Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media

DVD Format Changing Movie-making 297

rgmoore writes "The Los Angeles Times is running an interesting article on the impact of DVDs on the movie making process. They briefly mention the possibilities of end-users being able to re-edit the movie (with a veiled reference to The Phantom Edit) but focus more on the way that it's starting to influence directors and producers during the course of making the movie."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

DVD Format Changing Movie-making

Comments Filter:
  • DVDs of course (Score:2, Interesting)

    by littlerubberfeet ( 453565 ) on Sunday April 07, 2002 @11:44PM (#3301614)
    DVDs lend so many possibilities for extra content. As a person with close connections to the documentry film world, I know that there is a conflict between people wanting 2 hour specials, and people wanting FOX like 15 minute ADHD adapted summaries. The ability to include both is a real opportunity. Since so many people watch DVDs, they can watch what they want. Unfortunatly, people will start coming out with crap made just to fill up the 4.7 gigs of space. So film has found a new media, perhaps we should concentrate on making good use of it, instead of filling it with crap. How long until everyone will get Holiday DVDs with 4 hours a family footage? Sounds like the 7th level to me.
  • Director's comments (Score:2, Interesting)

    by miahrogers ( 34176 ) on Sunday April 07, 2002 @11:55PM (#3301651) Homepage
    I think one of the greatest things about dvds is that the director can show you multiple ways to watch the same movie. Once you're done with a movie, if you really like it, you can listen to the director talk about how he made it. I did this for American Beauty [imdb.com].

    Also more directors are able to put out the movie in wide screen, and I'm sure they love that. It's much more similar to the actual way we view things, and the film doesn't have to be "modified the film to fit your screen".

    Anyways. Hooray for DVD.
  • Big Deal (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Dr. Spork ( 142693 ) on Monday April 08, 2002 @12:02AM (#3301671)
    It seems to me that these interactive features are there to apologize for how terrible most movies are these days. It's like the studios are saying "sure, our directors and scriptwriters suck shit, but hey, you can "re-edit" the movie yourself and make it suck less." Pretty soon, movies will be so "interactive" that we will just periodically mail $10 to the MPAA, get some cameras and friends, film some footage, and edit it to our liking.

    But seriously, I am happy that LOTR-FOTR is being released in a four-hour version. I really like the idea of DVD-directors cuts. I'm pretty confident FOTR would have made a lot more money if it had only been 2 hours long, because it could be shown five times a day per screen, rather than three. There is a lot of pressure on studios to avoid long movies. They want people to pay and free their seats as fast as possible. DVD releases are not under that same pressure, so I think we will see more "unshortened" versions of movies.

    I hope that enough people buy the FOTR DVD for the extra footage that movie studios actually learn to always shoot extra scences (character-development, background explanations, and cheap stuff like that) that don't appear in the theater release, but show up on the DVD to drive up sales/rentals for people who loved the movie in the theater and want to see more. FOTR is one movie that definitely needs another hour or so to make it seem less rushed.

  • Phantom Edit 2001 (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Rufus211 ( 221883 ) <rufus-slashdotNO@SPAMhackish.org> on Monday April 08, 2002 @12:02AM (#3301672) Homepage
    According to the phantom edit forum [onecenter.com] (only thing I can get to right now, the site [onecenter.com] is down for "6 hours" right now) a new 2001 aka DC version (what's with the city names?) has been released. One person provided an ftp to download it from, but the ftp is dead. As someone who is just now hearing about this for the first time (and has too many SW-obsessed fans for friends) I'd be *very* interested in seeing this, or really any of the 3 (LA, NY, or DC) versions. Anyone out there have a mirror of any of them on a descent connection and be willing to share with the community or know of someplace we can get this from?
  • Re:Memento edit! (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Masem ( 1171 ) on Monday April 08, 2002 @12:13AM (#3301703)
    I've heard that the R2 (or R4?) version of Memento does have an alternate chapter ordering as to run through the main plot in order (starting with the B&W calls in the hotel room, ending with the death of Teddy). Sure, it wrecks the way the narration and discussion of the problem and how it's built into Leonard's discoveries in the reverse order, and some of the revelations made in the movie (how not only were others using Leonard but he himself was), but there are thsoe that might want to see it that way to figure it out. And it wouldn't have taken up that much space on the current disc, so I'm surprised it's in an R2 edit but not R1.

  • My (stalled) project (Score:5, Interesting)

    by swillden ( 191260 ) <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Monday April 08, 2002 @12:16AM (#3301710) Journal

    THis would help in editing the bad content of movies (cursing, nudity, etc.) and making some movies out there viewable for the whole family. I like this and hope to see this soon.

    I've been thinking about and half-heartedly working on this idea for quite some time.

    What I'm working on is taking an open-source DVD player (I picked Xine, but I'm questioning the wisdom of that decision) and hacking on-the-fly editing capabilities into it.

    The basic idea is that for a given DVD, a person can go through the movie and carefully "mark it up", generating a file that annotates all of the portions of the video and audio tracks that are potentially offensive, tagging each one with descriptive information including the nature of the material, relevance to the plot, etc. Then, an individual can create a personalized "viewing stylesheet" that specifies how he or she would like kind of offensive material to be handled. Obviously, some default stylesheets could be provided as well. The markup and stylesheet languages will both be extensible, (so you can add the "Jar Jar tag"), and you should be able to edit pretty much anything that's marked up in any way you want. A buddy of mine wants to make himself a stylesheet that will show *only* the offensive parts ;-)

    Then, of course, when you play a DVD on my hacked-up player, it would look up the markup file and use that and your personal viewing stylesheet to automatically edit the movie.

    I think it would also be cool to provide another sort of editscript that allows more sequential editing, rather than a rule-based system, so that you could do more "artistic" edits, grabbing snippets of video and audio from various places and maybe mixing them with your own. That's not my major interest, though, mainly since such edits probably wouldn't be done 'on the fly' anyway.

    The project has been languishing for a few months, though. The Xine support for playing DVDs is quite rough and doesn't seem to be improving quickly. The Xine developers had been talking about a 1.0 release in December, but it hasn't happened yet, AFAIK (haven't checked for a while). Actually it's the dvdnav plugin (which supports menus and such) that has been really lagging, and the regular DVD plugin doesn't support encrypted DVDs, which makes testing difficult, since I don't have any unencrypted DVDs.

    What I have done is implemented various edits (masking blocks of the image, skipping short scenes [long skips are much harder; seeking doesn't work in dvdnav yet], muting the sound and substituting alternative snippets of audio, altering subtitles, etc.) to verify that it can be done easily. I have also found what I believe is the best way to insert the editing stuff architecturally; as part of a general filter plugin architecture. I've also begun to define the markup and stylesheet languages (both in XML).

    I've mostly been waiting on Xine, though. Just recently I've gotten tired of that and I've started looking into some of the other options. Ogle, VLC and gstreamer are three I'm considering.

    If anyone knows of other players I should look into, or has any interest in helping me with the code, drop me a line.

  • by slamb ( 119285 ) on Monday April 08, 2002 @01:11AM (#3301812) Homepage

    I think it would also be cool to provide another sort of editscript that allows more sequential editing, rather than a rule-based system, so that you could do more "artistic" edits, grabbing snippets of video and audio from various places and maybe mixing them with your own. That's not my major interest, though, mainly since such edits probably wouldn't be done 'on the fly' anyway.

    I think that would be really great for stuff like The Phantom Edit. LucasFilm's objection to it is that their material is being passed around unauthorized. Something like this would allow you to basically distribute The Phantom Edit as a patch to the official movie. So in this format, people who have purchased the original can watch it and others can not. There's a clearer distinction between pirates and fans doing things like this. As a bonus, it'd take up a negligible amount of disk space and would be easier to re-re-edit.

  • by Spy Hunter ( 317220 ) on Monday April 08, 2002 @01:41AM (#3301851) Journal
    I think it is interesting that the phantom edit was directly made possible by DeCSS, and the DVD format by itself would have actually prevented its creation because of the copy controls. (in the future when VHS is no longer used, this will become even more relevant.)
  • An idea (Score:2, Interesting)

    by CarbonJackson ( 540580 ) on Monday April 08, 2002 @02:14AM (#3301898) Homepage
    Here's an idea that's been dancing around in my head. Let me see if I can make sense of it. Basically, I'm thinking of a program that would allow people to produce custom edits of DVD's. It would depend on someone owning the actual DVD for the video, but could import audio tracks (for commentary) and tracking scenes (for custom edits).

    In essence, you end up with a little script that tells the end user which audio track to play when and where to "drop the laser" on the video. No explicit IP problems that I can think of.
  • by Saeger ( 456549 ) <farrellj@g m a il.com> on Monday April 08, 2002 @04:33AM (#3302152) Homepage
    For me to interested in such a hack, there would have to be a way to apply video overlays.

    While there's many uses for such a thing (including inserting MORE ads), I'd be using anti-product-placement DVD "patches" like there was no tomorrow. For example, Cast Away would be much more bearable to watch, IMO, if every attempt to beam the FedEx brand into my brain magically became the generic ACME brand; I can deal with ACME. :)

    More generally, I'd want this functionality in a networked PVR such that live TV could be buffered for the 30 minutes or so it took for a trusted-network-of-distributed-johnny-rebels to "whitewash" the annoying digitally inserted advertisements out of baseball games, and off the pavement in Nascar races, etc. (not that I watch Nascar cars go round-dee-round.. ahem.)

    Anyway, since there's valid uses for this kind of thing -- just like there is for a 30-second skip button -- I don't see why it couldn't make into mainstream PVR's like a 3rd(?) generation Tivo.

    --

  • by Rogerborg ( 306625 ) on Monday April 08, 2002 @08:21AM (#3302409) Homepage

    Where have we already seen these groundbreaking developments?

    • Handheld cameras?
    • Straight to video releases?
    • Online releases?
    • Mock-amateur participant observers (aka gonzo filmaking), as used in the "innovative" Blair Witch?
    • Multiple POV scenes on DVD?

    Porn, that's where. Where the porn industry (and niche market filmmakers in general) innovates, Hollywood trails along, years afterwards.

    Want the know the Next Big Thing? Real time audience generated scripts. I'm thinking ho cams chat sessions, I'm thinking Troma and their script contests [ncsu.edu], especially the one where each scene was written by a different fan. Throw some budget at it, put a film crew and some Semi Big Names in a shiny van with a satellite uplink, webcast the filming and solicit "what happens next?" in real time from viewers. Zoom around Hollywood (or Toronto, more likely) with a lawyer and a light meter, spending bushels of money to shoot a quick scene in this cafe or that warehouse among real honest Joe Public, then edit it up and release a movie/DVD of the final version, complete with various alternative scenes, "the making of" documentary, and some stuff about the scene submitters. Cinema verite on steroids: "Yeah, my aunt's boyfriend's dog walker wrote this scene! Look, that's him in the credits, telling Harvey Keitel what to say!"

  • by Chelloveck ( 14643 ) on Monday April 08, 2002 @10:05AM (#3302736)

    I'd really like to see the DVD laid out so you can pick and choose which edition you want to see. This would be perfect for something like Star Wars. Wanna see the original? Great. Press "Play Original Version" and you get just that, no Special Edition footage. Wanna see the special edition? Great, press that button instead. And if you let me program the scene order myself, I can keep in the cool scene where the Millenium Falcon takes off out of Mos Eisle but take out the lame Jabba scene just before it.

    This was one of the promises of DVD that I haven't seen used in any title yet. I remember hearing it touted that you'd be able to switch between, say, an R-rated original or the PG-rated cut-for-TV release. Or maybe I'd like to see the deleted scenes in the context of the movie rather than as snippets to be viewed separately. *sigh*

  • If you fool around with the DVD Edition of Made [imdb.com] (by Jon Favreau of Swingers [imdb.com] fame), you'll see an example of in-DVD editing.

    You're allowed to 'edit' a few scenes. The tone and feel of one scene in particular, the 'pottery painting' scene, can be completely changed by your editing. Basically, the DVD splices the scene up into three or four shots, and gives you three or four options for each of these shots. These shots include the one used in the movie and some that were left on the cutting room floor. Once you've finished selecting your shots, the DVD shows you your completed splice. Granted, the splice is a little rough on the edges, but, man, what a cool-ass feature.

    The editing feature not only gives you an insight into what an editor's job is like (having such control over the tone of a scene is really amazing), its just a fun toy. It also neatly showcases the incredible power of DVD.

    If you haven't rented it, the DVD is worth a rent - packed full of special features, and just a good movie to boot. Highly recommended.

"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker

Working...