Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Media Handhelds Hardware

New Sony Minidisc Players 436

Andy_R writes "Sony's has announced it's new new range of Hi-MD players at the CES show. The range of players (which should hit the shops in April) will start below $200 for a device that can function as a USB hard drive as well as storing a claimed 45 hours of music. The twist is that the data is stored on a new type of removable 1Gb media, a development of the minidisk format, with blanks costing about $7 each. The BBC have some more details including backwards compatibility with old-style minidisks and an ominous mention of 'built-in copyright protection' but I can't find anything on Sony's official site yet." Another reader reader submitted some pictures and specifications (pdf).
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

New Sony Minidisc Players

Comments Filter:
  • by nemui-chan ( 550759 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @12:47PM (#7915671) Homepage
    The only complaint I currently have about my minidisc is the drm technology on it now. While you can copy any media to your minidisc using the supplied software (and any other software I've seen works the same way), you can only copy the media back onto the pc it was checked out from. If your pc crashes, then you're pretty much out of luck, and you better hope that minidisc lasts.
  • Sony's last gasp (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 08, 2004 @12:50PM (#7915717)

    minidisc is now out of date so i think this is Sony's last push before resigning the format to the bin (along with their other failed formats)

    also the hours of music quoted are for 44kbps music files using their lossy ARTRAC (remember it throws away 85% of the data) perhaps if they quoted MB storage space instead of this latest consumer scam of quoting songs (iPod and Jobs did the same) but not bitrate (hiding that in the small print)

    all in all MW radio probably sounds better than a 44k ARTRAC file

    sorry Sony , your media formats always suck, try concentrating on better quality hardware and stop trying to peddle your proprietry memory sticks, betamax, minidisc failures

  • Re:What's the point? (Score:5, Informative)

    by FerretOnMountDew ( 716007 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @12:51PM (#7915723)
    MDs are great. They combine the size of a flashcard-style mp3 player with the removable media features of a cd/cdrw mp3 player. And cost a bit less to replace than a HDD player.

    Personally, I've been eyeing a sony md player for a bit, but I think I'll hold off for the new 1gb md format to pan out a little. If nothing else, it'll drive the cost of the older-style players down a bit. Hopefully, the 1gb format will take off, though.

    Now an annoying DRM is a different story. And that will be the only factor (for me) which will make or break it in the long run.
  • by burgburgburg ( 574866 ) <splisken06@@@email...com> on Thursday January 08, 2004 @12:52PM (#7915737)
    From the PDF:

    4) Copyright Protection Technology
    To prevent an illegal copying of digital content, "Hi-MD" incorporates OpenMG and MagicGate technology, already adopted in Memory Stick and Net MD for content management to ensure that music content stored on a "Hi-MD" disc will be encrypted. "Hi-MD" also conforms to the Serial Copy Management System (SCMS).

  • convenience (Score:2, Informative)

    by NeB_Zero ( 645301 ) <nebzero@nOsPAM.gmail.com> on Thursday January 08, 2004 @12:52PM (#7915740) Journal
    i have many friends that use MD for the "convenience" factor... i never saw it but, i can appreciate it...

    MiniDisks stay clean a lot better than CDs, and with the RW capabilities there, you can continue to add/remove songs and the like... MDs are smaller than CDs, and come in cool colors.

    i dunno, improving the MD won't help anyone who has already adopted the format and with HDD MP3 players becoming so huge (iPod and the like), i doubt there will be any new adopters for the format... but if you weigh it all out, someone who travels alot (and has the input on their car reciever) MD v.s. CD... MD would win (if i could afford it)
  • by E-Lad ( 1262 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @12:58PM (#7915823)

    I use my Sony Net-MD player with a condenser mic to make field recordings. The only problem with Sony and it's "Copyright Protection" is that it doesn't allow you to transfer audio over the USB connect FROM the MD player TO the computer.

    So basically, any recordings you make need to be transfered analog into your computer's sound card.

    There have been petitions in the past from the MD users community demanding Sony allow bi-directional USB transfers, but because Sony has it's music label/tech world schizophrenia, it's never going to happen.

    Right now, the only thing that is reasonably priced and does do this is the Nomad 3 from Creative, but I want something with better A/D conversion than what it has.
  • by radish ( 98371 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @01:01PM (#7915845) Homepage
    Encode a CD in mp3 at 32 kbps. Now listen to it and tell me it's only eliminated "stuff that the human ear couldn't pick up". Lossy codecs (mp3, aac, ogg, mpeg, jpeg, etc etc) work by removing some data from the original. Which data they remove, and how much, is dependent on the particular codec and some "quality" setting (usually quantified as a target bit rate). Taking mp3 as an example, as you move the bit rate up it gets closer and closer to the original source. You'll never get it exactly the same, due to the reencoding there will always be some differences, but the vast majority of people would be hard pushed to tell the difference between CD and MP3 at, say, 320kbps using average an hifi. MP3 is generally considered an inferior format to the newer ones (WMA, AAC, OGG etc) because at any given bit rate it sounds worse than them. This difference is most pronounced at lower rates - OGG is clearly better than MP3 at 96kbps for example, but it's less obvious at 320.
  • by MonkeyBoyo ( 630427 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @01:03PM (#7915878)
    The only segment I know that has embraced minidisks is live theater where having the music for your show on a minidisk is a defacto standard. Check out this google search [google.com]. Maybe they will slowly upgrade to the new format.

    Are there any other segments where minidisks are standard?
  • by jargoone ( 166102 ) * on Thursday January 08, 2004 @01:06PM (#7915924)
    The advantage of a disc player is that you can swap the whole collection for a new one. Not a single one of those over-listened tunes remain. It's difficult to do that with a 20GB HD, even when you try hard.

    Curious: exactly how large is your music collection? Mine is about 35G, and I have a 10G HD player. Even though it took quite a bit of time, I was able to weed out the stuff I never listen to in order to get it down to 10G. I occasionally have to rework things, but it works well.

    As far as swapping the collection for a new one, and the over-listened tunes not remaining, I don't see that as a problem easily solved by playlists.

    In any case, I'm a lazy ass, and creating a playlist is easier than burning a CD.
  • by E-Lad ( 1262 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @01:10PM (#7915988)

    Optical line in doesn't mean a thing when you're recording from a analog microphone.

    Those analog signals must be sampled to digital somehow, and the quality of the Analog->Digital convertor matters. Especially when it comes to recording off of microphones.
  • "Hi-MD" uses the FAT file system, making it possible to use...

    Furthermore, as portable, rewritable PC media, "Hi-MD" complies with USB format's Mass Storage Class

    What do you think, Mac, Linux compatible?

    Absolutely.

    Guess what? EVERY USB Mass Storage Device uses FAT for storage. If you can connect a digital camera to it, you can attach this to it, because all digital cameras use FAT. That's how those USB readers can work, BTW... standardized storage format...
  • by colanut ( 541823 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @01:28PM (#7916214)
    A new MD format might have been attractive before PC and Macs were real Digital Hubs, but introducing more incompatible (unless you have a Viao) hard/software or marginal improvements in technology doesn't get me interested.

    I did buy into MDs around '98 for portable audio and comp disks. I loved it then. But now it is far easier to arrange a tracks on a computer and burn them out to CD (for the car or friends) or MP3 player. Plus with MP3 (in the generic sense) doubling as removable storage, Sony is way to late and more than a few dollars short.

    Additionally being a Mac person this announcement is worth less than the paper it was printed on. Grumble, grumble, NetMD, grrr, check in/check out bullshit, ricken, fricken.

    Hello to the new memory stick. Yawn.
  • Re:What's the point? (Score:2, Informative)

    by ldspartan ( 14035 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @01:32PM (#7916264) Homepage
    DAT DRM is a joke compared to the system we're talking about now. Consumers don't have DAT players because they're:

    - linear.
    - mechanically complex
    - unbelievably expensive
    - There's no pre-recorded music available for them.

    DAT isn't intended for consumers, its intended for making CD (or better) quality recordings. Who wants to carry around something with all the usability disadvantages of cassette tapes?

    Also, the DRM used on these devices is simplistic. We're talking about 2 bits in the data stream. You can specify "make one digital copy" "make no digital copies" and "make unlimited digital copies". Beyond that, real high-end DAT recorder/players that use AES/BEU for their digital audio interconnect rarely even implement the copy protection, as they're intended for professional studios who don't want to deal with such crap. Compare this to digitally encrypted, signed music and licenses, and its a whole different ballgame. Hell, this stuff is less complex than macrovision, and thats essentially a joke.

    --
    lds
  • by alleycat0 ( 232486 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @01:35PM (#7916324) Homepage
    I use a portable minidisk recorder for recording practice sessions and band gigs - *far* superior to tape, and easier to interface than a DAT.

    What i'd really like to know (can't glean from the links mentioned) is if i can directly access tracks recorded in the field from the PC interface - if so, that would be a significant advantage over the current generation of recorders.
  • by zardie ( 111478 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @01:36PM (#7916335) Homepage
    For some reason, Slashdot editors neglected to include the fact that you can use this to store data as well as music now (I was the 'Another reader' referred to in that post with the real links).

    The unit can be used with either the 300MB (standard MD media) or 1GB (the new Hi-MD format) disks and draws power from USB so that the music player becomes a portable USB storage device. No idea whether it supports the USB mass storage standard or whether it has its own whacky way of doing things, but it's something that should have been possible from the start.

    Any music stored on the device will be visible but protected and the device won't play standard music files if they're simply transferred to the data area. You still need to use SonicStage (the Sony equiv of iTunes) to transfer your files, although there are a few thirty party tools around (such as RealOne) which use the same drivers but sport a much nicer (and stable) interface.

    Needless to say, a 1GB disk should be plenty for keeping documents and such around, perhaps even a bootable linux distro such as Knoppix can be adapted for this, assuming it supports standard USB mass-stroage. Now that'd be cool :)
  • by zardie ( 111478 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @02:05PM (#7916729) Homepage
    As 48Kbps is specified as a codec sampling rate of ATRAC3plus, I would think that this would be what it is referring to.

    According to the PDF specification sheet, the actual data transfer rate of the Hi-MD discs is (a maximum of?) 9.83Mbit/sec, so appraching that of USB 1.1 flash devices.
  • by Lerxst Pratt ( 618277 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @02:08PM (#7916779)
    While I sincerely hope you are correct, the info from the PDF differs:
    ################
    2) High Quality Sound Recording and Playback "Hi-MD" incorporates ATRAC3plus high compression and sound quality audio compression technology, realizing extended length, near CD quality sound. By also adopting a non-compressible, linear PCM recording, "Hi-MD" compatible products enable users to enjoy the recording and playback of high-quality sound, close to the quality of commercial audio CDs.
    ################
    (emphasis mine) Commercial audio CDs are 44100KHz.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 08, 2004 @02:12PM (#7916832)
    At least with the current stock of NetMDs you can get around the DRM issues by downloading a Sony product: Sonic Stage.

    This was intended only for VIAO users (why they don't offer it to normal MD customers is a question for Sony Music division I'd Assume).

    If you can get your hands on this (c'mon you know where cough cough -usenet- cough), you'll be converting and loving the lack of said DRM pickiness that is everywhere in the software that ships with the MDs now.

    -JohnnySkidmarks
  • Re:What's the point? (Score:2, Informative)

    by odie_q ( 130040 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @02:22PM (#7917012)
    Well, cursed be technological advances! I bought a Sony MD last week, and perhaps wouldn't have had I known this then. Oh, well, it's still as good as it was last week, I suppose.

    The DRM might just be the same as all MD players/recorders use, and have always used; they all honour a "Digital original/copy" flag which tells them each original may only be digitally copied once, after which the copy is marked as a digital copy, and may not be digitally subcopied.

    The effect is that every other copy must be analogue and repacked, thus degrading quality. This has turned out to be an acceptable balance between consumers' rights/convenience and publishers' concern, enabling the minidisc's market dominance.
  • Re:What's the point? (Score:2, Informative)

    by spotteddog ( 234814 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @03:13PM (#7918120) Journal
    I defy anyone to walk into a mall and find a DAT device, a Digitam Minidisc, or a host of others

    I can walk into the local mall and buy a minidisk at Target [target.com], Best Buy [bestbuy.com], and Circuit City [circuitcity.com].

    You used to be able to get DAT recorders at MARS Music (before the chain went bankrupt last summer).

    These are just US places. From the minidisc web sites, like MiniDisco [minidisco.com] it seems the things are even more popular outside the USA.

  • by sbryant ( 93075 ) on Thursday January 08, 2004 @06:53PM (#7921771)

    ... so it eventually jams up the player by fscking the lens and servos.

    The servos, maybe, but the lens? You do know that the MD is not an optical medium, right?

    My MD Walkman is at least 6 years old. It's been used lots, mostly with the same set of 20 or so disks, and I've not had any problems with the media. Much better than CD-Rs which start to die after a couple of years! MDs are re-recordable too; the walkman can split, reorder and join tracks - I don't see many MP3 players offering those features. Our band records all our live gigs on MD. It just works.

    -- Steve

It appears that PL/I (and its dialects) is, or will be, the most widely used higher level language for systems programming. -- J. Sammet

Working...