will be the unquestionable king of P2P in short order.

    It's pretty clear that it's a big part of the reason they're being targetted by the BSA, RIAA, etc. currently... I can only hope that University research into these things doesn't fuel the corporate interests backing the anti-P2P movement.

  • by nsample ( 261457 ) <nsample@sta n f o r d.edu> on Friday November 30, 2001 @02:37AM (#2635109) Homepage
    Yes, in the Napster case "control" of the network was a critical issue. Specifically, though, it's a two-tiered test in order to have "vicarious liability" like the courts found Napster did... e.g., who is liable for what in terms of a P2P network's content. Remember, you need two things: the ability to supervise, and the making of profit.


    Vicarious liability arises when the defendant "has the right and ability to supervise the infringing activity and also has a direct financial interest in such activities." Napster, 239 F.3d at 1022.


    Also, there's still the good competitive analysis of kazaa, etc. from the RIAA (where we also find the codification of liability):


    http://www.dotcomscoop.com/riaamemo.html [dotcomscoop.com]

  • by DABANSHEE ( 154661 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @02:41AM (#2635114)
    Fast-track (Kazar, Morpheus, Grokster) apparently use some sort of P2P 'supernode' setup, where clients on computers with large bandwidth (like on-campus student networks) act as 'supernode', ie they act as servers, transparently to the user/s.

    Also Xolox uses the Gnutella network, so each client behaves like a transparent server.

    Because of that, you log on right now & even though Xolox says that they have shutdown because of the legal situation, the app still searches/downloads/uploads files perfectly well via the Gnutella network.

    So as far as my take on this is concerned, all these law suites can do is stop new revisions of these apps - they can't stop people using these apps even if the licensies/distributers of those apps shutdown.
  • by jx100 ( 453615 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @02:44AM (#2635127)
    It used to be largely decentralized, but in an attempt(and a sucesful one at that) to block out giFT an open source client to the KaZaA/MusicCity network, they put in some central servers to identify clients more thoroughly. Basically, it does give them a bit more liablity(since now the network will not work without them), and it keeps other(non-"them") clients out.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 30, 2001 @03:30AM (#2635211)
    The translation of the actual result seems to have lost some detail.

    Basically - KaZaA is ordered itself to stop infringing on arfists their right withing two weeks. It is not said that they are actually doing so - but if they are - they better not do it two weeks from now.

    But at the same time - the dutch version of the RIAA (well not quite comparable - the legal framing is way different) is ordered to sit down with KaZaA withing two days to reach agreement as to how to legally offer music.

    So the sword cuts two ways. While it is by no means clear yet -if- kazaa actually has stepped on the artist rights in any way.

    Also note that Buma/Stemra is quite in a different leage that the RIAA, has a lot more legal shackles and govt. oversight - and typically chargers very reasonable fees - for end users in the fractions of dollars per song. And is very cognant of fair use. The netherlands is rift with things like public libraries which rent out popular music.

  • by mlc ( 16290 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @04:00AM (#2635250) Homepage
    Even plagiarism sounds better than piracy, semantically.

    Plagarism is totally different than "piracy". Plagarism is when you pass off someone else's work as your own. It is possible, then, to commit plagarism (which is not, AFAIK, illegal, at least in general) on a Free work, if you claim that, e.g., you wrote Emacs. This doesn't take away from the fact that you are entirely within your rights to distribute Emacs. However, it is illegal to distribute copies of MS Word, even if you acknowledge that MS wrote it.

  • by CaptainCarrot ( 84625 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @04:03AM (#2635254)
    You're ignorant.

    DeCSS? Explicitly developed to enable playing DVDs on Open Source computers with DVD drives. It's hardly practical to share full-length movies over networks or even to store them locally on hard drives -- although you should note that the latter use is not infringing. I for one can't think of a single use for DeCSS that's infringing under the traditional doctrine of fair use, given the current practical technological limitations. It may well be in violation of the DMCA, but that's a seriously broken law that undermines rights that consumers of intellectual property have enjoyed for a very long time. The DMCA isn't Norweigian law, anyway.

    Skylarov? His product is entirely legal in the country where he wrote it. In fact, without his company's product it's Adobe's software that's illegal. It's against the law to erect technological barriers to fair use in Russia, but that's what Adobe's so-called encryption does. It's his company that ought to have been held accountable for marketing the product in the US where it was illegal; Skylarov himself as an employee had nothing to do with that. If he's guilty of anything, it's of demonstrating that Adobe's claims about the security of their encryption scheme was a total crock. Embarrassing corporations isn't illegal -- yet.

    Peer-to-peer networks? All of them run on top of the Internet, which, in the event you haven't noticed, is one vast peer-to-peer network designed for freely sharing information. None of the other indexing schemes for available information, such as Gopher or even some web pages, are not fundamentally different from networks like Gnutella.

  • Decentralizing etc.. (Score:2, Informative)

    by TheCrunch ( 179188 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @04:08AM (#2635258) Homepage
    KaZaa, Morpheus & Grokster are clients for the (decentralized) FastTrack network. So unless the RIAA go after FastTrack, good ol' Morph & Grok should be OK. Possibly. I read a while back that in their attempts to stop giFt, K, M & G made all user authentication go through a central server. Hence the "possibly".

    One thing I never did figure out was why K, M & G all look the same (bar different icons). What's up with that?? As far as I'm concerned, the RIAA can kill as many clients as they like. There will always be more (and better) P2P apps cropping up. Kinda like natural selection.

    Anyhoo, here are some old Slashdot posts on the subject:

    RIAA Looks To Stop KaZaA, Morpheus & Grokster [slashdot.org]
    File Sharing: Decentralizing, Open-Source Fasttrack [slashdot.org]

    -TheCrunch
    .sig .freud

  • by Trepidity ( 597 ) <[gro.hsikcah] [ta] [todhsals-muiriled]> on Friday November 30, 2001 @04:16AM (#2635271)
    I had no idea Kazaa was this popular

    It's good to see Slashdot editors keep up with technology. FWIW, the FastTrack network (through the Kazaa and Morpheus clients) has consistently been the single largest bandwidth user amongst colleges and universities for the past few months.
  • webwereld.nl (Score:5, Informative)

    by leuk_he ( 194174 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @04:27AM (#2635296) Homepage Journal
    The register points to this article on webwereld.nl [webwereld.nl]. Since i am not aware of any automated translaters:

    Rechter: KaZaA over twee weken dicht
    judge:Kaza must close in 2 weeks

    This is the remarkable outcome of a "kort geding" (court where outcome is in a short time) between kazaA and music right organisation "Buma/Stemra". If kazaa does not comply they must pay 100.00 guildens (~45.000 euro) a day with a max of 2 Million guildens. This outcome can end the Kazaa, that is one of the biggest music exchane services since the departure of napster.

    The judge also dertermined that BUMA/stemra must meet with Kazaa to negotiate a contract where Kaaza can legaly offer misc via the internet. Accoridng to kazaa there was already a oral agreement with the buma/stemra the they canceled the engotioations.

    Loyer Christiaan Alberdingk Thijm sees the judgement as a vicotry , in spite of the closing threat. "it is fantastic that they have to negotioate with us again. That means we still have enough time to make an agreement."
    ...

    about the passage in the verdict about the "auteursrecht" [copy right? ] he is less to speak. "in the verdict is that kazaa breachtes the copyright. This is nonsense. The users are responsible for this. With the same argument one could close the suppliers of video recorders"

    . . . appeal. . .

    according to Alberdingk Thijm the verdict only has consequense for the software. This means that the network where also morpheur and grokster make use of stay 'open'. Poeple who already have installed kazaa soule be able to continue with using the network.

    .
    .
    .
    Buma/stemra did not react. "we do that when we studied the verdict"

    [sorry for speliing errors and parts left out]
  • by ZxCv ( 6138 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @04:47AM (#2635329) Homepage
    If there exists a law that blatantly contradicts the constitution, is that law actually valid?

    Yup, unfortunately. It depends on where the jurisdiction of the law is, but it requires some court (usually the Supreme Court) to overturn it before its actually invalid.
  • by jquirke ( 473496 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @07:00AM (#2635570)
    The FastTrack network has a very scalable two-level structure. Every computer on the network is initially a 'node', however nodes with significant bandwidth are promoted to 'supernode' status.

    The KaZaa/Morpheus servers handle logging in and refer the node to a supernode, where the node sends its list of files it wants to share. These super-nodes store these lists, and search queries are forwarded to the supernodes.

    A supernode also gives the lists of some of the clients its connected to, so if the supernode disappears nodes can talk to other nodes about supernodes without getting kicked off the network.

    So, effectively the network is controlled by the supernodes, which can be just ordinary PCs with reasonable bandwidth. The KaZaa servers only handle the logging in pretty much, so I doubt the FastTrack network could ever technically be shut down. Unfortunately the FastTrack protocol is very proprietary, and uses some closed-source algorithms. It would be good to see someone create an open-source 'equivalent' of the p2p protocol with the excellent features of FastTrack.

    Anyway that's just my understanding of the FastTrack network, correct me if I'm wrong.
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @08:12AM (#2635675)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by toadnine ( 525325 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @08:19AM (#2635686)

    A more complete and better(?) translation of the webwereld.nl article [webwereld.nl].

    Judge: KaZaA must close in two weeks

    Thursday, 29 November 2001 - KaZaA must stop making copyright infringements of music artists in two weeks with, a judge decided today.

    That's the remarkable outcome of summary proceedings between KaZaA and Buma/Stemra [Dutch RIAA]. If KaZaA ignores the decision they are forced to pay 100,000 Dutch guilders per day, with a maximum of 2 million guilders [1 NLG = about 0.40 USD]. The verdict can mean the end of KaZaA, the largest peer to peer network after Napster.

    The judge also decided Buma/Stemra must negotiate with KaZaA within two days about a treaty that will allow KaZaA to legally 'distribute' music. According to KaZaA there already was an oral agreement with Buma/Stemra when Buma/Stemra canceled negotiations at the last moment.

    Victory

    KaZaA's lawyer, Christiaan Alberdingk Thijm sees the verdict as a victory, despite the threat of KaZaA being forced to close. "It's of course really nice that Buma/Stemra has to negotiate with us again. That means we still have enough time to make an agreement.

    Whether Buma/Stemra and KaZaA will be able to make an agreement within two weeks, Alberdingk Thijm can't say. "I find it difficult to estimate"

    But Alberdingk Thijm isn't happy about the passage in the verdict about copyright infringement. "The passage says that KaZaA itself makes copyright infrigments. That's of course nonsense. The users of KaZaA are responsible for that. You could also close down companies that make VCR's with that argument."

    Appeal

    "You can only have a point when you say KaZaA gives users the possibility to break copyrights, the same argument used against Napster. I have the feeling the judge bungled that part of the verdict", says Alberdingk Thijm.

    Thus KaZaA is thinking to appeal against that part of the verdict. "But before we make a decision we'll have to study the verdict again, calmly."

    According to Alberdingk Thijm the verdict only has consequences for KaZaA's software. That means the network the company uses [FastTrack], which is also used by Morpheus (MusicCity) and Grokster, will stay 'open'.

    People who already installed KaZaA on their computer, would still be able to use the network. KaZaA doesn't use central servers [they do! but it's still 'optional'] as Napster did, so stopping the service is difficult.

    Buma/Stemra doesn't want to comment the verdict yet. "We will do that after wes tudied the verdict thoroughly", as George Knops of Buma/Stemra says.

    Copyright (c) 2001 - WebWereld / Maarten Reijnders

    Translation by Eelco Lempsink

  • by psych031337 ( 449156 ) <psych0@@@wtnet...de> on Friday November 30, 2001 @08:45AM (#2635733)
    This is bad bad news. Quick to the Kazaa before it goes away !


    ...and the good news is, that it will take at least two weeks. Also the court has ordered the IFPI (the Dutch RIAA companion) to hold talks with "Consumer Empowerment" (the company that developed FastTrack protocol on which all clients rely) about the formation of a legal music-distribution service.

    So there might be a lot of water flowing down the Rhine before something happens. And then again, it is a Durch court. They are not really known to be a corporate whores. Hell, they smoke pot in that country so you might as well expect a sensible outcome from this...
  • by FatChuck ( 535859 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @09:17AM (#2635801) Homepage
    If I'm a judge, it's supremely easy to shut down Kazaa, et al. First, I shut down the servers where the program is downloaded because it leads to contributory copyright infringement, -or- I order Kazaa to come out with a new version of their software and force all previous versions to not work with the "decentralized" servers. Second, I mandate that the Kazaa people incorporate filters into their servers to screen out copyrighted files as happened with Napster. If they fail to comply with my orders, I fine 'em and jail 'em for contempt of court or massive copyright infringement.

    Last, remember that Kazaa and their ilk are *not* truly p2p networks - the software they run *does* require that the program check in with Kazaa occasionally. Sure, Joe Hacker can bypass that, but good luck running this p2p network when 98 of every 100 people are off of it because they aren't hackers.

  • by tb3 ( 313150 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @10:48AM (#2636225) Homepage
    Piracy is an act of robbery committed at sea. Any other use of the word is an attempt to make a minor crime sound a lot more heinous than it really is. Thank the spin doctors at the BSA, MPAA, and RIAA for this wonderful use of language.
  • by WD ( 96061 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @10:54AM (#2636264)
    It would be good to see someone create an open-source 'equivalent' of the p2p protocol with the excellent features of FastTrack.

    Try OpenFT / giFT [sourceforge.net].
  • Comment removed (Score:2, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @11:04AM (#2636319)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by StormyMonday ( 163372 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @12:32PM (#2636891) Homepage
    The real issue here is, how should authors of creative works be compensated ?

    No. The real issue is "how should the owners of creative works be compensated?". Music nowadays (at least for the big labels) is "work for hire". The musicians have no ownership rights to the music. Anything that goes to the creators is a matter of contract negotiations, and, I suspect, creative accounting. (The average musician is no more an accountant than the average accountant is a musician.)

    None of the money that you pay for a CD goes directly to the musicians. (Unless, of course, you listen to indie bands, like sensible people.) It goes to the label, who determines how much the band gets.
  • by wideangle ( 169366 ) on Friday November 30, 2001 @01:42PM (#2637326) Homepage

    Much like Napster and Gnutella, search results in Morpheus contain the IP addresses of peers sharing the files that match the search criteria, and file downloads are purely peer-to-peer. As is the case with Gnutella, file transfers are via the HTTP protocol. Because of this, each peer is essentially a Web server. With knowledge of the appropriate URLs, Clip2 was able to successfully download files from Morpheus peers using Microsoft Internet Explorer.

    A typical Morpheus file download request looks like this:

    GET /4431/Martin+Luther+King+Jr.+-
    +I+have+a+dream.mp 3 HTTP/1.1
    Host: 10.20.31.42:1214
    UserAgent: KazaaClient May 7 2001 16:00:44
    X-Kazaa-Username: anon
    X-Kazaa-Network: MusicCity
    X-Kazaa-IP: 102.12.97.42:1214
    X-Kazaa-SupernodeIP: 113.103.15.82:1214
    Connection: close
    X-Kazaa-XferId: 2956456

    Upon receiving the above download request, a Morpheus peer sends a response like this:

    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Content-Length: 4381547
    Accept-Ranges: bytes
    Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 20:43:32 GMT
    Server: KazaaClient May 7 2001 15:59:09
    Connection: close
    Last-Modified: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:31:02 GMT
    X-Kazaa-Network: KaZaA
    X-Kazaa-IP: 10.20.31.42:1214
    X-Kazaa-SupernodeIP: 120.23.123.227:1214
    X-KazaaTag: 5=274
    X-KazaaTag: 21=128
    X-KazaaTag: 4=I have a dream
    X-KazaaTag: 6=Martin Luther King Jr.
    X-KazaaTag: 14=Speeches
    X-KazaaTag: 3=asqK3s/zY2oC4IaGYq3gJYWLcKo=
    Content-Type: audio/mpeg

    Note the use of metadata headers describing the requested file. Also, note the repeated occurrence of the "Kazaa" name in these headers.

    Following the HTTP response, the number of bytes specified in the "Content-length" header is sent from the peer sharing the file to the one who sent the download request, and the connection is closed. [more...] [openp2p.com]

  • use IRC =) (Score:3, Informative)

    by ZaBu911 ( 520503 ) <.moc.liamg. .ta. .retskcaz.> on Friday November 30, 2001 @04:45PM (#2638298) Homepage
    IRC networks are something that, I assure, won't be shut down any time soon at all. looking for music? pr0n? TV episodes? turn to the warez networks, like EFNet (irc.prison.net, irc.arcti.ca to name a few) and DALnet (astro.ga.us.dal.net, sniper.tx.us.dal.net). Works well.

    Good alternative :-D

Scientists will study your brain to learn more about your distant cousin, Man.

Working...