Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media

DVD: Degradable Versatile... 246

jomaree writes "The SMH online reports that some DVDs are starting to corrode or "rot". Although somewhere between 1 and 10 per cent of DVDs are affected, it seems the distributors don't want to know. One list of affected movie titles reveals what might be a sinister pattern emerging: "One DVD website lists 18 titles known to have at least one bad batch, among them Planet of the Apes (1968), Men in Black: Collectors Edition, Independence Day and the Alien Legacy box set." Or maybe the person compiling the list only buys sci-fi movies."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

DVD: Degradable Versatile...

Comments Filter:
  • Bad DVD player! (Score:2, Insightful)

    by FyRE666 ( 263011 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @05:41AM (#5202700) Homepage
    Or maybe the person compiling the list only buys sci-fi movies.

    Yeah, or maybe his DVD player is knackered, and it's damaging all his disks...
  • by sn0wcrash ( 223995 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @05:45AM (#5202710)
    Planned obsolescence. Companies know that as long as a consumer has somethign that works they are inclined to keep using it. They can't make money selling you one product once. The whole goal of these companies is to have you buy thier product again and again. Why do you think so few quality products are available today?
  • Conspiracy (Score:4, Insightful)

    by cheshiremackat ( 618044 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @05:51AM (#5202723)
    Ok NOT Trolling;
    But I find it oddly convenient that I am not legally able to dupe my DVD collection, and THEN magically they start to break... total boon to the studios and MPAA!

    Although, in an odd way this could be the YRO savior... think of it... this is a perfect reason to extend 'fair use' rights to digital media... DVDs break...computers crash, all necessitating backups... with DVDs rotting, it becomes alot harder for the RI/MPAA to argue against allowing 'perfect digital' duplicates...

    Mr. Valenti, I now have a perfectly valid and (IANAL but seems) legal reason to dupe my DVDs. I would love to see someone go to court and sue because the product was faulty and they are not legally able to make copies, and the studio wont replace it because the DVD is out of the 90 day warranty period... this could be very interesting!

    _CMK
  • by MikeFM ( 12491 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @05:55AM (#5202736) Homepage Journal
    I'm glad that I disregard the law and make backups anyway. I have countless cd's that I would have had to replace if not for backups to my hdd and now that I've ripped my dvd collection I'm sure it'll save me a lot of bucks on replacements also. Keep my disks duplicated so that a hdd dying won't harm things and I'm pretty much set. Just keep adding/replacing hdd's as needed.

    I've considered opening a movie rental store. If otherwise good discs suffered this kind of problem I'd be tempted just to burn off a new copy and keep the original as proof of ownership. I'd like to see them take me to court for that. They couldn't do it without publizing that their discs were rotting.
  • Good (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kscd ( 414074 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @05:55AM (#5202737)
    As much as this sucks for the people currently affected, I can't help but think of this as a good thing overall. It's only when Joe Schmoe starts to feel the fact that his fair use rights have been taken away by the DMCA that there will be enough outcry to repeal it.

    Linux, isn't sexy. This, however, is the stuff those stupid segmants on the 10 o'clock news are made of.
  • by Picass0 ( 147474 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @05:58AM (#5202740) Homepage Journal
    This site [andraste.org] appears to be the original source. This guy puts his bad DVDs under a high powered microscope and documents the damage.
  • by surprise_audit ( 575743 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @06:06AM (#5202757)
    Could this lead to the DMCA being overturned? No, I'm serious - all of us here know that the DMCA prohibits us from making backups of DVDs due to having to break the CSS, but Joe Sixpack is less aware of this issue.

    If it became commonly known that not only do DVDs degrade, but also you can't legally copy them to preserve the content that you already paid for, maybe there'll be enough disgruntled people writing to their Congresscritters that the DMCA will get a serious review.

    That won't help Joe Sixpack until legally licensed DVD-copying shops start to appear, but until then us geeks might be able to legally help out our buddies...

  • by ComputarMastar ( 570258 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @07:32AM (#5202906)
    I haven't run into this problem myself (yet), but some of the DVDs I have are in cases that require you to BEND THE DISC to get it out. What a horrible design!
  • by ender81b ( 520454 ) <wdinger@@@gmail...com> on Saturday February 01, 2003 @07:52AM (#5202932) Homepage Journal
    There are a couple of reasons why I haven't yet ripped my DVD's.

    For one it takes along time. I used to not think I would need a new computer but with my pIII 850 it takes a *long* time (like 8-9 hours) to rip and encode a single DVD, and my roommates p4 2.53ghz it still takes 3 hours to rip/encode a single DVD.

    Also, I have yet to really decide what to rip them to. I could rip em bit for bit but that takes up too much space. Encoding them in any codec just means I will probably have to re-encode them in a few years once that becomes obsolete.
    Also, even though Divx is pretty good you can still tell a major difference in picture quality (especially if the DVD is like 720p originally).

    I don't know. I imagine if/when I get a DVD burner I might just burn backup copies, that is probably the way to go.
  • by NotAnotherReboot ( 262125 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @07:55AM (#5202939)
    I own a DVD of Gladiator (with Russel Crowe). There isn't a single scratch on the disc, but now when I put it in the player, it can't get beyond the menu (even on the computer). I'm not sure why these companies can't have a return policy since they're so cheap to make (ie, they tell you to send some type of SASE) but I suppose it's the whole thing about getting people to buy the same movie over and over again. I thought I had a license to view it by owning it, but if I can't do that, what do I have?
  • by anubi ( 640541 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @08:37AM (#5202995) Journal
    I'm glad that I disregard the law and make backups anyway.

    Bad Law fosters Civil Disobedience.

  • by djupedal ( 584558 ) on Saturday February 01, 2003 @08:41AM (#5202999)
    Since when were these discs glued togther?

    CD's, DVD's...they are not 'glued' together, as the article states. This guy should be shot.

    Anyone that knows will tell you why they refer to the 'stamper' when they talk about mass duplication. I'll wait for a more knowledgeable source to comment on DVD 'rot'...Sure, if you keep them on the dashboard of your van, or floor of the basement...but falling apart just by laying around in a case...not sure about that one. I can see delamination from a faulty stamping procedure, but these machines are expensive and are operated in clean rooms. Each disc is verified, etc. You'd know if you had a chronic problem, and then you have a different issue, such as fraud for selling bad goods. To say that 10% of the DVD's in general use are now faulty sounds like a bit of FUD.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 01, 2003 @08:51AM (#5203023)
    Just some observations.

    Years ago, there was a time when the only media on which the average consumer could buy recorded music was pressed vinyl disks. Since there was no way to copy these disks, and they degraded slightly with each use (on most people's record players,) they were treated more as a physical good than intellectual property. If your record broke, you bought another one. If you wanted to buy a used one for less than a new one, you knew you would have to settle for lower quality, and a product that would probably break again sooner than a new one.

    These days, there are many easy ways to copy music. Record companies now treat recorded music as intellectual property, and are doing everything in their power to stop your ability to copy it. They would even like to say that you don't "own" the music on your disk, that you have merely "licensed" it for listening, although they know that no consumer is going to accept a software-type "shrink-wrap" agreement on their CD's.

    But guess what. If your CD breaks, they still expect you to buy another one. The record companies want it both ways. It's licensed, so you can't copy it. But it's a commodity, so you have to buy another copy if it breaks.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...