MPlayer 0.90 released; MPlayer Maintainer Leaves 338
Viqsi writes "459 days after the previous stable release, the MPlayer folks have finally released stable version 0.90. With this done, A'rpi (th head maintainer) is leaving the project, citing too-much-free-time-forever-lost issues, and the team is looking closely at revising the way the project is managed as a result. Here's hoping some improvements come out of this."
well (Score:4, Informative)
Re:THANKS ARPI! (Score:5, Informative)
Since the license change, I've seen that (that allowed binary packaging) it is gradualy pushing other players to the background, exaclty due to it's versatility (aviplayer, xine, vlc,
The documentation seems to be somewhat lacking and for some things I (still) use IMHO better tools:
video recording: nvrec, AFAIK mplayer does not support V4L2
encoding: transcode, mainly because transcode seems to have a much better doc and logical buildup of the options to transcode and large modularity (for filters). I use mencoder sometimes when transcode has problems with particular file (or used to)
One thing which no player seems to pull of correctly, is to play files with awfully synced audio, video...
Embedded Mplayer (Score:5, Informative)
Big thanks to the developers., for this one.
Re:Congrats to the MPlayer team! (Score:5, Informative)
will it lose the race against xine? (Score:5, Informative)
I just completed downloading it! (Score:1, Informative)
I'm currently making some Slackware 9 packages for it. I'm trying to get it to compile with the Quicktime codecs, but it seems kinda broken (I probably screwed up somewhere)
The new default skin is really cool looking...
Re:Embedded Mplayer (Score:4, Informative)
It's just started, but already usable and quite nice. Very promissing.
sync issues (Score:2, Informative)
mencoder -o output.avi -oac copy -ovc copy filethatsyncsbad.ext
It even makes files that play correctly play more smoothly.
Re:Windows port? (Score:3, Informative)
According to the FAQ [mplayerhq.hu] you can compile it on Windows using Cygwin [cygwin.com]. On the subject of ports, Mac OS X users may be interested in MPlayer OS X [sourceforge.net].
Re:yes, exactly because of that (Score:4, Informative)
MPlayer rocks! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Windows port? (Score:5, Informative)
Free of course. Sister project is free videostreaming!
Re:Embedded Mplayer (Score:5, Informative)
Awesome (Score:1, Informative)
I moved to linux , and now that they've chosen
a default skin , I hope they incorporate it into
the project properly (ie default download
compile includes it)
I love showing my 'doze friends look I'm playing
an avi , followed by a dvd , vcd , mov , rm
etc... all from the same program !!! They just
look flabbergasted and upset.
Then I go look I'm re-encoding using the same
program (well source base at least) and once
again they're flabbergasted , and wow hey no voice
sync problems either
This is definatly one of the programs that makes
my life a lot easier using linux
Re:Windows port? (Score:2, Informative)
Both player are able to handle all DirectShow codecs (incl DivX) as well as RealMedia, QuickTime, and also DVDs.
jetAudio installs the RealMedia codecs, but no QuickTime codecs. Media Player Classic installs no codecs at all (that's why it's so small).
Re:will it lose the race against xine? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Idea for a new media player (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Idea for a new media player (Score:3, Informative)
Then we would be pretty much dependent on the speed of the CPU rather than any nice tricks that the different systems are capable of. Examples:
Apple makes uses of Altivec instructions in the G4 to get improved performance on the sort of ops that these plugins do.
SGI IRIX based systems make heavy use of the graphics subsystem (which is why they still command big bucks) for this sort of operation.
What you suggest wouldn't gain much approval from users as it wouldn't allow them to use the full power of the machines. Imagine having a system with a new graphics card and getting poor frame rates because the plugin didn't take advantage of the features of the card.
Re:Maybe we'll finally get some threading (Score:2, Informative)
Not sure how good it is since I don't have an SMP system, but it does exist.
http://mplayerxp.sourceforge.net/
Ah, the boon that is Free Software. Have a problem with something? You can modify the source and fix it yourself!
Re:I just completed downloading it! (Score:3, Informative)
should suffice for a Slackware 9 system (It's what I use). Be sure to put your codecs in
Re:Congrats to the MPlayer team! (Score:0, Informative)
Yes, obviously. Duh. What, you think running Windows on powerpc or alpha is going to solve anything? And yes, I'm quite aware that there is no Windows for powerpc...
Oh come on... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:non-DVD subtitles? (Score:2, Informative)
utf, UTF, sub, SUB, srt, SRT, smi, SMI, rt, RT, txt, TXT, ssa, SSA, aqt, AQT
Re:will it lose the race against xine? (Score:3, Informative)
As usual, he's got a major chip on his shoulder. It was always one thing or another:
-compilers that caused the program to crash or do odd things(mplayer's configure script would refuse to run unless you had certain versions of GCC, and no- it wasn't 'the broken one that shipped with redhat' that it would object to). Funny, but nobody else had such unusual compiler requirements.
-licensing problems(some of the rants are truly spectacular.) At one point he went and dug up other projects that he felt were worse violators, as if to try and shift people's attention/justify his own problem. It was pathetic.
-Distros "incorrectly building" the player(I think it was how they were linking to libraries), which would then send floods of users to them(and, of course, they think all their users are idiots). Mplayer is by far the most anal-retentive about distribution of binaries, and as a result, the distros have told them to kiss off distro-style(ie, mplayer's been dropped from the major distros)
Mplayer got a bad review for (surprise!) having "developers [who] were unfriendly and ... documentation incomplete and insulting." His response? He attacks the author of the review with several bullet-points in the DOCS TO MPLAYER ITSELF! As someone once told me, "it's better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you're an a jerk, than to open it and remove all doubt."
In each case, it was "mplayer versus the world", and in his opinion, the world could go screw itself. The docs, the website, even the messages in the configure script and the program itself- were all confrontational, and/or insulting; sorry, I don't like software that cops an attitude. This guy, if not the entire team, had serious problems with keeping their mouths in check. So, when I hear he's leaving, I can only say GOOD.
As I download this latest release, I can't help but remember how nothing changed with each release candidate up to this; the volume control doesn't work, the OSD is broken, some files give it complete conniptions but play fine in Xine, and it takes an enormous amount of CPU power now. Used to take about 2-5% of my CPU, now it takes 50%. Playback is jerky, too. Xine? None of these problems(sync is often better, playback is smooth, CPU usage is minimal/non-existent.)
Maybe the reason he's pissed off is because Xine is using his code(as they can- if you didn't like the concept of others using your code, you shouldn't have made the project open-source), but using it -BETTER-.
Re:mencoder directly to VCD/MPEG1 or SVCD/MPEG2? (Score:3, Informative)
Something like this should work (for VCD):
mkfifo stream.yuv
mkfifo audio.wav
mplayer <tv options here> -vo yuv4mpeg -ao pcm -aofile audio.wav <
cat stream.yuv | yuvdenoise | mpeg2enc -F 4 -f 1 -n n -a 2 -o video.m1v &
toolame -b 224 -m s audio.wav video.mp2
mplex -o video.mpg video.m1v video.mp2
'course, this is all assuming your box can handle decoding the TV stream and encoding the video and audio simultaneously.