Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Lord of the Rings Media Movies

LOTR: Two Towers Extended Edition Reviewed 626

akahige writes "The Digital Bits has just posted an exhaustive review and analysis of extended edition of The Two Towers, everybody that can't wait to get theirs -- or wait even longer to see the uber-cut in the theatre -- check it out. There's 43 minutes of new footage (not including the extended credits), and comparable extras to the extended version of Fellowship: 4 commentaries, documentaries, behind the scenes, etc. " I felt that FotR's Extended Edition was far superior to the theatrical release- usually these extra cuts add little, but this was the exception. I've been waiting with held breath for this one. I just wish it would ship a few days early!
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

LOTR: Two Towers Extended Edition Reviewed

Comments Filter:
  • by Jucius Maximus ( 229128 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @10:34AM (#7416155) Journal
    TEXT OF THE ARTICLE

    review by Bill Hunt, editor of The Digital Bits

    Film Rating: A

    Disc Ratings (Video/Extras): A/A+

    Audio Ratings (DD/DTS): A-/A

    Specs and Features

    Disc One: The Film - Extended Version, Part I
    Part I - 107 mins (approx 236 mins total - includes 20 min fan club credit roll on Disc Two), PG-13, letterboxed widescreen (2.35:1), 16x9 enhanced, single-sided, RSDL dual-layered (layer switch at 50:42, at the start of chapter 15), custom slipcase with fold-out Digipack packaging (featuring production sketches and artwork), all commentaries feature on-screen text to identify speaker, audio commentary (with director Peter Jackson and writers Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens), audio commentary (with design team members Richard Taylor, Tania Rodger, Grant Major, Alan Lee, John Howe, Dan Hennah and Chris Hennah), audio commentary (with production and post-production team members Barrie Osborne, Mark Ordesky, Andrew Lesnie, Mike Horton, Jabez Olssen, Rick Porras, Howard Shore, Jim Rygiel, Joe Letteri, Ethan Van der Ryn, Mike Hopkins, Randy Cook, Christian Rivers, Brian Van't Hull and Alex Funke), audio commentary (with cast members Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, John Rhys-Davies, Billy Boyd, Dominic Monaghan, Orlando Bloom, Christopher Lee, Sean Bean, Bernard Hill, Miranda Otto, David Wenham, Brad Dourif, Karl Urban, John Noble, Craig Parker and Andy Serkis), 8-page booklet with foldout appendices map, Easter egg, animated film-themed menus with sound and music, scene access (31 chapters), languages: English (DD 5.1 EX, DTS 6.1 ES & DD 2.0 Surround), subtitles: English, Closed Captioned

    Disc Two: The Film - Extended Version, Part II
    Part II - 129 mins (approx 236 mins total - includes 20 min fan club credit roll on Disc Two), PG-13, letterboxed widescreen (2.35:1), 16x9 enhanced, single-sided, RSDL dual-layered (layer switch at at 59:56, in chapter 18), all commentaries feature on-screen text to identify speaker, audio commentary (with director Peter Jackson and writers Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens), audio commentary (with design team members Richard Taylor, Tania Rodger, Grant Major, Alan Lee, John Howe, Dan Hennah and Chris Hennah), audio commentary (with production and post-production team members Barrie Osborne, Mark Ordesky, Andrew Lesnie, Mike Horton, Jabez Olssen, Rick Porras, Howard Shore, Jim Rygiel, Joe Letteri, Ethan Van der Ryn, Mike Hopkins, Randy Cook, Christian Rivers, Brian Van't Hull and Alex Funke), audio commentary (with cast members Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, John Rhys-Davies, Billy Boyd, Dominic Monaghan, Orlando Bloom, Christopher Lee, Sean Bean, Bernard Hill, Miranda Otto, David Wenham, Brad Dourif, Karl Urban, John Noble, Craig Parker and Andy Serkis), animated film-themed menus with sound and music, scene access (39 chapters), languages: English (DD 5.1 EX, DTS 6.1 ES & DD 2.0 Surround), subtitles: English, Closed Captioned

    Discs Three & Four (See Page Two)

    "It is an army bred for a single purpose... to destroy the world of men."

    And so we come to the crossroads. The Two Towers is the second installment in Peter Jackson's epic film adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkein's The Lord of the Rings - the installment poised to make or break the trilogy. Could Jackson and company follow up on the blockbuster success of 2001's The Fellowship of the Ring? Would the film continue with the same level of quality? Would the momentum of the story build upon the climax of the first film, and prepare audiences for the ultimate confrontation between good and evil in the soon to be released final chapter, The Return of the King? The answer to all of these questions, of course, is a resounding yes.

    As the film opens, we find ourselves plunged into the dark mines of Moria, to relive a few moments of Gandalf's confrontation with the fiery Balrog. But instead of playing out as we remember it in Fellowship of the Ring, this time, when Gandalf falls into the abyss, we fall with him to watch as his fight continues. The conseq
  • by dafz1 ( 604262 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @10:37AM (#7416164)
    Here are the added/lengthened scenes:

    "Among the new treasures in store for fans are several more moments with Gollum, more background on the Ents and additional scenes involving Treebeard in Fangorn Forest, Gandalf telling Aragorn that Sauron is afraid of what he may one day become, Theodred's funeral at Edoras, more of Faramir capturing Frodo and Sam, new scenes between Aragorn and Eowyn on the road to Helm's Deep, more intense footage during all of the major battles... and this is just scratching the surface. There's also a major new flashback scene in which we see Faramir with his brother, Boromir, and their father, Denethor, who is the Steward of Gondor. We learn why Boromir tried to take the Ring from Frodo in the last film, and why Faramir struggles with the same decision here. It's fantastic stuff that really fleshes out both Faramir and Boromir. It's also important for introducing us to the character of Denethor, who plays a larger part in the forthcoming Return of the King."
  • by -kertrats- ( 718219 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @10:40AM (#7416189) Journal
    There are only about 200 theatres nationwide that are doing the marathon. The nearest one for me is 200 miles away. that was sad. i could dig up a list, maybe i'll do that now.
  • Re:bleh (Score:5, Informative)

    by Pxtl ( 151020 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @10:44AM (#7416216) Homepage
    Not to mention the bizzarre little side plot of the Warg battle and Aragorn falling down.

    And Theoden being posessed instead of manipulated.

    and fscking elves at the battle.

    To think they cut out good Ent time for that.
  • Marathon showings. (Score:4, Informative)

    by -kertrats- ( 718219 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @10:45AM (#7416229) Journal
    A complete listing of showings for the marathon can be seen here [lordoftherings.net]
  • sold out immediately (Score:4, Informative)

    by peter303 ( 12292 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @10:55AM (#7416295)
    Yes, but they sold out within hours after the tickets were offered online.
  • by Bishop923 ( 109840 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @11:07AM (#7416376)
    Actually the "Good Reason" that those scenes ended up being cut is that Peter Jackson was contractually obligated to deliver movies that were only 3 hours in length,(so theaters could maximize the number of times they could show it per day) with the understanding that he could then release DVD's with the special stuff later on. In a sense, they are not just taking scenes and sticking them back in, but really developing two different versions of the same film, the theatrical to appeal to the general audience and the extended DVD to appeal to the fans.

    The FotR Extended version added so much to the movie that I know I could never appreciate the theatrical version again, and I'm willing to bet that Two Towers will be even better.
  • by sewagemaster ( 466124 ) <sewagemaster&gmail,com> on Friday November 07, 2003 @11:09AM (#7416397) Homepage

    meanwhile you can find out your name in elvish [chriswetherell.com] and your hobbit name [chriswetherell.com]!!!
  • by Martin Doudoroff ( 116376 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @11:10AM (#7416404) Homepage
    Answer: running time. The movies have shifted end points because the books are of different length, RotK being the shortest. Any time you make a film for theatrical distribution, running time is a huge problem, because long run times cut down on the number of screenings per day, which cuts into ticket sales revenue potential.

    It is to Jackson's credit that he is taking full advantage of the DVD to release a version of each film that does not take theatrical scheduling into account.

    You'll get the spider in December.
  • by UncleBiggims ( 526644 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @11:20AM (#7416492)
    I was so kindly informed that my first post with a link to a theater listing was incorrect. So... here is a link that is sure to help. Simply enter your zip code and it will show you the closest theater showing the trilogy.

    FIND A THEATER [movietickets.com]
  • Question of Venue (Score:4, Informative)

    by virg_mattes ( 230616 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @11:21AM (#7416501)
    > For me, that isn't a good reason. Tell me how long it is beforehand, keep it good and interesting and you can make it as long as you want.

    Well, I'm with you 100 percent, and I'll be picking this extended version up posthaste, but the reason for reducing the movie isn't because viewers won't sit that long (although it is for some). The main reason theaters like movies under three hours is because with that time frame, they can get more showings in in a day. If a movie is just 20 minutes over three hours, they lose a showing per day, and that's a lot of ticket sales lost. Movie makers are sensitive to this fact, and so they make directors cut it down to size. In this particular case, Jackson did it under the promise that he'd get to release the mondo-massive version on DVD, which is what this extended set represents.

    Virg
  • They're called... (Score:4, Informative)

    by uberdave ( 526529 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @11:32AM (#7416591) Homepage
    It's spelled Uruk-Hai [glyphweb.com].
  • Re:More Eowyn? (Score:4, Informative)

    by jdh28 ( 19903 ) <jdh28NO@SPAMbigfoot.com> on Friday November 07, 2003 @11:51AM (#7416746) Homepage
    Hollywood felt that the story just wasn't good enough without a love story (LOTR not a good enough story???), so her character took over other parts, and new content was created for her. New content created from nothing when they are having to chop out so much due to time constraints????

    There was even pressure to make her part of the fellowship that the director and cast resisted.

    I think you're talking about Arwen rather than Eowyn here.

    John

  • by TopShelf ( 92521 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @11:58AM (#7416794) Homepage Journal
    Just for the record, Celeborn's fine, it was Haldir who bit it at Helm's Deep...

    But I agree wholeheartedly about the difference between telling a story via a movie as opposed to a book. I think Jackson's doing a wonderful job, all told. My biggest beef has to do with all the complaining over the Aragorn/Arwen storyline. While it may not have been front & center in the book, the story is thoroughly told in the Appendix, and obviously has a major impact on Aragorn's personal struggle throughout the War of the Ring. It ties in nicely with the whole Elves-leaving-Middle-Earth angle, and yes, it does give the female audience another avenue for identifying with the characters and becoming emotionally involved with the story...
  • by Shenkerian ( 577120 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @12:18PM (#7416988)
    1. It's entr'acte, not entracte.
    2. If your considered its etymology from French, you'd realise this.

    You're correct that your parent poster used it incorrectly. He meant overture.

  • by codesmith.ca ( 251628 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @12:47PM (#7417234)

    From digitalbits.com:

    Discs 1 and 2

    [tech stuff snipped]

    "It is an army bred for a single purpose... to destroy the world of men."

    And so we come to the crossroads. The Two Towers is the second installment in Peter Jackson's epic film adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkein's The Lord of the Rings - the installment poised to make or break the trilogy. Could Jackson and company follow up on the blockbuster success of 2001's The Fellowship of the Ring? Would the film continue with the same level of quality? Would the momentum of the story build upon the climax of the first film, and prepare audiences for the ultimate confrontation between good and evil in the soon to be released final chapter, The Return of the King? The answer to all of these questions, of course, is a resounding yes.

    As the film opens, we find ourselves plunged into the dark mines of Moria, to relive a few moments of Gandalf's confrontation with the fiery Balrog. But instead of playing out as we remember it in Fellowship of the Ring, this time, when Gandalf falls into the abyss, we fall with him to watch as his fight continues. The consequences of these moments will resound throughout much of the remainder of the story, as Frodo and Sam continue their quest to carry the One Ring into Mordor, and Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli race to save Merry and Pippin from the orcs. Along the way, two important new story elements come into play. The first is the character of Gollum, who is bound to the Ring in such a way that he simply must follow it to Mordor. As we watch, Gollum's dual personalities fight for dominance, one wishing to help Frodo and Sam in their quest, and the other seeking to kill them and take back the Ring that was stolen from him (as told in The Hobbit). Meanwhile, Aragorn and company have made their way into the horse realm of Rohan, whose king has fallen under Saruman's dark spell. The people of Rohan are made to suffer too, for Saruman has built a army of murderous orcs numbering ten thousand strong. Together, the white wizard and the dark lord, Sauron, mean to rule Middle-earth, and their first step in this conquest is to wipe out the kingdom of Rohan, and all of Mankind, once and for all. What follows is nothing less than a truly epic battle, in which the fate of both Middle-earth and the Quest of the Ring literally hang in the balance. Trust me when I say, it's like nothing you've ever seen before on film.

    What I appreciate most about The Two Towers is that Jackson has made no compromises for the audience. Middle-earth is a world where violence is commonplace, much blood is shed and evil stands a very real chance of winning and must be confronted head-on. There is no sugar coating on these bitter pills to make them easier to digest. As a result, the journey one takes in this film is just that much more satisfying. An additional compromise that Jackson manages to avoid is obvious right from the opening frames of The Two Towers. You simply MUST have seen the previous film in order to understand what's going on, because there is no recap of the action. Other than the very brief opening flashback, this film launches you immediately into the story, picking up right where Fellowship left you hanging. And the pace throughout much of the film is relentless, pausing only occasionally to let you catch your breath.

    In addition to Jackson's deft direction, the savvy adaptation and great performances by cast members new and old, there is much technically to be impressed with here as well. The character of Gollum, entirely created by computer graphics, is astonishing. At last, we have a CG character that gives a real dramatic performance on screen. This is thanks to the work of WETA Digital, as well as the strong acting of Andy Serkis. Serkis not only provides Gollum his voice, but his movent as well thanks to the process of motion capture. Serkis also performed the character on set with the actors, lending the final digital creation a particular presence and immediacy it would otherwise have lacke

  • by Shenkerian ( 577120 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @12:51PM (#7417285)
    You could be right [google.com], but in English the word retains [bartleby.com] the [reference.com] apostrophe [hyperdictionary.com].

    Kind of funny, since French is typically more resistant to change, whereas English will happily hypenate then combine words (e.g., to[day|morrow].

  • by sparrow_hawk ( 552508 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @12:52PM (#7417288)
    I'm a theater employee, and I can sympathize with you on the bladder-capacity issue. If I have even the smallest amount of soda, I will inevitably have to run the the bathroom. I got lucky in LotR:FotR -- even though I didn't buy any concessions, I still had to dash, and got back just in time to watch Gandalf's fight with the Balrog. (The upside is that concessions can make certain movies more bearable, however.)

    if they want to make money on me, they have one of two options, charge less for concessions, or charge more for the ticket.

    Sadly, the second option isn't available to us -- the studio wants its cut of the ticket, whether we charge $4 or $10, because in that case we're making money off "their" movie. This is why groups can't passes for a fundraiser (ie. they buy $4 passes and sell for $5), because the studio wants that money. We make nothing off the tickets regardless of how much we sell them for -- every theater is a popcorn-and-pop shop that happens to show movies, which is why we can't charge much less for concessions either.

    I know the situation sucks, but there's not really a whole lot the theaters can do about it. Blame the studios, not us.
  • by crashnbur ( 127738 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @01:22PM (#7417571)
    Because it is not mentioned in the story or any of the highly modded comments yet, I thought I'd remind the masses once again that the extended version of The Two Towers will be released to the masses on November 18. I will be among the first in line!
  • by kiddailey ( 165202 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @03:39PM (#7418937) Homepage
    If you watch any of the interviews where Peter Jackson is talking about the extended versions, he answers the question as to which is the 'real' version and why the extended versions were produced.

    "Director's cut implies that the theatrical version was not the movie I wanted to make." is what he says. The Extended Versions were created for the purpose of giving that little something extra to the fans.
  • by TerryMathews ( 57165 ) on Friday November 07, 2003 @04:06PM (#7419217)
    Because the price charged for the ticket determines the class of the theater which determines how quickly said theater gets movies.

"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson

Working...