Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Star Wars Prequels Media Movies

Skywalker Ranch Wines 319

Gates82 writes "The creative force of George Lucas is at it again. Producing his own wine. "I would love to see them plant another 5 to 10 acres. There must be spots on that ranch to make some really interesting wines."" Wonder if there's any spots on that ranch left that can make a good Star Wars movie?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Skywalker Ranch Wines

Comments Filter:
  • advertisement budget (Score:5, Informative)

    by stonebeat.org ( 562495 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:27PM (#8333655) Homepage
    and just like any star wars movies, they have a huge advertisement budget for the wine as well. In CA, f you tune in KGO or KCBS, you can hear the Ad many times a day.
  • Cynicism :-) (Score:5, Informative)

    by BWJones ( 18351 ) * on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:27PM (#8333663) Homepage Journal
    Wonder if there's any spots on that ranch left that can make a good Star Wars movie?

    Oh, the cynicism. :-)

    Seriously though, growing wines in west Marin leaves me wondering about the quality of these wines (particularly a Chardonnay), but Coppola has produced some rather tasty wines including a scrumptious Merlots and a Claret or two, so I am inclined to believe there may be something of note.

  • A bit catty today? (Score:5, Informative)

    by steveha ( 103154 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:29PM (#8333684) Homepage
    Wonder if there's any spots on that ranch left that can make a good Star Wars movie?

    Meee-ow!

    By the way, I didn't think the ranch made the movies. That comment is stranger the more I think about it.

    steveha
  • Celebrity Wines (Score:5, Informative)

    by severoon ( 536737 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:31PM (#8333706) Journal

    I worry about celebrities making wine. Often, the wine's price gets a bump just for the name recognition factor, regardless of how good it is. This is the deal with Coppola's wines--they're just ok wines for better-than-ok prices.

    Celebrity winemakers overally have little impact on serious wine drinkers. Obviously, though, Coppola proved there's a market segment that will spend money for a name on the bottle.

    I would like to point out a brand new up-and-comer, non-celebrity wine--Sawkar Family Vineyards. They make a delicious Syrah that's probably in the upper scale of what most people want to pay for a bottle, but it's one of those that's actually worth it.

    sev

  • by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:35PM (#8333753) Homepage Journal
    The force was strong with this vintage... it's actually not too bad a wine, but horridly overpriced. Of course due to collectors only 2 bottles will ever be consumed, the rest stored away with all those action figures :)

    In this event, best keep it in a dark, cool basement. Not on the bookself in your room, near your computer, unless you're into explosive interior decorating and the stink of vine vinegar.

  • by payndz ( 589033 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:42PM (#8333842)
    I've had Skywalker Ranch wine (on the premises, at that). It's very nice (Lucas must have been getting tips from Coppola), but considering how much money's been sunk into it, it bloody well ought to be.

    One amusing thing I was told by the Lucas PR girlbot was that grape-picking was an annual event for the employees. From the way she phrased it, it sounded compulsory!

    (Oh, and should you ever be lucky enough to have lunch there, go for the steak. It's delicious. No wonder Lucas has got so fat!)

  • Re:$30 (Score:5, Informative)

    by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:44PM (#8333866) Homepage Journal
    If you bother to go to the wine country of northern California, I suggest going through Sonoma rather than Napa. Napa has some good wines, but it's very touristy. Sonoma has great wines and is fairly quiet, off the beaten path. One of my favorites is Rochioli, close to Hop Kiln, which is also good. Suggest taking along some food, get a bottle of Chardonnay and kick back, as most of these places have a little outdoor area you can relax at.

    I have no idea if Coppola invites visitors or has a tasting room.

    Don't expect Lucas to welcome you onto his ranch.

  • Re:Cynicism :-) (Score:5, Informative)

    by gwernol ( 167574 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:44PM (#8333867)
    Seriously though, growing wines in west Marin leaves me wondering about the quality of these wines (particularly a Chardonnay), but Coppola has produced some rather tasty wines including a scrumptious Merlots and a Claret or two, so I am inclined to believe there may be something of note.

    Yes, but the Niebaum-Coppola wines are grown on the Rutherford Bench, which is generally considered the finest grape growing area of the Napa Valley. Fine wines have been cultivated there for over 100 years. He also has some very serious winemakers working for him.

    West Marin though, as you note, hasn't exactly got an illustrious history of viticulture. That said you can grow some great wines in some unlikely spots in California, thanks to the excellent climate. One of my favorite wineries is Ridge [ridgewine.com] whose main vineyards are on the ridge overlooking Silicon Valley.
  • Nitpicker (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:47PM (#8333901)
    Viandante del Cielo means "sky walker" in Italian

    Actually the correct translation of viandante is traveler.
  • Wine takes time (Score:4, Informative)

    by spun ( 1352 ) <loverevolutionary@@@yahoo...com> on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:48PM (#8333917) Journal
    Grapes from newly planted vines don't make good wine. It takes years for the plant to develop to the point where wine made from the grapes tastes good. Nowadays, people use old root-stocks, grafting new plants onto older roots, to speed up the process. But it still takes time. So all you jokers saying the first vintages will be good, but later ones will leave a bad taste in your mouth, sorry. Nice joke though.
  • Re:Cynicism :-) (Score:4, Informative)

    by BWJones ( 18351 ) * on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:55PM (#8333984) Homepage Journal
    With the recent advances in wine making (and even some old fashioned blending) it is possible to get good wines even without the best soil or climate.

    The classic example of this is the blended wines from Jadot in France. They have blended some exquisite wines that are quite reasonable in price.

  • by ObviousGuy ( 578567 ) <ObviousGuy@hotmail.com> on Thursday February 19, 2004 @07:59PM (#8334024) Homepage Journal
    Start with Scotch. Though it seems more expensive up front, you don't have to drink as much to learn an appreciation for the pleasantries of the drink.

    By drinking scotch you will gain a taste for the various flavors in the drink. Tastes like 'peaty', 'earthy', and 'oaky' are common descriptions of the flavors of whiskey. To enjoy it, you don't toss back shot after shot, rather you would sip and let the flavors spread on your palate. Though quite offensive at first, whiskey becomes delightful once you have developed a sense of what it is that you are tasting.

    You can use the same slow tasting technique with wine. It's much less harsh than whiskey and it has many more flavors. The process of learning to enjoy whiskey will help immensely in your appreciation of wine.

    It will at least help wean you off of White Zin, if nothing else.
  • Re:$30 (Score:3, Informative)

    by gwernol ( 167574 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @08:05PM (#8334086)
    If you bother to go to the wine country of northern California, I suggest going through Sonoma rather than Napa. Napa has some good wines, but it's very touristy.

    Agreed in general though even the Napa has some quieter, smaller wineries that are worth visiting. There are several hundred wineries in the Napa and they vary tremendously.

    Sonoma has great wines and is fairly quiet, off the beaten path. One of my favorites is Rochioli, close to Hop Kiln, which is also good. Suggest taking along some food, get a bottle of Chardonnay and kick back, as most of these places have a little outdoor area you can relax at.

    Hop Kiln is a great place to visit and picnic - wonderful old building - but the wines are mediocre. If you really want great Sonoma wines then travel a little further down the road to Davis Bynum for some of the best Pinot Noir on the planet.

    I have no idea if Coppola invites visitors or has a tasting room.

    Yes there is a large visitors center at Niebaum-Coppola. Its touristy, including the inevitable movie museum complete with Oscars, but still fun and the wines are good. They recently announced a plan to go upmarket, lower volume better quality. Given their history with their reserve blends and vintages, I suspect they could come up with sometiming exceptional. Time will tell.
  • Re:$30 (Score:4, Informative)

    by smoondog ( 85133 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @08:25PM (#8334308)
    I completely agree. I had for years gone wine tasting regularly at sonoma (and surrounding areas), without going to napa. I went to napa and I was apalled! $9 and $12 tastings? Super touristy rooms, that sell mostly cheap souveniers?

    Sonoma has lots of excellent wines, the tastings are half the price and it is far more pretty, IMO. Hit Ferrari Carrano (sp?), Mondavi, Rodney Strong (one of my faves, you can often taste 3-4 price points of the same family of grape for about 5 bucks, for those who want more, try Gary Farrell and get their tour (res req'd), or go to the Alexander valley (Hanna is very good, free tasting). Glacier Peak is good, as well.

    We call the windy road (can't remember the name) that ends up hitting lake sonoma the tipsy highway ... heh.

    -Sean
  • Re:GL Wine (Score:3, Informative)

    by Jim McCoy ( 3961 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @08:26PM (#8334321) Homepage
    Can a wine lack body and character development while also being pretentious?


    Sounds like you are describing the last couple of years of Bordeaux... I think a 2000 Pomerol would fit your requirements quite nicely.

  • Having been there... (Score:3, Informative)

    by ev1lcanuck ( 718766 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @08:29PM (#8334348)
    I can tell you that there is loads of space to put more vines, but from the general opinion of the staff the products of those vines are, well, un-drinkable. Last time I was there, in January 2003, it looked like they removed a lot of the old vines and had planted new ones and were also expanding it.

    This photo [lucasfilm.com] shows "Lake Ewok" and to the right of it the Technical Building (where Skywalker Sound [skywalkersound.com] is). Between the two and down a little is where most of the vines are, and to the right of the tech building there are vines as well. It's an old picture so these changes aren't reflected in it.

    And no, we didn't sneak in. In fact I don't think it's possible to sneak in. Anyways, I was there to visit family; doing the sound for a movie at SS.

  • Re:Celebrity Wines (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 19, 2004 @08:35PM (#8334401)
    Obviously, though, Coppola proved there's a market segment that will spend money for a name on the bottle

    Actually, Coppola's winery had quite a long history of making outstanding wines before he bought it. The winery he purchased, Inglenook, is one of the oldest in Napa, and during its heyday was well known for creating some of the best cabernet sauvignon in the world.

    There are plenty of other examples of wines getting a price bump from a celebrities name factor, but Coppola's high end reds were selling for premium prices even before he bought the winery.
  • Re:yeah... (Score:3, Informative)

    by Dukael_Mikakis ( 686324 ) <andrewfoerster AT gmail DOT com> on Thursday February 19, 2004 @08:39PM (#8334442)
    You mean he's producing something that's not 90% CG?

    Skywalker Ranch is in Marin here by San Francisco, I think we can expect his wines to have at least 90% California Grapes.

    I assume that's what you meant ...
  • by adrianbaugh ( 696007 ) on Thursday February 19, 2004 @09:10PM (#8334715) Homepage Journal
    Freedom wines, er sorry, French wines, are still undoubtedly the best. Don't believe me? Buy some in France. Don't confuse the stuff the French export as wine with the real stuff - the export is just the horrid crap they fob off on foreigners. But if you actually go to a shop in France[0], especially one of the caveaus in Nuits St. Georges or any village in a good wine producing region, you will find some top wine at pretty reasonable prices. Of course, you can pay through the nose for the excellent crus, but you can do that anywhere; the point is, even the 3 euros[1] table wine from the supermarket actually tastes good.

    But the main thing in their favour is that, apparently unlike almost everywhere else, the French haven't forgotten how to make subtle wines.

    [0] No, I don't mean "EastEnders" in Calais. That barely counts as France ;-)

    [1] Damn. Why has my keyboard stopped producing euro signs...
  • Re:Nitpicker (Score:3, Informative)

    by Zakabog ( 603757 ) <john&jmaug,com> on Friday February 20, 2004 @12:38AM (#8336497)
    Via = Latin for "By the way of" (I went to Manhatten via the Staten Island ferry) Mostly used in english, not in italian.
    presidente = president
    Del Cielo = of the sky
    Viandante, dunno really, I thought dante by itself was giving.

    Anyway your translation is very very off.

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...