Indiana Jones To Arrive Again in 2005 416
Dolemite_the_Wiz writes "The Raider.net reports that the release date for the next Indiana Jones Movie (tentatively titled 'Indiana Jones 4') is, according to Steven Spielberg, "...going to come out probably for the July 4th weekend of 2005...". The movie looks like it will be set in the 1950s and include just about every main character from the first three films. For more links about this movie, check this search result from Cinescape. Secondly, IndianaJones.com reports that the First three films in the Indiana Jones Trilogy will be released on November 4th. These films have to be one of the most requested DVD releases (probably next to the Original 'Star Wars' trilogy and the first two 'Godfather' movies) ever. "
"
This Four DVD set will include:
- Restored Film Footage
- Remastered in THX
- New Dolby 5.1 soundtrack
- A 4th DVD with just about every aspect of how the films were made.
This collection will retail for $49.95 (US)
Here's the official release notice for the DVD.I just hope that the new film and DVD will be able to Satisfy all the Indy fans."
Not again (Score:5, Insightful)
I would rather have a single new original movie, instead of tons of the same old stuff.
Luck in three's? (Score:4, Insightful)
Back to the Future, Indiana Jones, Star Wars (I refuse to count the three "newest" ones), etc.
While I am midly excited to see that this film is going to be released I don't see it as being popular. They are going to concentrate on large-scale special effects and less on the content (just like all recent films and sequels/pre).
That's my worthless
slow release (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Milking the franchise.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Milking the franchise.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:imdb forum (Score:3, Insightful)
Incomplete DVD Set (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not again (Score:5, Insightful)
No! NO! (Score:3, Insightful)
-MDL
Re:Luck in three's? (Score:3, Insightful)
But if IJ and SW I think their appeal was the fact that they were Action Movies and the characters seemed believable and not over the top like todays movies (The Flying Yoda). Sure Luke had some force powers but it was usually limited to moving some small objects (The Return of the Jedi made Yoda seem to really concentrate to move the X-Wing) and some limited last minute extended super human tequniques that could almost be considered an endrenalon rush. But they were believable it is something you may see someone do in a circus or at a magic show.
in IJ Indiana, didn't have any super powered he was just creative, and resourceful and all the things he did were believable although probably nobody will survive it.
With all the special effects I feel we loose our emotional connection to the character we don't really care if he survives or not because we don't connect to the character they don't feel human they feel like a video game.
So Far the Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter seem like they are good movies. (Although there are a lot of effects in these movies you don't see Grandalf throwing huge fireballs all the time, or Harry Potter racing a pod or constantly doing all the over the edge magic tricks) they try to use special effect a little more responcibibly then some of the other movies (Hulk and Matrix 2 comes to mind) Effects are good and all but using effects for effects sakes doesn't make a good movie. Effects should be used to make the movie more believable and forget that the people in the movie are actors in an fictional environment. I think Forest Gump had the best special effects because most of them were seamless and we didn't even think that they were special effects.
Re:Youth? (Score:5, Insightful)
Personally, I would rather see the series retired before they bring in someone else.
Indiana Jones is not a "James Bond" type that you just pass the reigns on to. Harrison Ford will always be Indiana Jones, plain and simple.
I mean, they have kept the "timeline" of when the movie takes place moving, so it makes passing the reigns harder, whereas James Bond is a 'contemporary character' that is always just played in 'modern times' (i.e. when the file is shot to be in line with how we live our lives at that time).
But seeing the series retired after Harrison Ford retires from acting would be the right thing to do...
Maybe you forgot... HHGH !!! (Score:5, Insightful)
I hate those young techno punk that think they invented a new, but interesting problem...
Idea! lets have Indiana JUMP over a SHARK... (Score:3, Insightful)
To a true fan, nothing is sadder than the beloved series that goes on and on, becoming less good, then mediocre, then embarrasingly bad self-parody.
Because the true fan just has to keep watching them all, out of appreciation for what was and hoping against hope for what might be but almost never is.
Three cheers for the entertainers who remember the old show business maxim, "Always leave 'em wanting more."
Short Round != Jar-Jar (Score:5, Insightful)
On the rope bridge, Jar-Jar would have screamed and blubbered. Short Round quietly turned to Willie and said, "Hang on. We going for a ride." The kid had a set of balls on him, man.
If they had both been there, Short Round would kicked Jar-Jar off the bridge himself in the name of the mission.
Re:Maybe you forgot... HHGH !!! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Incomplete DVD Set (Score:2, Insightful)
Not everything is a conspiracy.
Re:Time to eat monkey brains again (Score:3, Insightful)
Not to mention, pluck out our side-kick's heart from his body while shouting Om Namah Sivay ;-).
Seriously folks, but the Temple of Doom has one of the worst portrayals of Indians ever on celluloid (which, if I'm not wrong, led to the movie being banned in India). I know it's all fiction, and certainly, I don't know if it's a cross-cultural over-reaction, but I think ToD was a simplistic, and a grossly overstated description of a complex set of cultural traditions and values. You know, the old Oh-The-Americans-Know-Nothing-But-Are-Loud-Mouthed routine... it comes from cultural objects like this.
The parent's point seems to be that most Indians can't stand the IJ universe, so to speak, because of this grotesque sequel.
Re:Youth? (Score:4, Insightful)
I hear what you are saying, but I would argue that James Bond is not a type that you can just pass the reigns on to either. None of the successors have come even close to having the charisma that Sean Connery did in the role. And without the incredible charisma (which is the same thing Harrison Ford provides to Indiana Jones), it's just a bunch of bad plots and gadgets...
Just my two cents.
Re:japanese ring because it is... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Short Round != Jar-Jar (Score:2, Insightful)
Unlike the case of Jar Jar -- when Liam Neeson expresses confidence in Jar Jar, you're left scratching your head.
Racist of them all... (Score:1, Insightful)
Sure - Jones kicks Nazi butt and the evil monkey-eating Indian cult. But thats all dishing out misinformation and bias towards certain communities. For one thing - Nazis might be evil, but by trying to cultivate enmity against them by fabricating elaborate plots is doing the Nazi work ourselves. Indians have a permanent "snake charmer" impression on the west and monkey eating makes it worse.. the last time I checked, snake charming is not in the top 100 popular professions in India and they worship monkeys and respect them as much as they respect another human being.
If by telling these Jones' adventures on screen, Speilberg is trying to glorify the "explorers" - who were mostly murderous theives, then Lord save the sane world. Look at what spaniards did to native americans...