Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media

Wal-Mart Enters NetFlix's Business 679

wcbrown writes "AP reports that Wal-Mart is entering into the online DVD rental arena, currently dominated by Netflix. Wal-Mart is starting out with 13,000 titles, six distribution centers, and competitive pricing. With a seriously tremendous infrastructure and expansive will, Wal-Mart stands poised to overtake Netflix. To say the least, that's not going to be good for business."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Wal-Mart Enters NetFlix's Business

Comments Filter:
  • by Lumpy ( 12016 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @03:57PM (#6174573) Homepage
    Last week my local Walmar had a large vending machine that dispensed the DVD that you wanted to rent. and the machine would accept the returns also.

    All I needed was my credit card/ debit card.

    Maybe they are looking to expand in both online rental and vending style?
  • by djh101010 ( 656795 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @03:58PM (#6174585) Homepage Journal
    Given that NetFlix has been pushing pop-under ads to my browser, I've chosen to avoid being a customer of theirs. So, as long as Wal-Mart doesn't start doing the same sort of thing, this sounds like a great idea.

    I wonder if they'll have a similar "frequent renters get lower priority" scheme to what NetFlix has.
  • by Zaphod B ( 94313 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:00PM (#6174614) Journal
    I really don't mean this to be a troll... but it occurs to me that Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players.

    Wal-mart's greatest move (from a financial gain POV) was to move into middling-to-small towns (this means towns with 4000 people or more, or county seats) and take over the businesses downtown, the mom-and-pop stores, by slashing prices. (Whether you like that tactic is irrelevant, it was enormously successful.)

    Well, how much are you going to be able to slash prices on an online DVD rental? It's not like Netflix and Blockbuster are higher-priced than the market will bear.

    They can try it... but I suspect it won't be a roaring success.
  • by HiKarma ( 531392 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:01PM (#6174625)
    I have always felt of things like NetFlix, and even the Tivo, as a "poor man's video on demand."

    You pick the movies you want, and some time, a few days later they are there to watch at your leisure, taking as long as you want, with pause, rewind FF.

    Everything you want from video on demand except the ability to pick a movie right now and watch it right now.

    Which turns out to be not so important after all. And it's a lot cheaper than putting in all those servers and 7 megabits to every home of highly reliable bandwidth.

    Another example of the old adage that you should never underestimate the bandwidth of a stationwagon full of magtapes, except this time it's a postal van full of DVDs.
  • by dirtyboot ( 158648 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:01PM (#6174628)
    I'm not *too* worried about this. I think Netflix customers are probably somewhat saavier than your standard Wal*Mart customer. Granted, Wal*Mart has the advantage of being able to pour money into the program (a la Microsoft's Ultimate TV) and the advantage of brick 'n' mortar stores to push the product, but if they play the same censoring games as they do with their music, I don't see them taking off. Hell, even Blockbuster is beginning to see the original-aspect-ration light.

    If Netflix embarks on an even semi-intelligent ad campaign, I think they have a fighting chance.

    -d
  • by Jack Comics ( 631233 ) * <jack_comics@nOSpAm.postxs.org> on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:01PM (#6174631) Homepage
    Gee, just what I always wanted! A censored DVD rental company! Sigh. I have lost complete and total respect for Wal-Mart over the years. First they started flexing their muscles to censor the video game industry and made it plain that any video game they didn't like wouldn't be sold by Wal-Mart, thus making game companies cave and self-edit their games. Then they pulled some men's magazines off their shelves that had less female skin than most women's magazines these days. Now they want to start renting out DVDs, which I'm quite sure are censored? Heh, good luck.

    It's a shame they're the largest employer in Pennsylvania. :( In the meantime, I'll stick to Target, at least they seem to let consumers decide for theirselves, instead of deciding for the consumers what's right and what's not.
  • bad for business? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Maeryk ( 87865 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:03PM (#6174659) Journal
    How exactly is this bad for business? Is it bad for business like Canon coming out with copiers was bad for Xerox business? You know, where it drove the exhorbitant price of copiers down to where most of us have them built into our 300 dollar printer? Yeah.. I see how bad that has been for Xerox.

    Its not "bad" for business, it is just business. It is competition. If walmart undercuts NetFlix by .50c, netflix can A) price to match, B) add a benefit that makes their slightly higher-than-the-otherguy price worth it, C) go out of business. Either way, its good for the consumer, and thats pretty much the bottom line.

    I tend to not shop Amazon, beause I dont like thier policies, and i can usually find something at close to the same price. (And, I can usually get brick and mortar stores to match Amazon's price to get my sale.) I suspect the same thing will happen here. A lot of people DONT LIKE Wal-Mart.. and wont rent from them. But anything that kills BLockbuster and 48Hours is good, imho. I still think the ridiculously high price that they charge for DVD's will come down as people find it cheaper to rent them enough to get tired of them.
    (Okay.. so its not so ridiculous anymore, but why does it seem the more successful the film in the theaters, the cheaper it is to get, but it costs three times that for something that is slightly more obscure? The costs of production of the DVD's should be about the same, shouldnt they?)

    maeryk
  • by FatAlb3rt ( 533682 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:09PM (#6174724) Homepage
    Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players

    At $40 or so [walmart.com] for a DVD player, who can't afford one?

    Well, how much are you going to be able to slash prices on an online DVD rental?

    I doubt that's the point. People do their grocery shopping at Wal-mart since groceries are there too. Now they won't have to stop by the video store on the way home either.

  • Re:Family fun! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Elvisisdead ( 450946 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:09PM (#6174730) Homepage Journal
    I bought Dogma at Wal-Mart. Unedited.
  • by Maeryk ( 87865 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:09PM (#6174736) Journal
    I really don't mean this to be a troll... but it occurs to me that Wal-mart's core customer group are not exactly likely to own DVD players.

    You kidding me? Where else can you get a DVD player for 40 bucks? not Rad Shack.. anything they sell has to be at least 80.. or they wont sell it. Walmart can hook you up with a passable home theater for under 500 bucks.. and they stock a fairly reasonable selection of DVDs and videos. (And yes, even pulp fiction, uncut, last time I was there looking).

    So this is the next logical step for them. Super Walmarts have replaced the shopping mall for all intents and purposes. (Sure.. they sell Kmart level CRAP in most cases, but in some instances you can get good deals there.) The one here has a pharmacy, a grocery store, a pearle vision center, automotive, the usual Walmart crap, a decent electronics and sporting goods area, and an outdoors home decor shop. There really isnt any reason to shop anywhere else. (Unless you want to go to home despot for hardware..).

    This is exactly the demographic they want.. the kind of people who are at wal-mart three times a week grocery shopping anyway. The difference between a scheme like this and the ill fated VHS in grocery stores, would be selection.

    Maeryk

  • by Frymaster ( 171343 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:11PM (#6174761) Homepage Journal
    no, it's bad for netflix because walmart has a virtually limitless warchest and can win by attrition. how big is walmart?
    • last year their revenues were $200 billion us. that's more than the gdp of israel
    • of the 10 richest people in the world, five are waltons (of walmart fame). you think gates is a fat cat? the waltons are downright obese!
    • heck, s. robson walton may even be richer than bill! the "rich list 2001" claimed that s.r. had a personal bankroll of 65 billion, and placed him in the top slot for wealth worldwide.
    • walmart has 1 million employees. three times general motors.
    • however, despite all this, the average walmart employee makes only 15k/year.
    how do you beat that kind of war chest?
  • by tinrobot ( 314936 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:13PM (#6174790)
    I doubt WalMart will carry anything with either nudity or controversy. I mean they just pulled Cosmo off their shelves because it was too tittilating. Being so 'family oriented' eliminates a *huge* proportion of the films out there.

    I think NetFlix can survive simply on the fact that they can carry a wider selection of films...
  • Re:Competition (Score:5, Interesting)

    by BigBir3d ( 454486 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:16PM (#6174828) Journal
    What is so unfair about Wal-Mart moving into the online DVD rental business?

    Maybe now we will see some "innovations" in Netflix's offerings?
  • by FleshMuppet ( 544521 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:17PM (#6174840)

    Netflix is great for people like me and my roommate. The best part about netflix, IMHO, is the fact that you can keep a DVD for as long as you want it. We were the sort of people who always were paying late fees before Netflix. Now, we can keep it around until we're done with it, and then return it without the effort of even leaving the house.

    And as for your lack of organization issue, remember that you get to keep a certain number of movies on hand. The number varies depending on how much you pay, but if you send your movies back after you watch them, you will have half a dozen DVDs sitting around at any one time that you haven't watched yet.

    So, in other words, next time your wife and you decide on the spur of the moment to go and get a movie, instead of getting in your vehicle and driving to the DVD store, you simply walk over to your DVD player and pick one of the movies that you have lying about that you'd already decided you wanted to watch.

  • by seafoodbuffet ( 527069 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:19PM (#6174859)
    A quick search on google for netflix porn [google.com] Seems like there's quite a few already in this space including:
    • privateathome.com
    • X4rent.com
    • xxx-dvdrental.com
    • rentflixxx.com
    • sugardvd.com
    disclaimer: I've not tried any of these services so please don't ask me if they're any good
  • by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel ( 631252 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:21PM (#6174887) Homepage Journal
    I work for Circuit City...Some of our largest revenue sources come from service providers. We are very good at selling wireless (sprint's largest retailer) Direct TV and broadband internet access. We would love to sign people up for Netflix when we sell them their new DVD player.
  • Limited Market (Score:2, Interesting)

    by dkragen2002 ( 635073 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:25PM (#6174941)
    To be honest, I think Netflix has already saturated the market for this. As has been identified by others, the true geeks, rent and rip the DVD, or find the torrent, or KaZaa or iMesh it.

    The market to watch is when someone (like a Wal-Mart) puts thier money into the technology to develop a streaming technology or a download and play type of busniess model. Of course what that model is, I can't say (or I'd be rich!)

    I think the weak link in the chain is the hardware. If I could watch movies without having to actually get a DVD or pry my kids away from the DVD player to watch a movie, it would be more appealing.

    Also, there is nothing (in movie rental land) worse than getting your NetFlix rental disc after waiting 2 months and seeing that it appears to have been run over in a gravel pit. (Just return it, we'll put you back on the list).

    Lastly, our stupid television media (techno-morons) had this story last night and said Wal-Mart was going to now compete directly with Blockbuster for the video rental market. No mention of NetFlix whatsoever. Shows an interesting perspective on what the true perception of the "masses" are about what technology exists.

    Dave
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:36PM (#6175062)
    I am amazed at how much obscure stuff the Walmart DVD rental service has. They have Anime stuff I cant rent anywhere else. Really, if you like anime you should check it out.
    Now I feel guilty, I actually dont care that Walmart uses slave labor in third world countires because I want these cartoons so bad!
  • by sbeitzel ( 33479 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:47PM (#6175200) Homepage Journal
    Heh. The biggest enemy of capitalism is successful capitalists. I forget whom I'm quoting, here, so I'll welcome any citations.

    The point, though, is that an economic juggernaut like Wal-Mart has the ability to erect such significant barriers to entry once it achieves market dominance that no future competition can exist. Capitalism and the free market are nice models, but they are ultimately unbalanced. As soon as some entity has accumulated a huge portion of any given market, then that market is no longer free.

    Your point about taking the market for granted is well-made, but it is a separate issue. There you're not talking about capitalism or free market economics, you're talking about business practices and inertia -- dangers which lurk for companies of all sizes.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @04:50PM (#6175225)
    Not good for the consumer? Rubbish. You act as though aggressive competition guarantees an irrevocable market dominance. It doesn't! As soon as your theoretical future-walmart doesn't meet the consumer's desire for quality+low prices+convenience (something it currently does quite well, mind you) another business can rise up to meet that need.
    And Wal-Mart can (and will) then leverage their near-monopoly to lower their prices to an unprofitable level, putting this other business out of, well, business. Lather, rinse, repeat.

    IOW, there will never be any real competition. It will always be sporadic and doomed to fail. Other businesses will come and go, but Wal-Mart perseveres. Yay, capitalism.

  • by dekashizl ( 663505 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @05:06PM (#6175420) Journal
    Lo, an intelligent sub-thread!

    The issue here is that mega-corporations like WalMart (and companies like them) have the ability to subsidize long periods of losses in one division (by even giving product away for FREE) to achieve market dominance and force out little players.

    Once in a monopoly position, their power is even more significant, because they can further erect barriers to entry beyond simply impossibly low price expectations. For example, they begin invoking patents, pushing for new legislation, establishing single-vendor agreements with suppliers/distributors, and more.

    We've seen ALL of this done before. The examples the Slashdot community is most familiar with are no doubt Microsoft, but they didn't invent Monopoly business practices, they just play it very well.

    Your idealist view of the free market sounds like it came from a 7th grade economy textbook. It sounds great on paper, but it just doesn't work that way. I don't mean this as a flame, but it is dangerous when intelligent people (as you appear to be) maintain overly-simplified views of matters of this importance. For example, your last sentence regarding Capitalism. Capitalism doesn't "work" or "not work". It's just a pretty good man-concocted system for keeping economics in rough order, and it has its flaws like any other system.
  • by wondafucka ( 621502 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @05:06PM (#6175422) Homepage Journal
    Walmart encourages the self censorship of media. An example would be that Walmart refuesed to carry Magic the Gathering cards until they took out several cards / altered the artwork which did happen. The same could be true for movies as well.

    Netflix will probably always survive because you can rent movies that are controversial, but I don't like it when a company has such an impressive control over the content of their products.

    That aside, Walmart has every right to not sell "questionable" or "offensive" material and consumers have every right to support this by shopping at Wallmart.

  • by jsgates ( 232994 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @05:13PM (#6175498) Homepage
    Theirs just one problem with that, because Wal*Mart is so large, when they refuse to carry a product unless it meets their criteria, it severly hurts buisness for that company. Whats that mean? It means before the majority of magazines/etc publish their magazines, they send a preview copy to Wal*Mart to make sure it meets their standards of publication. Basicaly you end up with censorship by market dominance.
  • Re:Competition (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Ovidius ( 144915 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @05:22PM (#6175600) Homepage

    What is so unfair about Wal-Mart moving into the online DVD rental business?

    There's nothing specifically unfair about Wal-Mart get into the online DVD rental, except that they can absorb huge losses while they wait for their competition to die.

    That may seem like it's just the breaks of being in business, but Wal-Mart's brick-and-mortar store strategy is to open up so many Wal-Mart's in an area that it cuts into everyone's bottom line, even that of the other Wal-Mart's. Then when all the mom and pops are gone and any other competitors -- surprise! -- all the Wal-Mart's but one are closed. Net effect, fewer jobs and zero choice about where to take your business.

    This is a "vertical" example of the same thing. Now that many American's have no place to shop and work other than Wal-Mart, they have to leech into other sectors of the economy in order to grow, and growth is the only important thing in American business these days. Doing what you do well (as Netflix does, in my opinion) doesn't count any more. Whatever you do, you have to do it more and more, no matter how bad you get at it because you're doing too much.

    This is bad because only being able to choose what Wal-Mart sells is no real choice, and because Wal-Mart has very specific ideas about what you should be able to buy.

  • by EricTheGreen ( 223110 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @05:32PM (#6175685) Homepage
    I do believe that capitalism works, but you underestimate the ol' "barrier to entry" issue here. Just because an opportunity exists doesn't mean an enterprise is ready/able to service it.

    When you start considering Walmart's ability to throw it's collective weight around in the supply chain, said barriers to entry become even more formidable. You want to service a niche in the DVD rental market. Hard to do it if the various distributors will only supply you if you buy thousands of copies of a broad part of their catalog, only 5% of which may make sense to your business model...

    Again, I'm all for capitalism--but don't sugar-coat the difficulty of carving a niche out, even one ignored by the big players.

  • propane tanks (Score:5, Interesting)

    by zogger ( 617870 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @05:47PM (#6175815) Homepage Journal
    That "walmart only, propietary" deal happend to me with a couple of my small refillable propane tanks. I got two from walmart, turns out they put a "walmart_only_ thread on the filler valve, you are forced to get filler-ups/exchanges only at walmart then, unlike my other ones that I can take anyplace handy.

    I didn't mind walmart when sam walton was still kicking, it seemed like they at least made an effort to have "made in USA" stuff in abundance, and didn't have weird polices like this propane deal (and what they will probably do with DVDs-good call there), but now,since he's died and who knows who is running it as an economic division of the chinese peoples liberation army, I've about almost completely removed them from sucking on my wallet. Once in a great while I get stuck, and have no recourse but to go in there, and every time I see aisle after aisle of lost homes, lost jobs, lost equity, lost cars, basically a lot of lost hopes and dreams disgusied as cheap trinkets, like what were used to purchase manhattan island. Trinkets, ohhh shiny and cheap.

    They are that-cheap. Cheap as in price, cheap as in quality, but very expensive with a bigger look at when once those dollars leave the shores of the US and cease acting as an economic force multiplier.
  • frequent renters get lower priority
    It was covered in Slashdot before, the original analysis is... An Analysis of Netflix's DVD Allocation System [dreamhost.com] I've noticed some odd tweaks that Netflix use. Sometimes weeks can go by when I don't get any of the movies on my "Very Long Wait" schedule (which I have all collected right at the start of my 450+ queue. But if I register a broken or scratched disc, then suddenly I get a small flurry of "VLW" movies, that surges, then subsides. SO I figure their CRM system does some sort of temporary promotion to keep you happy.
  • P2P Netflix (Score:2, Interesting)

    by dcgrigsby ( 167583 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @07:15PM (#6176427)
    There's another alternative: P2P style netflix. Check out mozo [mozo.com].

    Basic idea is that arround you -- your dorm, co-workers, etc.-- there are thousands of DVDs. If you pool them into groups and share amonst yourselves you'll never need Blockbuster.

    Statistically, it works: average DVD owner buys 15 a year, rents 30. With these numbers, the average person has access to thousands of DVDs around them already.

    And yeah, I wrote this code for this site, so I'm biased..

All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin

Working...