Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Power Outages Strike East Coast 1697

fordp writes "CNN, CNBC and others are reporting that major power outages are happening just after 4:00PM EDT in New York, New Jersey, Detroit, Ottawa and Toronto, Toledo." There are reports of a Con Edison transformer on fire on 14th Street in NYC, and lots of people stuck in trains and elevators. CNN is reporting that it is, according to power officials, most likely not related to terrorism, because you know you were wondering. The Niagra Mohawk power grid is overloaded, which feeds electricity throughout the northeast U.S. and into Canada. Update: 08/14 21:06 GMT by P : The mayor said there was no fire, that it was black smoke brought on by an automatic shutdown because of the power grid failure.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Power Outages Strike East Coast

Comments Filter:
  • by Pavan_Gupta ( 624567 ) <`pg8p' `at' `virginia.edu'> on Thursday August 14, 2003 @04:58PM (#6699337)
    I was watching Modern Marvels on the History channel, randomly, when I noticed that CNN and MSNBC had their news anchors put the war helmets on, and start the 9/11 rant all over again.

    I'm not one to say that we shouldn't worry a little, but coincidences happen! Why should we jump to conclusions long before anything really big has happened? Come on now, this is just way too much hype!! When they begin to find evidence of something bad happening, then tell me about power outages.

    People stuck in elevators? Please. The power goes out everywhere, let's at least pretend that we're not shaking in our boots, and put some confidence back in our country!
  • Air conditioners? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Snodgrass ( 446409 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @04:59PM (#6699353) Homepage
    Judging by this [weatherunderground.com] chart I'd say a whole lot of people were running their air conditioners today. Maybe that's it?
  • by Lumpy ( 12016 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:01PM (#6699396) Homepage
    I report this 20 minutes earlier when it happens and I get rejected....

    I find it really interesting that one overload in niagra falls area can do this to the power grid.

    Why in the world is it engineered that way? to allow undersized power plants supply a city that overgrew it's power potential?
  • outages like this (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Guano_Jim ( 157555 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:04PM (#6699450)
    Should serve as an example to the Department of Energy. The U.S. needs a distributed power generating system ASAP. Lots of small solar and wind generators all over the nation. Every block should have one.

    Right now, "officials" are saying this probably isn't terrorism. But I bet it's giving al-Qaeda some ideas.
    If an accident can make this happen, I'm sure a cleverly-placed explosive can make it happen much more easily.

    And once all those cities are out of power and essentially crippled, the real strikes start.

    And now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go get some tea on for when the FBI guys come knocking on my door. Does Ashcroft take one lump or two?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:08PM (#6699529)
    Why in the world is it engineered that way?
    It isn't engineered. It's evolved.
  • by Dr Caleb ( 121505 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:13PM (#6699612) Homepage Journal
    only to say there was no evidence of it.

    If they said "There is no evidence of Terrorist attack" that would have caused panic, because everyone is just on egde from too many "Yellow/Orange" alerts. And they know it.

    Perhaps they could have worded it "It appears to be an unplanned outage..." but they had to use the "T" word for dramatic effect.

  • by LostCluster ( 625375 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:13PM (#6699631)
    Clock in a "here" report from Central MA as well. Seems like Most of New England is safe, as we're tied to an unaffected Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant. Our grid hasn't gone down, although I wouldn't be surprised if we eventually are asked to power down whatever we can to allow New England to donate some power to the affected zone once they figure out a link that gets the power there.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:14PM (#6699651)
    That's private enterprise for you...if you can do it cheaply, why do it well?

    They're just deregulating the electicity market here in Holland, so commercial entities can now compete for customers instead of electricity production being managed by the government. Our infrastructure is a lot better (small country, so you can easily interconnect everything and have redundant lines, and it's linked into the Europe-wide network too) but I hope they've got some good regulations set up to ensure a steady supply of electricity, and not just a cheap one...

    Lourens
  • by Havokmon ( 89874 ) <rick@h[ ]kmon.com ['avo' in gap]> on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:18PM (#6699724) Homepage Journal
    I was watching Modern Marvels on the History channel, randomly, when I noticed that CNN and MSNBC had their news anchors put the war helmets on, and start the 9/11 rant all over again.

    Well, YEAH, it's New York. Hell, they get 1" of snow, and all of a sudden the whole world is shut down.

    Sorry, I live in Wisconsin, we don't shut down for 1" of snow, and I'm tired of their 'center of the world' mentality over there.

  • by pudge ( 3605 ) * <slashdot.pudge@net> on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:19PM (#6699746) Homepage Journal
    Perhaps they could have worded it "It appears to be an unplanned outage..." but they had to use the "T" word for dramatic effect.

    Don't be ridiculous. EVERYONE was wondering if there was a terrorist link, including you. Why tap dance around a question on everyone's mind, when you can address it directly?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:24PM (#6699835)
    Jesus Christ, it JUST FUCKING HAPPENED, the people working on FIXING it probably don't even know exactly what happened or why, should you be the first person to know? God fucking dammit, shut up.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:26PM (#6699872)
    Well, if it took you a whole hour to clean it off, then I wouldn't be running your mouth about other people's skills..
  • by jfroot ( 455025 ) <darmok@tanagra.ca> on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:28PM (#6699916) Homepage
    You know you're a geek when you post to Slashdot and mix up 'your' and 'you're'.
  • by el-spectre ( 668104 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:29PM (#6699936) Journal
    No. Many of us realized that it is august and bloody hot, and an outage was likely. Lots of major problems occur w/o terrorism being a likely cause.
  • by mabu ( 178417 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:31PM (#6699965)
    CNN just spewed the same speculative garbage.

    Let's preview the baseless speculation that we'll likely hear in the next hour or so as 24-hour news pundits rush to scare the crap out of the public in their overzealous attempt to add more color to the simple news item that they intend to milk for all its worth over the next day:

    * CNN interviews a taxicab driver whose cousin thinks this may be the work of Saddam Hussein

    * Fox "confirms" the "terrorist attack" using as evidence, an unnamed "washington insider" noticing a dark-skinned man walking down the hallway of an unspecified building seconds prior to the outage.

    * Red Cross is immediately planning "Power Aid 2003" featuring an all-new remake by Vicki Lawrence of "The Night the Lights Went Out in George" - proceeds of $100 billion are expected, $11.43 of which will actually be used to improve the power grid.
  • by bartyboy ( 99076 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:32PM (#6699977)
    You bring up a valid point, but a massive blackout like this one happens because the already-loaded grids are used to supply the blacked out grid. The more grids black out, the greater the demand on the other grids, increasing their chance of failure.

    Kind of like a domino effect.

    The system is probably way too slow to handle (or predict?) near-by grid failures, which is why other grids are popping, too.
  • Re:Manhattan (Score:2, Insightful)

    by rigmort ( 584960 ) * on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:35PM (#6700010)
    Turn the brightness down to half on your laptop and you'll almost double your battery life...

    You're probably in the dark anyway, huh?

  • Re:And California? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by realdpk ( 116490 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:35PM (#6700017) Homepage Journal
    Why'd you re-elect him then, in November, like 10 months ago?
  • by Dr Caleb ( 121505 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:35PM (#6700019) Homepage Journal
    EVERYONE was wondering if there was a terrorist link, including you.

    No, I wasn't. I heard about this first here. My first thought was W32/Blaster. And I would have laughed...

    I don't think terrorists are organised enough yet to pull something like this off. Just like SARS, West Nile, Mad Cow; I think terrorism is way over hyped. I think we need to be aware of them and deal with them, but drunk driving, not wearing seatblets and undercooked meat kill far more people, and are often overlooked.

  • by cgadd ( 65348 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:36PM (#6700027)
    Most UPS systems won't power an aquarium filter for long, but you can use an UPS to power an air-pump. An airstone on the end will keep water circulating, preventing any O2 problems in the tank.

    The other problem a power outage causes is that the bacteria in the filter that do the bio-filtration will die during the power outage, and when the power restarts, all the waste will get pumped into the tank.

    So, power an airstone from an UPS (or get a simple and cheap battery powered airpump), and break-down and clean the filter so that when it comes back on, it doesn't pollute the tank.
  • by dougnaka ( 631080 ) * on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:40PM (#6700090) Homepage Journal
    If they're smart they will say exactly that...
    Conserving power is ludicrous. There is an unlimited supply of power in the Universe. Why should we even *consider* conserving it?
    We need MORE POWER NOW! I want cheaper, more reliable power. I want a nuclear plant next to my house, better yet, in my basement, for my own personal power usage.
    Conserving water, makes sense, we only have so much h2O, although it'd be better to invest in purifying our current supply and recycling water.
    So, again, WHY? WHY SHOULD WE CONSERVE POWER????? WHY WHY WHY????

    my power bill is $180-200. I keep my house at 72-75F, even when it's 105F outside. IF the power company gets 35% more expensive here then it will be cost effective to generate my own using propane and a generator.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:41PM (#6700104)
    If a riot starts, looting starts, or if this is part of some kinda terrorist attack you are going to feel dumb.

    Forget that: It's not funny because we're in the middle of a serious heatwave, and these power outages are going to put large numbers of people, particularly the elderly, at risk. Electricity is far more vital to people's lives than, "It lets me read Slashdot."

  • Re:And California? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Lemmy Caution ( 8378 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:42PM (#6700113) Homepage
    Because the alternative was Bill "A Little to the Right of Darth Vader" Simon.

    Frankly, I think Cruz Bustamante would make a fine governor. Unfortunately, I think it's "hasta la vista, California."
  • by DoorFrame ( 22108 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @05:47PM (#6700173) Homepage
    There's no need for conservation if we can produce enough electricity to cover our needs... and I'd say so far, aside from this little gaff (and all of California... which is chock full of people who love conservation) we're doing just fine.

    Stay the course.
  • by Wiseazz ( 267052 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @06:02PM (#6700355)
    No kidding. And whenever something like this happens, there's a high degree of probability that we'll be seeing heat-related deaths (particularly among the elderly).

    Let's hope it gets cleared up soon.

    - g
  • by purpleflux ( 412518 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @06:07PM (#6700408)
    Actually with Mars being so close it will give people in big cities a very rare chance to see this site without all the light polution by which they are normally surrounded.
  • by HanzoSan ( 251665 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @06:29PM (#6700680) Homepage Journal


    Thats just the problem, I dont believe the news, the news is getting to be so far right of far left, that its too political to believe. I get my information from the internet.

    I do not believe some gov official just because they say its so, I need evidence, I need to see an expert tell me what happened, not the mayor.

    I actually dont get my news from NPR because I know its slanted just like fox news. Instead I actually gather my own evidence and decide for myself.

    I dont understand why people get mad when a person asks questions about what happened. So its not terrorism? Well what is it?

    IF the government is so clear that its not terrorism they should also be the first to tell us what exactly happened, or else they shouldnt make a statement at all until they KNOW what happened.
  • by prime2003 ( 698325 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @06:43PM (#6700817)
    You all forgot administrators that haven't applied the patch - they will be the first to blame and M$ will pull out as usual
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 14, 2003 @06:58PM (#6700957)
    Hahahah, +1 Informative. Best moderation ever.
  • by sprocketbox ( 636698 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @07:00PM (#6700982)
    I've been wondering for a long time what it would be like if lots of people had solar power on their homes. And whether or not this kind of thing could be lessened if we could create a parallel power grid. Who care's if mine goes down for minute, I can just borrow some power from my next door neighbor. Implementation is left as an exercise for the reader.
  • by Random832 ( 694525 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @07:27PM (#6701244)
    The amendment was designed so that the militias could protect the people from the government, not the government from foreign powers.
  • by Zeinfeld ( 263942 ) on Thursday August 14, 2003 @08:04PM (#6701582) Homepage
    And I am sure the all the environmental regulations, buricratic red tape, permits, licenses, and construction union labor costs have nothing to do with why enough power plants are not being built.

    Construction and power production have been unionised for at least six decades. It does not seem that there has been a sudden change there.

    There is quite a bit more regulation, but the main set of regulations that have affected capacity are the increased scrutiny of nuclear plants after the one at Three Mile Island came close to a melt-down. When idiots build a nuclear bomb upwind of Manhattan even a 1% chance that the station would go critical is too close to be acceptable.

    The problem is that the nuclear industry lied repeatedly about its safety record. So now nobody can believe a word that is said by them.

    I am actually prepared to support certain nuclear power designs. The heavy water system built by the Camadians and the MIT 'carbon ball' systems are both true failsafe systems. The light water and AGR systems built in the US, most of Europe and the USSR are all intrinsically unsafe, kept from catastrophic failure by a series of 'safety' systems. As the Challenger, Columbia and Chernobyl events showed, technologists are not as good at building risk free systems as they claim.

  • by VivianC ( 206472 ) <internet_update@y a h o o.com> on Thursday August 14, 2003 @11:05PM (#6702787) Homepage Journal
    The USA is a funny funny place! People seem to be worried about all sorts of crimes being comitted now that there are no lights. Riots, Murders, Home Invasions...possibly even an Army of Darkness attacking (Great Movie!).

    Why are you so worried? You seem to be more afraid of each other, then other things!


    Well, let me tell you a couple facts about major US cities. I figure it is probably true in urban areas in other countries, but I can't directly speak for them.

    Before there was any hint of a power outage on the east coast, police who would be working tonight knew it could be a tough night. It was going to be hot and muggy tonight but no rain. People would be out on the streets because the houses and apartments without air conditioning would still be hot from the daylight hours. It is a summer Thursday night and a lot of people would be getting their weekend startend early. It is almost payday for a lot of people. Checks hit on Fridays or on the 15th of the month for most people. Usually, if you have direct deposit, they hit a day early. So you combine all these factors and you are going to see a rise in domestic disputes and general violence. Now, turn off the lights and everybody's air conditioning and you have just multiplied the problem. Now you have a lot of hot people without their nightly drug (TV) or the money they expected (ATMs are down) with nothing to do but interact with other hot, annoyed people. Smell trouble?

    My other question is...isn't the 2nd Amendment about creating a mulitia to defend your country...not about defending your house?

    The simple answer, without politics, is yes. But how do you define 'militia'? Historically, at the time it was written, it meant all able-bodied males between the ages of 18 and 45. When the militia was called upon, they were an irregular force used to suppliment or replace regular soldiers. Often, they would take over a fort or garrison when the regular troops were needed elsewhere. Usually, this meant defending their own homes, although the British in the colonies were known to pull the militia out to other areas and force the homes to be left undefended. This would have the effect of upsetting the militia.

    When the militia was called up, they were expected to bring their own weapons and provisions, hence the need for keeping weapons in their homes and knowing how to use them. The Swiss use this method to this day.

    And is it the gun culture of the USA that brings about this fear?

    No, it is really the media that inspires this fear. When we wake up Friday morning, we are going to be shown every bad thing that happened overnight in the blackout areas. If there isn't major unrest, we will hear about 'heat-related deaths' and traffic accidents. That is the American media mentality. I guess it must be our own fault for watching all the trash we do. What you won't see covered are things that are going on right now in New York: People are buying food and water for strangers when the shop keepers aren't just giving it away for free. People are taking in their friends and coworkers and giving them a place to stay for the night if they can't get home. People are sharing their cell phones so strangers can call home and let their families know they are alright. I saw a man walking with candles to the houses of older members of his church to make sure they were alright and had what they needed to make it through the night. What is going on right now is the true American spirit and it crosses all racial, social and economic lines. And this is true of 99.99% of the people caught out in this mess tonight. The other 0.001% will be splashed across the front pages and news broadcasts around the world and people will wonder how terrible it must be to be in that situation.

    And last, but not least, this is the night that will have a ripple effect throughout the entire area. No TV, nothing to do and the condom stores are closed? Expect a mini baby boom next May of 'black-out babies'!
  • by layingMantis ( 411804 ) on Friday August 15, 2003 @12:37AM (#6703208) Homepage


    they aren't the same logic: the first, "A implies B" means that A is a sufficient condition for B to occur. The second, "B only if A" means A is a necessary condition for B to occur. A could be true but B still might not happen in the latter case.

    -mantis

  • by Kenneth ( 43287 ) on Friday August 15, 2003 @05:18AM (#6704092) Homepage
    I'm not attacking your right to bear arms. I was asking about why that right was given.

    A few major reasons. First and foremost, the Constitution was thought to be a document to goveron the nation for, at most, a generation or so. After that it would be scrapped, and rewritten as more appropiate to the times, (although I would be hard pressed to find something I like better). The Founding Fathers were concerned that THEY not some future despot would become drunk with power and try to oppress the people. Remember that we were less than ten years from a fairly bloody conflict with our (and your) parent nation.

    The theory was that the people should have the ability (not necessarily the right) to overthrow the government, should it become necessary. Indeed history shows us that in most cases despots have first disarmed the populace:

    "Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms."
    -Aristotle

    The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, short swords, bows, spears, firearms, or other types of arms. The possession of unnecessary implements makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues and tends to foment uprisings.
    -- Toyotomi Hideyoshi,
    dictator of Japan, August 158

    Every Communist must grasp the truth, 'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.'
    -- Mao Tse-tung, 1938, inadvertently endorsing the Second Amendment.

    The Founding Fathers had some very specific viewpoints about it as well.

    Are we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defence? Where is the difference
    between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defence be the *real* object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
    -- Patrick Henry, speech of June 9 1788

    "As to the species of exercise, I advise the gun. While this gives [only] moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun, therefore, be the constant companion to your walks."
    -- Thomas Jefferson, writing to his teenaged nephew.

    Men trained in arms from their infancy, and animated by the love of liberty, will afford neither a cheap or easy conquest.
    -- From the Declaration of the Continental Congress, July 1775.

    There was legitimate fear that the government would become corrupt, and NEED to be overthrown because the people would be unable to remove the corrupt from power.

    From our Declaration of Independence:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    This is a small section of the document that many Americans actually feel is more important than the constitution. After all, there are several perfectly legitimate ways to organize a government. Furthermore, a constitution needs to change with the times.

    Over the years how we have interpeted and taken this portion of the Declaration has changed. Now, we a

  • by johnrpenner ( 40054 ) on Friday August 15, 2003 @10:37AM (#6705243) Homepage

    august 15, 2003 - 9:56am (toronto)

    here in toronto, there are portions of the city getting power.
    where i am (college and dovercourt), there is still no power.
    this was a rare opportunity to observe a city of people
    without electricity.

    a report of what it was like being here -- actually quite nice.
    its the first time i've ever been able to see the stars at night
    from inside the streets of toronto. the moon is just past full,
    and mars sits there like a jewel to her lower right, with the
    whole glittering firmament behind her. it was quite beautiful.

    around 4:15pm yesterday, we were all at work, when the screens
    in front of our faces went dark, and a big gasp and then a golden
    moment of silence, and you could just hear some birds chirp, and
    no more fans. then people were wandering about aimlessly -- like
    unplugged borg. there was no more point in carrying on, since we
    need our machines to produce anything, so the crew was soon packed-up
    to go home.

    since it was nice weather, the patios along king street the
    street lights were out, it was little use trying to get anywhere
    by car, so people started walking. at the intersections, some
    people were still using light-driven habits, and many others
    quickly negotiated intersections by looking across with glances.
    its amazing how well people keep going without with simply the
    communication provided by LOOKING. i could finally understand
    the traffic dispersal patterns of old black and whitee photos
    taken in times before traffic lights -- people wandering an
    intersection, and negotiating the passage by glances is really
    a good experience.

    Comforts that were rare among our forefathers are now
    multiplied in factories and handed out wholesale; and indeed,
    nobody nowadays, so long as he is content to go without air,
    space, quiet, decency and good manners, need be without
    anything whatever that he wants; or at least a reasonably
    cheap imitation of it. (G. K. Chesterton)

    of course, i wish all the best efforts towards those helping
    those who were stuck in elevators, or had emergency situations.
    most of us just went down the stairs. one of the programmers
    used the light on his gameboy to get down the ten flights.
    those in cars were especially afflicted with bad traffic getting home.
    but the phones were working, the water is working, and the weather
    is fine. a lot of people used this time to start talking with their
    neighbours. if you had a case of beer (which couldn't be bought --
    since all the tills need power), then you were lucky.

    yes, it was strange to see lights out on abandoned and stopped
    street-cars, but since things were actually quiet in the middle of
    the city for the first time in memory -- you could hear things better,
    and you could hear a lot of people talking, and socializing and
    laughing with people in the backyards -- many of them lit with
    candles. riding bike along bloor street, there was a fellow in a
    darkened shop window selling candles with a transistor radio on,
    and that's how we found out it was the whole east coast.
    you ask, is it the building? the block, the city? progressively
    the scope of the blackout became known as people called relatives
    outside the zone.

    also of note -- it is a lot cooler without the air-conditioners.
    without all the air-conditioners drawing power and producing heat,
    the overall general OUTDOOR air-temperature is much cooler,
    and everything is quite nice. we still don't have power,
    so i've not ventured to ride my bike in to work yet.
    but right now, the sun is shining, there's no loud droning of
    air-conditioners all over the place, you can hear the morning
    winds in the trees wafting, and birds chirping, and neighbours
    walking around outside talking with each other. i hear they
    have power now a couple blocks over from my section in the
    downtown core -- maybe i'll be able to dail-in to slashdot,
  • by Grunschev ( 517745 ) <slashdot@nospAm.grunschev.com> on Friday August 15, 2003 @11:16AM (#6705544) Homepage
    But if there was a power-outage how would you keep your beers cold?

    Silly question. You don't keep them cold, you drink them.

    Igor
  • by Reziac ( 43301 ) on Friday August 15, 2003 @01:47PM (#6706636) Homepage Journal
    As to the media creating anxiety, you're dead on there. Frex, media hype has given the rest of the country the impression that Los Angeles is the murder capital of the world, and given L.A. residents gibbering paranoia. But in fact, L.A. averages around 10 murders per year (the range being 8 to 14, IIRC). Which comes to about one murder annually per 1.5 million people, and dropping (since the annual murder count is falling but the population is growing). You have higher odds of being hit by lightning or run over by a bus, or even of dying from an accident in your own home. But "woman falls down stairs, breaks neck" doesn't get nearly the ratings that "man found dismembered in Central Park" does. And the latter has that "Omighod, they're everywhere!" effect, somewhat lacking in the average household.

    Ya know, it could be that people have their tinfoil hats on backwards, or maybe inside-out. If you turn it other way round, you should become properly paranoid about home accidents, and feel blissfully protected against being murdered in the park.

  • by hobbit ( 5915 ) on Saturday August 16, 2003 @06:12AM (#6711427)

    I thought it was called "humor" - you British Imperialist slimeballs lost your linguistic dominance several hundred years ago.

    Firstly, if you had a decent global perspective you might realise that it's not only the British that spell 'humour' that way - squigglesquash could just as easily be Canadian, Australian, etc.

    Secondly, if you had a decent grasp of history you would know that several hundred years ago, British English was the only widely-spoken form, and was dominant enough that an infant country called the United States of America adopted it (prior to Webster making official changes to its spelling for political reasons).

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...