Interview with Dr. Villanueva 207
cigarky writes "I think many of us were very impressed by the recent letter of Peruvian Congressman Dr. Edgar David Villanueva Nuñez. Linux Today has a followup interview with more in-depth information."
Beautiful (Score:5, Interesting)
When you hear people complaining that free (as in beer) software is going to cost programmers jobs or cut their salary, or that free software will send us into an economic tailspin, remember this: Both free (as in speech) and free (as in beer) software are making technological revolutions possible in places where it just couldn't happen otherwise. And you can bet that we're going to see good stuff (more software!) starting to flow back the other way.
Considering Microsoft's Position on their own OS (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Beautiful (Score:2, Interesting)
Actually, I wish there were a better term to differentiate between the two. "Free open source" versus "public domain open source" versus "public domain" versus... gah. "Free software" may have been an unfortunate choice of wording, but we'd need something like a permissions mask to cover all the possibilities:
"Oh, frobjazzer is 754." "So the author can do anything, friends can edit and redistribute, but strangers can only redistribute?" "No, that'd be a 732 license. Bit 2 is reselling." "Oh! So MS would be 711?" "No - MS is 700, and requires a hard drive that won't let you chown..." "Oh ho..."
Write YOUR elected reps -- now! (Score:1, Interesting)
Slashdot Interview (Score:5, Interesting)
How about a Slashdot interview with this guy? I haven't know many politicians to shy from another couple million eyeballs regarding their pet project, even if it comes from non-constituents.
Re:The Bill (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually, this is the text of a bill proposed in Argentina, but it is almost identical (to the point of s/Argentina/Peru/g). The free software deffinition used in both is the same.