Mashed-Up Music 274
An unnamed reader submits: "The New York Times is running this article (also available here) about "mash-ups:" songs created by digitally synchronizing instrumental tracks with vocal tracks from two (or more) existing songs. Often the source songs are wildly disparate, and the result is frequently better sounding than you might first expect. Who knew that Christina Aguilera mixes well with The Strokes or that Nirvana and Destiny's Child make a good combo?" This is an interesting answer to arguments that online music sharing is nothing but theft.
DJ Z-trip (Score:2, Informative)
If you can find it, get "Uneasy Listening, Vol 1" although I think they only put out 1000 because he didn't license any of the songs he mixed on it. :-)
A good review of the album [sfweekly.com]
Moulin Rouge (Score:4, Informative)
herb alpert + public enemy (Score:3, Informative)
Welcome to 2001! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Artistic and Theft are not mutually exclusive (Score:2, Informative)
No. Even local bands playing in bars have to pay royalties if they perform covers of other bands' songs.
Been done before.. (Score:2, Informative)
Besides mixing Public Enemy songs with Herb Alpert songs they've also been on the wrong side of some lawsuits from CBS regarding 5 minutes of remixing of Dan Rather's broadcast [evolution-control.com].
*Yawn* (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Copyright violation (Score:5, Informative)
The 1909 copyright revision was done in response to such technological changes as movie making and early recorded music. It was the same revision that first allowed for corporate owners of copyright. I think maybe the 1909 Congress was being influenced by something other than the public good. Allowing innovative uses of someone else's ideas IS for the public good. It may hurt some individuals, but it gives a wider range of creativity to the public.
In 1790, George Washington set for a new law "For the encouragement of learning" not "for the protection of authors." The public is supposed to be the beneficiary of copyright law - whatever benefits the author might see are coincidental.
2 Many DJs album (Score:2, Informative)
So, is the article wrong, is this CD available here in the UK? or has it climbed to #4 solely as an import CD? Does anyone know?
If it's available off-the-shelf here in the UK, I might very well go and get myself a copy!
One ot the theories.. (Score:2, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Dexy's vs Public Enemy (Score:2, Informative)
The track is a mix of Come On Eileen and Bring Tha Noize - there's a crap mp3 of it hanging around on Audiogalaxy.
There's some interesting stuff here [base58.com] too.
Lots o' Links (Score:2, Informative)
A compilation of bootlegs was released, naturally a-la bootleg, on a collection called "The Best Bootlegs in the World, Ever." Here's a tracklist [greenspun.com].
Radio 1 recently did a special on the whole bootleg scene (also called "mash-ups", "cut-ups" and "remixes"). You can listen to it in MP3 format here. [phink.net]
The best sites I've seen are:
Dsico [4trak.net]
Boom Selection [base58.com]
Evolution Control Commitee [evolution-control.com]
Due to a recent New York Times article, and because of these site's recent popularity among other online media sources [slashdot.org], you may have to wait a couple of days to get to the MP3's on these sites.
A incompletely informal introduction to good mash-ups:
Hope this helps...
Hasn't been /.'d yet... (Score:2, Informative)
You can see their cheesy video for "Smells Like Teen Booty" while you listen to the cool song.