Open Source... Television? 200
jarit0z writes: "In Robert Cringely's latest column he toys with the idea of creating a TV show to go along with his rants. The show would be freely (as in beer) distributable, to hopefully keep bandwidth costs down. And it would also be freely (as in speech) modifiable, since he would also be releasing the "source" or raw footage of the show. Very interesting ideas if you ask me."
Re:pbs (Score:5, Informative)
When a production company or station makes a program, they turn over only the finished piece to the distributor or broadcaster. The production company or station keeps ownership of and rights to the stuff that went into making the program. Sometimes there are agreements between the distributor and the production company, like the production company promising not to turn around and use the same footage to make a different cut of the same program and sell it to somebody else for instance.
So what PBS gets is actually just the finished programs, not the raw footage or anything like that. It's not theirs to release.
'Open Source' television already exists (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Start with (Score:4, Informative)
Re:pbs (Score:3, Informative)
Actually, total federal funding to CPB/PBS is about $250 million, only 12.2% of CPB's total budget (figures from CPB). This is less than 0.0005% of the total federal budget.
Personally, I wish Congress would either a) leave CPB/PBS alone, cut funding entirely, and let it do its own thing, instead of this shoestring allowance it gives it (currently, the President picks the head of the CPB board and Congress approves) OR b) keep CPB's current setup, but FUND the organization it founded so they don't have to rely on so many advertisers, and so they can give us better programming. [/rant]
Re:pbs (Score:2, Informative)
I already do it, download now ! (Score:1, Informative)
Mr Cringly obviously has no idea how much footage goes into a 1/2 hr program, i make documentaries (for a tv company) and on average we have 10 - 40 hrs of raw footage to produce a single edited hour program, this in data terms at full broadcast resolution equates from 200gig - 2tb, so how does he propose i distribute this footage my cable modem ? my t1 line ? who pays for the bandwidth ? what if 500 people try to download it, should take you ooh six months to download the footage and even then you have no creative freedom over the camera and where to point it. mr cringely is obviously more stupid than i though