ReplayTV May Drop "Commercial Advance" 366
An anonymous reader writes "Wired News is reporting that the new owners of ReplayTV are considering dropping the Commercial Advance and Send Show options features." I had bad luck with that function chopping out bits of show anyway. Between that and the 30 second skip function, I'm surprised ReplayTV has lasted this long!
Silly. (Score:2, Insightful)
They sell you these products with the promise of watching "TV Your Way" (or whatever their silly tagline was) and pull stunts like this. It's bait-and-switch.
Before the flames begin. (Score:5, Insightful)
Would you rather have cat^H^H^HTV detector vans running around?
Re:Another crippled product (Score:4, Insightful)
I can't think of one.
MythTV and Freevo (Score:5, Insightful)
However, MythTV is leading the charge to offload this processing to the WinTV PVR cards, freeing up the system CPU for other stuff, or just allowing the user to scrape by with minimum requirements. So the feasability is improving quite rapidly right now.
MythTV has also been doing some impressive work on their GUI (check out the screenshots). This was one area I previously thought Freevo had a leg up on, but that advantage is going away.
Links:
MythTV [mythtv.org]
Freevo [sourceforge.net]
Never Happen (Score:3, Insightful)
Yup and I'm never surprised that you continue your crappy yellow journalism!
Face it folks it's not going to happen. There are a lot of consumers out already using the replay that will raise holy hell if they discontinue this function. What they need to do is get off their ass and countersue like the VCR makers did in the 80's since these functions are no different then hitting FF on a VCR.
These suits have no basis or merit. They need to let them run the course, and make the precident so that the product can go back to normal operations.
DP
Re:Why oh why... (Score:2, Insightful)
This is why you roll your own PVR. (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, this is why you roll your own. Yes, its a little more work, the cost is pretty much the same, but there is no monthly fee, and features don't get yanked out from under you.
MythTV is absolutely amazing, and its evolving incredibly fast. If your lookinng for a PVR, I recommend giving it a shot.
Re:Before the flames begin. (Score:5, Insightful)
TV is bad for your life (Score:4, Insightful)
Watch TV all the time. Requests to turn the damn thing off are met with a confused gaze.
My Apartment:
TV gets turned on when we have friends over for the purpose of watching a movie, or we're too brain drained to do anything but sit and watch pretty colors. Oh, and when I want to play with my PS2.
How does that impact our lives? I spend most of my time with my friends. A night to myself becomes a rare and cherished thing spent reading a book I've been looking forward to or on a game I haven't played in ages.
My GF and I throw dinner parties, have nights out with friends, spend time talking to each other and interacting as adult human beings.
Hell, I didn't have cable for four years and never missed it.
Although I do admit, the Food Chanel is pretty fun. Of course, my GF and I end up trying a lot of the tings we see on the shows there.
My mother can give a run down of the entire life story of all the characters on "Friends" and "Stargate SG1" (The latter watched not for the content, but for MacGyver's presence.) Her social life consists largely of people from Church, and she doesn't see them very often.
I prefer my life, thank you very much.
And to add a slice of irony, I'll quote a character from a very bad sci-fi show: "We stopped watching movies when we realized that our own lives were far more interesting."
Re:Before the flames begin. (Score:5, Insightful)
Not really, but I don't think that's necessary. Look at HBO's model, or any other specialzied subscription-based channel.
I've been dying to select exactly the cable channels I want for years. It seems vastly preferable - to me, anyways - to pay $40/month for 8-12 channels that I actually like, through and through. Of course the media giants are all-too aware of this; after all, they watch TV too. You can't shovel your pap in with the good stuff if people have the power to only receive the good stuff, and filter out the pap.
As for Replay... these companies have got to stop with the fucking bait-and-switch routine. This is the precise reason I'll never consider a subscription-based PVR. It was too easy to see it coming. It's also too easy to just buy the parts for the computer that I need to make it happen there. (Where it belongs, IMHO.)
Look, I sympathize a bit with the broadcasters, they have some tough questions and sitations to answer. But that's the extent: a bit. I don't care a lot, nor should you. TV will not 'go away' any more than music will. The presupposition that without this one specific economic model for media dissemination, we'll all be without any art whatsoever, is ludicrous.
Re:"Respecting the intent of copyright"? (Score:4, Insightful)
Tivo and Replay (Score:3, Insightful)
Bought the replay, found out you had to buy a subscription, it wouldnt work without one. (and it was refurbished...)
Hooked it up off the tivo, and the picture quality saving fromt the Tivo to the Replay was not that great. Could of been the Digital->Analog problem, but even my VCR recorded better. But I was able to move the files to the PC or MAC and edit them. But in the end, I didnt want to pay for the subscription, and he quality wasnt as good. Also, it didnt work with my normal DSS box. (the IR didnt control it) So I returned it.
Even thou Tivo doesnt have an option to copy the movies off, the DSS models have a great picture, even better than the normal broadcast quality. Im thinking of getting the series 2 for DSS, could use more HD space also.
BTW, i used the litttle secret code to enable 30 second skip, works great. Only problem tivo has, season pass manager is slow.
Fast Forward? (Score:4, Insightful)
Crippled? Barely... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:This is why you roll your own PVR. (Score:3, Insightful)
They haven't removed any features. They aren't removing features from existing products. They're considering removing features from new products they might offer.
Why is this controversial? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I aggree (Score:3, Insightful)
They got out of it around the same time TV began pushing the boundaries of what used to be morally unacceptable. Since then, TV has succeeded in programming a generation into mindless drones. They don't interact with other people, so all their perceptions of morality and acceptable behavior come from the TV. They watch the commercials and buy what they see.
That said, like many things it is the abuse which is harmful. Some people are intelligent enough to judge the content, and have the willpower to get up and turn it off. But a lot of people would have no idea what to do with their time. They have no skills or hobbies, because they have spent all their free time watching canned entertainment and laughing with the fake audience even if they don't get the joke.
Not everything on TV is bad, and certainly there are some fun programs to watch (for example, Junkyard Wars or Battlebots are some pretty fun shows for a bunch of engineering students to watch). But you need to be able to walk up and turn it off. Switch your mind from remote-control to self-control.
I wish there was a version of Quicken that accounted for your time and personal development. It would be interesting to track mental acuity, skillset expansion, energy, and rest levels in response to different activities. You could budget in time for entertainment, working on a hobby, reading a book, and even exercise. Then you could plot a graph and see whether you are a skilled and improving person, or a sad sack sitting on the couch, getting sadder and sackier.
Re:Stop Watching TV (Score:2, Insightful)
TV is no more evil than books or movies, and avoiding TV does not make your life inherently better.
Re:TV is bad for your life (Score:4, Insightful)
Remember, for every issue you stand high on, in your moral rightousness, there is another you surely completely fail on.
Consumerism, Fossil Fuels, Recycling, Diet/Weight/Health, Intellectual persuits, Spirituality, World Awareness, Community Participation, Civil Service....on and on
Pick your lifestyle and enjoy it, but certainly don't flaunt it. There are no angels. Claiming the high ground makes one look niave.
mug
ref: "Bowling Alone"
Not the end of the world! (Score:4, Insightful)
First off, it only affects the 5000 or newer series. So, two of my three ReplayTV boxes will be unaffected.
Second, some have had great success with Commercial Advance, but I never had much luck, so I never use it.
And third, the Internet File Sharing for me is another non-issue. Given the upstream cap on my Internet connection, show sharing is just plain prohibitive.
Dinally, let's not confuse "Internet File Sharing" with in-house program streaming between ReplayTV boxes on the same LAN. This feature is NOT being removed. This is the one feature for me that makes the 5040 worth it--it lets me seamlessly offload shows using the DVArchive app to my PC where storage is cheap and either stream them back to the ReplayTV box or burn them to DVD.
Re:This is why you roll your own PVR. (Score:5, Insightful)
Tivo has:
- No install of Linux, software, libraries.
- no install of cards
- Customer support if you cant figure out how to plug it into your TV (the truely braindead)
- Comes with all the cables
Some of us are Unix admins at work and can write their own Myth TV if they wanted, but DON'T WANT TO. TV is supposed to be a relaxing veg-your-brain "activity". Most people don't want to have to think about it.
Have you seen the FAQ on Myth TV?
Compare these questions and nswers to the "plug it in" install of Tivo:
I get an error when compiling about 'mkspecs'?
You need to set QTDIR. On Debian, it should be
I can't change the channel when watching TV?
Something's wrong with your program database. Did filldata run with no major errors?
When is the last time Tech Support over at Tivo asked a user "Did you make sure that
Re:This is why you roll your own PVR. (Score:5, Insightful)
You Get It (tm).
This is why I'm a Sun/HP-UX admin by day, but a DirecTiVo/Mac user at night.
I like things that Just Work (tm).
Re:Before the flames begin. (Score:3, Insightful)
HUGE difference, my friend. The simple one-word explanation is demographics
Advertisers don't want the MOST viewers possible, they want the MOST VIEWERS IN THE DESIRED DEMOGRAPHIC. IANAAE, but I believe the hot demo right now is young women. (That's why you and I think Jerry Springer sucks, but it remains popular with advertisers anyway.) If there were a "viewing tax", equally distributed among all age, sex, and income brackets, then demographics would become meaningless, and television producers would cater to viewers, rather than advertisers (when then in turn care about viewers, but only certain ones.)
I am getting crotchety and unreasonable in my old age, and I have gotten to the point that I would rather watch a show about starfish reproductive habits on PBS than something with 2 minutes of ads for ever 3 minutes of content. (e.g. anything on TBS in the evening. Watching the last 30 minutes of any movie on TBS is an exercise in madness because the ration worsens to 4 minutes of ads for every 1 minutes of content.)
Add me to the list of people who wouldn't mind paying a TV tax if it would get rid of the goddam tampon ads.