DVD Forum Approves HD-DVD Standard 333
An anonymous reader writes "Toshiba Corp. and NEC Corp. said Friday that the DVD Forum, an international association of electronics makers and movie studios, has approved the two Japanese companies' standard for next-generation DVDs. It has
always annoyed me that DVDs are not the same top resolutions as High Definition TV. Maybe this will fix it." Well, better get to work rebuying your entire video collection, again.
Someone will still complain (Score:5, Insightful)
But why would that make your current collection "look like crap"? It's the same DVDs you've been watching (or rather, collecting) since the beginning.
Re:That'd be terrible! (Score:3, Insightful)
err...
Actual Spec Anywhere? (Score:3, Insightful)
Have ANY technical details of the new standard been published anywhere yet? I can't find any public resources I can link to.
Re:Re-buying (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Just re-process the video (Score:2, Insightful)
what happened to EVD? (Score:2, Insightful)
Or we could get lots of cheap used DVD's (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Re-buying (Score:5, Insightful)
Then you need to buy the entire remastered original Trilogy in the keepsake collectors box set. Several months later they'll release the entire remastered Star Wars episodes I-VI so you'll need to buy it again. Can't keep up with all these releases. How about just releasing a movie once with all the stuff you want to put in it including commentary without coming back 6 months later and re-releasing a completely new version with new commentary? Damn money whores.
What Irks Me about the DVDs (Score:2, Insightful)
In a time when our economy is becoming ever more global, we are full of market segmentation anyway. If these new DVDs don't get rid of the regional settings it will cost the American consumer a lot.
Storage Amount (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Movie rentals (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Re-buying (Score:5, Insightful)
CD is NOT compatibile with DVD (wavelengths, format, etc.) and yet we see practically every DVD player capable of playing CDs.
I assume we're talking LOTR? (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, this I think goes into the "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" category. Early on, probably everyone got bit on this. I know tons of people who owned the non-extended version of LOTR:FOTR. Not me, simply because I procrastinated so much on buying it that they announced the extended edition before I got around to buying the non-extended.
That said, I know few people who actually bought the non-extended version of LOTR:TTT. Everyone I know who really, really couldn't wait to see it again *rented* the non-extended version, then bought the extended when it came out.
By this point, no one should be getting burned on the "infinite editions" crap. If it's a movie likely to have interesting Collector's Edition features, or if it's a series likely to come out in boxed set, for God's sake, wait to buy it, or at worst rent it once in the meantime.
Re:Overkill? (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm not saying there's no difference, or that there's no market for it, but since the difference is so subtle for most people, it will be a luxury item that not many will buy for a long time. Just think about how long VHS remained the standard for home movies, even though beta was available with much higher quality. It's also interesting that very few people have TVs that can show the full quality of DVD as it is.
Exactly! (Score:2, Insightful)
*scoff*
fs
Re:Re-buying (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Re-buying (Score:1, Insightful)
You can take care of your own dvd's, but cases like that would have helped the rental situation.