Open Content Music Database Launched 148
An anonymous reader writes "The open source music database MusicBrainz was launched officially today. The data is partly in the public domain, partly under an open content like license. It includes artist/album/track information, with more to come. There's support for CDDB-like CD identification (actually, a lot of the current data was imported from freedb), but also identification of single tracks via audio fingerprints (TRMs). Help both in adding new content by tagging your music collection and consolidating the existing data is welcome. Also check out some technical information on the XML database at IBM developerWorks."
Re:What will the RIAA think?!? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? (Score:5, Informative)
example image [amazon.com]
Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? (Score:3, Informative)
As far as the legality, as long as you are selling the items for Amazon.com, then you can use the images. Other than that, I doubt it ;-).
--sex [slashdot.org]
Slashdot effect... (Score:5, Informative)
Google cache of MusicBrainz.org [216.239.53.100]
One of the MusicBrainz developers here.
It seems our provider cannot handle the bandwidth requirements for the Slashdot effect. We are very sorry about that. Please come back tomorrow if you like out project.
Our dual 1.2GHz Linux server is doing OK:
Greetings,
J.
Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? (Score:3, Informative)
Whether it's actually illegal or people without time/money to fight I don't know.
Tagger win-only ? (Score:3, Informative)
This sounds really nice, but it works only on Windows ! The code being GPL, I hope it will soon be ported to other free OSes.
Or does anybody know such a tool working under Linux ?
Re:Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network.. (Score:3, Informative)
lest we forget... (Score:5, Informative)
cf. slashdot [slashdot.org] and wired [wired.com].
Not all it's cracked up to be (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Is CD cover art illegal? (Score:2, Informative)
Typically the labels only have limited rights themselves with respect to the cover art. Specifically, they usually only have the right to use the cover art when selling or promoting the album. Third parties, having no contract or license from the photographer, will not have any right to exploit the artwork. In fact, if someone uses the artwork in a way that generates money (including ad revenue), they should not be surprised if the photographer (or other album art copyright holder) goes after them and their earnings. Granted, I haven't heard of this happening before...
Re:linux client? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:questions... (Score:1, Informative)