MP3.com's Content to Be Destroyed 354
WCityMike writes "Vivendi Universal recently sold the MP3.com domain to CNet. However, they're not selling the approximately one million songs on the archive. (recorded by over 250,000 artists) Instead, they're simply destroying it as of December 3. MP3.com's founder and former CEO, Michael Robertson, is pleading with Vivendi to allow the Internet Archive to preserve the songs."
wow... (Score:5, Interesting)
It seems as if mergers and acqusitions always have some negative effect on the customer.
Unfortunately, this is a major one. Shouldn't the government be able to step in? hmmmmmm afterthinking about it, it's probably best that they don't...
destroying what? (Score:4, Interesting)
Conspiracy theory begin here: (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:their property, their decision (Score:4, Interesting)
"antitrust"
While it's true, they should be able to do whatever they want to do with their property, this would make an excellent anti-trust suit. Not sure if the EFF would be the appropriate "David" to their "Goliath", tho. Any ideas?
Music industry showing their hand (Score:5, Interesting)
What they're trying to do here is attack a competing distribution chain. This is the whole reason they hate MP3s in the first place.
MP3s represent a method for unknown artists and styles to reach popular recognition. This is a threat to the music industry, because if that were to happen, they would have to find acts that were actually good on their own merits as opposed to mediocre copycats and sexbomb divas who only sound good because of their multi-million dollar production jobs.
I can't express my hatred for the executives and committees who make decisions like these behind closed doors and for obscure reasons.
crawler? (Score:3, Interesting)
250k songs at ~5-6 MB each will require about 1.5 TB of storage. Easily within the reach of a small group of dedicated music fans.
Hell, put it up as a permanent bittorrent archive and distribute it around.
This is going too far. (Score:1, Interesting)
That's it. That's it! These people have to be fucking stopped.
It was one thing when the consolidation of radio stations combined with neo-payola fixed it so there was nothing but top 40's crap to be heard on the radio, then they try to quash p to p networks and maintain their near complete control over distribution of MY freakin' culture and sue 12 year olds for hundreds of thousands of dollars, but if it looks like they're going to go the additional step and actually start DELETING the $%#$ing art they've gone too far.
I want these pricks out of business with their children out in the street turning tricks for wonderbread. Monday.
GOD I've got a hangover.
of course they are not selling it (Score:1, Interesting)
the content isnt their's to sell,
unless you want to distribute the cash amongst 250,000 artists cos iam pretty sure you do not assign mp3.com commercial distribution, publication, and wave your song rights so a multimillion dollar company can sell them without you getting a bean
this is a good thing, shame they are destroying gigs of music but better that than a few more leeches get rich off the backs of creative people
No need to delete. (Score:2, Interesting)
VU won't have to worry about the bandwidth, the storage, or anything having to do with the old content that it does not want to.
Re:Library of Alexandria, meet mp3.com (Score:3, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:destroying what? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What about the public library? (Score:1, Interesting)
Transition to iTunes? (Score:3, Interesting)
For example, I can promote a new band I just discovered, Zero 7 [edgesuite.net] by providing a link like this, which should go directly into the iTMS.
What you'll have to do is find an iTunes Music Store Partner. Individual artists will not be able to add their content. However, I think I read somewhere that cdbaby was working on becoming one. Try contacting them.
Re:Library of Alexandria, meet mp3.com (Score:3, Interesting)
This is REALLY a damn shame (Score:3, Interesting)
After plenty of downloads and some dedicated touring, they were recently signed to maverik records.
So you cant say that sites like mp3.com doesnt help get the music out there, or isnt good for fledgling artists.
Oops, their band name is stutterfly if someone wanted to know.
Here is the mp3.com link [mp3.com].