Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Media Media Movies

League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen Trailer 360

An anonymous reader notes that the League of Extraordinary Gentleman Trailer is on apple.com. It's in quicktime. And since I'm downloading at under 3k a second, I'll let others comment on it. Here's hopin'
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen Trailer

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 16, 2003 @10:05AM (#5313608)
    Why not explain what the League is in the description???

    Or is it cool to pretend that obviously we all know?
  • by koi88 ( 640490 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @10:06AM (#5313611)
    I had the trailer in 20 seconds...

    Maybe you should finally get rid of that 36.6Kbit/s Modem...

    Yeah, trailer looks good-- but what is it? Am I supposed to know that?

  • by Lproven ( 6030 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @10:18AM (#5313664) Homepage Journal
    A mindless SFX extravaganza with none of the original's wit, subtlety, irony, cleverness, in-jokes, immaculate period references and panache.

    I was going to say, a fine opportunity wasted, but I don't think it was. The League was too sophisticated for the type of audience attracted to a movie derived from a comic in the West. They mainly want mindless violent-action crap, such as Dardevil appears to be.

    Ignore the movie. Alan Moore's stuff is too good for movies; this looks to be a travesty even more egregious than the appalling From Hell. Read the book, instead. It's pure, inspired brilliance, with breathtakingly intricate Kev O'Neill artwork to match.
  • by 17028 ( 122384 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @10:24AM (#5313689)
    Kudos for knowing what the heck you are talking about, compared to most of the other comments.

    I was a little disappointed that the trailer was all action, and didn't give any feeling about the theme. It would've been cool to at least start the trailer with the cobblestone streets and horse-drawn coaches to show that it is the 19th Century, and not the 1930s like it seems based on the car shots. They didn't move it in time, did they??
  • by osgeek ( 239988 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @10:40AM (#5313726) Homepage Journal
    But then again, it's seldom that trailers don't look good, assuming you like the actors and the genre.

    God knows that having Sean in it tells us nothing about the movie's quality. He lets himself appear in some real stinkers.

    Here's hoping for the best...
  • by TopShelf ( 92521 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @11:03AM (#5313799) Homepage Journal
    Between LotR and all the comic-book films of the last few years, you'd think that the film industry has gone ga-ga over the simplistic "good vs. evil" genre. But you know what? It's actually a prefect fit for these times. The debate over war in Iraq, the neverending saga of Israel & Palestine, and the blackmailing tactics of North Korea all serve as focal points for this topic. Of course, the tone was set in W's State of the Union address last year, with the "Axis of Evil".

    Hollywood seems to follow a pack mentality at times, but this time I think they've actually hit the right cultural spot...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 16, 2003 @11:04AM (#5313807)
    Good to know /. still has the requisite number of arrogant losers hanging around. Your comment is right up there with "Let them eat cake."
  • by neomiasma ( 639496 ) <neomiasma AT gmail DOT com> on Sunday February 16, 2003 @11:52AM (#5313978) Journal
    I saw Daredevil yesterday, and the LXG trailer was there. I'm a little put off by the "X". Last I checked, Extraordinary started with an "E". I don't expect this movie to to do all that well, but I'll probably see it simply because it's got Sean Connery. When I was in college, my friends in I came up with a scale of whoop-ass for actors. It involved how many cans, cases, or kegs of whoop-ass an actor could open. Sean Connery earned the top spot as the Epitome of all Whoop-ass.
  • *Yawn* (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Ryosen ( 234440 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @11:59AM (#5313994)
    You didn't miss much. The whole trailer looks pretty generic. They don't explain who the "League" is (B-Grade, classic literary characters turned superheroes), not even naming them. And what's with this "LXG" crap?

    The whole trailer looks like an X-Men 2 rip-off.
  • by PizzaFace ( 593587 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @12:02PM (#5314004)
    Everyone's saying this movie is set in Victorian England. Queen Victoria ruled until 1901. That car, and the WWII-style German helmets, don't look "Victorian" to me.

    And besides the Victorian anachronisms, why is it never daytime there?
  • Re:excellent! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Parsec ( 1702 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @12:05PM (#5314013) Homepage Journal

    the characters may not exactly have amazing powers, but they've definitely got a lot more going for them in terms of depth and charm

    That certainly didn't come across in the trailer! It looked like an invisible guy, a long haired guy with a gun, blond guy in a car with two pistols, Sean Connery punching some bad guy, and some scenery falling down. {yawn}

    ... but I'm sure they were restrained somewhat by the marketing department who insisted the preview feature Sean Connery saying something "witty".

  • Re:Heros? bah. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Pharmboy ( 216950 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @12:18PM (#5314059) Journal
    I don't understand this need for heros, if indeed it truly exists. Does anyone else find the thought that Americans are so frail and weak minded that we need heros to comfort/inspire/nurture/motivate/whatever us, to be somewhat pathetic?

    Most find heroes inspiring. We look for the best qualities in our hereos that we hope to find in ourselves. Heroes remind us that the fight is worth fighting, and that in the end, generally, good does win over evil if the goal is worth sacrificing for.

    Not everyone believes this. I do. I think the motivations behind every day heroes (doing the right thing) is stronger than the motivations behind the bad guys (self gain), in general.

    To most persons, heroes don't represent any new ideals, rather, they affirm the deep convictions of those who admire them. This is not a bad thing in and of itself.

    Wanting to watch virtual heroes defeat the bad guys doesn't make me weak as an American. It reinforces the American ideal that ordinary persons can do extraordinary things when they do it for the right reasons.

    As a form of entertainment, I find this much more palatable and uplifting than "Faces of Death", "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" or "Scream".
  • by SetarconeX ( 160251 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @01:21PM (#5314324)
    Now, I was never a regular reader of the comics, but I did have a healthy respect for them. So I cringed when they trotted out the giant glowing "LXG" logo.

    Where's the fun in that? The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen wouldn't use an acronym like that? In fact, I find it hard to swallow that ANY Victorian would use the letter "X" for extra. I guess they were just trying to make the logo not say "LEG."

    The clips in the background look good, but I worry that the trailer's missing the feel of the comic completely. Something about the entire thing just doesn't feel Victorian. To much of the overblown "action movie" music, possibly. I'm going to cross my fingers and hope they pull off this movie...
  • by bellings ( 137948 ) on Sunday February 16, 2003 @02:49PM (#5314783)
    The debate over war in Iraq

    Yep. Good versus evil right there, no doubt about it. Well, except for the "good" part.

    the neverending saga of Israel & Palestine

    Yep, once again it's good versus evil. Well, again, as long as you ignore the requirement for the "good" part.

    Why is it that if something or someone is evil (like Palistinian suicide bombers or Saddam Hussien) that makes anyone believe the opposition to those things is morally good?

    Iraq is run by a very, very bad man. That does nothing to provide any moral justification for killing another 250,000 iraqis to secure oil rights.

    Palistinian suicide bombers are evil. That does nothing to provide any moral justification for imposing martial law on Palistinians in Isreal, and it does not excuse fifty years of condemnable human rights abuses by the Isreali's.

    Stop looking at the world as black and white. Because, that point of view forces you to think that anything that's not "quite as evil" must somehow be "good." That way of looking at the world makes you into a moral cripple.

BLISS is ignorance.

Working...