Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media

Salon on Gollum's Failed Oscar Nomination 301

Masem writes "Salon has an interesting commentary on the failure for Andy Serkis, the actor that used as the model and voice for Gollum in The Two Tower, to garnish an Oscar nomination despite the pressure that Peter Jackson and others placed on the Academy to get the nomination. They had previously pointed to John Hurt's Best Actor nomination in "The Elephant Man", in which the only visible feature of Hurt was his eyes after the elaborate makeup and costuming, but even then, Hurt did not win, he himself believing that it would be hard to connect the real actor to the role that he played. Salon suggests that the Academy needs to seriously consider how digital technology is affecting the way movies are being made and to be more open to non-traditional roles and films as potental Oscar material."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Salon on Gollum's Failed Oscar Nomination

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @01:41PM (#5326973)
    "Sssssallllonnnnn yessssss... can't pay rent, no!!! Kicked out of officessss ssssoooon! Homelessssss... poor poor homelesssss... Sssssaallllon."
  • A shame... (Score:5, Funny)

    by joeszilagyi ( 635484 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @01:42PM (#5326980)
    ...and now we'll never get to hear Serkis thank "his precious" for helping him win in the acceptance speech.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @01:47PM (#5327027)
    "on the failure for Andy Serkis, the actor that used as the model and voice for Gollum in The Two Tower"

    He was used as the model? My god...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @01:51PM (#5327064)
    And? What? They should get a cookie? It's like telling that last T-Rex congrats on outliving all the others shortly before he died, too.
  • Bad omen (Score:5, Funny)

    by Tim Macinta ( 1052 ) <twm@alum.mit.edu> on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @01:55PM (#5327102) Homepage
    This does not bode well for the new character being introduced in The Return of the King [bbspot.com] who is also digitally generated.
  • by LMCBoy ( 185365 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @01:59PM (#5327141) Homepage Journal
    aren't these things supposed to be related to actual performance by the actor compared to his contemporaries, and not crooked lobbying?

    No, that's the other Academy of Motion Pictures you're thinking of. You know, the one that doesn't exist.
  • by Lethyos ( 408045 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @02:00PM (#5327150) Journal
    Shigeru Miyamoto's masterwork Super Mario Brothers is truly a classic work of modern literature; borrowing heavily from Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and an obvious inspiration for Trainspotting, SMB shows the initial joy but the eventual mental and moral decline due to drugs.

    Like in classic Greek drama, much of the story is implied. Because the setting is not a part of our common mythos, however, it comes with a small supplemental text which fills in the history for the reader: the evil dragon Bowser Koopa (a metaphor for a kingpin) has invaded a once-propserous kingdom, and those residents who did not join him and become goombas (the local slang for dealers) were turned into blocks - that is, they were embedded in concrete, to sleep with the fishes, as it were.

    Enter Mario, the fallen hero. At the very outset of his adventure, he is doomed, as almost right away he steals a dealer's mushroom (obviously mixed with peyote) and begins to hallucinate, that he is big, that he is powerful. As though on PCP, he finds it easy to break solid bricks by punching it and does not perceive the pain; however, when dealers, pushers (personified by turtles much like Thompson's literal lounge lizards), and other minions of the kingpin cause him pain (in retaliation for his original drug theft), he immediately loses the empowering effects of the peyote, and in fact, seems very small and vulnerable, and must desparately seek out another hit. When he is not seeking out a hit of peyote, he is seeking out much more powerful stuff indeed - a flower (the opium-giving poppy) or a star (a hit of LSD), both of which further his delusions of being strong and powerful.

    Right after he has apparently slid down a flagpole (a strong reference to receiving anal sex), he finds himself in the proverbial sewers, already feeling a deep low from his initial hits wearing off. But after more anal sex, he is high in the mountains, which psychadelically appear as gigantic mushrooms, an obvious result of his hallucinatory state. And then, after even more anal sex, he finds himself in a castle, but it is of his own imagination, built up of his drug-induced isolation, for at the end he thinks he has confronted the kingpin Koopa, but he quickly finds that it is but another hallucination, merely a pusher goomba, though he only discovers this after, in a drug-crazed rage, he kills this apparition of his nemesis.

    His trials and travails continue along his slide into dementia, with such powerful imagery as being underwater (drowning in desparation) and along a long suspension bridge with flying fish (skirting death at every corner). After chapter 3, which describes a night of terrors, and chapter 4, another full day, he finds himself in another castle delusion, but this time he is so hopelessly lost in his mind that it appears to him as a maze, where if he does not climb the correct stairs in the right order, he is trapped and seems to endlessly repeat the pathway.

    Much more of the same continues, showing the repetition and mental deadness of a drug-induced haze, with some intermediate powerful imagery as a landscape so bleak and gray that it appears to be frozen, causing our fallen hero to psychosomatically slip on what seems to be ice. At many points, he is also unwittingly caught up in drug-related urban warfare, bullets careening across the landscape, although in Mario's stupor, the inanimate metal slugs appear to be living, almost sentient things.

    Finally, he enters a final castle which appears to be real, but it is quickly apparent that it is not, for it is filled with all of his prior hallucinations, but twisted into much more nightmarish images, again arranged in a maze as some of the castle-hallucination-nightmares before (although this time with the strong symbolism of the magic number 3), and at the end, when he finally destroys what he believes to be the kingpin Koopa and rescues who he believes to be the princess, it becomes obvious to the reader (though not to Mario, still in a state of dementia) that he was only a hapless pimp and the "princses" his whore, who (at our hero's expense) direct him to start his hapless Quixotic quest from the beginning, only this time, all the drug dealers are wearing bullet-proof jackets (who have appeared as gigantic beetles to our hallucinogenic hero all along).

    And so, the cycle of depravity begins anew, but much more difficultly for our pathetically-pathos-pumped plumber.

    Of course, this plot summary only begins to scratch the surface of this epic novel. One really must complete it on their own in order to truly appreciate its depth and challenge, trying to sort out what is real and what isn't.

    There is, of course, a like-minded series following this book (although the immediate sequel is a blatant last-minute search and replace job on the cancelled Doki Doki Panic); there are also several TV adaptations, a movie (which completely missed the point and took major liberties with the plot), several spin-off series, and, at one time, there was even a breakfast cereal, in a monstrous twist of consumer-driven poetic irony. Regardless of this sensational consumerism, however, the original story has withstood the test of time, and will forever be a literary classic.
  • Re:Bad omen (Score:5, Funny)

    by Joe the Lesser ( 533425 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @02:08PM (#5327214) Homepage Journal
    Wesa gonna savda hobbits? Mui-mui! I love you! Oi! Whatsa meya saying?!?
  • by dmanny ( 573844 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @02:14PM (#5327266)
    Ah but Jar Jar's repugnance must have been digitally enhanced. Look at the difference in public reception between these two.
  • by mao che minh ( 611166 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @02:18PM (#5327303) Journal
    ...to see Serkis rush the stage and yank the Oscar out of whoever's hands wins it this year while screaming "my precious!". Would be a great way to generate hype for the next movie, as well as make a mockery of the snide-old-men's club that rejected him.
  • by Mr Fodder ( 93517 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @02:38PM (#5327463)

    Best Voice / Digitally Enhanced Acting Performance. That would also let actors from animated films get a chance.

    And Keanu Reeves!

  • by syle ( 638903 ) <syle@waygate. o r g> on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @02:39PM (#5327465) Homepage
    The creative talent in Hollywood (please don't snicker) should find that the chance to make art they think is meaningful and appreciated by others is reward enough.
    Yes, truly, this applies to television as well. Acting in such productions as NBC's Friends [nbc.com] is art for the sake of art. It is not about the money [eonline.com].
  • by grub ( 11606 ) <slashdot@grub.net> on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @02:47PM (#5327531) Homepage Journal

    and managed to pay writers what they are worth.

    Too bad Jon Katz didn't work there, he'd end up paying them for the priviledge.
  • by ChristTrekker ( 91442 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @03:10PM (#5327664)
    Me! I'm an actor! Hire me and pay me a lot of money!

    Whoa, for a second there I thought you were CleverNickName [slashdot.org].









    (Just kidding, Wil.)

  • by Ilan Volow ( 539597 ) on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @03:11PM (#5327677) Homepage
    The dirty judges steals it from us they do. No awardses for Smeagol. Crooked judges, we throttle them in their sleep we will. No, wait, we will lead them to her, and then she will eats them and their bones and their clothes and then maybe she will give the award to us. Yes! Smeagol will lead them to her law firm...

  • by sh00z ( 206503 ) <.sh00z. .at. .yahoo.com.> on Tuesday February 18, 2003 @03:19PM (#5327716) Journal
    the Oscars are more of a joke than anything else.
    Especially in light of the fact that a completely fictional person [imdb.com] did receive a nomination this year ('Donald Kaufman' for co-writing 'Adaptation').

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...