Slashdot Turns 5 692
As much as I avoid discussing Slashdot on Slashdot, I figured I'd just take
a moment to say that Slashdot is 5 years old now. I've written a
Journal Entry with a few more comments on the subject. And yes we know we jumped the shark about a week after we registered the domain name, but we just don't care! Here's hoping we're here 5 years from now doing exactly the same thing with the same folks. (As a side note, due to a data importing bug, we really don't know exactly when we made our debut, but I spent september 97 putting the site together... and when we went live, we didn't even have comments for the first week or so!)
Where's GIS? (Score:4, Insightful)
How about a birthday special guys?
wow (Score:2, Insightful)
Many of us slashdotters have grown as well. From humble beginnings to the dizzying heights of the dot.com boom to the unemployment line (and mom and dad's house again). But it gives us more time to hack on Free Software, so bring it on!
I'd just like to say "thanks" to Rob & the gang who put in long hours on
Here's to hoping the next half-decade is as good as the last. Cheers.
Slashdot is all grown up (Score:2, Insightful)
But I'm glad to see Slashdot has matured since then. Now they realize that sometimes banning someone's netblock is just plain necessary when that person is posting non-factual information. If some innocent net neighbors are gagged for a few days, that's simply the price we pay for informational freedom. And deleting posts, while morally abhorrent, is the only way to keep ourselves from accidentally reading a 3 page long "taco snotting" FAQ.
Thank you, Slashdot, for making the trains run on time.
Chips, Dips, Taco and the Dot (Score:3, Insightful)
As one of the first
Re:The secret of ./'s success.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:5 years? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do no stories display the year? (Score:4, Insightful)
It's great seeing 'October 01'.. but what year is that? Why do Slashdot stories not display the year? It's a pain in the ass when you search for an old story, but all you get is the date and not the year.
Am I the only one who noticed this yet?
Re:And Now... (Score:5, Insightful)
Silly posts commenting on a funny article was the norm back in those days. Now its brutal competition among the pedantic keepers of wisdom and those who can google out gems of knowledge. Comments back then seem trollish today. But its still fun to see how much information thousands of people can pack into the comments section. Slashdot today is quite an impressive collection of concise facts following each article.
Mispelled words and poor grammar are just tokens of nostolgia.
Another reason to like /. (Score:2, Insightful)
Also, the best way to get lost is to read
Happy birthday
Re:The secret of ./'s success.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:1st posting on the Wayback Machine (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually this post: SGI releases V2 VRML browser [archive.org] is actually a day older.
You'll notice from the URL that its article number is 297 and the Netscape/MSIE article is number 304. 297 was the lowest article number to work using that URL format. Also, the oldest previous articles page [archive.org] also lists the SGI article as the oldest listed article.
My guess is 12/21/97 was the first time they archived the site and either