VP3, Open Source Video at 200kbs 219
Honest Man
noted that intel is hyping VP3 as the first low bitrate open source video codec. 200kbs for VHS quality video sounds good to me, especially when I can apt-get it. But is DivX already to entrenched in this niche?
Boosting Ego / Marketshare (Score:4, Insightful)
Quick Answer (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Will the MPAA allow Intel to do this? (Score:5, Insightful)
well (Score:2, Insightful)
Having to fill out any registration forms will push people away, and not being able to find the codec online will obviously throw people off. The easiest way to get around this would be to encode a bunch of movies, or tv shows.. in the name of the file put the URL to download the codec, and message everyone who is trying to download it, telling them where to download the codec.
With a bit of support from its users, this could easily take over as the common standard. With mp3's, people were only used to hearing about one specific codec (mp3). With video, people already know there are multiple kinds, each with different qualities. They know of real video, mpeg, divx, quicktime, and a few other formats. Throwing another one in the mix won't be surprising to them.
Also, after someone has downloaded a 600Mb file, they are more likely to go out on a limb and install a codec, than if they just downloaded a 3Mb mp3.
Re:Quick Answer (Score:5, Insightful)
It has a reputation for being primarily used for pirated video
So did MP3. Sometimes being first is more important than being better.
Open source? Looks like $395 to me.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Intel's link takes you to on2.com's website where they have this to say:
With the VP3 for Windows codec, you can encode VP3 video and play it back through the Windows Media Player! The VP3 for Windows codec allows you to encode VP3 video using any Video for Windows compatible encoding application (such as Adobe Premiere and Virtual Dub) and play it back through the Windows Media Player. This version comes with limited email support. $395 USD"
The free open source versions can be found at www.vp3.com, but it looks like Intel is promoting them the big bucks version.
Re:Quick Answer (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Wiht @Home in Doubt (Score:2, Insightful)
Open Source != Free Software (Score:2, Insightful)
Ok, back to my lurking.
DivX shouldn't be entrenched (Score:1, Insightful)
BlackGriffen
Dig deeper next time... (Score:3, Insightful)
Not free software (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:200 kbps... (Score:1, Insightful)
Instruction set (Score:2, Insightful)
Often companies say that their product produces "VHS" quality, but that is a bit subjective. For example some say that one codec sounds just as good as another (WMA at 64kbps vs. MP3 at 128kbps) but I can notice the difference immediately. And since this is a product produced by a company, not a standard, it probably won't be very popular.
Re:Quality comparison? (Score:3, Insightful)
The big problem with this is that perception is individualistic. Similar to how "golden ears" can perceive compression artifacts in MP3, "golden eyes" can perceive artifacts in compressed video.
For example, DVD compression drives me into a blind rage everytime I see those fat pixels in the shadows of dramatically lit masterpieces [imdb.com], I have to supress an urge to go on a murderous rampage across the desks of hundreds of idiots who thought that MPEG-2 would be "good enough".
Now, I am forced to rent a DVD before I'll consent to purchase it, just to see if I'm going to be irritated by compression artifacts. I'm not gonna blow some $20 on a screwed up compression job.
Re:Low bandwidth. (Score:1, Insightful)
1/10th of that is 21Mbps, not 200Kbps.
VHS quality? What the hell is that? (Score:2, Insightful)