World Cup Final 781
The World Cup final is over; some ludicrous number of people watched some team beat the other team. The next tournament will be held in Germany in 2006. If you haven't watched the game for whatever reason, obviously you might want to avoid clicking through (or reading any other news site, or talking to anyone...). Neither of those two links should be a spoiler, though.
And for those that did click through, the final standings are up, as are lots and lots of reports about the game.
Re:Where are the US ? (Score:3, Informative)
Bzzt, Wrong (Score:2, Informative)
tlhf
xxx
Re:Brasilians do not have last names? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:true world champions (Score:2, Informative)
world. It was originally sponsored by the
(long dead) newspaper called the New York World.
Re:Brasilians do not have last names? (Score:5, Informative)
So all these players are known here by their first name... it would be very confusing for the Brazillian public see in the player's shirts their last names... even for foreigners, since almost nobody knows Ronaldo's last name (I know... but I forgot
Re:Very good game (Score:3, Informative)
The goalkeeping in this world cup has been superb. Several of the games that have ended up 1-0 or 2-0 have been nothing short of spectacular with plenty of chances. The only thing holding the score down in some cases has been the goalkeeping.
Kahn in particular has had a great tournament, and while some may criticize his bobble that would be a bit harsh after the saves he did make in the final. Rivaldo did take a wicked shot that forced that drop.
Brazil's keeper was also out of his mind to make his save on the free kick in the first half.
Re:Very good game (Score:2, Informative)
ESPN had different announcers and commentators from the guys on ABC today. They were much better, just like their hockey games with Gary Thorne, Bill Clement and Darren Pang are much better than when a series goes to ABC and John Davidson.
Also, the ESPN/ABC broadcasts lagged Univision by 3-4 seconds, which provided a nice replay feature -- you could quickly switch to the English broadcast to see a play again.
Anyway, yeah, I've been watching Univision. The only thing I miss is the explanations for the fouls ("una falta! mumble mumble mumble...") and cards.
Interestingly, while the ESPN crew all agreed that the hand ball by Germany against the US was a correct non-call, the Univision announcers were foaming at the mouth that there should have been a penalty kick.
Some comments about some posts. (Score:1, Informative)
2) No, *I* would not like to live in USA. I won't like to live in a place with DMCA. I like my freedom.
I'd like to live in Germany, for example; they support OSS.
(there's other reasons, too; most of them political. i will leave this open for now)
3) There's much more stuff about France'98 that is said around. All was strange. Very strange. Ronaldo's "sickness" before the game wasn't convincent for me and for a half of the country.
4) Brazilians DO *NOT* SPEAK SPANISH, PLEASE! We speak PORTUGUESE. Thank you.
5) Yes, this post at
Re:true world champions (Score:2, Informative)
Re:No, it's not (Score:2, Informative)
Also, you call them "Germany".
We call them "Alemanha".
They call themselves "Deutchland".
Anyway, thanks to the one who wrote "Brasil". It is often silly for a Brazilian to see the writing "Brazil".
Re:true world champions (Score:2, Informative)