Diamonds & the RIAA 739
eaglebtc writes "After reading the previously-posted article on cdfreaks.com about the rapid erosion of cheap CDR's, I found another equally scintillating write-up about the economics of music CDs written by Richard Menta, founder of MP3 Newswire. Sure, we've all heard the whining about how CDs are so expensive, but Mr. Menta takes a unique perspective on the issue by comparing the RIAA to DeBeers. He argues that both companies control distribution of products in their respective markets with an iron fist, and by so doing can artificially raise prices. Coincidentally, the bubble is beginning to burst in both markets: the RIAA is fighting against the uprisings of P2P software, and the diamond cartel's lawyers are losing sleep over the $5 diamonds produced in a lab."
Re:The names may change, but (Score:5, Informative)
There are much prettier stones available, many with cool characteristics [gemstone.org]
control is the problem (Score:4, Informative)
Re:DeBeers never promised (Score:3, Informative)
Yeah, but wouldn't inflation make the prices lower, when compared to today's dollars?
So in a sense, by not raising the dollar ammount, they have lowered prices.
RIAA & CD Sales are hand in hand, kind of... (Score:5, Informative)
Industrial quality? (Score:5, Informative)
These new companies are not making diamond dust, they are making gem size diamonds, and plan to use the income from that, as they destroy deBeers, to finance making diamonds for semiconductors, as in huge wafers.
Maybe you could come up with some definition for "industrial" diamonds, whatever that is, and then update it for the new artificial diamonds, and realize it has no more meaning.
Re:DeBeers never promised (Score:1, Informative)
The Cost of making a cd has gone down to pennies, yet prices stay the same. Dont forget this is the same RIAA that was convicted of pricefixing cd's.
Re:They aren't so worried about $5 synthetics (Score:2, Informative)
Don't want to give DeBeers money? (Score:5, Informative)
True, Diamonds won't be expensive for long, and Moissanite is cheaper now, and may eventually cost more than diamond. But, Moissanite is harder than Ruby, and has a greater luster than diamond, and it also costs about 1/10 of what diamond does today.
* One day, you will find a nice little woman who wants a ring, and generally it is best to get her one!
Re:Labor Of Love (Score:5, Informative)
The DeBeers marketing campaigns are brilliant. If you are exposed to them from a young age and see fictional weddings on TV and how they focus on the ring, you will understand. It is ground into North American minds from the very beginning. Most people in North America know what I'm talking about when I refer to the "A Diamond is Forever Music."
Re:Help the RIAA - Not a Troll (Score:1, Informative)
What we need to do is figure out a way for good artists to pull a reliable 50-60k a year, and leave it at that.
Blood Diamonds - Does RIAA have blood on its hands (Score:3, Informative)
Because this is about the RIAA, and it brings out the worst in me, I couldn't help but bring your attention in this analogy of the diamond trade and the music trade - the "Blood Diamond." Does the RIAA have blood on its hands ... (of course this is meant only in the sense of extending the analogy ... so RIAA please don't try to sue me ... ha ha.)
Blood Diamonds [amnestyusa.org]
http://www.amnestyusa.org/amnestynow/diamonds.html
Greg Campbell is the author of the forthcoming Blood Diamonds: Tracing the Deadly Path of the World?s Most Precious Stones (Westview Press), to be released in September 2002.
Illicit diamonds make fabulous profits for terrorists and corporations alike. The trade illustrates with the hard clarity of the gem itself that no matter where human rights violations occur, the world ignores them at its peril.
Market data concurs with Menta's analysis (Score:5, Informative)
The RIAA's "xxx's is killing music" (substitute cassettes, P2P, MP3, whatever comes next) is somewhat undermined by all of this.
Menta makes the point that CDs are priced by the big five at the point that maximises profit. No surprise then to hear that whilst UK CD sales were up by 3%, profit was down by 2%.
Re:Labor Of Love (Score:3, Informative)
Seriously, other gems really are much prettier. Diamonds aren't even "forever". They can be incinerated, and there are harder substances than diamond...how would they cut them if there wasn't anything harder?
Linares' patent for vapor deposition (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Synthetic diamonds (Score:2, Informative)
DeBeers has been much more effective than RIAA (Score:5, Informative)
part 1 [theatlantic.com]
part 2 [theatlantic.com]
part 3 [theatlantic.com]
More info on Diamonds (Score:5, Informative)
DeBeers is an even bigger fraud than the RIAA. Diamonds (even natural ones) are not really scarce. Also, the new lab methods do not all rely on the mettalic solvents to create diamonds. One is deposited as plasma, with no extra gunk in the process. They are white diamonds, of unusual perfection.
BTW, Plastic [plastic.com] had this a few weeks ago [plastic.com].
Dean G.
Re:How *could* it work? (Score:2, Informative)
Alternative to the DeBeers Engagement Tax (Score:3, Informative)
Look at their Asha stone. My wife and I got one of those for our engagement, and the jewlers who put together the ring said that they were fooled from two feet away. And it's harder than anything else non-diamond.
Maybe someday we'll replace it with an actual synthetic diamond!
the difference is... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Synth Rocks (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The names may change, but (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Synthetic diamonds (Score:2, Informative)
In a word, no. The thing that gives diamonds their impressive sparkle is that diamond has an unreasonably high refractive index, which means that it is very good at bending light. The high refractive index gives diamonds their "fire", which sets them apart from other gems. Imperfections are one of the things that gemologists look for in diamonds largely because those that have detectable flaws are less valuable than those without.
Excellent Atlantic Monthly article... (Score:3, Informative)
Have You Ever Tried to Sell a Diamond? [theatlantic.com]
Artificial diamons (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The names may change, but (Score:3, Informative)
As an aside, alexandrite turns a sweet orangish-red under a black light. Very cool.
Re:You learn something everyday. (Score:2, Informative)
Id just like to add that even if you are a solid state chemist, there is only one company in the world that has created these flawless lab diamonds (the guy from Wired had them tested) - and the only people who can tell you how do it work for that company, so you are unlikely to get an answer on how they got the metastable phase fixed.
The closest answer I can give you (and it is from the Wired article if youd care to read it) is:
To grow single-crystal diamond using chemical vapor deposition, you must first divine the exact combination of temperature, gas composition, and pressure - a "sweet spot" that results in the formation of a single crystal. Otherwise, innumerable small diamond crystals will rain down. Hitting on the single-crystal sweet spot is like locating a single grain of sand on the beach. There's only one combination among millions. In 1996, Linares found it.
If you want to know more about it then realise that (again, direct quote from Wired):
This June, he finally received a US patent for the process, which already is producing flawless stones.
So the information you require should be found in the US patent office.