1.8 Inch Removable Hard Drives Coming 135
bedessen writes "According to an article at PCWorld.com, a new type of removable storage known as iVDR will be demonstrated at January's Consumer Electronics Show. The iVDR standard (backed by a consortium consisting of a number of manufacturers) describes a lightweight, compact, removable hard disk drive compatible with a wide range of applications from AV to PC devices. The products on display will come in 2.5" and 1.8" form factors with parallel and serial ATA interfaces. Capacity will start at 80GB for around $170, but manufacturers hope to drop this to under $80 and well as double the capacity by next quarter." Here's hopin'
Desktop machines? (Score:3, Insightful)
Seems like a candidate for use in the next generation iMac...
Just how useful is this going to be? (Score:5, Insightful)
In other words, "we're still working out how to cripple it in a Hollywood-approved way with DRM."
1.8 inch removable hd's have existed for years (Score:5, Insightful)
This PCWorld thing is about a drive in some weird bigger enclosure which seems pointless. They should just make higher capacity PCMCIA drives.
are they delicate? (Score:3, Insightful)
Do i think the benefits of portability outweigh the fact that its still just a harddrive? No.
Im all for solid state.
IBM? (Score:4, Insightful)
Wester Digital is also "missing"...
Anyone who knows more?
Recommendation (Score:3, Insightful)
Comments?
Parallel & Serial ATA? Where is Firewire? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why ignore the relevant, modern, already available standard, Firewire AKA IEEE-1394?
Re:Just how useful is this going to be? (Score:2, Insightful)
The real purpose: Copy protection (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Just how useful is this going to be? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Parallel & Serial ATA? Where is Firewire? (Score:2, Insightful)
How exactly is SATA better than IEEE 1394 (firewire) for internal uses? Do you like being limited to the number of ports the motherboard manufacturer thought was necessary? 1394 allows you to chain devices, akin to scsi - much more convenient.
SATA requires a special power connector too, likely on the motherboard itself. 1394 gives you power too, in one little connector.
Linux certainly does support 1394. When our tape library failed at work, we replaced it with a bunch of firewire disks. Not only do they offer more storage at a lower cost, but they are all simultaneously online and are hell of a lot faster than tape. See linux1394.org [linux1394.org]
Do you really want to perpetuate the cruft that is ATA? You don't need drivers for SATA because it inherits many of PATA's limitations. Personally, i like hotswap (important for software raid) and i like isochonous transfer (good for cd burners as well as video streams). 1394 requires new drivers because it offers more. Linux has no problem reading 1394 drives. Windows has no problem reading 1394 drives. MacOS has no problem reading 1394 drives. How difficult would it have been to boot off of 1394? The only real obstacle is that anachonism - the PC BIOS. Replace with linuxBIOS and you'd be golden.
If Apple and Co had not decided to tax firewire, we would have had this years ago. Back in the days of the FX chipset, intel promised to include 1394 in it's motherboard chipsets, right next to USB. But no. They didn't want to be beholden to a third party, so they went off and invented the abomination that is USB2.
Re:Just how useful is this going to be? (Score:3, Insightful)
While the profit hit may, in the end, truly turn out to be imaginary (I don't honestly believe that any side in this numbers game has the real answer right now) the political clout that the entertainment industry holds is very, very real.