Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Star Wars Prequels Media Movies

How Yoda Became an Action Star 769

fexter writes: "This article at Entertainment Weekly talks about Yoda's transformation from a puppet to a completely-CG character, and talks about the animators' horror at Lucas' transformation of Yoda: 'When Coleman and crew first saw them, they were appalled. They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How Yoda Became an Action Star

Comments Filter:
  • Well ... (Score:1, Insightful)

    by gTsiros ( 205624 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @07:54PM (#3682908)
    Yoda is (supposedly) one of the "strongest" in the Force. Others can move objects using the Force(which is completely nonsense in my opinion- mental power doesn't have nothing to do with physical power or the ability to affect the physical world) why shouldn't Yoda be able to levitate and throw his own body about to compensate for his low posture (is that the correct word?)... Besides, if he didn't, he would just be able to aim at legs.

    I was dissapointed that he didn't just kill dooku on the spot...A tie is not a win. Oh well. :/
  • by Brigadier ( 12956 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @07:54PM (#3682917)


    Everyone knows he used the force

    evryone I know who watched the movie enjoyed that scene the most. Just to see him spiraling through the air. then pick up his walking stick and limp away. To be honest I think the transformation was reasonable. There is always that cartoony effect that you get with CGI. that you dont get by using a puppet. Real hair real shadows, real intigration with the scene.
  • by CarlDenny ( 415322 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:01PM (#3682948)
    I'm still annoyed at the Yoda fight scene, and I think the animators were right.

    Yes, having Yoda kick ass was cool.
    But he didn't have to do it by spinning around at 3600RPM.

    Yoda is supposed to be relaxed and smug. He should have overwhelmed Dooku with -skill- instead of just being four times faster, with no moment of inertia. That scene would have been twice as good if the big Y had stayed upright, and parried and feinted like a madman. No need for backflips.
  • by allism ( 457899 ) <alice.harrisonNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:03PM (#3682956) Journal
    The animators were right...he does look like a bouncing Sooperball, it is undignified, and I (and others I asked) found it more comical than amazing.
  • Re:Lucas, Lucas... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by 3th3rn3t ( 245106 ) <ethernet@epOPENBSDimp.com minus bsd> on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:04PM (#3682958) Homepage
    " They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store. "

    Yes, i have to agree with that, Lucas is a complete moron. Always was and always will be.
    He completely disregarded all the background the fans had created for the various characters in the movie ( for example Boba Fetts story ) and managed to ruin things once again.

    Not to mention the whole film was PACKED with CG. I mean, ok, sure, CG are nice and helpfull, but for god's sake, do use some real actors and scenert at some point. Every signle thing in the movie was CG'ed. I dont know, it just didnt feel like the StarWars people loved and respected anymore.

    As for the duel scene, it was a complete disaster IMHO. Many people in the theatre laughed and laughed after it, when Yoda grabbed his stick to help him walk. Sure, Yoda uses the force blah blah blah, but dont make the duel act as a comic relief.
    We await for Episode III - Lucas Epic Disaster.
  • Sadly Undignified (Score:5, Insightful)

    by blink3478 ( 579230 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:22PM (#3683057)
    The animators were right all along, and I had a small piece of my childhood die watching Yoda leap around like a gymnist on crack. Yoda was my favorite character growing up, and that fight scene made no sense. I remember a video I saw of the guy who invented Aikido in the 1900s - I forget his name now. He was a wizened old man in the video, probably pushing ninety years old, his diciples had long-since taken over teaching their own varieties of aikido, and he still showed up in his dojo to train his students and give little demonstrations. What he lacked in mobility and strength he made up for in grace and economy of movement, and I watched as he would toss aside the students with little hand movements or slow sweeping gestures. The students could attack in piles, and still they would be tossed aside like leaves. It was really magical to watch such an old man possessed of such power. Anyway - that's how Yoda should have fought. He should have been slow, graceful and easily dispatched his enemies using only the force. He had no business using a lightsaber, and had no reason to spring about like a ping pong ball. Lastly, the reason Yoda and Boba Fett were awesome characters in the original trilogy was because they were mysterious - unknown pasts, unknown barely hinted-at abilities under the surface. Lucas destroyed their mystique by making them full fleshed-out characters in AOTC.
  • by Deagol ( 323173 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:22PM (#3683062) Homepage
    I have to agree. I would have liked to see a parallel to the first Luke/Vader fight in ESB. The first few minutes are Luke going at it, while Vader kinda shrugs him off with his 'saber -- with one hand, no less. This really made an impact as to how much of a badass Vader truly was.

    And don't get me started on how Yoda should have simply force-shoved Kenobi and Skywalker out of the way of that pillar, rather than stop the pillar itself. Soooo lame.

    Speaking of Vader, am I the only one who was really let down by the 30-second battle between Anakin and Dooku? I mean, this kid is destined to be the Jedi, yet this scene lacked any real tension. Even the last Darth Maul fight in E-1 was better!

  • by Black Parrot ( 19622 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:29PM (#3683091)


    > Anyway - that's how Yoda should have fought. He should have been slow, graceful and easily dispatched his enemies using only the force.

    Yeah, but how many action figures would he sell that way?

    > Lastly, the reason Yoda and Boba Fett were awesome characters in the original trilogy was because they were mysterious - unknown pasts, unknown barely hinted-at abilities under the surface. Lucas destroyed their mystique by making them full fleshed-out characters in AOTC.

    Kind of like his inspiring "explanation" of The Force in E1, eh?

  • by mir@ge ( 25727 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:32PM (#3683107) Homepage
    ...and knights are combatants. It only makes sense for their most respected member to be able dish it out when necessary.

    That said, Yoda is more in touch with the light side of the force than all of them. When he is a peace it flows through him and he can do wonders. I personally thought that he should just have "relaxed" and start tossing Doku around like a rag doll when he wipped out the light saber. It is peace that has always been Yoda's ally not violence. I think the Yoda we see in AOTC is more rash and youthful himself. He is arrogant and still has a lesson to learn.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:35PM (#3683119)
    fexter (original story submitter) here...

    It's only fair to note that the article concludes that it was cool for Yoda to do this, after all:

    But, boy, were they wrong: The scene has played like gangbusters, and Yoda is by far the most popular character in the new film (as a recent EW.com poll confirms). He even became the star of the ads, which dropped romantic-lead costars Natalie Portman and Hayden Christensen for him.

    But I think this points out the bigger flaw with the movie: that a mentor character becomes, with ease, more popular than the supposed heroes.

    I think the writing and direction were the root cause of this.

    This article:

    http://nationalpost.com/search/story.html?f=/sto ri es/20020525/299070.html

    was really spot on. All about the missing rogue character.

    Lucas talks all about Joseph Campbell's mythology structure, which focuses on the hero's journey. But somehow, in the last two movies, Lucas has managed to avoid giving us any heroes we could enjoy watching.

    Sure, he has given us a couple characters who we at least like, but that doesn't mean they're heroes who we root for all the way along, and who we grow *with*. The most recent two movies are more of a series of events than heroes' journeys.

    fexter, ashintaro.com [ashintaro.com]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:36PM (#3683124)
    why was Yoda straining to lift the column thing in ep. 2, when in the eyes of the force (as it were) everything is the same. Someone as 'powerful' as Yoda shouldn't have had to strain at all. and why didn't he maneuver it to crush Dooku's escape thing?
  • Re:Appalled? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by FFFish ( 7567 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:45PM (#3683159) Homepage
    I think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes.

    Damn straight. Imagine him fighting with an economy of motion and energy. Defeating enemies by using their movement against them; parrying their attack by using their attack against them; using the subtlest shift in weight to completely alter a situation to his advantage.

    It'd have been a thing of beauty.
  • Re:Dignity? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by qubit64 ( 233602 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @08:49PM (#3683181)
    I disagree about how wise you think Yoda is. Consider the scene at the end "victory you say? ..." I think it is more about arrogance than wisdom. I suppose they are to a degree mutually exclusive, but I guess the Jedi simply have not had to deal with such a problem in a long time. (How long was it? 1000 generations or something) They've put themselves on quite the pedestal so they don't think that a Sith lord could possibly slip by them when in fact he did... They've forgotten (to a degree) the ways of the sith and how powerful they really are. Also, I think they respect Yoda for his wisdom in that he is very wise in matters that would effect the affairs of the jedi up to episode 1, and not so much with this new threat. Even with this new threat however Yoda seems to know more about it than the others... (again look at the victory comment) Come to think of it, it seems like a dark side ability is to be able to cloud the vision of even other jedi (light or dark). Evidence for this is the obvious stuff from episodes 1 and 2, but also in ROTJ, in which Vader feels the presence of luke when Sidious does not, and near the end when Sidious doesn't notice Vader is about to pick him up and throw him to his death. All this being said I don't disagree that they also respect him for his mastery of the sabre. I think it's a combination of the two however...
  • by inkswamp ( 233692 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @09:58PM (#3683440)
    I'm starting to wonder if our culture isn't collectively losing its ability to suspend their disbelief. Of course, a diminutive warrior like Yoda suddenly flying through the air is going to be funny on the surface. But if you were lost in the film like I was, really submerged into the world on-screen, not self-consciously fearful of what people might think if you let yourself go and connect with it, then that moment was one of the most startling moments in all the SW films.

    One nice touch I noticed is that Yoda grabs his cane afterward and we are left to ponder the fact that this guy just moved like lightning in his fight, but has difficultly with the act of walking. It strikes you that he was exerting the Force on himself to move himself through the air and engage in battle. It makes a definitive statement about his ability.

    I didn't have trouble with this. I feel sorry for those who couldn't enter that world and experience it full-force. Pity.

    --Rick
  • by Nighttime ( 231023 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @10:36PM (#3683610) Homepage Journal
    The most crowd pleasing scene in a movie so far this year was Kirsten Dunst giving mouth to mouth resuscitation to Spiderman in the rain with her nipples hard from the cold.

    You didn't notice that Natalie Portman had a twin nipple-on in the cockpit scene on Tatoonie. Who'd have thought it was that cold in the desert? :)

    (No, I wasn't deliberately looking out for it, but it was one of those things that once you'd noticed it, you couldn't stop noticing it.)

  • by dswensen ( 252552 ) on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @10:54PM (#3683701) Homepage
    ... instead of drawing lightsabers, Yoda (who would be a puppet, because believing a CG image is Yoda is so much harder than believing a wad of latex with Frank Oz's hand up its ass is Yoda) should have fought Dooku by using the Force to summon a clunky ethereal knight (done in cheap front projection of course; matte lines just look more -real-, and matching color palettes are for sissies), who then fight in jerky slow-motion.

    During this battle, there is much groaning, pantomiming, and grimacing (except for Yoda, who has only two expressions: "furrow brows" and "lower ears." That's okay though, because PUPPETS GOOD.) Then, at the end, when there is a big flash of light (all done with squibs), Dooku says "You never could beat me, Egg Shen."

    Yeah, that totally would have been worth my five bucks.

    (Oh, and bring back Mr. Perfect, Irvin "Empire Strikes Back, Robocop II, SeaQuest DSV" Kershner to direct, because that man can do no wrong. Just watch that Amazing Stories episode "Hell Toupee.")

    Please, take off the rose-colored glasses. The special effects technology of Star Wars has always, always, always been a work in progress. Watch the difference in space battles, and the lightsaber battles, between Episodes IV-VI. They make a quantum leap in sophistication, complexity, and speed.

    That's because FX technology was, and is, always developing. This expectation that CG is somehow infallibe, and all its imagery should somehow be perfect and consistent, is rubbish. There's probably a very good reason there wasn't a CGI Yoda in Episode I -- and he will probably look much better in Episode III -- just like everything else.

    Star Wars has always been about pushing the technological envelope as far as it will go. Sometimes it works. Sometimes they drop the ball. This has not changed since 1977. Look at any of the movies and you will find places where the special effects are truly great, and places where they stink on ice. Why all of a sudden this warrants another "George Lucas sucks" troll of a story is beyond me.
  • by Wylfing ( 144940 ) <brian@NOsPAm.wylfing.net> on Tuesday June 11, 2002 @11:02PM (#3683728) Homepage Journal
    All you who cry "TPM and AoTC were betrayals" and whine endlessly about how much it suxored and fucking nitpick about whether the physics of Yoda's swordfight were accurate or whether it takes more skill to leap than to parry -- you are all like the worst kind of trekkies now. In other words, you are ruining for the rest of us a perfectly good pulp space opera that is escapist fiction which is not supposed to be realistic .

    I am reminded of a Saturday Night Live sketch starring William Shatner, in which he is pelted with inane questions from feverish trekkies about "What was the combination to the lock in Episode 17?" Shatner tries to explain that it was just a prop, and there wasn't really a lock and therefore no combination at all, and the trekkies just stare without comprehension.

    You are those fuckwits now. And yes, that means you too, you butt-munch, who are even now preparing a reply that goes something like "But Ep1 and Ep2 really were betrayals." Yes, you are the fuckwits.

  • by junkgrep ( 266550 ) on Wednesday June 12, 2002 @01:24AM (#3684235)
    Maybe, like many martial arts masters, Yoda likes to play up his supposed frailty to catch others off guard.
  • Re:Appalled? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by raistlinne ( 13725 ) <`lansdoct' `at' `cs.alfred.edu'> on Wednesday June 12, 2002 @01:56AM (#3684324) Homepage
    I've always thought that the Jedi are a pretty clear reference to martial arts and that The Force is similar to the chinese concept of "chi".

    Well, sort of. The Chinese concept of chi is a fairly internal one, whereas the idea of the force is very external. Chi powers have more to do with manipulating energy in one's body, and force powers have more to do with manipulating energy outside of one's body (not that the force isn't inside of people as well, but it's by virtue of being all-pervasive).

    I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips.

    Well, this isn't so idiotic. There are chinese styles that are very, very jumping-heavy. From what I understand, there are some northern styles where a fighting person spends more time in the air then on the ground. (This is supposed to be derived from fighting on ice, where the air is actually a more stable place than the ground is.)

    That being said, I heard a story (from someone who witnessed it) about a 60-something year old black dragon gung fu practicioner who drank gin from the bottle, smoked cigars about 1" in diameter, had a pot belly the side of some people's bodies, and waddled around. Some students insulted him (laughed at how fat he was, I believe) and by way of demonstration, after informing them of what he was going to do, he jumped upso that his waste was around the height of their shoulders or heads, kicked one in the shoulder and before he hit the ground had spun around and kicked the other one in the side of the leg. The students both hit the ground at approximately the same time.

    So maybe there's more to the idea of a master jumping around at really high speeds than you realize. :-)

    He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around. Remember, when you're doing a flip, you're basically defenseless and not doing any real attack.

    Well, I thought that (1) it wasn't his energy - it was the force, so that there was an unlimited supply of it and (2) he was moving around to attack from different positions. After all, it's not like he jumped up and waited to land again before attacking. His saber was spinning around saw-tooth fashion while he was jumping, and I recall Dooku having to block it more than once while yoda's feet were not on the ground.

    You would think that a wise old Jedi like Yoda would be able to use some pretty efficient moves on Dooku.

    Given that Yoda probably couldn't even reach Dooku's chest with his light saber, how did you want him to fight? By constantly attacking Dooku's ankles? Do remember that in traditional sword fighting a longer reach count's for quite a lot - and Dooku's arms were something like twice as long as Yoda's, if not more. Yoda would have been severely outmatched just by that, had he stayed relatively motionless on the ground. By jumping around, Yoda was able to attack Dooku near his head.

    That being said, he didn't seem to be doing much in the way of deflecting Dooku's saber and attacking a more vulnerable spot, which happens a lot in real fencing. That was a bit dissapointing. That and yoda not winning. It's not like Dooku wasn't expendible.

  • by raistlinne ( 13725 ) <`lansdoct' `at' `cs.alfred.edu'> on Wednesday June 12, 2002 @02:25AM (#3684392) Homepage

    Well, I really do believe that a large part of the reason that yoda was jumping around so much was that his opponent was so damn tall in comparison to him. After all, he had to jump several feet to be at the same height as dooku's shoulders. I doubt that it would have been a wonderfully effective strategy to launch an all-out attack on dooku's shins.

    Not to mention that if yoda stands still, all of his attacks are coming from roughly the same place because of how small he is. The only way that he can meaningfully attack from different places is by moving.

    Here, try this thought experiment. Pantomine fighting someone who is slightly taller than your knee for about 30 seconds. Now do the same thing in reverse - pantomime fighitng someone whose knee is only a little lower than your head (for about 30 seconds). Now do 30 seconds as the tall guy again.

    Have you noticed that no matter what attack you tried as the small guy, as the big guy you could block it mostly by waving your sword back and forth (occasionally lifting horizontally to block a downward slash)? Notice that it doesn't take much movement and is entirely within your range of easy (and hence fast and strong) movements?

    How do you want yoda to beat someone when he can't get them into a weak position? Especially considering that Dooku probably had force-strength as well, so sheer overpowering him probably wouldn't be successful?

  • by KaptajnKold ( 575207 ) on Wednesday June 12, 2002 @08:22AM (#3685177) Homepage
    Lucas had however received quite a bit of criticism about the morality of the Star Wars universe after Episode I came out. Episode I made things look like the universe was one in which the only way to be great was to be born great. Young girls were born into monarchy and being given authority based on their royal birth alone (not just "Queen Amidala" but also "Princess Leia"). The Jedi were all genetically superior (high midiclorian counts). The Force was only strong for Luke Skywalker because he was the son of Darth Vader, not because he was our lonely hero. And the annoying kid Anakin was born by some kind of Immaculate Conception. Lucas altered things in Episode II deliberately to change those perceptions.

    That's the kind of thing that makes me want to scream! It all happened "a long time ago"---It's supposed to be a fairy tale! And why is it moraly wrong to have a universe in which it is necessary to be born great to be great? I'll tell you why: Because it contradicts the American Dream. And that's the reason that I want to scream out loud. I am NOT american, and to anyone like me it feels like an assault of the mind to be made to believe that americans have seen the light and everyone else has not! (I will now go and eat som fruit to raise my bloodsugar).

    /Adam Lett

  • by DEBEDb ( 456706 ) on Wednesday June 12, 2002 @10:38AM (#3686053) Homepage Journal
    That said, it is pure hogwash to think that a planet would elect a 14 year old to rule them.


    If people cannot even suspend their disbelief
    for a FICTIONAL STORY, and allow for the fact
    that people a LONG TIME AGO in a FAR-AWAY galaxy
    could have different belief systems, one wonders
    if tolerance of cultural differences is at
    all possible in our world.

"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson

Working...