Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Media

Firefly Premieres Tonight 688

fm6 writes "Firefly, Joss Whedon's 'anti-Trek drama' premieres tonight, on Fox, 8 E/P. I normally despise hypespeak, but this time it's the only language that fits: this is groundbreaking, mind-boggling, totally original. I've seen a bootleg of the pilot (which, unfortunately, the network is holding back) and I promise you this is the most geek-friendly SF you've seen in a long time. Yes, more so than Star Trek and B5, and way past Star Wars. I've never seen the future so skillfully, realistically, and lovingly portrayed. Here is the Official Site and a leading fan site." This is the single new show this season I have added a season pass for to the old Tivo. But I'll probably watch it live. This looks like it could be as good as we hope.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Firefly Premieres Tonight

Comments Filter:
  • by Tsali ( 594389 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @04:29PM (#4299653)
    ... but the trailers for this thing have made it look more like Baywatch in spaceships with retread lines.

    It just doesn't seem believable to me... but I'll have to watch it and see.

    What's wrong with Star Trek, anyways? :-)
  • by Arcturax ( 454188 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @04:33PM (#4299694)
    Really, is any sci-fi original anymore? I can think of little in sci-fi that hasn't been done already. Not to say this will be a bad series, but I've already seen a lot of what's in it in other places.

    In fact, for some reason this show reminds me a lot of Outlaw star, just less cartoonish. Must be the girl in the box thing that makes me think of that particular Anime series. And the fact they are tooling around in a ship doing odd jobs for a living. And the fact that they have no real home port anymore after they have to blast their way off of the one place they called home.

    You could also say they play the Hon Solo angle a bit as well other than the fact they have more to their crew than just a wookie.

    I'll give it a watch regardless, it could be fun and maybe it will be surprisingly original, but I'll withold any hype or wild statements until I've actually seen the first few episodes.
  • by Angry White Guy ( 521337 ) <CaptainBurly[AT]goodbadmovies.com> on Friday September 20, 2002 @04:35PM (#4299709)
    Everything is a rip off of anything anymore.
    Honeymooners->Flintstones->Jetsons
    At least they picked good shows to rip off, instead of the absolute shite out there.

    Incidentally, anyone see Star Hunter on TV?
  • by xenocide2 ( 231786 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @04:46PM (#4299793) Homepage
    What about Outlaw Star? There's even a naked chick in a suitcase!
  • by Wraithlyn ( 133796 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @04:49PM (#4299816)
    People say, "After Columbine, do you feel a responsibility about the way you portray violence?" And I'm like, "No, I felt a responsibility about the way I portrayed violence the first time I picked up a pen."

    Wow, I think that's just about the most intelligent and responsible thing I've ever read about the influence of culture on behaviour.
  • Animerica (Score:2, Insightful)

    by yojimbo311 ( 610298 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @04:53PM (#4299850)
    From the previews I've seen Firefly seems to take a LOT from Outlaw Star and Cowboy Bebop. I mean a girl curled up in some sort of stasis box? Complete governmental restructure where outlaws are the norm? It even has the same feel as the anime.

    All that's missing is a bunch of star ships with arms waving around doing some sort of mechanical kung fu.

    Honeslty though, the story is great and I'm personally looking forward to see where they take it.
  • by RobotRunAmok ( 595286 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @04:55PM (#4299857)
    Me, I'll take good writing and characters I care about, thanks.

    Is it Geek-Friendly 'cause it's Science Fiction? Most of the good SF I have read does not translate well into the Geek ouevre of Wookies and Mind-Melds and big-boobied Borg babies in catsuits. The best SF, in my experience usually does not translate easily into episodic TV at all.

    Are you calling Firefly "good geek TV" because it is both SF and intelligent? Someone mentioned someplace (maybe on this board) how wonderful FireFly would be because there would be no sound heard when things exploded in space. Well, Oh boy, Roy! Sounds like a best-Drama Emmy candidate to me! Let me race upstairs to set my Tivo...! Hopefully, the writing will extend beyond the use, or non-use, of special effects.

    Which is not to say that I don't have high hopes for the show as well. I'm a huge fan of Buffy -- another show Whedon created -- but not because someone "finally got vampires right." I just find it extraordinarily well written, with believeable characters well acted.

    Is Buffy "geeky?" Whom do I ask to find out? You?

    >as good as we hope.

    "We?" Who's "we?" Linux SysAdmins? SlashDot Editors? Buffy Fans? You and your room-mates? Surely you don't expect all SlashDot readers to ever be on the same page on any single topic, do you?

    I hope, for Mr. Whedon's sakes, Firefly catches a buzz which extends far, far beyond the parameters of "geek-itude."
  • Re:Neat Trick... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by thefirelane ( 586885 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @05:12PM (#4299987)
    This question is posted ever so often by someone who thinks they are real clever... it is one of those "invisible people would be blind" things that if you think about, makes sense...

    Then, someone on slashdot (sorry, not credits to give out, can't remember) posted a great reply I thought I should parrot:

    in modern fighter jets, there is no way a pilot could hear the planes flying around him. To increase awareness however, the engine noises are added in by computer. The computer figures out where the planes are, given radar data, then adds in engine noises with the appropriate distance and placement. This way, the pilot is much more situationally aware, without having to check the instruments.

    I thought that was pretty cool.
    Presumably, this is a feature that would be included, and improved upon in the future. Therefore, the sounds you hear, might not be from the ships themselves, but a computer onboard making those sounds to identify what ships they are, how fast they're going, and where they are.


    ---Lane
  • Re:Original my ass (Score:4, Insightful)

    by foobar104 ( 206452 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @05:19PM (#4300026) Journal
    Dude, you're basing all of your complaints on the show's marketing. Stop and think for a minute. Does that really make sense?

    Why don't you just sit down and watch the show. Or TiVo it, or whatever. Then you can bitch.

    Besides, complaints about how it's not original will fall on deaf ears. Wasn't it Joesph Campbell who said there were only about seven stories? Most of 'em can be found in The Odyssey, if you just look. The theme of the story isn't what makes it interesting. It's the execution that matters. And none of us will know anything about that until 8:00 PM, Eastern and Pacific.
  • Business Plan (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 20, 2002 @05:56PM (#4300202)
    Hire ad company to run a grassroots campaign
    Design fan websites
    Make ad company employee submits posts to Slashdot
    Actually get your advertising blurb posted as a story on slashdot instead of banner ad.
    Thousand of naive nerds give story instant cred
    cause they saw it on Slashdot.

    hey perhaps this ad as a story is the new
    Slashdot business mdoel
  • Re:Original my ass (Score:4, Insightful)

    by yasth ( 203461 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @06:14PM (#4300290) Homepage Journal
    I fully agree. I mean it isn't the only one look at this one book I was reading:
    Raskolnikov: Insane Student
    Sonya Marmeladov: Kind Whore
    Dmitri: Loyal Friend
    Dunya: Close Sister
    Alyona Ivanovna: Mean Crone
    Lizaveta Ivanovna: Tragic Mistake
    etc...

    In short, don't be silly. Yes you can reduce them to simple cardboard cutouts, but that doesn't matter. It is like that old thing that there are only n (7, 28, 36 etc.) plots in the world. Well actually you can simplify it down to one plot: "Something happens". Reduction can make fools of anything, even the best work. So just watch the show, or wait for a review, don't complain because some intern wrote crappy copy for a website.
  • by King_TJ ( 85913 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @06:34PM (#4300413) Journal
    Right, that's what bothers me about Star Wars too. I don't think anyone really got that sense about it when the first couple films came out; probably because there wasn't enough storyline told for us to make those conclusions.

    But in the last two Star Wars movies, I think it's become quite clear that a universe ruled by the Jedis isn't necessarily much of an improvement over the Empire. For just one example, look how the Jedis take away small children from their parents, for the good of their "war effort". Something seems really disturbing about that scene with Yoda and all those small kids in the training room.....

    In Star Trek, my biggest problem with the series is how often the crew comes close to death, and escapes with some last-minute scheme that's "not certain to work". Surely, by now, they'd have all blown themselves up - just due to the law of probability. (They can't always guess right, when they've taken hundreds and hundreds of such chances and long-shots.) Other than that, it's a well-done show with surprisingly Libertarian ideals. (When you think about it, the only thing the Federation does in the way of "war" is fighting off those that refuse to "live and let live". The policy they're trying to enforce is one of "You can do whatever you like, as long as it doesn't infringe on any other civilization's rights.") They covered such difficult issues as, "Do androids have the same rights as humans and other living things?" It's not just a simple "war story".
  • by L0rdJedi ( 65690 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @07:06PM (#4300624)
    It's my understanding that the line was mis-delivered. Something else was suppose to be there to make it funny, but they cut it.
  • The Poster Speaks (Score:3, Insightful)

    by fm6 ( 162816 ) on Friday September 20, 2002 @07:27PM (#4300726) Homepage Journal
    I do have a few small issues with Star Wars. Yeah, it's been a geek benchmark for longer than I care to think about. But for all that, it's blatantly commercial, totally unimaginative, and has absolutely nothing to say. It uses (or rather abuses) a bunch of Joseph Campbell gimmicks to give itself a "mythological" status. Most people actually like that, but I find it grotesque.

    Worst of all, Star Wars is very bad science fiction. I mean, sounds in a vacuum have become conventional, but how can you sit still for spaceships that behave as if they had airfoils? And armor that doesn't protect its wearers against rocks and sticks? And space pilots who think a light year is a unit of time?

    I know, I know, because it's fun. Just ignore me, I had a lousy childhood.

  • by BadmanX ( 30579 ) on Saturday September 21, 2002 @02:43AM (#4302107) Homepage
    Slugthrowers are never, ever going away. They are simply too cheap and effective at what they do. Honestly, if you're going to kill somebody with a laser pistol, you're going to have to have one powerful enough to drill a hole right through them - and then you have to hit a vital orgain. With a slugthrower, even a hit to the foot can put someone into shock, removing them from the fight.

    Repeat the mantra, student: The Future Will Not Be Like Star Trek.

Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.

Working...