Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Movies Media

Spiderman 2 Trailer 280

Ant writes "Apple just posted the Spider-Man 2 trailer after the trailer was shown on The Apprentice for west coast."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Spiderman 2 Trailer

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:18AM (#8814952)
    Anyone know what happened to the original Spiderman teaser/trailer that had the jewelry store heist, 'copter getaway, and web slung between the towers of the World Trade Center? It disappeared pretty quick after 9/11.
  • by prgrmr ( 568806 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:22AM (#8815004) Journal
    Annoyed? How about totally pissed-off. I first noticed the give-away trailer format all the way back with "Throw Momma from the Train". There were 3 different commercials they were showing on TV and if you'd seen them all, then you saw almost every physical gag they did in the movie. Very disappointing, particularly as ticket prices keep going up the net effect is we are paying for less and less as the trailers reveal more and more.

    The trailer for Hellboy, which I've not seen yet, seems to give a good mix of enticement and still not be a complete give-away. The Hildalgo trailer, however, looks like it shows way too many of the dramatic parts.
  • Re:Ye gods... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by HeghmoH ( 13204 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:37AM (#8815153) Homepage Journal
    Slashdot has never successfully slashdotted Apple; they have more bandwidth than slashdot dreams of. Apple successfully streams realtime full-motion video to tens of thousands of simultaneous viewers a couple of times a year, I think they can handle a few trailer downloads.
  • Potential (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:39AM (#8815169)
    Spiderman has the potential of being the best comic book converted to movie series.

    My 2 cents:

    Superman - Classic. Great. But didnt have the technology to bring the movies to their full potential. Story started to fade as it approached the later movies. Didn't fully capture the superman comic.

    Batman - First one was great, possibly one of the best Comic book Movies EVER. The rest...well you've seen them. Storyline altered to make it more entertaining.

    X-Men - Fantastic movies. Very entertaining to watch. Difficult comic to convert into a movie series b/c of the huge personalities of every character. There is no way to capture the true greatness of the comic books without having 5 LOTR length movies.

    Spiderman - First one was fantastic. Showed the depth of Peter Parker, Mary Jane and Harry Osborn. Only time will tell if the second movie can bring story together while still keeping us entertained. All the conflicts that Spiderman/Peter must face with Mary Jane and Harry will truely be interesting if done right. In addition, we have Dr. Octavus being introduced which is one of my favorite comic villians[possibly making my opinion bias :-)].
  • by oogoliegoogolie ( 635356 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:47AM (#8815252)
    At the end of the trailer it opens a browser and connects to http://spiderman.sonypictures.com/. That's a 'feature' I can do without.
  • by jerkychew ( 80913 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @10:50AM (#8815290) Homepage
    First off, I'm a huge fan of the first one, as well as the comics. I'm not trying to incite a flamewar, but...

    As was said earlier, the trailer gives away pretty much the whole damn movie! We see the initial backstory, the inner demons, Peter throwing away the spiderman costume, Peter putting it back on... I mean, am I going to have to stop watching trailers soon just so I'll be surprised at the theater?

    And second, from the trailer the plot looks almost identical to the first. Evil scientist has a wardrobe malfunction (heh) that turns him crazy, and destroys NYC. Peter wants to be with MJ but has to choose what he really wants (Superman 2, anyone?). Crazy scientist captures MJ, Spiderman has to rescue her.

    Or am I missing something?
  • by BESTouff ( 531293 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @11:42AM (#8815958)
    There was *one* thing I was reaally missing in the first film: the music. Before entering the cinema, I thought I'll hear some kind of remixed spiderman music (like in MI2), but I was very disappointed. Music is really part of my memories about the cartoon (yeah, I know, you couldn't hear it in the comics. Whatever).
  • Re:cartooney (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Golias ( 176380 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @01:52PM (#8817448)
    The CGI in Spiderman was just fine. Certainly better-looking than any stuntman-based attempts at superhero film-making that has come before.

    If you disagree, kindly name three movies (apart from LOTR) which you think have better CGI than the Spider Man films, and we can commence to piss all over a favorite movie of yours.

  • Re:cartooney (Score:4, Interesting)

    by phriedom ( 561200 ) on Friday April 09, 2004 @03:50PM (#8819182)
    I think the problem isn't with the animation, but with the goal. Spider-Man moves impossibley fast and ignores some basic physics. I think it is impossible to have a "person" spring 20 feet straight up into the air and not have it look cartooney. If we are going to enjoy the movie, we just have to suspend disbelief and accept that if there were a Spider-Man, then that is how he would move.

So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand

Working...